Union backing de Blasio 2020 bid scores major City Hall favor

From NY Post: Mayor Bill de Blasio has ordered the Department of City Planning to study mandatory permitting for all new hotels across the city, an unprecedented move that would give the politically powerful Hotel Trades Council tremendous leverage.

The move comes as de Blasio banks on that union’s support for his quixotic presidential bid, igniting a new round of criticism from good-government groups over pay-to-play behavior from a City Hall badly tarnished by a string of campaign finance scandals.

“At a minimum, it creates the appearance of impropriety and illegality,” said Susan Lerner, the head of good government group Common Cause. “The mayor keeps setting up situations that beg for a pay-to-play interpretation.”

Despite the appearances, de Blasio denied any impropriety. “That’s just inaccurate in every way,” he told NY1’s Errol Louis Monday night.

Special permitting would require any developer seeking to build a new hotel to go through an exhaustive review process, including community board recommendations and City Council approval, before they could start construction, even if the land is already zoned for commercial and hotel uses.

Only hotels opened in recently rezoned neighborhoods like Midtown East or in manufacturing areas are currently covered by such a requirement.

“This is a political decision by the mayor, not a land-use decision,” said Kenneth Fischer, a former Brooklyn councilman and land-use expert.

“That doesn’t mean that it’s a quid pro quo,” he added. “[De Blasio] believes that union membership for hotel workers is a path to the middle class and their political and ideological interests line up on this issue.”

City Planning officials confirmed Monday that the administration requested the study based on conversations that began around April — just a month before de Blasio launched his flailing presidential campaign. They added there is no firm deadline for the study to be finished.

Crain’s New York Business first reported the news.

De Blasio narrowly avoided state and federal indictment in 2017 for trading favors with donors to a nonprofit controlled by his allies, the Campaign for One New York.

And campaign finance watchdogs have filed complaints with the Federal Elections Commission over de Blasio’s use of loosely regulated political groups to help pay for his White House run.

“He keeps taking the wrong lessons from these reprimands – that he can get away with things, rather than stop doing them,” Lerner added. “It’s deeply upsetting and completely objectionable.”

City Hall offered a different spin on the turn of events. “This is not new — it’s been in discussion for years,” said de Blasio spokeswoman Jane Meyer. “There’s nothing more to it.”


Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0 0
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dr. Eowyn
1 year ago

The corruption of the U.S. government — deBlasio’s NY city govt, the federal govt’s DOJ/FBI — has reached Third World level.

1 year ago

A good employee does not need a union. Unions were created to protect the corrupted employees, drunks, thieves, bitches. In turn, union reps are “in bed” with the supervisors so it gets pushed to the side with the blessing of the higher ups to avoid “going to the press”. All of it is allowed because unions are powerful when it comes to elections. They PRESS employees to vote for WHOM they support, i.e. De Blasio -dare not go against the Union, they’ll find a way to push you out. The less union members the better for the companies and employees.… Read more »

1 year ago
Reply to  Alma

Many years ago Unions did serve a purpose to protect employees and collectively bargain for them. My Father was a member in a construction Union for over 50 years. He never filed a grievance and always did his job to the best of his ability. Contractors always asked for him because his work was known to be the best they could get. I am and have been a Union member of several different organizations but request a partial rebate of my dues that go to political action. After belonging to these organizations I have come to the conclusion that they… Read more »

1 year ago
Reply to  Watertender

Watertender, I worked for a company with a powerful union. No doubt there were and there are a majority of good and loyal employees, but I also saw a lot of coverup going on between supervisors and union presidents/reps. There are a lot of disenchanted members with no other choice than to stay on while both the company and the union have their big meetings in Vegas. Lotsa “fun” at our expense.

1 year ago
Reply to  Alma

Alma I agree with you on the coverup shit and the Union people living on the backs of the working stiff. I called out the Union president at the one place I worked at and eventually it came to light about him scamming the members. I proved a stolen election and about $10K of fraud. He was removed from office and I got screwed with some by his people until I laid one out cold… Watertender don’t play… I currently belong to a fairly useless union with a well tanned regional president who drives a leased Cadillac Escalade on our… Read more »