What those Muslims were chanting at Washington National Cathedral

Rate this post

On Nov. 14, 2014, the Washington National Cathedral in D.C. — an Episcopal Christian church that calls itself “the spiritual home for the nation” — hosted a Muslim prayer service that was by invitation only.
I’ve posted about how the Muslim prayer service to “Allah” — a moon god whom Arabs had worshiped before Mohammad founded Islam — violated the First Commandment.
I’ve explained that the cathedral’s hosting a Muslim prayer service is an invitation to Muslims to claim the cathedral as theirs because according to Islam, physical possession of an area by Muslims is regarded as spiritual possession by Islam, especially when Muslims pray there.
But the National Cathedral chose to ignore all of that, in the interest of promoting “religious freedom” and “interfaith dialogue” and against “Islamophobia.”
I’ve also posted about a brave woman, Christine Weick, who alone spoke up for Christ amidst that blasphemous prayer service in which Muslim prayer rugs replaced the Cross. Pointing to the cross, Weick proclaimed: “Jesus Christ died on that cross. He is the reason we are to worship only Him. Jesus Christ is our Lord and Savior. We have…allowed you your mosques in this country. Why don’t you worship in your mosques and leave our churches alone? We are a country founded on Christian principles.”
She was escorted quickly out of the church by security guards.
Christine Weick
But are you curious about the prayer service itself? What prayers did the Muslims say?
I searched the Internet but found only two sources that actually reported what those Muslims said, prayed, and chanted at the National Cathedral, neither of which is mainstream U.S. media.
Muslims praying at Washington National Cathedral
From CBN News:
1. A Muslim man sang from the podium, “allahu akbar, allahu akbar,” a phrase which can be translated to mean “allah is greatest” or “allah is greater.”
2. Rizwan Jaka of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) called the National Cathedral a house of prayer for all people. The ISNA has ties to the radical Muslim Brotherhood, and was named by federal prosecutors in 2007 as an unindicted co-conspirator in the largest terrorism financing trial in U.S. history.
3. A woman named Inas Shabazz said, “I think that if people read and have a better understanding that they will know that we are a peaceful people. You know… the Koran… Islam… Muslim… it all means peace and love. There’s nothing terroristic about it.

By the Koran and Islam being all “peace and love,” was Shabazz referring to these quotes from the Koran?

Sura 9:29– “Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.”
Sura 9:5– “Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay the idolaters wherever ye find them, and take them (captive), and besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush. But if they repent and establish worship and pay the poor-due, then leave their way free.”

From Israel Today:
1. Hundreds of Muslims prostrate on their prayer rugs chanted in unison: There is only one god, he begets not and I bear witness that Muhammad is His only servant and Apostle.”

Just so you know, by “he begets not,” Muslims mean Jesus is not the son of God. 

  1. An Imam led the congregation of hundreds in declaring that “god has no son, that Jesus Christ cannot be his son, and that there is no god like Allah.”
    In other words, on November 14, in a Christian cathedral that has seen countless funerals for presidents and other dignatories of the still Christian America, hundreds of Muslims defiled the church by denouncing Jesus Christ as Son of God, and proclaiming their blood-thirsty moon god as the one god.
    That’s a hell of a way to promote “interfaith dialogue and tolerance.”
    The liberal clerics of Washington National Cathedral might as well have invited outright Satanists. At least satanists are honest about the god demon they worship.
    ~Eowyn
Please follow and like us:
0
 

0 responses to “What those Muslims were chanting at Washington National Cathedral

  1. I am so ashamed of the church in which I was raised…to allow this blasphemy. Did you all see the looks on the faces of the women watching the Christian worshipper ejected? Nothing but hatred. The National Cathedral is online. I suggest those who are moved contact them by phone or email and vent your disgust. My mother who passed away 20+ years ago hated the direction the Episcopal church had taken. But she was loyal to the end. There has to be an end to diversity. Carried to an endless acceptance can do NO good for anyone. Mom is rolling over in her grave as well as aunts, cousins, great and great grandparents. This was an ugly day in history. Look what has happened in England.
    And if you have a CAIR sponsored outreach center (I think they use the word “understanding” center, and a mosque…well, I say no more.

     
    • Excellent suggestion, maziel.
      Here’s the contact info for Washington National Cathedral:
      The Very Rev. Gary Hall
      10th Dean of Washington National Cathedral
      3101 Wisconsin Ave NW, Washington, DC 20016
      Telephone: (202) 537-6200
      Fax: (202) 364-6600
      E-mail: dean@cathedral.org

       
  2. Cowardly and worthless liberal clergy, willingly and clearly in a spirit of submissiveness, allowing themselves to be the agents of muslim theological imperialism. Perfect little dhimmis these mainline Anglican Protestants are. They have managed to emasculate their brand of Christianity. Have they forgotten Jesus chasing the moneylenders from his Temple with a whip?
    At least that brave little lady stood up to the defilement and lashed out with her tongue for there must be no doubt in her mind what these muslims have in store for that once beautiful church. They now have a claim to it as history clearly illustrates. History is replete with numerous examples. Hagia Sophia and the Cordoba ‘mosque’ are just a couple that come to mind. Yes, the ‘mosque’ has been a Catholic church for several hundred years now, but the muslims, both in and out of Spain, have been clamoring to get it back as of late. They (the muslims) never tell you the site they built their mosque on was once a Visigothic church before they occupied Spain. They even used the columns and other building materials from it. This is how muslims are. How else could it be? Their very first and holiest site, the Kaaba was once a pagan temple and need I mention Jerusalem’s Al Asqa mosque?
    One more thing I’ll leave you guys to ponder. Can any of you recall an historical example of muslims willingly allowing a Christian or Jewish congregation to hold a worship service in a mosque? I cannot recall a single example and I would wager to bet muslim clergy and laity would tell any non-muslim congregation to drop dead if propositioned so. Double standards are indicative of Islam’s intrinsic supremacism. If one was to point this out to the clergy at the Washington Cathedral, one would get a “deer in the headlights” look from these libtards, either that or the gaze of sheer indifference. Thank you Dr. E for a truly fine article. People need to understand what is happening in our world today.

     
  3. While I agree that the broader ecumenical push is a major part of the agenda of the anti-Christ’s coming one-world religion, I’m not sure it makes a lot of sense to mourn this kind of thing occurring in a place like the “national cathedral” as if it were really some sort of affront to a true Christian landmark….
    Whether or not it’s even true that America was founded on “Christian principles” (a concept which I think can be debated on several levels, but that’s neither here nor there), I think a building like the national cathedral can be fairly easily shone to have been a project of the Illuminists and “secret Satanists” from the get-go, and much like almost every other major building in D.C., has really always been an hidden-in-plain-sight temple for the luciferian elite, much the other major “American cathedral” of St. John’s in New York. That one is quite plainly an illuminist temple in reality, complete with stone carvings of the twin towers falling down having been added to the building’s edifice before 9/11. This one in D.C. has the curious addition of Darth Vader’s head on it’s exterior, but I have no idea what that’s all about!
    Anyhow, I don’t think Jesus ever intended for his true followers to go and build humongous cathedrals in the first place, so I guess I’m just not that inclined to be upset by it in the first place. I guess my main point is that sadly, there is a lot more going on with a story like this than some “liberal clerics”. I’m afraid more often than not, such “liberal clerics” actually ARE the Satanists, blasphemously parading in the name of Jesus….

     
  4. Here’s the skinny on what happened (plus video at the link):
    “Imam Insulted Christians, Jews in National Cathedral,” by Leo Hohmann, WND, 18 Nov 2014
    https://mobile.wnd.com/2014/11/imam-insulted-jews-christians-in-national-cathedral/

     
  5. Dr. Eowyn, thank you for the needed warning given in the post. Every bloody act and enslavement carried out by ISIS follows rules given in the Koran. That includes forcing chaste women, Christians and others, into lives enduring rapes in sexual slavery. Women in harems of days of old did not apply for those positions. These horrors have been going on since at least the 1980s with the murder of millions in Sudan alone. May the work of the staff of FOTM be followed far and wide.

     
  6. Pingback: What those Muslims were chanting at Washington National Cathedral

  7. I am what is called a “Cradle Episcopalian”. That means my parents belonged to the Episcopal Church when I was born, I was Christened in the Episcopal Church, and attended the church regularly the whole time I was growing up. I still go to the church, but I have become very disheartened with the direction the church has been going for really a very long time. I have not changed churches, one, because my mother would prefer I didn’t, and two, a lot of belonging to the Episcopal Church as to do with the specific perish you frequent.
    The Episcopal Church needs to return to its roots so to speak. The original story of how the church got started isn’t very well known, but in a nut shell, the episcopal church got started when the catholic priest (they thought they were catholic) went back to the Vatican to re-assert the “laying of hands” in order to validate the branches of the catholic church that had migrated to the “new” country (to become the USA later). The Vatican said, “We don’t have any priest in the new world. I don’t know who you are, and I’m not going to support you. Don’t let the door hit you in the ass on the way out”
    The priest went back to the “new world” and communicated what happened. All of the priest decided to declare themselves as a new church called the Episcopal Church in order to continue to do Gods work. So the origins of the Episcopal Church are directly out of the Catholic Church.
    But starting in the late 50s and into the 60s the Episcopal church decided it would be a good idea to allow all the “new” (liberal, progressive) ideas to be incorporated into the churches rules. So they started allowing female priests in the 60s, and have continued to support concepts that the Catholic church doesn’t.
    Some of the “relaxing” of the rules from the Catholic religion is what I like, but the “new” Episcopal Church has gone way too far with trying to be “liberal”. They should have maintained their “Conservative” stance, but just separate from the Catholic Church. The continuation of “progressiveness” continued pretty well without issue until about 6 years ago, the church “split”. A LOT of people (the conservatives) felt the church had strayed too far, and opened a whole new branch. The new branch grew by 23 new churches last year. The Episcopal church only opened ONE new church last year.
    As for me. I’m seriously considering the change, to be with people that are more like my ideology.

     
  8. Pingback: What those Muslims were chanting at Washington National Cathedral -

  9. I have a different understanding of history, please look into it and tell me if I am mistaken. The separation from the Roman Catholic church began with Henry VIII, details of which are shameful and cannot in any way be excused as merely following holy scripture, Muslims take note. This was followed by ongoing war, both on the British Isles and with Spain. Expeditions for trade with colonists/adventurers and colonists/religious freedom seekers made the mere idea of seeking papal approval unimaginable, and the short-lived Dutch colony in New York was at least in this regard in alliance with the British. However, in the time after the pilgrim settlement, another colony was established, Roman Catholic, complete with laity, sisters, bishop, and papal approval. That was Maryland. And in the process, Roman Catholicism came to Massachusetts, priests, sisters, and bishop included. And they got along reasonably well, it was a few witches that the Puritans didn’t like. The Church of England became well established, too. especially with the connection to power given politically through governorships appointed by the king. Revolution eventually followed, and those siding with the Church of England were called loyalists, or tories. This conflict has continued, usually behind the scenes, ever since, with the royal family and company seeking control of the United States. We have even had a president honored with knighthood! You are awarded an “F” if you think it was John Kennedy.

     
  10. Wonder if the Peace and Love cult would allow the Christians to hold prayer services in their mosques? I doubt that. We are supposed to be smarter than the members of this genetically incestuous cult and yet we bow to them, the Liberals make us all look stupid as a country.

     
  11. God, forgive them for they know not what they do.
    Church is the holiest place on earth. Let us not desecrate it.

     
  12. It would have been better if you had done proper research before writing this article.
    Negus of Abyssinia was the first Christian ruler who granted sanctuary to Muslims when they were being persecuted in Makkah.
    When Christians from the Arab lands of Najran came,Prophet Muhammad allowed them to pray inside the 2nd most Holy Mosque of Islam. The Christians were allowed to pray according to their own faith.
    A copy of the document by which the Prophet Mohammed
    gave protection to the monastery
    Source: romanvirdi.com
    “This is a message from Muhammad ibn Abdullah, as a covenant to those who adopt Christianity, near and far, we are with them. Verily I, the servants, the helpers, and my followers defend them, because Christians are my citizens; and by Allah! I hold out against anything that displeases them.
    No compulsion is to be on them. Neither are their judges to be removed from their jobs nor their monks from their monasteries.
    No one is to destroy a house of their religion, to damage it, or to carry anything from it to the Muslims’ houses. Should anyone take any of these, he would spoil God’s covenant and disobey His Prophet. Verily, they are my allies and have my secure charter against all that they hate.
    No one is to force them to travel or to oblige them to fight. The Muslims are to fight for them. If a female Christian is married to a Muslim, it is not to take place without her approval. She is not to be prevented from visiting her church to pray.
    Their churches are to be respected. They are neither to be prevented from repairing them nor the sacredness of their covenants. No one of the nation (Muslims) is to disobey the covenant till the Last Day (end of the world).”
    https://st-katherine.net/en/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=20&Itemid=65

     
  13. How could Mhd be God’s “only servant and apostle”? Muslims believe in all the prophets that the Jews and Christians believe in. There are only 2 Islamic feasts and one commemorates the worship performed by Prophet Ibrahim.

     
    • Muslims are said to believe that all the other prophets were specific to a time and people, but only Muhammad is universal — therefore, Islam will conquer the world — and God’s last prophet.
      That being said, if Muslims truly regard Jesus as a prophet of God, why do Muslims persecute and kill Christians?

       
  14. Reblogged this on kommonsentsjane and commented:
    Reblogged on kommonsentsjane/blogkommonsents.
    For your information. Sheep in action.
    kommonsentsjane

     

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *