The Hounding of Judge Kavanaugh: A Synopsis

Rate this post

Beverly Ann Barnum is a longtime Facebook reader of Fellowship of the Minds.

She wrote this essay to inform “all those clamoring for an FBI investigation into the Ford/Kavanaugh situation.”

WHO: Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, accuser; Judge Bret Kavanaugh, defendant; Mark Judge, witness; Patrick J. Smyth, witness; Leland Ingham Keyser, witness.

WHAT: All named witnesses declare, under oath of committing felony perjury, it never happened. Ford’s best friend Leland, said Ford never ran in the same crowd as Kavanaugh. Dr. Christine Blasey Ford claimed that in the early 80s, perhaps the summer of 1982, she attended a party somewhere near Columbia Country Club in Montgomery County, Maryland. She neither remembers how she got there, nor how she returned home. She does remember it was before she obtained her driver’s license. She mentions four boys and two girls were there, or maybe more. She was only able to provide names for four: Brett, Mark, PJ, and Leland. Although she was never asked why she was upstairs in the first place, since most nearby homes have at least a powder room on the first floor, she claims she was in an upstairs bedroom with Mark and Brett.  Here, she was thrown onto the bed and Brett attempted to take off her clothing, ground himself against her and put his hand over her mouth. She feared for her life. Mark threw himself onto the bed and they all fell onto the floor. She recalls the boys laughing hysterically at her expense. She escaped into the bathroom and later went downstairs and outside, returned home and no police report was filed. In order for any investigation to occur, either then or now, plaintiff must file a police report and Ford did not. Recent requests by Democrats to investigate were met with a refusal because it was a 1982 misdemeanor and the statute of limitations expired after one year. She was too afraid to mention the incident to anyone until 2012, when she first divulged it in couples therapy. The emergent memory was so strong she claims she had to install a second front door in her home in order to have an additional way to escape in case of another attack. But the building permit for this door was issued in 2008, reportedly to connect to a room she rents out.

WHEN: Time unknown, date unknown, probably in the summer of 1982 prior to Ford obtaining a driver’s license.

WHERE: Place unknown, some home in Montgomery County, Maryland, probably near the Columbia Country Club.


Motive One: To use the newly minted phrase, “create a moral panic”. Democrats would have you believe it is because Brett Kavanaugh is being hired for a lifetime job and for this, should have a totally unblemished character. This 11th hour allegation should provide, beyond any reasonable doubt, an adequate reason to reject his application, despite being totally unprovable and totally opposed to an otherwise spotless reputation. Kavanaugh passed six previous FBI investigations. This motive is relatively improbable because more than 100 friends, classmates and coworkers have written and spoken to the quality of his character. Mark Judge has agreed to testify to the FBI.

Motive Two: Brett Kavanaugh’s mother was a judge with ties to a foreclosure of the Blasey Maryland residence and this is REVENGE. This motive is also improbable because the home was not actually foreclosed and his mother’s ties were distant to the case.

Motive Three: Some Republicans would have you believe Democrats, the Deep State and Nevertrumpers within the Republican Party want to use any possible means to delay the Kavanaugh confirmation beyond the 2018 Midterm elections, hoping they will reclaim the majority necessary to prevent a conservative judge from being appointed to the Supreme Court.

Motive Four: As payback for what the Republican majority did to President Obama’s nomination of Merrick Garland in 2016. Probably another contributing factor for motive three.

HOW: This is where it gets interesting, with evidence pointing to Motive Three as the most logical answer. Since high school yearbooks entered the discussion re. Kavanaugh, with allegations that he habitually partied, got drunk and even might have passed out with no recollection of events, it is only fair to also point out Ford’s yearbook records. Holton Arms, the private girls’ school Ford attended, might be a role model for “Fast Times at Ridgemont High.” Girls partied, got drunk and bragged about being sexual predators. Logic and knowing most teens frequently do things of a questionable nature, might indicate the alleged sexual assault, if it actually happened, would be plausible for either Kavanaugh or Ford. Kavanaugh’s online yearbooks were not scrubbed from the Internet; Ford’s have been. Pages from hard copy remain and have been shared.

Kavanaugh was blindsided by the accusations. His family receives death threats. He has no GoFundMe website to pay for legal expenses. Ford has pro bono attorneys, she testified she does not know who paid for her polygraph and her GoFundMe donations are nearing one million dollars at this writing.

Ford sent an accusatory letter to Senator Dianne Feinstein in July, after having previously contacted her congressional representative who initially suggested a course of action. This letter has been examined and found to have typographical inconsistencies. It does not mention Kavanaugh by name. Writing experts furthermore claim it could not have been written by someone with a Ph.D. There were at least 14 glaring elementary mistakes that a published author with a Ph.D. should not have made. Rumor has it that the same or very similar letter has been seen before, prior to the Justice Gorsuch confirmation.

Feinstein suggested hiring attorneys she knew. Ford also requested Feinstein keep information confidential. During a lengthy confirmation process, Kavanaugh was asked nothing about this incident, by either Feinstein or any of the other nine Democratic senators on the Judicial Committee. Instead, Feinstein sat on the letter for more than a month, saving it to use at a later critical juncture. That critical juncture was September 12, when the Judiciary Committee was scheduled for a vote on Kavanaugh’s nomination.

There are procedures specified by the Senate Judiciary Committee for having investigators handle affairs quietly. But Feinstein forwarded the letter to the Justice Department, which someone from her office or Ford herself leaked to the Washington Post. What ensued was a very public planned or unplanned media circus.

The choice of attorneys is interesting. Kavanaugh’s lawyer, Beth Wilkinson, is a high-powered, Washington, D.C. lawyer who represented multiple top Clinton aides involved in the FBI email investigation during the campaign. She’s also a long-time Democratic booster, and is married to CNN contributor David Gregory. As for Dr. Ford’s attorneys, Debra Katz was a campaign fundraiser for Clinton during her 2016  campaign; Michael Bromwich resigned from his law firm because the partners objected to his decision to represent Ford. Bromwich was also the face of fired FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe’s legal team.

Brett Kavanaugh and his life are an open book, documented by his written judicial record. In contrast, there are many red flags in Christine Ford’s life and connections, pointing to a left-wing political agenda:

(1) Ford’s ties to George Soros: According to The Washington Times:

Look at what’s going on with Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation proceedings for the Supreme Court, and the fingerprints of George Soros are all over it.

First there was a report from June in the Daily Caller that found “a new political advocacy group that vowed to put $5 million behind an effort to stop … Kavanaugh’s confirmation has significant ties to the liberal financier” Soros

What are those ties?

The group, Demand Justice, established in 2018, gets its money from the Sixteen Thirty Fund — and the Sixteen Thirty Fund received roughly $2.2 million from the Open Society Policy Center, one of Soros’ outlets, between the years of 2012 and 2016.

And Demand Justice’s entire mission is to advance a progressive agenda through the courts.

“[Our goal is to] sensitize rank-and-file progressives to think of the courts as a venue for their activism and a way to advance the progressive agenda,” DJ’s executive director, Brian Fallon, said to The New York Times.

But that’s not all.

Debra Katz, the attorney representing Kavanaugh’s accuser — Christine Blasey Ford — is vice chair of the Project on Government Oversight, an organization that has been directly funded by Soros’ Open Society Foundation.

Katz is also a hefty Democratic donor, giving thousands of dollars over the years to Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and other leftist candidates, as Front Page Mag reported.

(2) Ford’s ties to the CIA:

According to Michael Savage:

Well, besides being a “professor” at the off-brand university, she also works at a major university down the street from Palo Alto. She just so happens to head up the CIA undergraduate internship program at Stanford University. Christine Blasey Ford’s brother, Ralph the third, used to work for the international law firm of Baker Hostetler. The firm created fusion GPS, the company who wrote the Russian “dossier”. They later admitted it was only a collection of field interviews. Baker Hostetler is located in the same building where the CIA operates three companies called Red Coats Inc, Admiral Services and Datawatch. They are operated by Ralph Blasey II. He is the father of Christine and Ralph III. Christine and Ralph III’s grandfather was Nicholas Deak. Former CIA director William Casey acknowledged Deak’s decades of service to the CIA.

(3) Ford’s ties to the abortion industry: She has profited from an abortion drug. Natural News reported:

Ford works for a pharmaceutical company that manufacturers an abortion pill drug, whose profits could be strongly impacted by future Supreme Court decisions on abortion rights. Corcept Therapeutics ( manufacturers and markets an abortion pill drug called mifepristone, and Christine Blasey Ford is a co-author of at least eight published scientific papers produced by the pharmaceutical giant to promote its pills. You can see Blasey’s name listed on several publications at this web page detailing their research papers. Corcept Therapeutics, Inc., a $166 billion market cap company (stock symbol CORT) reportedly has current annual sales of $216 million. The company offers just one drug, mifepristone, which is widely known as an “abortion pill” or RU-486. The controversial site Gateway Pundit first broke this story. It seems to have all its facts straight. And it leaves out a key one: Ford actually worked as “director of biostatistics for Corcept Therapeutics in Menlo Park,” according to the San Francisco Chronicle. (H/T Tiger Droppings.)

So the one person with a remotely plausible story attacking Kavanaugh, whose story Democrats saved as a Hail Mary pass, turns out to have profited directly from an abortion drug. Imagine if an anti-gun SCOTUS appointee were just about to be confirmed, then some right-wing woman came out with vague, unprovable charges. Then we learned that the accuser had worked for a company that made AR-15s. How much credence would the media give her?

Even though Roe v. Wade is established abortion law and it would take another case brought before the Supreme Court to change anything, Democrats, Planned Parenthood and radical feminists are so protective of the right for unrestricted abortion, they use this as a perceptive wedge against the Pro-Life segment of the population. The Supreme Court, according to Constitutional provisions does not and can not legislate on its own. By stacking the court with liberal judges, the left wants to enable the court to legislate as well as rule.

A forensic accountant should be appointed to ”Follow the money!”

Ford as a political activist: Ricki Seidman, a Democratic operative and former Clinton White House official who is now an advisor to Mrs. Ford, said in July (at roughly the same time as the letter was submitted) that she predicted a “strategy” forming to destroy Brett Kavanaugh.

She suggested a “strategy will emerge” to destroy Trump’s nomination for the Supreme Court in a conference call with the American Constitution Society in July. “I do think that over the coming days and weeks there will be a strategy that will emerge, and I think it’s possible that strategy might ultimately defeat the nominee,” Seidman said in audio that was recorded by the Republican National Committee’s War Room. “And whether or not it ultimately defeats the nominee it will, I think, help people understand why it’s so important that they vote.”

Blasey Ford is cited in a San Jose Mercury News article as opposing President Donald Trump, including a science march in California last year where she donned a version of the “pussy hats” worn at the January 2017 Women’s March, angered by the Trump administration’s proposed cuts to research.

Discovery: Little hard evidence about the alleged event is available. Kavanaugh produced a calendar/diary for the summer of 1982, which indicated he was out of town for much of the summer. When he was home, there were only a few occasions to attend a party. But Kavanaugh had good reasons for not attending each of the few parties, e.g. taking a SAT exam the following day.

Ford turned over a problematic lie detector record during which only two questions were asked and neither mentioned Kavanaugh by name.  Beth Wilkinson, Kavanaugh’s attorney, is interested in seeing the therapy sessions notes, which she says are important to corroborate claims made by Ford. “Apparently in those notes, there’s a differing story about how many people were present at the party, there’s no mention of Judge Kavanaugh, and so all that information would be very important to determine whether there’s any corroboration of this allegation,” Wilkinson said on “CBS This Morning” Wednesday.

At every step of the way, Ford and her team have managed delay after delay, sometimes for reasons that rise to the level of malpractice by her attorneys. Apparently Ford was not advised that senate investigators would come to her in California after she objected to flying. In contrast, from day one, Kavanaugh has asked for and agreed to cooperate with any opportunity or investigation to clear his good name against this defamatory allegation.

The FBI presents facts, not conclusions, facts which are up to courts and trials to prove or disprove.

Judiciary Committee Democrat members displayed a holier than thou attitude when questioning Kavanaugh. This is more evidence of creating a “moral panic.” You would think, listening to them, the alleged crime rose to the level of a serial killer’s 30th victim rather than a sole youthful indiscretion. Rather than use questioning time to actually ask Kavanaugh to answer questions, getting the information they so repeatedly say they want from the FBI, they chose to pontificate and cast irrelevant character aspersions about Kavanaugh such as, “Do you drink on weekdays?”


(1) If Kavanaugh is not confirmed, his reputation and employment opportunities are stained forever.

(2) If his confirmation is delayed until after the mid-term election and the majority party is flipped, his reputation remains stained and he will not be confirmed.

(3) If he is confirmed, his judicial decisions will always be thought by some to be as flawed as those by Judge Clarence Thomas, whom Anita Hall had accused of sexual harassment.

Whatever the final outcome of this case, whether Ford wins or loses, whether Kavanaugh is confirmed or not, the entire process has been so poisoned that it is America that loses.

See also these posts on Kavanaugh’s nomination:

Please follow and like us:

39 responses to “The Hounding of Judge Kavanaugh: A Synopsis

  1. It does not seem that Corcept Therapeutics has anything to do with RU-486. Looked at their website as well as history of RU-486. May want to confirm.

    • From my post “Christine Ford, the woman who accuses Judge Kavanaugh of sexual assault 36 years ago“:

      According to a Palo Alto University document from 2015 (see page 97), Christine Blasey, Ph.D. is a professor at Palo Alto University and a “Director of Biostatistics at Corcept Therapeutics.” As “Blasey CM,” Christine Blasey Ford, whose middle name is Margaret, co-authored 8 research papers with Corcept Therapeutics, which manufactures and markets an RU-486 abortion pill, mifepristone. From Wikipedia:

      As of 2018, Korlym is Corcept’s only product and treats about 1,000 patients annually in the U.S. Korlym’s active ingredient is mifepristone, also known as RU-486, which is a medication typically used in combination with misoprostol to bring about an abortion.

      • The pharmaceutical company is busily trying to find “other uses” for RU-486 so as to make themselves less of a target. Blasey-Ford (who apparently only uses “Blasey”) is useful to them to add “professional” credentials to their advertised research efforts.

        All of these endeavors are in some way connected to the CIA and other “intelligence” agencies and their controllers. She is clearly not a “rocket scientist”.

        The examples of this method of operation are too numerous to mention. It’s all about “connections”. I have no idea if she is programmed or not. She knows what side her bread is buttered on, that’s for sure. She’s up to close to a million dollars on “Go Fund Me” alone.

        Does anybody think that these hand-wringing leftists are shelling out THEIR money here? I doubt it.

  2. Has anyone read her dissertation about child abuse or the books she helped write? Wondering why at these times she did not say anything.

  3. Thanks

  4. Thank you Dr. Eowyn for this remarkable synopsis.

    ANOTHER BIG MOTIVE – SAFE HAVEN: The accuser, Prof. Ford WILL NOT be investigated by the FBI; only the accused, Kavanaugh.

    If she was investigated, it would lead to the Central Intelligence Agency’s MK-Ultra Project Monarch operation and its path from child pornography and recruitment into government corruption that implicates some of the most prominent figures in global politics. Ford displayed the markers of child abuse when testifying THROUGHOUT. She also mentioned her long periods of difficult relationships with men and then when questioned — if she told her parents, she responded with an emphatic DEFINITELY NOT indicating a dysfunctional relationship with them.

    The ugly facets of mind control was exposed in the 90s Senate Hearings striking deep in the heart of the beast revealing the confusing cruel, murderous world particularly in the high-flying worlds of politics, Hollywood and music.
    The DemonRATS, obviously aware of Ford’s damaged childhood and little regard for her welfare, exercised advance planning and malicious intent to conjured up the Kavanaugh circus.

