Top adviser to Australia PM: Global warming is a NWO fraud led by UN

A brave man in the Australian government is telling the truth about “climate change,” formerly called anthropogenic (man-made) global warming.
He is Maurice Newman, a former chairman of the Australian Broadcasting Corp., who is the chairman of Australia Prime Minister Tony Abbott’s Business Advisory Council and, as such, the government’s top business adviser.
In an op/ed for The Australian newspaper, Newman asserts that:

  • “Climate change” is a myth fostered by the United Nations for political reasons — to create a new authoritarian world order under its control.
  • 95% of the climate models we’ve been told which “prove” human activities — specifically carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions — have caused and are causing Earth’s temperatures to be warmer, are in error. Instead of warming, world temps have been “in stasis,” i.e., unchanged, for the last two decades.

Instead of giving you second-hand sources to Newman’s op/ed (which is what Drudge Report inexplicably did yesterday, with a link to an AFP/Jiji article in the Japan Times), it is always better to go to the original or primary source because then there is no filtering and added commentary by the middle-man.
So here is Maurice Newman’s op/ed in its entirety. Maurice Newman

The UN is using climate change as a tool not an issue

By Maurice Newman The Australian, May 8, 2015
It’s a well-kept secret, but 95 per cent of the climate models we are told prove the link between human CO2 emissions and catastrophic global warming have been found, after nearly two decades of temperature stasis, to be in error. It’s not surprising.
We have been subjected to extravagance from climate catastrophists for close to 50 years.
In January 1970, Life magazine, based on “solid scientific evidence”, claimed that by 1985 air pollution would reduce the sunlight reaching the Earth by half. In fact, across that period sunlight fell by between 3 per cent and 5 per cent. In a 1971 speech, Paul Ehrlich said: “If I were a gambler I would take even money that ­England will not exist in the year 2000.”
Fast forward to March 2000 and David Viner, senior research scientist at the Climatic Research Unit, University of East Anglia, told The Independent, “Snowfalls are now a thing of the past.” In December 2010, the Mail Online reported, “Coldest December since records began as temperatures plummet to minus 10C bringing travel chaos across Britain”.
We’ve had our own busted predictions. Perhaps the most preposterous was climate alarmist Tim Flannery’s 2005 observation: “If the computer records are right, these drought conditions will become permanent in eastern Australia.” Subsequent rainfall and severe flooding have shown the records or his analysis are wrong. We’ve swallowed dud prediction after dud prediction. What’s more, the [UN] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which we were instructed was the gold standard on global warming, has been exposed repeatedly for ­mis­rep­resentation and shoddy methods.
Weather bureaus appear to have “homogenised” data to suit narratives. NASA’s claim that 2014 was the warmest year on record was revised, after challenge, to only 38 per cent probability. Extreme weather events, once blamed on global warming, no longer are, as their frequency and intensity decline.
Christiana Figueres
Why then, with such little evidence, does the UN insist the world spend hundreds of billions of dollars a year on futile climate change policies? Perhaps Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of the UN’s Framework on Climate Change has the answer?
In Brussels last February she said, “This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years since the Industrial Revolution.”
In other words, the real agenda is concentrated political authority. Global warming is the hook.
Figueres is on record saying democracy is a poor political system for fighting global warming. Communist China, she says, is the best model. This is not about facts or logic. It’s about a new world order under the control of the UN. It is opposed to capitalism and freedom and has made environmental catastrophism a household topic to achieve its objective.
Figueres says that, unlike the Industrial Revolution, “This is a centralised transformation that is taking place.” She sees the US partisan divide on global warming as “very detrimental”. Of course. In her authoritarian world there will be no room for debate or ­disagreement.
Make no mistake, climate change is a must-win battlefield for authoritarians and fellow travellers. As Timothy Wirth, president of the UN Foundation, says: “Even if the ­(climate change) theory is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic and environmental policy.”
Timothy Wirth Having gained so much ground, eco-catastrophists won’t let up. After all, they have captured the UN and are extremely well funded. They have a hugely powerful ally in the White House. They have successfully enlisted compliant academics and an obedient and gullible mainstream media (the ABC [Australian Broadcasting Company] and Fairfax in Australia) to push the scriptures regardless of evidence.
They will continue to present the climate change movement as an independent, spontaneous consensus of concerned scientists, politicians and citizens who believe human activity is “extremely likely” to be the dominant cause of global warming. (“Extremely likely” is a scientific term?)
And they will keep mobilising public opinion using fear and appeals to morality. UN support will be assured through promised wealth redistribution from the West, even though its anti-growth policy prescriptions will needlessly prolong poverty, hunger, sickness and illiteracy for the world’s poorest.
Figueres said at a climate ­summit in Melbourne recently that she was “truly counting on Australia’s leadership” to ensure most coal stayed in the ground.
Hopefully, like India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Tony Abbott isn’t listening. India knows the importance of cheap energy and is set to overtake China as the world’s leading importer of coal. Even Germany is about to commission the most coal-fired power stations in 20 years.
There is a real chance Figueres and those who share her centralised power ambitions will succeed. As the UN’s December climate change conference in Paris approaches, Australia will be pressed to sign even more futile job-destroying climate change treaties.
Resisting will be politically difficult. But resist we should. We are already paying an unnecessary social and economic price for empty gestures. Enough is enough.

Maurice Newman mocked by climate fascistsGood students of satanist Saul Alinsky that they are, Global Warming Nazis are already deploying Alinsky Rule No. 5 by mocking Maurice Newman as a crazy tinfoil hatter. (Source of pic)

See also:

~Éowyn

Please follow and like us:
0
 

0 responses to “Top adviser to Australia PM: Global warming is a NWO fraud led by UN

  1. Reblogged this on By the Mighty Mumford and commented:
    ORT-ORT-ORT-ORT…IN MY HUMBLE OPINION !!!!

     
  2. Excellent post! Now all we need to do is figure out a way to get the “brain dead” to wake up and realize the fraud of the whole thing!

     
  3. Germany has plenty of all grades of coal, and when it builds coal-fuelled power plants, be assured they’ll be the cleanest in the world, and the most efficient, by far.
    As I’ve repeatedly written & said for more than forty-five years, we must follow Dr George Gamow’s counsel to look at our time on Earth in 100,000 year cycles, NOT in annual reports or even a human lifetime of 100 years! I’ve also pointed out that it is NOT improbable that we could have three volcanic events the size of Krakatoa, spaced a few years apart, and the entire planet would be radically affected for a long time afterwards. It will make human pollution look miniscule. [http://www.sfu.ca/geog/geog351fall06/group06/Volcano.htm]
    Having said that, we do not have a moral license to despoil the planet so as to make in uninhabitable, which is what the ruling 10% is concerned for: they like white sandy beaches, a life of ease and pleasure atop a pyramid of supportive ‘useless eaters’ as Heinrich ‘Dr Strangelove’ Kissinger puts it to us.

     
  4. So-remind me again,the UN is benefiting the US-how??

     
  5. Regretfully, we now have indisputable evidence the UN was formed on 24 Oct 1945 to control the world with deception about Earth’s source of heat and light.
    The scientific revolution began 402 years earlier with Copernicus’ 1543 discovery the Sun is a fountain of energy giving light and heat to Earth and other planets orbiting the Sun.
    The Church said this was heresy, but Galileo defended himself at trial in 1633, noting the heliocentric solar system is the “Divine Order” that any other persistent observer could decipher.
    Subsequent observations revealed additional features of this “Divine Order:
    The fountain of energy that gives heat and light to Earth is also the Creator, Sustainer and Destroyer of every atom and life on Earth, and every planet in the entire Solar System [1], as Kuroda surmised while standing in the ruins of Hiroshima in Aug 1945: “THE BEGINNING OF THE WORLD MAY HAVE BEEN JUST LIKE THIS” nuclear explosion that destroyed Hiroshima [2] (words capitalized for emphasis).
    Two months later, world leaders – frightened by events hidden from the public during a news blackout in Aug-Sept 1945 and by the last paragraph of Aston’s Nobel Lecture on 12 Dec 1922 [3] – agreed to unite nations (UN) and national academies of sciences (NAS) on 24 Oct 1945 to prevent public knowledge of NEUTRON REPULSIONthe powerful “force of creation, preservation and destruction” with three (#1-3) standard models that recently evolved into a fourth (#4):
    #1. Standard Nuclear Model: The force between neutrons is attractive
    #2. Standard Solar Model: Hydrogen-filled stars are heated by H-fusion
    #3. Big Bang Cosmology: Created H from nothing, starting time @ t = 0
    #4. Anthropologic Global Warming: Man-made CO2 heats planet Earth
    Worldwide modifications in post-1945 science reduced the conflict with religion, and on 22 Nov 1951 Pope Pius XII announced to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences that modern science proved the existence of God.
    http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Pius12/P12EXIST.HTM
    But humanity was denied the promise in the last paragraph of Aston’s Nobel Lecture of 12 Dec 1922 because of the decision to hide Neutron Repulsion – the source of energy that
    _ a.) Destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Aug 1945;
    _ b.) Created and sustains every atom and life [1]; and
    _ c.) The climate of every planet [5] in the Solar System.
    That is the historical and tragic roots of the AGW scam.
    – Oliver K. Manuel
    Former NASA Principal
    Investigator for Apollo
    PhD Nuclear Chemistry
    Postdoc Space Physics
    Fulbright Astrophysics
    References:
    1. “Solar energy,” Advances in Astronomy (submitted 1 Sept 2014) https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Solar_Energy.pdf or
    “Solar Energy for school teachers”
    https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Supplement.pdf
    2. P. K. Kuroda, The Origin of the Chemical Elements and the Oklo Phenomenon (Springer Publishing, 165 pages, December 1982) The quote is on the last line of page 2. http://www.amazon.com/Origin-Chemical-Elements-Oklo-Phenomenon/dp/3540116796
    3. “Aston’s Nobel Lecture (12 Dec 1922); CHAOS and FEAR (Aug-Sept 1945)” https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/CHAOS_and_FEAR_August_1945.pdf
    4. Pope Pius XII, The Proofs for the Existence of God in the Light of Modern Natural Science, An address to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences (22 Nov 1951) http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Pius12/P12EXIST.HTM
    5. O. K. Manuel, Barry W. Ninham, Stig E. Friberg, “Superfluidity in the solar interior: Implications for solar eruptions and climate,” J. Fusion Energy 21, 193-198 (2002) http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023%2FA%3A1026250731672

     
  6. Thank you Dr. Eowyn for this great post, setting forth the fraudulent communication regarding global warming. The ulterior motives involved by global warming advocates reveal their true motive of controlling the world and treating us like stupid people who are gullible for any theories.

     
  7. Pingback: “Nature / Environment / Critters” May 22nd, 2015 | jeff-goodall

  8. What kind of idiot are you? Getting your SCIENCE information from a POLITICIAN is absolutely ridiculous. You’re hearing what they’ve been PAID to tell you! As a Christian do you believe that destroying what god gave you is how he would have wanted it? Do you think Jesus would say, “It’s alright. Keep your money. The environment will just have to suffer for you as I did.” ??? Why would you get your information on global warming from anywhere other than SCIENCE? You are what’s wrong with this country. People like you allow religious zealots (greedy corporate darlings) to run our country into the ground, all while demonizing the ONE president out of the last 3 who does NOT have family or other close financial connections to Wall Street (Clintons) or the Saudi Royal Family AKA Muslims (Bushs). Granted, Obama hasn’t done everything he said he would and he’s fast tracked the TPP (carrying out the will of Bush jr. mind you.) People like you allow your religion to hijack your brain and abandon your common reasoning skills. Don’t get so caught up in judging how “morally corrupt” our society is. Use your platform to preach what is truly at stake in these times: our freedom. Is it disgusting the way children and women are treated in societies across the globe? Yes. Do these people need to be brought to justice? Absolutely. But do you need to dignify what they did by taking the time out of your day to write an article about it? We all know it’s wrong, but bitching about it on the internet doesn’t actually do anything. Encourage people to contact their local representatives, to make education reform and to also make political reform that will bring us back to a country that truly understands the seperation of church and state while still enabling her people to enjoy the many freedoms the founding father’s (who if you actually do research were NOT Christians) intended us to have.

     
  9. Fina Biscotti

    One way, in which this Global Warming/Climate Change HOAX can be addressed, is to DEFUND The United Nations or completely close it down.
    The United Nations has been holding U.S. Taxpayer money in “escrow” for Programs that were never implemented.
    The United Nations are a bunch of dictators who demand “funding” _ but are against CAPITALISM.
    With that ideology and a request for MONEY in the same sentence _ just breeds more INSANITY _ such as bourgeoisie elites flying around the Globe in private jets, having no concern about their polluting emissions, while soliciting more cash _ for their Global Warming/Climate Change HOAX.
    Every one of these FRAUDSTERS should be JAILED.

     
  10. Pingback: KOMMONSENTSJANE – Top adviser to Australia PM: Global warming is a NWO fraud led by UN — Fellowship of the Minds | kommonsentsjane

  11. These people have such a lack of humility. How can you go on trusting your own conclusions when time after time, your assumptions have been so wrong? A true scientist would see the confirmation bias in their charts and graphs when their predictions fail to deliver.

     

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *