This disgusting woman "loves" abortion

See this horse-face toothy smiling woman?
You’re looking at the face of evil.
Her name is Jessica DelBalzo, a blogger on OpenSalon.com and a self-described activist for Left-wing causes — “social justice, family preservation, reproductive rights, and politics.”
DelBalzo has stripped all the pretenses from the pro-abortion crowd:

It really is all about the woman’s selfish interest — and the life of another human being be damned.

Nancy Flanders reports for LifeSiteNews, March 23, 2012, that in a post DelBalzo wrote for RH Reality Check, the “reproductive rights” activist protests against pro-choicers who say abortion should be rare because in saying so, they are implying that abortion is wrong. Instead, according to DelBalzo,

“Rather than trying to cozy up to the forced-birth camp, women who value their freedom should be proud to say that they like abortion. In fact, they should venerate it whole-heartedly. Abortion is our last refuge, the one final, definitive instrument that secures our bodily autonomy. What’s not to love?”

Venerate.
What an interesting choice of words.
To “venerate” is “to regard with respect, reverence, or heartfelt deference” as one would toward a deity.
In other words, DelBalzo is recommending to women that we are to love killing so much that we murder “with reverence.” Who is the deity to whom the murders of the unborn are offered in veneration?
At the same time as DelBalzo professes her great “love” for abortion, she condemns adoption as “not only unnecessary, but also unethical.”
DelBalzo operates Adoption: Legalized Lies, a self-described grassroots initiative to put an end to adoption. The front page of the group’s website shows a child happily holding a handmade sign that says, “Adoption Hurts Babies.”
Flanders writes:

“This is perplexing, since adoption leaves a child not only alive, but in a loving home, while abortion either burns the child to death or dismembers it limb by limb. Even if birth parents can’t raise a child, they can give their child a good life, rather than allow her body to be ripped apart and thrown into a bin of medical waste.”

In her self-description on OpenSalon.com, DelBalzo describes herself as “a mother.”
Shudders….
“Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!” (Isaiah 5:20)
~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:
0
 

0 responses to “This disgusting woman "loves" abortion

  1. The twisted mind of this woman is unfathomable. I read some of her blog, and here’s what I think about her. She’s a cold bit/////

     
  2. I hope she tries to spout her evil nonsense when she stands before the Lord in the hereafter, before the first syllable leaves her lips she will be in Hell.

     
  3. i bet she is the type of person who gets outraged over clubbing baby seals
    i always thought a good poster would be a picture of men out clubbing baby seals but on closer inspection the seals would be human babies and the clubbers would be dressed in surgical gowns

     
  4. When I read stories like this I wonder HOW someone could foster these sentiments. What background must they have that would lead them to think and act like this woman? My only answer is that evil is alive and thriving.
    “The danger when men stop believing in God is not that they will believe in nothing, but that they will believe in anything.” -Chesterton
    “All that is required for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing.” -Burke
    “The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge, but fools despise wisdom and instruction.” -Solomon (Proverbs 1:7)
    “For what will it profit a man if he gains the whole world, and loses his own soul?” -Jesus

     
  5. She probly is a satanist who relishes in murdering babies and drinking their blood and eating their organs. We need to recognize the witches. She’s a witch and a monster from horror movies. She’s the face of evil. That she had one or more children live — as a “mother” — that doesn’t mean she hasn’t murdered many more of her own and sacrificed them to Satan.
    We really do need to bring back the utter contempt for evil people and stop believing they deserve our acceptance. An evil woman like this one should be regarded as the witch that she is.
    *And if she’s not sacrificing babies to Satan, drinking their blood, and eating their organs in ritual sacrifice… then why does she have the moral code that corresponds to a witch like that??

     
  6. “See this horse-face toothy smiling woman?”
    You’re argument against Jessica DelBalzo is correct and her belief systems are disgusting, and definitely evil. Calling her names hurts your argument, and what she looks like has nothing to do with her philosophy. Why employ a liberal tactic when the truth is on your side? Look, I am a big fan, love your blog and understand nobody is perfect. I am not part of the speech police and believe you have every right to say what you said. I still argue that it hurts the cause and does not influence anyone.

     
    • What “names” did I call her? Did I call her a bitch? No. Did I call her a witch? No. Did I call her a slut? No. Did I call her a c*nt? No.
      The words I used are “horse-face toothy smiling” — which are a description of her physiognomy:
      * She is smiling in the photo
      * She is toothy — certainly her teeth are bigger and longer than mine.
      * She does have a horse face, i.e., a longish face that is not soft or feminine but rather equine with large teeth. The actress Sarah Jessica Parker has been described as having a “horse face”. Here’s a Google page of images for “Sarah Jessica Parker horse face”.

       
      • Sorry, I didn’t know “horse-face” and “toothy” were neutral terms and non-offensive, like, “she is a blue-eyed blonde”. Normally, describing someones face as similar to that of an animal it is derogatory. I won’t judge your heart, I will take you at your word.
        I know this, call my wife that, and we will have a problem.
        Just sayin’.
        But since it was just a description, I hope you go on record agreeing that when people to “name call” they actually denigrate themselves and take away from the real intellectual argument.

