Washington State governor and AG want to ban assault weapons and high-capacity magazines

Washington Gov. Jay Inslee speaks, Thursday, Feb. 2, 2017, at the Capitol in Olympia, Wash. Inslee was urging the passage of bills enforcing safe gun storage and enhanced background checks when buying or selling assault weapons. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren) ORG XMIT: WATW110

This past Thursday, Washington State AG Bob Ferguson made an announcement, along with support from Governor Jay Inslee, that they will seek to ban assault weapons. They also want to propose limits to magazine capacity in order to combat mass shootings.

Excerpts from his announcement:

“In addition to renewing calls to ban the sale of these dangerous weapons and limits to magazine capacity, Ferguson is also proposing legislation to add background checks on ammunition sales after federal rules are changed, in addition to other safety measures to keep ammunition out of the hands of dangerous individuals.

“This is the time to take action on common sense measures that will save lives. We should be making it harder for those who want to inflict mass violence and destruction upon innocent people,” Inslee said. “By limiting magazine capacity and banning assault weapons, we can work toward a day where no one in Washington state loses a friend or family members to senseless gun violence.”

Ferguson and Inslee are proposing joint-request legislation to limit the capacity of magazines sold in Washington to 10-rounds.

The bill’s definition to assault weapons is similar to the definition used by the seven other states that have banned the sale of assault weapons — semi-automatic weapons that contain at least one military-style feature. Those laws have survived legal challenge.”

There’s also this stupid part of his proposal: “The bill makes it illegal for violent felons not legally allowed to buy guns to buy ammo, and prohibits firearms dealers from knowingly selling ammo to the or anyone else not legally allowed to buy a gun.”

Such a vague description of what a “military-style feature” is in this announcement. My guess is this feature:

Because we all know what the end goal is of gun-grabbers: Take away your guns.

DCG

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
3 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
William
William
9 months ago

Yet another “common sense” proposal. If you want to establish total State control of the American people, it’s a good idea to disarm them first. That’s just common sense. They really need to hire new cliche writers

TrailDust
Admin
9 months ago

That’s my guess too, DCG.

truckjunkie
truckjunkie
9 months ago

I’m STILL unable to discover a solid answer to this,so I’ll ask: When the Second Amendment is said to “Protect our Right to own and bear Arms”,OR WHAT? I have yet to find ANY form of “Enforcement” of our Right. I firmly believe that the Bill of Rights has strong language,but no teeth to back it up. If there was a finite penalty for the crime of changing removing or violating a Constitutional Right,Politicians would think MUCH harder about the consequences of drafting Unconstitutional Bills before writing such legislation. If there isn’t a form of enforcement in the Constitution,it would… Read more »