Tag Archives: Terry Lakin

Retired CIA Agents Say Obama’s Birth Certificate is Fake

On June 13, 2011, on the Terry Lakin Action Fund radio show, retired Major General (and Fox News contributor) Paul Vallely confirmed what we already know.

Gen. Vallely said this: [beginning at the 5:35 mark]

“I’ve had retired CIA Agents and Investigators look at Obama’s birth certificate and 10 out of 10 say it is fraudulent.”

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTMv2XAUHP4&feature=player_embedded]

Vallely also said this, beginning at around the 13:55 mark,

“[Obama eligibility] is probably the biggest fraud perpetuated on the American people ever in our history, at the highest level of government…. Obama was not vetted properly…on his eligibility…his college records…Social Security…his background, his life…. I hold Congress responsible…[and] the states validating candidates….

There was an organization funded by one individual named George Soros who wanted to insure Barack Obama become chief executive of the United States and take this country down a different path, a socialist path….

All of those things we’ve said and observed prior to the [2008] election have now come true, but yet we have a Congress, we have a Supreme Court that will not take the tack…. I am sure the FBI did not investigate Barack Obama….”

H/t beloved fellow Tina.

~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

Obama Birth Certificate Press Appearance

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bnYJI4QTpXs]
[Note his rapid eye blinking. Note also he took no questions from the press.]
True to his nature, Obama is in full scapegoating mode.
He blames everyone but himself for what he calls “distractions” from the real issues and problems of our country.
Without explicitly identifying the birthers, he calls liars those U.S. citizens who only ask to see his original long-form birth certificate instead of an online image of a secondary document, the COLB. Obama calls us vulgar “carnival barkers” in “side shows” who “just make stuff up and pretend that facts are not facts”.
Obama, you are the carnival barker, the 3-ring circus master.
By refusing to produce your long-form birth crtificate for more than two years, you are responsible for the “distractions” and the “side shows”. And if is you who could have prevented the court martial, conviction and imprisonment of a righteous man, Bronze Star-recipient Army surgeon Dr. Terry Lakin, if you had produced the birth certificate sooner.
Shame on you!
~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

Birthers Receive Death Threats

As the Left-Dems-MSM exploit the Arizona shooting by scapegoating “right wing rhetoric” for sicko Jared Loughner’s mass murder, they conveniently overlook real death threats that have been made against those whom the complicit media deride as “birthers” — U.S. citizens who only want the truth of Obama’s birth eligibility for the presidency, as prescribed by the Constitution.
This blog recently was targeted with death threats by a commenter, James Spader, with a legion of successive aliases: Lets Kill Birthers, Birthers Are Traitors, Why Lie?, Want Truth?, and Truth Hurts.
On January 5, 2011, under his first alias “Lets Kill Birthers,” Spader posted the following comments to my post, Dems and Media Fear Civil War From Obama Eligibility:

Lets kill birthers | January 5, 2011 at 12:44 am
You are so full of shit. You birthers are fearful of us because you know we’ll kill each and every one of you for being traitors to the United States,. It’s you and only you who have threatened to overthrow the LEGALLY elected government. You are, thus, enemies of the state and I promise you YOU will pay for your crimes.
Lets kill birthers | January 5, 2011 at 12:55 am
You don’t worry us a damn bit you puke birthers. Only thing that concerns us is where to dispose of all your traitor bodies when we rid the universe of you.
Lets kill birthers | January 5, 2011 at 4:13 am
LMAO. You honestly think the “authorities” are going to come after me when it is YOU pieces of shit who are threatening to overthrow a LEGAL and perfectly constitutionally eligible government/president??? Seriously? The only people the “authorities” are arresting and throwing in jail is BIRTHERS!!! (Walter Fitzpatrick, Terry Lakin, Leo Haffey) to name just a few of the many birthers who have been jailed or imprisoned in the last couple years….. Seriously you inbred moron, you are treading on thin ice motherfucker. We are going to either JAIL or KILL the rest of you treasonous cockroaches before the next couple years are out.

 Lets kill birthers | January 5, 2011 at 4:24 am |
I hope to GOD they do forward my IP the the cops. I really do. I do this to call their attention to your treasonous websites. It’s YOU cockroaches who need to be investigated and imprisoned/executed.
Lets kill birthers | January 5, 2011 at 4:26 am
A BIG FUCK YOU to all you evil birthers! May you die and rot in hell you no good or nothing sacks of shit.

This vile commenter has used two IP addresses (24.113.150.252, 24.113.22.31), both from Port Angeles, Washington. On January 10, 2011, after I finally banned this individual, he sent me two enraged e-mails, calling me a “bitch,” “shit,” and to “go fuck yourself.” But his e-mails also revealed his real (?) name to be James Spader and his e-address to be spaderj35@yahoo.com.
H/t beloved fellow Tina for the WND article below.
~Eowyn

Header of hate mail sent to American Patriot Foundation


Brand-New Crosshairs, Death Threats Target Birthers, GOP
Media anti-eligibility rhetoric blamed for mail, phone threats
By Brian Fitzpatrick – WorldNetDaily – Jan 10, 2011
The American Patriot Foundation has received dozens of threatening phone message, e-mails and letters during “birther” Army officer Terrence Lakin’s legal proceedings the past few months, including two letters that view the words “GOP” and “Birthers” through a sniper scope.

An APF official claims the threats are inspired by media attacks on people who question President Barack Obama’s eligibility to serve in the White House, even as many media figures are attempting to blame the Tucson massacre on harsh rhetoric from Republicans and conservatives.
“I’ve been called a subversive and an enemy of the state, not to mention moron, insufferable little b-tch and a lot of other similar nasty comments,” APF’s Margaret Hemenway told WND. “I write a lot of them back to tell them that e-mail rage, like road rage, is neither healthy nor adult behavior and remind them it is the fundamental obligation of citizenship to support the U.S. Constitution.”
Lakin is the officer who refused to obey orders to compel the Army to put him on trial, in an effort to force President Obama to prove he is constitutionally eligible to serve as commander in chief of the U.S. military. APF was established to support Lakin’s legal defense during his Army court martial.
Hemenway sent the following letter, postmarked in Columbus, Ohio, to the U.S. Post Office authorities to be investigated because it contained a direct threat:

“This is to inform you that LTC Larkin (sic) is a F—— COWARD who should be put in front of a firing squad and shot. If I see his a– on the streets of Washington I will save the government the expense of a trial, I’ll dip a bullet in s— and shoot him in the head. This f— off deserves to die on the streets of America.”

Hemenway said a postal inspector told her the letter is “prosecutable,” but the inspector was not able to identify the sender during the investigation.
The incendiary rhetoric and threats aimed at “birthers” could be inspired by over-the-top rhetoric by some figures in the media, in Hemenway’s view. “I’m just sick of the vitriol and hate mongering of the liberal media, decrying ‘birthers’ as whack jobs, lunatics, fringe, etc. Their venom has encouraged this type of email, phone calls and letter threats,” Hemenway told WND.

Jeffrey Toobin


Hemenway cited CNN host Anderson Cooper and a guest on one of Cooper’s shows, commentator Jeffrey Toobin. “Toobin called us a ‘racist, freak, lunatic fringe’ on Cooper’s show,” said Hemenway, who added that Cooper himself has directed abusive language at people who question Obama’s eligibility. “You don’t think this encourages attacks against us? They deserve to be held accountable for their comments.”
The steady stream of invective directed at “eligibility activists” has received little media coverage, though numerous commentators have attempted to draw a connection between heated conservative rhetoric and the attempted assassination Saturday of Democratic U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords in Tucson, Ariz.
For example,Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik said during a press conference, “Let me say one thing, because people tend to pooh-pooh this business about all the vitriol that we hear inflaming the American public by people who make a living off of doing that. … That may be free speech, but it’s not without consequences.”
MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann quickly linked Dupnik’s remarks to former GOP vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin, pointing out that a Palin website identified 20 Democrat-held congressional districts, including Giffords’, as targets for the GOP in the November elections by putting crosshairs on them.
Ironically, the liberal website Daily Kos also put a bull’s-eye on Giffords’ district, targeting her for defeat in the 2010 primary for being a “blue-dog Democrat.”
In an article titled “Violence and politics merge,” Politico reported that some people may have a political interest in blaming conservatives like Sarah Palin and tea partiers for inspiring Arizona gunman Jared Lee Loughner. According to Politico, “One veteran Democratic operative, who blames overheated rhetoric for the shooting, said President Barack Obama should carefully but forcefully do what his predecessor did. ‘They need to deftly pin this on the tea partiers,’ said the Democrat. ‘Just like the Clinton White House deftly pinned the Oklahoma City bombing on the militia and anti-government people.'”
No links between Loughner and Palin, conservatives, Republicans or the tea party have surfaced since the shooting. A far different picture of Loughner is emerging: that he is a mentally deranged leftist who formerly volunteered for Giffords and the Democratic party. 
Two anonymous letters sent to APF from Richmond, Va. place “GOP” and “Birthers” in the crosshairs of a rifle scope alongside the exhortation “Load ’em Up!” These letters claim to be sent by a group called “Militant Association of Democrats,” which says “We are Second Amendment Democrats!” Each letter consists of a profanity-laced tirade directed at Republicans and eligibility activists….
Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

Marine Kid Shows What He Thinks of Obama

On Christmas Day, Obama and Michelle Antoinette dropped by a Marine Corps base in Honolulu during their Christmas dinner for a photo op.
One young boy greeted Obama by sticking his tongue out at the “commander-in-chief” while the two posed for a picture.

HaHaHaHaHa. Give the boy a medal!
This is how the First Lady was dressed, sans wig, for the occasion — she who cost taxpayers an extra $63,000 (at a minimum) because she refused to wait a couple of days to fly with Barack to Hawaii for their vacation.

[Source: Daily Mail]
For all of Obama’s faux concern for our military men and women, do not forget that this is the same man who let a Bronze Star-decorated U.S. Army surgeon, Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin, to be court martialed, sentenced to prison, and tossed out of the military–his reputation and career in tatters. All Obama had to do to stop the court martial from taking place is to produce his original long-form birth certificate.
If I were in his place, and I indeed was born in the United States as claimed, I would — in a heartbeat. Wouldn’t you?
A Daily Mail reader left this most interesting comment:

My son is a Marine stationed at Marine Corps Base Hawaii, where Obama is visiting. What’s not being reported is that His presence has made the gym and other facilities “off limits” to everyone else. If the Marines want to work out, the must now use the Navy gym on the other side of the island at Pearl Harbor! A two hour round trip drive, easily. This has been mandated just in case the president might want to shoot a few hoops.
So much for genuine concern for our guys returning from Afghanistan! All the Marines are to him is a convenient photo op. Bah. Humbug.
– Tigerized, Livermore, CA, USA, 26/12/2010 11:15

~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

Citizen's Video of LtCol Lakin's Court Martial

Though amateurish, this video is heartfelt. The videographer’s remarks about Day One of the trial are interesting. Sure looks like the jury members had their minds made up even before the trial.
This is an American tragedy.
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=24VYBgyE6iU&feature=player_embedded]
H/t beloved fellow May.
~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

Obama Eligibility Is Now a Conspiracy


A conspiracy is a secret agreement by two or more persons to perform an illegal, wrongful, or subversive act.
Somehow, conspiracy theories have become synonymous with kooky nutcases, sneered at by the MSM. But there are real conspiracies, for example, the assassination of Julius Caesar, the Dreyfus Affair, Nixon’s Watergate scandal, and the Iran-Contra Affair.
It is now incontrovertible that there is a massive conspiracy about Obama’s eligibility. Every branch and institution of our government is covering up for Obama.
First, it was the Democratic Party at both the state and national levels who looked the other way in 2008, choosing not to vett Obama’s birth documents to ensure he indeed is constitutionally eligible for the presidency. This was followed by the McCain campaign and the Republican Party acting like the eunuchs that they are in not questioning Obama’s eligibility.
Then, it was Congress that failed to screen his eligibility, using the lame excuse that no law requires them to do so, conveniently forgetting that the Constitution itself is the highest law of the land.

Next, the courts failed us. Beginning in 2008 even before Obama was elected president, American citizens brought one lawsuit after another challenging Obama’s constitutional eligibility. But judge after judge in state after state refused to even grant a hearing to the lawsuits, using the lame excuse that the litigants “lacked standing” and in so doing, effectively said that the constitutional eligibility of the President of the United States is not a matter of concern or interest for We the People.
Last Monday, November 29, 2010, the judicial branch of the American government completed its surrender to Obama when the Supreme Court denied the Kerchner v Obama’s petition for a writ of certiorari (translated into ordinary English: SCOTUS refused to review/hear the case). Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., the lead plaintiff, is a retired Commander of the US Naval Reserve.
Then there’s the United States Army. It, too, capitulated to the Mighty Obama when the top military brass decided to court martial decorated (Bronze Star) Army surgeon Lt. Col. Terry Lakin who defied his deployment orders on the grounds of the dubious constitutional eligibility and authority of the top of the command chain — his Commander In Chief. To complete the Army’s self-castration, the military judge in Lakin’s court martial, Denise Lind, refused to grant the defense’s discovery request of Obama’s concealed documents (original long-form birth certificate, kindergarten and college records…), thereby making impossible Lakin’s defense.
The latest government agency to join the Conspiracy of Silence and Coverup is the Social Security Administration.
Last May, private investigators discovered that not only are multiple social security numbers associated with Barack Obama (when we are all supposed to have only one number each), the social security number that Obama is presently using is one that’s set aside for residents of the state of Connecticut — a state in which Obama has never lived and with which he has no association. As I explained in my post of May 13, 2010, Obama Uses Dead Connecticuter’s Social Security Number“:

The first three (3) digits of a person’s social security number are determined by the ZIP code of the mailing address shown on the application for a social security number. (See Q. 18 of “Frequently Asked Questions” on the Social Security Administration’s website, HERE.) Connecticut’s SS numbers begin with 040, 041, 042, 043, 044, 045, 046, 047, 048, or 049. Obama’s SS number begins with 042.
The most plausible explanation is that Obama’s Connecticut SS number once belonged to a Connecticuter, born in 1890, who is now diseased. This means that Obama is using that number illicitly because the SS administration says a SS number is never re-issued or re-used. (See Q. 20 of “Frequently Asked Questions” on the Social Security Administration’s website, HERE.)
Furthermore, since Obama’s first job was in a Baskin-Robbins ice cream shop in Oahu, Hawaii, when he was 14 or 15, he would have obtained a SS number then as a Hawaii resident. Hawaii’s SS numbers begin with the prefix 575 or 576. This means that he has used at least TWO different SS numbers, which is against the law, because the law says a person can have only one SS number in a lifetime.