         
        • Name calling or physiognomy? I am a blue-eyed blonde and that can be construed as offensive, given the context. Physiognomy can be considered an “art” and is frequently used in astrology.
          Given this woman’s support for abortion and her disdain for adoption, why can’t we interpret her physiognomy to define her character?

           
        • Weeping Eagle-
          I don’t think that stating a fact is wrong. Do you honestly think that this article is telling her something she doesn’t already know? If she owns a mirror, BELIEVE ME, she knows!! There is no possible way that she could have missed’em . And I’ve been told, that a lot of people think horses are beautiful. 😉
          By the way, she has red hair….I wonder if she took your “blue-eyed blonde” comparison as an insult?
          And, let me get this straight, I’m suppose to worry about her feelings when she is celebrating the murder of children? Think about all of the absolutely gorgeous baby girls that did not get a chance to EVER look into a mirror or hear someone say that they were beautiful.
          SHE HAS BIG TEETH…..Biggy-freakin-whoop!! I promise, she soooo knows it!

           
        • It just fascinates me to no end that, out of the 355 words that make up my post, you choose to fixate on two words: “horse-face” and “toothy.” Wow. Those two words upset you more than words like “disgusting,” “evil”, “selfish,” and my implying that DelBalzo is a satanist. But it’s “horse-face” and “toothy” that get your panties all twisted into a knot.
          Nice to know your priorities. By any chance are you “horse-face” and “toothy”?
          Psychiatrist M. Scott Peck and theologian Malachi Martin both observed that the instinctive reaction (if one is a normal human being) to evil is a feeling of revulsion. Just as I find cobras and rattlesnakes repugnant, I find DelBalzo to be utterly revolting and repellent — and that includes EVERYTHING about her, including her “horse-face toothy smiling face” and — to get your panties even more twisted — her bottle-blonde hair and her big horsy nose.
          By society’s beauty standards, Mother Teresa was considered quite homely. But I find her to be radiantly beautiful.
          Beauty is goodness
          Finally, you don’t dictate to me or any one on this blog what we write or don’t write. Go get your own blog.
          P.S. I see you do have your own blog! — a blog that does not even allow readers to leave a comment. Too funny.

           
          • My dear grandmother had a favorite phrase that she instilled in us–“pretty is as pretty does”. Mother Theresa is beautiful, this woman is NOT!

             
  7. We are no different from the people in the Bible that sacrificed children to their gods. We are sacrificing our children for selfishness, greed, convenience, etc. These babies are all being sacrificed for sinful reasons. Abortion is evidence that even a small amount of sin, such as greed, can grow if not ever dealt with. This woman is a perfect example of that.

     
  8. She says on her blog her passion is “family preservation”. Good grief….abortion helps preserve families?
    She’s got a post on Redefining “failed” relationships. She got pregnant a month and a half after dating a guy. Tried to stay with him for nine years yet he was a louse. Goes on about “The religious right likes to talk about the sanctity of marriage” and “Can you look me in the eye and tell me that I failed because I would no longer tolerate dishonesty and disrespect from my partner? Do you really want to measure your success by the number of betrayals you manage to sweep under the rug?”
    “Sometimes, the end of a relationship is a victory, not a defeat. It takes courage to admit that you deserve better and that you’re ready to go find it. In fact, moving out and moving on just might be the bravest moves you ever make.”
    I don’t fault her for leaving a cheater. Maybe she should have dated the man longer than a month and a half before getting pregnant to actually know what kind of person she was getting involved with. But heck, justify away all you want girl.

     
  9. I am an atheist but I am still vehemently pro-life, as was Christopher Hitchens. But I think that the Church’s militant view towards protecting Life harms the pro-life movement significantly. I wrote this article
    http://secularjustice.wordpress.com/2012/03/08/how-pro-life-organizations-keep-abortion-legal/
    on the matter about a month ago, and I hope you will consider what I have to say.
    Thanks!

     
    • A prolife athiest? Shocker!
      You state you aren’t a doctor. Have you ever spoken to one that witnessed a late- term abortion and heard the baby cry then watched as doctors killed it?
      Militant view? That describes Sanger and her love of abortion.
      Even if you don’t believe in God why do you condone killing an innocent child? Aren’t you glad your mom didn’t abort you?

       
  10. Can’t believe anyone could “love abortion.” Disgusting. She will face God for what she has said.

     
  11. They need to make a movie about this witch and call it “Bitch Evil.”
    This woman came straight out of Hell.
    -Dave

     
  12. Thank you Dr. Eowyn for disclosing this woman’s warped and cruel understanding of what is good for women, completely ignoring the FACT that abortion is the KILLING of another human being. The fetus is a separate HUMAN BEING, completely distinct and made in the image and likeness of God.
    As for the person who uses the term, “Eagle,” please do not desecrate this beautiful bird with your falsehoods. Most importantly, you attempt to change the issue of killing babies, little children, with the description of the person who finds it not only acceptable, but behavior to cherish. This is called a MATERIAL FALLACY, something I learned at the National Judicial College, which is a clear attempt to avoid the actual issues in a matter. We here at the Fellowship are not stupid people! We see through your shadow!
    As to Ethan Hill, you are full of inconsistencies. God is the Creator of all things, including but not limited to little babies housed in the womb of mothers. These little babies are created in the IMAGE AND LIKENESS OF GOD, by the First Cause, the First Mover, the Logos! Wake up!

     

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *