University editorial board: students 'don't need' to study America's founding documents

Rate this post

school2
Campus Reform: The student editorial board of University of South Carolina’s (USC) Daily Gamecock argued this week that “[w]hile knowledge of our country’s founding documents is undoubtedly a good thing to have [. . .] most students don’t need it.”
The South Carolina legislature recently began pressuring USC over an old law that requires universities to teach the provisions and principles of the Constitution, Declaration of Independence, and Federalist Papers, as well as “the study of and devotion to American institutions and ideals.”
The editorial board argues that “[s]tudents who are pursuing a field outside political science or journalism won’t necessarily need to know about these documents to the extent that the class would be aiming to teach them” and that the class “could hurt a studen’ts GPA when it isn’t even that central to their degree.”
Authors of the editorial, published in The Daily Gamecock seem most concerned about financial consequences amid rising tuition. “If the state is going to require that something be done, it’s only fair that they give us the funding for it,” the editorial says.
“Telling USC that we have to add on another class, with all the including expenses, without giving us any money to do so is like telling someone who never learned how to swim that they have to cross Lake Murray or face retribution,” the editorial board wrote. “It’s borderline ridiculous to make something required by law and not provide the funds to do so, thereby forcing us to drain our own resources.”
A pair of South Carolina schools already have such provisions. Legislators cut funds from the College of Charleston and University of South Carolina-Upstate after they became aware of mandatory pro-LGBT readings. That funding was later reallocated to fulfill the law regarding the teaching of the Constitution.
According to the editorial, USC President Harris Pastides recently came under fire for calling the law “archaic,” and Vice Provost Helen Doerpinghaus said that USC follows the spirit of the law by handing out pocket constitutions on Constitution Day.
The editorial board says that students have been learning about the Constitution “since we were in the first grade,” and argue that the class should be an elective “so that people who don’t need it or have already taken a similar class don’t need to be saddled with it.”
“The truth is, if a Schoolhouse Rock song can cover a subject, it isn’t necessary in a college curriculum,” the board wrote.

TV already taught you everything you need to know about history, apparently...

TV already taught you everything you need to know about history, apparently…


funny9We have youth of today who post pictures of #clouds and #smoke when in fact it was the aftermath of the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster. Considering the company blamed the mistake on the fact that “the worker was unaware of the tragedy” and was “born after the tragedy”, I don’t have much faith that many youth of today will retain a lot of knowledge about our founding documents (if they even learn about all of them, comprehensively), because you know, like #ithappenedbeforeiwasborn and #whatever. They have more important things to do, like you know, take a #selfie everytime they see their reflection in a mirror. You know…#me!
DCG

Please follow and like us:
0
 

0 responses to “University editorial board: students 'don't need' to study America's founding documents

  1. I hope the sane grownups in South Carolina’s legislature prevail.

     
  2. What’s that saying? “History is Doomed to repeat itself” sumpin like that. groann.
    PS. Eowyn, test from diff browser.

     
  3. Kids should have studied American history in the 12 years before they get to college.

     
    • You would think so…the Common Core curriculum includes study of the U.S. Constitution (with a book that doesn’t include a copy of the Constitution) yet the same era doesn’t mention study of the Federalist Papers.
      https://commoncore.org/maps/history/chapter/We_the_People_Building_an_American_Republic/primary

       
    • Sorry to allow reality to intrude…but American History (or social studies, as it is called in middle school) is NOT required if the student tests “below basic” in both language arts and math. The elective (art, music, etc) will be taken away to satisfy a double block of ONE of them, but history is taken away to satisfy a double block in the other. There’s a “downtown” middle school in my district (mostly ESL families/students) that has not had electives for 20 years…and has not had history for over half of its students since the old NCLB (No Child Left Behind) system….we’ll see what happens under the “new” Common Core” system. Sorry guys, but the very kids that I HOPE and PRAY get a good grounding in US History and government are the ESL kids…..I don’t give a RIP if they can solve an algebra problem in 7th or 8th grade. First things first.

       
  4. If they did, they might not be indoctrinated into the compliant sheeple dumbMasses the left so desperately wants.
    -Dave

     

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *