Troubling Implications of Israel Flotilla Incident

Rate this post

Amidst the media storm of conflicting accounts about Israel’s recent bloody raid on a so-called “peace” flotilla carrying supplies and activitists to Hamas (identified as a terrorist organization by the U. S. government) in the Gaza Strip, my friend Sol Sanders has written this thoughtful piece. He steps back to ponder what the implications of this incident are for international politics. This article will appear in this coming Monday’s edition of Washington Times.

The West: mugged by reality

By Sol Sanders – Washington Times – June 7, 2010
Encounters between the so-called Peace Flotilla and Israeli Defense Forces have far reaching implications beyond the conflict between the Jewish state and the Palestinians and their supporters.
Those concerns eventually will dictate the course of the U.S. fight against terrorism. Basic trends are now obscured by Washington’s desperate attempt to minimize friction with the umma, the whole of the 1.3 billion Muslim world.
But the clash has dramatized an ugly reality: a world torn apart by Islamic fanaticism verging on nihilism is increasingly abetted by old European and American leftism. That is further compounded by an attenuated economic recovery in the West. And that, in turn, threatens what has been until now rapidly growing export-led Eastern economies.
This economic and political devil’s brew includes:

  • Turkish government knowledge/participation in the Flotilla operation, is a touchstone which casts doubt not only on Ankara’s role but questions hoped rapid modernization of other Muslim societies
  • NATO’s eastern flank crumbles as member Turkey courts Iran, Russia and Syria and other pariahs, in an effort to establish regional hegemony.
  • Israel poses a moral, political and military dilemma for the West as multidirectional hostile forces threaten Jerusalem’s existence, forfeiting any possibility of major compromises from the Jewish state — including land for peace.
  • Pres. Barack Hussein Obama’s outreach to the Islamic world has failed — all signs pointing to growing radicalization and no evidence of emerging strong reformist leadership.

All these issues are complex, of course, and there will continue to be conflicting evidence. VIP voices will deny these interpretations because geopolitical reality is always difficult to acknowledge. But just as the collapse of European welfare statism has proved those critics clairvoyant who argued against creating socially dependent societies, so inevitably will the true nature of the present conflict become self-evident.
As anti-Nazi German Lutheran Pastor Martin Niemoeller acknowledged so long ago, the Jews – this time in their own country — are the canary in the mineshaft.
That Jerusalem underestimated the capacity for violence is intriguing. The Turkish activists’ affiliation to known Istanbul terrorists was well-known. Counter-intuitively, caution led the Israelis to incur casualties, grist for propaganda of the new alliance of red and green, the traditional Western radical left and Islamicist sympathizers. Their attempt to portray their provocative voyage as a mercy rescue ignored Gaza’s large food and vitals stocks provided through additional European and American aid millions., actually flowing through Israel and Egypt.
The Israelis now facing rapidly arming terrorist neighbors – Hamas in the south, Hezbollah in the north, and an increasingly unstable Jordan to their east – can take no new gambles on their security in any “peace process”. Israel’s Gaza withdrawal has proved a strategic catastrophe.
 Meanwhile, the Tehran mullahs who arm these groups are moving relentlessly toward nuclear weapons at some indeterminate date. However credible Tehran’s threat to wipe Israel off the map, a nuclear Iran would dominate world oil and gas, a constant threat to regional stability and the world.
Turkey’s new role as an apologist for Tehran means turning its back on its half-century alliance with the U.S. It returns to an equivocal position, much like that during World War II when former German Chancellor Franz von Paper made Istanbul the Nazis’ overseas intelligence center.
As with more than one contemporary administration around the world [perhaps including the U.S.], it is hard to judge how much Turkish Prime Minister RecepTayyip Erdogan’s policies are Michaevelleian and how much amateur hour. But clearly a half century of top-down Kemalist secularism is fading rapidly under attack from a new Anatolian, conservative Muslim middle class — ironically in no small part created by huge post-World War II American aid. As an anti-Soviet ally, Washington pumped more than $12.5 billion in economic and $14 billion in military aid [in unadjusted dollars] into Turkey. This does not include vast sums spent on and from U.S. bases and training programs. In riposte, Turkey, of course, blocked US/NATO base transit during the Iraq invasion.
 Although Ankara now runs a bilateral trade deficit because of energy dependence on Moscow, Turkish companies are investing heavily in Russia. In return Prime Minister Vladimir Putin has promised to build Turkey’s first nuclear power plant — ominous given Moscow’s collaboration in helping to lay the groundwork for Iran’s nuclear weapons program.
Unlike the Korean War, and even Vietnam, where Turkey played a role, its 1800 troops in Afghanistan are smaller than Holland’s contribution and restricted to training. So much for calculations that its high birthrate and military tradition would make Turkey the principal NATO European fighter pool.
It was in Turkey, of course, where Pres. Obama launched his celebrated foreign policy initiative, an attempt to dialogue with a hoped for strengthening moderate Islam. Pres. Obama’s reiteration of American support for Turkish entry into the European Union rings hollow today with membership out of the question. To the contrary, how to deal with radicalization of Europe’s growing emigrant Muslims – including Turks — has become a chief West European headache. And nowhere has new, effective reformist Muslim leadership arisen.
Sol Sanders, veteran foreign correspondent and analyst, writes weekly for the Washington Times on the convergence of international politics and business-economics.

Please follow and like us:

0 responses to “Troubling Implications of Israel Flotilla Incident

  1. Peace for our time! (With similar results.)

  2. YouTube on the “peace” flotilla:

    • Now censored by YouTube for “copyright violations” (i.e., offending jihadist and/or left/libtard sensitivities) even though such parody is expressly allowed by such law. YouTube still has all the anti-Bush, anti-war/-military stuff galore using actual copyright music it did before, but who’s counting? The jihadists and left/libtards LIKE those.

  3. This article of lies and half-truths is an insult to the well-informed intelligent person. Obviously, the only reason the writer is allowed to publish in the Washington Times is to propagate the victimization of Israel and the demonetization of the Arab people.

  4. Steve, EVERYBODY has been fighting for 3,000 years, peace “breaks out” for a couple of years every now and then.
    It seems the Brits are at fault due to the Balfour Declaration, pre dating the UN.

  5. Peace is the farthest thing from a martyr’s mind…

    • Sure. Without those 72 virgins, he’s just a guy who can’t get a date. (If anyone’s wondering how Major Hassan at Ft. Hood came about.)

  6. All the Arabs consider them (the Palestinians) to be riff-raff, even back when they were the Philistines who cut of Samson’s hair. If it weren’t for the Israelis no other Arabs would give ’em the time of day… and keeping them in camps, squalor, etc. makes ’em pissed-off at and rocketing the Israelis. As for hatin’ the Jews, Mohammed decided it was good to raid them and steal their women for sexual purposes… the “sons of apes and pigs” rhetoric followed to keep the animosity toward them up (he said Allah said it) while he was off in his tent… um, “fantasizing” about it so no one else would cut in on his action. Blaming “them Jews” (as Jeremiah Wright continues to this day) became a convenient answer for anything the Arabs jacked-up (human nature being what it is) especially when the Jews didn’t jack-up something that the Arabs did. And these are but two (2) of the many reasons (beside people in general) why the Mideast is so f*cked-up.

  7. Sol Sanders sounds like one of my Political Science Professors; filled with a vast amount of knowledge but unable to explicitly convey an understandable message. The fact that he willingly tackled the subject is quite impressive.
    I knew Turkey was slowly moving away from the US and I know Obama is moving away from Israel. We know that Iran is for the complete annihilation of Israel and we know the Palestinians are, under the Hamas, ready to join forces with the Hezbollah. Now, If Jordan does happen to enter the picture with a show of force the question is can Israel withstand the pressure? It is possible, but without the support of the U.S. it will be difficult.
    Obama walking away from Israel might just be the straw that brings the curtain down. It will be interesting to watch the outcome and it will be interesting to see how our country reacts to whatever happens.

  8. Whitewraithe,
    I’m not as nice as Steve. The Arabs were cast out when Abraham threw Hagar and Ishmael out of his house at the bequest of Sarah. Now someone returned the remnants of the Jews back to their homeland and the Arabs don’t like it. Why? Because they have been rejected. They think the law of inheritance should apply to Ishmael instead of Issac. That may be true, but under the old law Ishmael was born of a bond woman and not entitled to the inheritance of the natural son. Now that might not be fair but that’s the way it is.
    Now everyone over there is fighting for the right of ownership.
    You, my friend can hate all you want but you can’t stop the old law from implementation.


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.