    Chairman Grassley Quote: Senator Feinstein only informed the FBI of the allegations after they were leaked to the media on the eve of a confirmation vote. The proper course of action would have been to investigate Dr. Ford’s serious allegations as quickly and as thoroughly as possible, as I did as soon as these allegations were made known to me.

    Additional Kavanaugh HATERS

    Smith-Mundt Modernization Act (NDAA 2012 signed by Obama) legalizes the government lying to the people and using propaganda.

  5. This essay was very nicely done. I have been trying to follow everything I can find on this fiasco. It isn’t easy to be coherent here, I think that is because so much of it is completely fabricated.

    There are a couple of minor points that have more than one possible explanation. Nonetheless, none of that matters in terms of whether or not this is a disgusting sham. It is.

    Actually this whole episode began long before the nomination. The whole “MeToo” thing was a prelude to this. I believe it is also a setup for the impending impeachment attempt on Trump.

    As is stated in the essay, if all of this were true (and it isn’t), we are talking about a misdemeanor for which the statute of limitation has long expired. If the Republicans had spines they would have categorically refused to entertain this.

    For just a few reasons, (there are many more), this was not a trial. If it were a trial there would be rules. You are not allowed to do a Feinstein in a trial. At least you wouldn’t get away with it.

    Because they withheld this information until after the vetting was officially complete, all they had to do was simply refuse to hear it. Who would they have screamed at? Why Feinstein for causing their poor little “victim” to lose her “right” to be heard.

    Who is Blasey-Ford to dictate to the U.S. Senate? She wants a conviction in the court of public opinion but refuses to hand over her counseling notes? In other words, “the only evidence you’ll see are my statements”.

    Although I think she has several screws loose, I do not think she wrote that note. Some have claimed that that note has been around quite a while with a different person’s name affiliated to it. Namely Gorsuch.

    I think that Soros/Brock/Obongo and the rest of the demons from Hell contingent, simply got with their CIA assets and decided that Blasey-Ford was in the right place at the right time to carry the ball for them.

    They trotted out Katz (Adam Lanza’s sister) and she worked much of the underhanded “magic” here. We should not forget that these people march to a different drummer. Their standard is “do as thou wilt is the whole of the law”.

    This does give them some power. It is especially useful for them when their opposition is too spineless to resist. Just like trying to negotiate with a psychopath, cooperating with Social Marxists is impossible. They have nothing to offer and you can only lose.

  6. Excellent synopsis by Beverly.

    “I think that Soros/Brock/Obongo and the rest of the demons from Hell contingent, simply got with their CIA assets and decided that Blasey-Ford was in the right place at the right time to carry the ball for them.”

    This is how Robert David Steel puts it:
    no holistic analysis of the Blasey situation can be completed without considering CIA mind-control and the possibility that she was a) used as a CIA child prostitute for the Washington DC pedophile circuit back in the day; and b) programmed to take down future influentials — I would actually look for her having multiple therapists, each given a different judge’s name as part of a “salt the mine” strategy. CIA is part of the Deep State — it — like the FBI and NSA — thrives on blackmail and bribery.

    “We should not forget that these people march to a different drummer. Their standard is “do as thou wilt is the whole of the law”. This does give them some power. ”

    Yes it gives them power esp when as you said the spineless Repoops play their game. No amount of black magic which in essence is what these vile creeps are practicing works unless you buy into it.

    The Arch Of Baal Was Put Up In Washington D.C. One Day Before Brett Kavanaugh Testified To Congress

    • SHES was an early example of how this “connectedness” works. Soon it will be Trump’s impeachment. They will do a version of this mindless garbage any time it suits them.

      I get into trouble a lot by saying that the “opposition” isn’t serious. I don’t think they are. If they are they’re stupid.

      I have some uncertainty as to how complicit Dr. Bambi is in this. She’s a terrible actress. I am guessing that she did not offer her services. They probably sought her out. After all, she probably owes them for her plush positions and her newfound wealth.

    • You might find this interesting. Sometimes he gets it right. He writes well:

      • That was an EXCELLENT article. I haven’t been on Rense pretty much since he had his row with Makow. Heard various stuff about him being an agent himself. Never the less he has had some amazing articles on his site.

        • I like his writing. He usually gets at least one thing “wrong”. In this case he’s talking about “Yale group sex parties…”. No!

          Anyway, the rest is OK. He often gets a lot of information that nobody else seems to get.

        • As to Rense, I check him every day but I’m not sure that’s where Shimatsu’s piece came from. I doubt that he’s an “agent”, just weird. He’s another one who is often WRONG.

          I can’t emphasize enough the importance of being willing to read anybody. I have NEVER found anybody that is always in agreement with my beliefs. That’s OK. Usually there is SOMETHING useful in someone’s article. Sometimes there is a lot and those are the ones I check regularly. Shimatsu is somewhere in between.

    • That would make a great trade symbol for Corcept Pharmaceuticals.

      • Isn’t that the truth.

        The article also mentioned “groping”. When I think back to high school and a bit beyond ( I was married young!), you half expected a guy was going to try to get away with something at some point. Rare indeed was any guy who didn’t. Just wondering if we now adopt the left’s standards of sexual behavior for young men what that will do to male female relations? Are we to expect that a young man is going to formally ask if he can touch or kiss? I imagine not not a few have noted just a bit of hypocrisy by the left who have pushed all the “sexual liberation”, kids included, and abortion without parental consent are now suddenly so upset about groping? At the current rate, it seems the only way dating etc. can possibly survive is if we go back to the old time when young women were never let out with a young man without a chaperone.

          • Yes of course. Out of the mouth of another ((( ))) I’ve never witnessed this kind of innate hatred, and genuine racism in my life.
            Tucker Carlson showed that one tonight and forgot to remove
            the ((( ))). Ooops!!!

        • None of this is logical. The truth is that they are trying everything to destroy normal sexual relations. Queer, perverse ones are OK. With leftists it doesn’t matter whether their logic is consistent.

          They favor abortion both for the profit, Satanic value and for the fact that it lowers the birth rate. That’s especially true for whites.

          They are racists, through and through. It’s all a form of extreme Eugenics. They have no morals and their objections to sex aren’t based on that. They want to exterminate as many whites as possible.

          “Experimenting” when one is young is normal and healthy. It’s those attributes they can’t stand.

  7. I have done no real checking in order to confirm this, but I’ve seen other posts with similar materials.


    “Dr Christine Blasey-Ford (Maiden Name = Blasey)

    “You read that right! She Seeks/Mentors and Oversee’s a CIA College Training Program – who is looking for Future and Pre-Screens potential young CIA Agents. Dr Blasey-Ford main College position is a Psychiatric Professor – Yet she needed a “Therapist” to Remember a lost memory for 30 years? “Psychiatry” is one who learns to control one’s Minds, Thoughts and Mental Illnesses! Stanford just removed all photos/job titles since she went public to hide her “Deep State” involvement. A Previous Professor of this Psychatric position is linked to a MKULTRA mind control assassination in 1985, allegedly ordered by her very own CIA father, using this CIA Internship program.

    Dr Blasey-Ford has a Husband, Russell Ford, met at Stanford Univ, and were married in 2002. They have 3 young children. Russell Ford is the “Senior Director” at Zosano Pharma, and Exclusively Specializes in “Mind Altering” Drugs. Russell deleted his Facebook account, and removed his name from his Companies Website. Imagine that, he deals with Mind Altering drugs, and Christine is a CIA Internship recruiter for Stanford for CIA MKULTRA mind readjustments?

