This just doesn't seem right…

Brothers?

Parents keep child’s gender secret

From parentcentral.ca: One family has decided not to reveal the gender of their child.  And you guessed it – they are liberals. The only people who know the gender of their new baby “Storm” is “its” brother Jazz (pictured above on the left with Storm) age 5, and “its” other brother, Kio, who is 2 years old. Also familiar with Storm’s gender are the two midwives who assisted with the birth.
When Storm was born, the couple sent an email to friends and family: “We’ve decided not to share Storm’s sex for now — a tribute to freedom and choice in place of limitation, a stand up to what the world could become in Storm’s lifetime (a more progressive place? …).”
Parents Kathy Witterick and her husband David Stocker (why different last names?) believe they are giving their children the freedom to choose who they want to be, unconstrained by social norms about males and females. Some say their choice is alienating.
In an age where helicopter parents hover nervously over their kids micromanaging their lives, and tiger moms ferociously push their progeny to get into Harvard, Stocker, 39, and Witterick, 38, believe kids can make meaningful decisions for themselves from a very early age. “What we noticed is that parents make so many choices for their children. It’s obnoxious,” says Stocker.
Jazz and Kio have picked out their own clothes in the boys and girls sections of stores since they were 18 months old. Just this week, Jazz unearthed a pink dress at Value Village, which he loves because it “really poofs out at the bottom. It feels so nice.” The boys decide whether to cut their hair or let it grow. Jazz — soft-spoken, with a slight frame and curious brown eyes — keeps his hair long, preferring to wear it in three braids, two in the front and one in the back, even though both his parents have close-cropped hair.
Witterick practices unschooling, an offshoot of home-schooling centred on the belief that learning should be driven by a child’s curiosity. There are no report cards, no textbooks and no tests. For unschoolers, learning is about exploring and asking questions, “not something that happens by rote from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. weekdays in a building with a group of same-age people, planned, implemented and assessed by someone else,” says Witterick.
Both come from liberal families. Stocker grew up listening to Free to Be … You and Me, a 1972 record with a central message of gender neutrality. Witterick remembers her brother mucking around with gender as a teen in the ’80s, wearing lipstick and carrying handbags like David Bowie and Mick Jagger.
There are days when their decisions are tiring, shackling even. “We spend more time than we should providing explanations for why we do things this way,” says Witterick. “I regret that (Jazz) has to discuss his gender before people ask him meaningful questions about what he does and sees in this world, but I don’t think I am responsible for that — the culture that narrowly defines what he should do, wear and look like is.”
I’m no child expert yet I don’t believe this is right.  Children are not capable of making meaningful decisions at a young age. Sounds like these “parents” are imposing their “progressive” ideas on children that have no choice in the matter.  The children are going to be in for a big shock when they enter the real world.
h/t The JawaReport
DCG

Rate this post

Please follow and like us:
0
 

Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Linda
Guest
Linda

Try coming from a conservative (not ultra) family, in which one of the girls decided she was a boy at age two, and feels strongly still at age 18. Every posssible avenue was sought, including a psychologist, endocrinologist, etc, and the bottom line is, this person feels the wrong gender.; Come walk a mile in these shoes. It’s an anomaly I would not wish on anyone. But it happens.
I must say these parents have take this way too far.

tina
Guest

these two in my mind should not really be allowed to have children,this is against the grain of nature. This childs life is at stake here. They are doing an experiment. Some day they will be sorry. [very sorry}

BKeyser
Guest
BKeyser

Is there a better example of self-loathing than the parents of a newborn so disgusted with their own sexuality and gender limitations that they refuse to acknowledge the gender of their own child?
There’s a special place in hell for people like this- one can only wish them a lengthy stay in a Sharia society beginning in the very near future; save for their poor children, off course.

Will
Guest
Will

This. Will. End. Badly!

Will
Guest
Will

Just like everything else Liberals attempt. This too will fail.

josephbc69
Guest

OK, let’s try another POV. What if it were a puppy and this technique was deemed “appropriate”? I’m being serious, because this situation is serious. Any ideas on how what the outcome might be? As it is, Dr Lori, Teddy’s vet, chides me for not being enough of an “alpha male” to him, and there was never any doubt in my mind or Teddy’s as what gender we are. I thought I was being the best I could be for him, just as I did for my children! Fortunately, Teddy’s matured into a self-assured Prince of Pomeranians, and the only… Read more »

Dr. Eowyn
Admin

What a strange conception of “freedom” the parents have. How sad it is that Kathy Witterick and David Stocker think gender is “a limitation.”
No wonder Leftists, e.g. Community organizer Obama’s political mentor Saul Alinsky, admire the fallen angel Lucifer because he too sought “freedom” and rebelled against his Creator. For that, Lucifer instead purchased the “freedom” of eternal Hell of his own eternal rage.

Dave
Editor
Dave

Some people just should not be allowed to procreate.
-Dave

Mike
Guest
Mike

You people are all crazy. Whats so wrong with allowing a child to pick certain things it enjoys? At the age of 4 gender is not even an issue. Enjoying your young years and allowing to make decisions based on what you like.. not what society has established is a blissful ignorance that only a child can experience. I don’t understand how this is a bad thing and how their parents are going to be unhappy. and as christians why would you condemn these parents and wish unhappiness upon them.. when all they had are their children’s best interest at… Read more »

josephbc69
Guest

Hmm…. Some creative knob’s gone down the comments and ticked a “thumbs down” on all but the last two, which are mine and “Mike”. However, I suspect we’re next on knob’s 2nd visit to “correct” us….
“Ideas Have Consequences” wrote Dr Weaver, and it’s hard for me to see anything but poor to bad ones for this infant/child, a soon-to-be product of what is, if truth be told, an experiment at best, and perhaps a disaster, at worst.