Now, the Social Security Administration is introducing a new policy in an attempt to conceal, obfuscate, and evade Obama’s curious Connecticut social security number. Jerome Corsi of WorldNetDaily reports on November 30, 2010: 

Without addressing questions regarding the apparent assignment of a Connecticut-based Social Security number to President Barack Obama, who reportedly spent his growing-up years in Hawaii and Indonesia, the federal agency now is moving quickly to make certain such questions never come up again about political figures.
The administration is starting down a path that is intended to randomize all future Social Security numbers – a move critics allege is designed to make it impossible to tell where any future Social Security number is issued.
In a notice currently published on the Social Security Administration website, the SSA announces Social Security numbers issued in the future will be randomized starting on or about June 25, 2011.
A spokeswoman in the Social Security press office confirmed to WND the plan is moving forward.
“In an effort to increase the number of Social Security numbers (SSNs) available for use by the Social Security Administration (SSA) and in order to help reduce identity theft, SSA plans to change the methodology by which SSNs are issued. In June 2011, we will begin to issue SSNs randomly, regardless of the address on the application. As a result, we will have the ability to continue to issue SSNs in all areas of the country for many more years without having to make additional changes,” said Trish Nicasio….
Ohio licensed private investigator Susan Daniels says the government policy change is an attempt to cover up in retrospect the controversy over Obama’s Social Security number by making it impossible in the future to trace where a Social Security applicant lived at the time the person applied for a Social Security number.
“Now all the Social Security Administration has to say is that they have been experimenting with randomized numbers for some time,” Daniels said. “How would anybody prove differently?”
She continued, “With Obama, there is obviously a case of fraud going on here. In 15 years of having a private investigator’s license in Ohio, I’ve never seen the Social Security Administration make a mistake of issuing a Connecticut Social Security number to a person who lived in Hawaii. There is no family connection that would appear to explain the anomaly.”

The White House has refused to answer queries about Obama’s social security number.
If Diogenes were alive today, he’d be consigned to an eternal and fruitless wandering in his search for just one honest man in the U.S. government. Sadly, there is none.
H/t beloved fellows Tina & FS.
~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

Wikipedia Took Down Entry on LtC Terry Lakin


Lt. Col. and Dr. Terrence (Terry) Lakin is a distinguished US Army surgeon and recipient of a Bronze Star who is undergoing court martial for refusing deployment orders on the grounds that his Commander in Chief (CIC) has not proven he is constitutionally eligibile to be CIC and President.
One would think that Dr. Lakin merits an entry in Wikipedia. And indeed, Wiki did have an entry on him; the URL for the entry is https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php\?title=Terrence_L._Lakin&oldid=396351151.
If you click the URL however, you won’t find the entry because Wikipedia has removed it, ostensibly because Lakin is not a noteworthy person. That is most curious because the same Wikipedia find three other Lakins sufficiently noteworthy to warrant each an entry. They are:

Have you ever heard of them, especially “American actress” Christine Lakin? Me neither!
H/t beloved fellow Tina.
~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

Judge In Lakin Court Martial Makes Defense Impossible


UPDATE #1: On Sept. 27, 2010, Lt. Col. Lakin’s defense counsel, Paul Rolf Jensen, filed a Writ of Mandamus and an application for a stay of proceedings on behalf of Lakin with the United States Army of Court of Criminal Appeals. Jensen’s petition asks the Court to (1) order military judge Denise Lind to vacate her order denying Lakin’s discovery requests; and (2) until the Court rules on Jensen’s petition that all proceedings will be stayed before the military judge. To read Jensen’s petition, CLICK HERE.
UPDATE #2: Dr. Lakin’s court martial, originally scheduled for Oct. 13-15, has been postponed to November 4, two days after the critical mid-term elections. One cannot help but wonder if the Army fears a verdict of guilty would cause even more Americans to vote against Obama and the Democrats.
+++
Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, the brave Army surgeon who is putting his liberty and career in jeopardy by questioning Obama’s constitutional legitimacy as Commander-in-Chief, is dealt another devastasting blow to his defense today.
Prior to today, military judge Col. Denise Lind already made Lakin’s defense daunting by ruling against the defense counsel’s request — as part of the discovery process — for Obama’s concealed documents, including his Honolulu kindergarten records and his long-form birth certificate. The reason for Lind’s ruling? — she does not want to “embarrass” the president.
Today, Judge Lind dealt another blow when she ruled against allowing Lakin’s attorneys to use motive and duty in their defense. This ruling effectively strips his attorneys from mounting ANY defense of Lakin, who has put his personal liberty, professional career and reputation at risk for a simple cause: he takes seriously the military officer’s oath of office that he “will support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” In other words, a U.S. military officer is duty bound to give his allegiance to the Constitution and not to the person who’s President.
Brain Fitzpatrick of WorldNetDaily reports, September 28, 2010:

The rulings came today from Col. Denise Lind, who, in effect, told Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin to pound sand. Rocks actually. He faces up to four years at hard labor if convicted in his case.
“We got absolutely slammed today,” said Paul R. Jensen, lead counsel for the defense. “It’s impossible for us to have a fair trial under these rulings. The judge did what she thought was right, but the result is to deprive us of any opportunity to have a defense.”
Lakin believes any order issued under Obama’s authority as commander in chief of the armed forces may not be valid because his eligibility to serve as president is unproven. After fruitlessly requesting the Army to verify Obama’s eligibility to serve as president, Lakin wrote directly to Obama asking for proof of eligibility. But without a response, Lakin decided it was his duty to refuse an order to deploy with his unit as part of Obama’s Afghanistan surge. As one of the defense briefs states, he “… [took] the distasteful route of inviting his own court martial.”
Note: A legal-defense fund has been set up for Lt. Col. Terry Lakin. Click for information.
In her decision, Lind, acting as judge in the case, censored the last remaining arguments Lakin planned to make in his defense: motive and duty. Lakin had intended to explain his motive for disobeying the order and contend that it was his duty as a good soldier to disobey orders that he believes to be illegal.
The defense also planned to call as witnesses Ambassador Alan Keyes and retired Air Force Lt. Gen. Thomas McInerney. Keyes was to explain the constitutional issues involved in the case, and McInerney was to talk about the training soldiers receive regarding when they should question and even disobey orders.
Lind was following up on her rulings from Sept. 2, when she rejected defense plans to introduce evidence concerning Obama’s eligibility. The defense also requested for Lakin’s defense documents referencing Obama’s birth records on file in Hawaii, but Lind refused to allow that either, noting that providing the documents might prove “embarrassing” to Obama.
“Our arms were cut off last time,” said Jensen. “Our legs are being cut off this time.”
In rejecting Lakin’s right to discovery of Obama birth documents, Lind joined a host of other judges – in civilian courts – who have refused to allow plaintiffs suing Obama to obtain his birth records. Jensen told WND he had hoped the court would permit Lakin to go to discovery, because Lakin is the defendant in a criminal case and has the right to mount a full defense.
In objecting to the participation of Keyes and McInerney and the presentation of Lakin’s planned arguments, the prosecution argued that all issues related to Obama’s eligibility, Lakin’s motives and the good soldier doctrine were “irrelevant.”
“We have to have the opportunity to present some defense!” Jensen countered.
Just before Lind recessed the hearing to prepare her decision, Jensen asked rhetorically whether the government intended to allow him to call any witnesses at all and thundered, “This is all we had left!”
Jensen’s pleas fell on deaf ears. Less than two hours after the court recessed following arguments, Lind returned to the bench to render a lengthy, detailed decision. Reading in a dry monotone, Lind reaffirmed her Sept. 2 decision and ruled out discussions of motive and duty.
Lind, with her rulings, effectively has restricted the scope of Lakin’s trial to what the government wanted: the simple questions of whether the officer had received orders to deploy to Afghanistan and whether he complied. Neither of these facts is in dispute.
But Jensen said the trial will not end the case. “We will look to appellate courts for justice. With these constraints it’s not possible here,” he said.

To read the rest of the WND article, CLICK HERE.
H/t beloved fellows Steve and Tina.
~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0