    Keep in mind her 4 (or 2) boys statement was in 2012 – but in 2018, it changed to 2 guys!? If she remembers Brett, surely she remembers the 2nd boy. What was she and her husband in “Therapy” for and what caused this – as an average 98% of families do not ever need such treatment. So we see their was documented “Mental Stress” upon her. Now – what affects did her Stanford CIA MKULTRA college position have on her Mental Illness? Was she CIA MKULTRA Mind Controlled then or now? But wait, their are still 1 or 2 more “Mind Altering” MKULTRA connections to this specific CIA Stanford position that will be exposed.” [More, and even MUCH more].

    • Some of it appears correct, other parts maybe not so much. Again, a person could do more investigation but, in the end, they would still arrive at the same conclusions vis a vis Kavanaugh.

      There is no question that she is CIA connected. That is enough in itself. I believe it has been established that “Deal” is her maternal grandfather, not her father’s assassination target. Deak was a former CIA director.

      The pharmaceutical interests naturally lead to MK-Ultra. She does not strike me as someone that is too tightly wrapped. Of course she could be a cunning agent, but I doubt it.

      As to the promiscuity, it wouldn’t surprise me but I’ve seen no validation of this claim. If its true, however, it would certainly throw some water on the current fire wouldn’t it?

      As Lana pointed out, anyone who grew up in this time frame would not think that fooling around or “groping” by teenagers was weird. I can attest to that. I cannot get over the adult leftists wringing their hands over this as if they’d never experienced anything like it. Maybe they haven’t. Probably to busy chasing farm animals.

    • Re: Question
      “What was she and her husband in “Therapy” for and what caused this – as an average 98% of families do not ever need such treatment.”

      Both of them were damaged by MK-Ultra Project Monarch programing very young. She met him at Stanford and his family background is as vile as hers. One of the things MK-Ultra victims are forbidden to us is Marijuana because it mucks up their programing. Alcohol, cocaine and other drugs are not discouraged as they do not disrupt neural pathways. More than likely, both were puffing behind their handlers back at sometime. MK-Ultra programing disrupts all sense of time which explains her time-line memory problems and disassociative personality disorder presented during testimony.
      When Mark Phillips rescued Cathy O’Brien the first thing he had her do was to wear a watch. She thought she was 24 and lost all those years when she was actually 30. Her 3 books and website are a must for all to comprehend the evils of mind control that’s been in existence before the Pharaohs then advanced during the Inquisition with torture and again WWII using drugs.

      The weaponized technology in use worldwide today is invisible. We are all targets. Knowledge is your only protection as Cathy O’Brien would often state during presentations/interviews. Dr. Katherine Horton, a particle physicist that previously worked at CERN is an excellent source of knowledge. She became targeted by MI5 in 2011 when she attended a High Court case in London.

  8. “Christine Ford Published 2008 Article on Self-Hypnosis Used to Retrieve and “Create Artificial Situations”

    “Christine Ford has not turned over her therapist’s notes to the Senate regarding her suppressed memories about Judge Kavanaugh abusing her decades earlier.

    This may be because if the memories were revealed through hypnosis they would be “absolutely inadmissible” in the court of law in many states, including New York and Maryland.

    There were also accusations that Christine Ford was under a hypnotic trance during her testimony.”

    • Indeed, the last I read she has not turned over those notes. She DID, however give some of these “private” notes to the Washington Post. I understand that the polygraph consisted of two questions, as well. In that way she can claim to have taken one.

      While I don’t rule out the possibility that she is masterful and clever, she doesn’t seem so. Her reactions and expressions do not match her answers or the situation. The overall impression is that there is something wrong with her.

      She is, at a minimum, very strange. The entire story of the “two doors” has got to be a fabrication. According to what I’ve read it is a rental property that they’ve never lived in. So why the concern? It certainly doesn’t look like the class of housing a couple like them would choose.

      Of course NOW she can afford as many doors as she likes. This is one of the problems with the fact that this is not a trial. We don’t get the benefit of discovery or the ability to cross examine her.

      I don’t understand all the references to her being “brave” etc.. If true, and I don’t believe it is, it would have happened thirty-six years ago. It isn’t even like she was raped, just groped. This is a certifiable exercise in leftist hysteria.

