UN Introduces New Feudalism Under Guise of Social Activism

This is Agenda 21 on steroids.
See also:

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0 0
 
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
MA in MO
4 years ago

I am assuming that this “Global Goals” initiative is the same as the UN’s 2030 Agenda. I believe the UN’s 2030 Agenda has been described as Agenda 21 on steriods. If there is another presidential election in this country, the nominees, from both parties, will have to be on board with the UN’s plans. Otherwise they will be eliminated. So far all except Trump seem to be on board. I can’t tell about Trump at this time. Trump will come around or else. May the Lord have mercy!

omanuel
4 years ago

We did not vote for any part of the UN 1945 plan for a totalitarian, one-world government.
The Pope, Obama and Putin have been working together behind the scenes to get us to voluntarily jump from the frying pan into the fire.
“Stalin’s science” identifies abrupt and unfounded FALSEHOODS inserted in the foundations of nuclear & solar physics after WWII

Steven Broiles
4 years ago

This is PROOF POSITIVE we are living under an oligarchy, because all an oligarchy can give is feudalism! We have got to get the word out. Throughout my conversations with riders in the yellow cab and now at Uber, I urge people to read this site and others, e.g., Alex Jones, Webster Tarpley, Lyndon Larouche, etc. I have also learned how to temper myself. One night about two months ago, I drove a woman over to Lefferts Gardens in Brooklyn. She said, nicely, to me, “You know, I’ve been listening to you for 20 minutes now. And you’re very intelligent… Read more »

omanuel
4 years ago
Reply to  Dr. Eowyn

All inhabitants of planet Earth have a vested interest in getting reliable information.
All human tyrants have a vested interest in prohibiting public knowledge of the force actually controlling planet Earth.
That seems to be the basis for the ~500 year (1543-2015) conflict between science and religion. See above link to Stalin’s science

Steven Broiles
4 years ago
Reply to  Dr. Eowyn

I never realized Steve Quayle links up to FOTM! I listen to him all the time on Hagmann & Hagmann. He’s really good.

truckjunkie
truckjunkie
4 years ago

What does the UN do that’s actually GOOD? The whole concept of letting the world’s leaders decide policy for individual Nations is just WRONG. Can’t count the number of times I’ve urged our “elected officials” to get us OUT of the UN and STOP FUNDING THEM,but I guess that’s been just whizzing in the wind-they’re all part of the problem,so they won’t be involved in the cure.

CalGirl
4 years ago
Reply to  truckjunkie

DITTO

Glenn47
Glenn47
4 years ago

Any candidate that so much utters the word Sustanibility or open borders, will be so high on my radar. They want the people to cut back while the lustrous leaders go bigger. They want us to live, work and shop while living close to rail in newly formed cities. Anyone notice the sudden influx of living in Tiny homes showing up in TV? A while back BO was ready to sign over our Treaty of the Seas rights over to the UN. He was also going to sign over certain islands near Alaska to Russia. No one is watching the… Read more »

omanuel
4 years ago
Reply to  Glenn47

Yes, tyrants want to control God’s beautiful, bountiful, benevolent creation instead of serving the public to make certain that they have their inalienable rights to enjoy life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

CalGirl
4 years ago
Reply to  Glenn47

Pickpocket? How about the Biblical “theif in the night?” “666” is writ all across his forehead….who has NOT yet seen it?

MA in MO
4 years ago
Reply to  CalGirl

I also shudder every time I hear the word ‘sustainability.’ This word has been so abused and misused it no longer holds its original meaning. Just like the word ‘gay’ and ‘niggardly’ have lost their original meanings. It is so sad that we have, among many other things, allowed our language to be so misused and redefined. Yes, I know, redefining words is one of the “Rules for Radicals” by Saul Alinsky, but it still does not make it acceptable.

CalGirl
4 years ago

So…how come when the huge failed 70-year “experiment” with Soviet Communism failed….the UN didn’t go down with it? They are both outdated museum pieces that cost so much that the people they “serve” are starving to death….time to kick it to the curb and go to “twitter” diplomacy or even facebook or email or that old damned “red phone” for God’s sake…..