  9. Now they vandalize a Republican HQ and the MSM couldn’t care less:

  10. Ford is NOT a licensed CA Psychologist

    Testifying under oath before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Christine Blasey Ford identified herself as a ‘psychologist,’ but records indict this is a false statement under California law. Someone at Stanford University also appears to have caught the blunder and edited Ford’s faculty page.

  11. Pingback: Exposing the Kavanaugh hit job | Designs on the Truth

  12. It’s possible the Democrat plot against Kavanaugh was “in the wind” as early as 2017 or before. Thanks to Flanders’ earlier post, “MEET THE REAL CHRISTINE BLASEY FORD, NOT THE FAKE ONE PRESENTED BY THE DEMOCRATS”, it aligns with Maryland’s new sex abuse laws.

    Del. Kathleen Dumais, the vice chairwoman of the House Judiciary Committee, said the bills amounted to the most significant rewrite of the state’s sexual assault laws in her 15 years in the legislature. The Montgomery County Democrat attributed the easy passage in part to the influence of the freshman class of legislators elected in 2104. They are, she said, “a little less old-school.”
    April 18, 2017 – Maryland Gov. Hogan (R) signs bill giving sexual abuse victims longer to file suits. ( this was just one of 3 bills )

  13. Not sure if this was posted on one of the other companion links?

    TO: All Republican Senators
    FROM: Rachel Mitchell, Nominations Investigative Counsel United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary DATE: September 30, 2018 RE: Analysis of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s Allegations

  14. Is there a deeper purpose behind the blatant manner this is handled? I’m not convinced in the manner it is stated, but the article below does have some correct perspective on substantial parts of it.

    “It ought to be obvious even to the uninitiated that the Blaseygate scandal was completely avoidable, as well as quite deliberately engineered to make the Democrats look bad—REAL BAD! When an open letter to the C.I.A. is posted on the Internet about this transparent psyop, you know things are about to get very hairy indeed. See: An Open Letter to the C.I.A.

    Not only has Blaseygate exposed the sheer criminality and revolting corruption of the Democrat Party, it has revealed the inner workings of the now notorious Deep State. The American people are receiving an extraordinary crash course in how the Democrat Deep State routinely manipulates the electorate through sensationally levying false accusations against innocent victims. As a matter of fact, the DEMs do this every election cycle, but very few are aware that the preferred candidates are being character assassinated with liberal premeditation.
    The decision-maker perps at the very top of the pyramid have as their goal the imposition of a whole new set of legal standards. A new paradigm of “communist era justice” is likewise being rolled out.
    ◾For example, the accused citizen is now guilty until he or she proves themselves innocent.
    ◾Any woman who lodges an allegation of sexual crime is to be believed unquestioningly, without an iota of evidence.
    ◾The white male, in particular, is always culpable unless they can produce conclusive proof showing otherwise.

    These are just a few of the stunning reversals of generally accepted legal principles that are being implemented by extreme leftwing lawyers and ultra-liberal politicos nationwide. These and other intentional subversions of the very bedrock of the U.S. Criminal Justice System by cultural marxists are but a small piece of a much larger and nefarious agenda to destroy the American Republic. Cultural Marxism: The Secret Strategy Used To Carry Out An American ‘Bolshevik Revolution’

    With the unfolding of Blaseygate, the USA is truly witnessing a full-blown revolution being carried out by political bolsheviks. Unlike the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917, this one is being fought on the Internet.”

  15. “It ought to be obvious even to the uninitiated that the Blaseygate scandal was completely avoidable, as well as quite deliberately engineered to make the Democrats look bad—REAL BAD!”

    I haven’t read your link yet so maybe I have no right to comment, but the statement above is pure idiocy. Yes the whole thing could have been avoided, but repoops do not have Dem senators on puppet strings. They have managed to make themselves look stark raving mad all on their own solely due to their unbounded arrogance and hubris and insatiable just for power. It never ceases to amaze me how libs can claim the victim in any situation.

  16. Pingback: Beverly Ann Barnum, The Hounding of Judge Kavanaugh - James Fetzer

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.