Tag Archives: Rush Limbaugh

SCOTUS says Obamacare is just a tax. Here's Obamacare's 21 Taxes!

“The chief justice of the United States Supreme Court, John Roberts, said [about Obamacare], ‘It is not our job to protect the people from the consequences of their political choices.’ Not our job…. So Obamacare is nothing more than the largest tax increase in the history of the world…. We have the biggest tax increase in the history of the world right in the middle of one of this country’s worst recessions. In fact, as the vice president said yesterday, a depression for millions of Americans.”Rush Limbaugh, June 28, 2012

The betrayers (l to r): Sonia Sotomayor, Stephen Breyer, John Roberts, Elena Kagan, Ruth Bader Ginsburg

The Supreme Court’s narrow 5-4 ruling on Obamacare effectively puts its seal of approval on the biggest tax increase in most Americans’ lifetime.
But as The Washington Times notes, on the campaign trail four years ago and since taking office, none other than Obama himself has said again and again that middle-class families will not see their taxes rise “a single dime” under his presidency.
The high court’s ruling leaves in place 21 tax increases in the health care law costing more than $675 billion over the next 10 years, according to the House Ways and Means Committee. Those 21 tax increases are:

  1. A 156% increase in the federal excise tax on tobacco
  2. Obamacare Individual Mandate Excise Tax
  3. Obamacare Employer Mandate Tax
  4. Obamacare Surtax on Investment Income
  5. Obamacare Excise Tax on Comprehensive Health Insurance Plans
  6. Obamacare Hike in Medicare Payroll Tax
  7. Obamacare Medicine Cabinet Tax
  8. Obamacare HSA Withdrawal Tax Hike
  9. Obamacare Flexible Spending Account Cap – aka “Special Needs Kids Tax”
  10. Obamacare Tax on Medical Device Manufacturers
  11. Obamacare “Haircut” for Medical Itemized Deduction from 7.5% to 10% of AGI
  12. Obamacare Tax on Indoor Tanning Services
  13. Obamacare elimination of tax deduction for employer-provided retirement Rx drug coverage in coordination with Medicare Part D
  14. Obamacare Blue Cross/Blue Shield Tax Hike
  15. Obamacare Excise Tax on Charitable Hospitals
  16. Obamacare Tax on Innovator Drug Companies
  17. Obamacare Tax on Health Insurers
  18. Obamacare $500,000 Annual Executive Compensation Limit for Health Insurance Executives
  19. Obamacare Employer Reporting of Insurance on W-2
  20. Obamacare “Black liquor” tax hike
  21. Obamacare Codification of the “economic substance doctrine”

For full details on each tax, go to Americans for Tax Reform.
Twelve of the Obamacare tax hikes will affect families earning less than $250,000 per year,including a “Cadillac tax” on high-cost insurance plans, a tax on insurance providers and an excise tax on medical-device manufacturers. According to the Congressional Budget Office & Joint Committee On Taxation, at least 75% of individual mandate penalties will fall on those making less than $250,000.
In addition, medical insurance providers are not fools. They will simply pass their Obamacare tax onto the insured, which means high-, middle-, and low-income Americans. All of which, of course, is a clear violation of Obama’s pledge that he would not increases the taxes of low- and middle-income taxpayers.
After the Supreme Court’s ruling yesterday, Obama gloated by twittering “Still a BFD.”
BFD is slang for “Big Fucking Deal.”
A President of the United States of America tweeted “Big Fucking Deal.”
Democrat strategists also are feeling emboldened that the Supreme Court under ostensibly conservative Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. has aided Obama’s agenda. Simon Rosenberg, president of NDN, a Democratic think tank in Washington, crowed: “The late decisions by the Supreme Court this summer leaves the GOP’s agenda in tatters. Their efforts to overturn two administration efforts — immigration and health care reform — have failed. Obama comes out of this week much stronger, the Republicans weaker. His first term will now be seen as consequential, their opposition feckless.”
Hold your horses, Mr. Rosenberg. Remember what the word “hubris” means in its Greek origin. The plain fact is that most Americans do not want Obamacare.
The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey of June 23-24 shows that 54% of Likely U.S. Voters favor repeal of Obamacare, while 39% are opposed. This includes 43% who Strongly Favor repeal and 28% who are Strongly Opposed to it.
Seth Masket, an associate professor of political science at the University of Denver, found in a study that 13 House Democrats lost their seats in 2010 as a result solely of voting for Obamacare.
The Supreme Court’s wrong-headed ruling already has mobilized conservatives. Already, presumptive GOP nominee Mitt Romney’s campaign has garnered donations of at least $4.2 million since the ruling. 
Now is the time for us to redouble our efforts. What our enemies want more than anything is for us to despair and become apathetic.

No one ever said being a democracy is easy.

I’m not giving up! Ever!
Join me!!!
~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:
error0
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20
 

Jon Stewart's Vagina Manger

Jon Stewart, whose birth name is Jonathan Leibowitz, is a non-religious Jew who said he was subjected to anti-Semitic bullying as a child. He describes himself in high school as “very into Eugene Debs and a bit of a leftist,” but says his political affiliation is “more socialist or independent” than Democratic. Eugene Debs was an American union leader and ran several times for the U.S. presidency as the candidate of the Socialist Party of America.
Nevertheless, Stewart insists he’s not liberal; nor is he a “partisan ideological activist.” He makes $15 million in salary a year; has an estimated net worth of $80 million; owns a duplex penthouse in lower Manhattan’s tony TriBeCa neighborhood, a water front home in the Bay Point area of Sag Harbor, New York and, his most recent purchase, a water front home in Red Bank, New Jersey. What a “socialist” that Jon Stewart is!
On April 16, 2012, on “The Daily Show” increasingly the source of news for young Americans Stewart ripped the Fox News Network for giving air to the “war on women” issue. He then ridiculed Fox’s “war on Christmas,” asking, “What can women do to generate the same sense of outrage from Fox as the removal of decorative slightly poisonous holiday plants? Perhaps they could play into the theme?”
At this point, Stewart showed a picture of a naked woman with her legs spread apart with a nativity scene ornament in between.

Imagine if Stewart had done that with an image of Mohammad.
Stewart said, “Maybe women could protect their reproductive organs from unwanted medical intrusions with vagina mangers.”
We heard ad nauseum about Rush Limbaugh’s “slut” remark about the unmarried Georgetown U. student Sandra Fluke who said the federal government taxpayers should pay for her contraceptives.
But did you hear about Stewart’s vagina manger?
No? Why is that?
Did you know that it was the Catholic League who went after Stewart for that blasphemous offensive “vagina manger” image, and insisted that the non-liberal [snark] Stewart apologize or the League would coordinate a boycott of businesses that air commercials on The Daily Show?
Well, Stewart did not apologize.
On May 7, 2012, it was reported that as a result of Catholic League’s campaign, Delta Airlines pulled its ads from The Daily Show.
Delta spokeswoman Leslie Parker said that “We are constantly evaluating our advertising strategy and at this time no longer advertise during The Daily Show,” but denied that the decision had anything to do with “any opinions expressed” by the show.
Yeah, right.
Catholic League’s pugnacious president, Bill Donohue, pledges in a press release to continue his campaign, with Kellogg’s as the next target: “All the top management at Kellogg’s will receive a color photo of a naked woman with her legs spread and a nativity scene ornament in between. Let’s see if that jars them. Over 700 photos have been sent to leaders in Battle Creek, Michigan.”

A Kellogg’s representative didn’t immediately comment on whether anyone at Kellogg’s had received the photos. A spokesperson for the Daily Show didn’t respond to an inquiry from BuzzFeed.

Founded in 1973, Catholic League is America’s largest Catholic civil rights organization. The League defends the right of Catholics – lay and clergy alike – to participate in American public life without defamation or discrimination. Motivated by the letter and the spirit of the First Amendment, the Catholic League works to safeguard both the religious freedom rights and the free speech rights of Catholics whenever and wherever they are threatened.
~Eowyn
Please follow and like us:
error0
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20
 

Prosecutor to charge Zimmerman for Trayvon shooting

Sari Horwitz reports for the Washington Post, April 11, 2012, that Florida special prosecutor Angela Corey plans to announce as early as this afternoon that she is charging neighborhood watch volunteer George Zimmerman in the shooting of Trayvon Martin, according to a law enforcement official close to the investigation.

Angela Corey


It was not immediately clear what charge Zimmerman will face.
Corey’s office released a statement saying it would hold a news conference “to release new information regarding the Trayvon Martin shooting death investigation” at 6 p.m. Wednesday in Jacksonville, Fla.

Trayvon Martin (l); George Zimmerman (r)

A day ago, Zimmerman’s attorneys had withdrawn from the case, citing their inability to contact Zimmerman. Lawyers Craig Sonner and Hal Uhrig expressed concern about Zimmerman’s emotional and physical well-being, saying he has taken actions without consulting them. They also said they do not know where Zimmerman is, but that he’s not in Florida.
But the lawyers said they stand by their assertions that Zimmerman acted in self-defense when he killed the 17-year-old, who was unarmed, but they acknowledged that they formed their impressions without meeting Zimmerman.
Meanwhile, moments before news came that the prosecutor will charge Zimmerman, Rush Limbaugh said Obama and officials in his administration are intentionally stoking racial chaos in America in connection with the Trayvon Martin case: “There’s no question that the White House wants this kind of chaos and unrest in the culture.”
~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:
error0
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20
 

Creeping tyranny…

LA council urges curbs on derogatory radio speech

FresnoBeeThe City Council called on TV and radio broadcasters Wednesday to keep their hosts from spouting crude slurs, citing Rush Limbaugh’s reference to a woman as a “slut” and a KFI show calling Whitney Houston a “crack ho.”
The council voted 13-2 for a resolution urging Los Angeles stations to do everything in their power to ensure that their on-air hosts do not use and promote racist and sexist slurs over public airwaves.  The resolution also states that it’s important for stations to hire more women and minorities.
The measure has no legal force and Councilman Richard Alarcon said its message would be “mild and weak” in comparison to the reach of radio. However, he and other council members argued that it was proper for the ethnically diverse city to speak out against what they called hate speechGovernment has no right to suppress “hateful, vile, despicable speech,” but society should not tolerate it, Councilman Paul Krekorian said. “We can drown out that hatred with a loud chorus.”
The measure was sponsored by three black council members and supported by civil rights and minority media groups. It was broadened after originally naming only KFI-AM and its owner, Clear Channel, which carries Limbaugh and owns hundreds of stations nationwide.  Clear Channel said it supported the spirit of the council action.  “Clear Channel Los Angeles and KFI support the spirit of the LA City Council resolution regarding the need for diversity of personnel, inclusionary programming, and appropriate on-air language across all media,” Clear Channel said in a statement.
At the council meeting, speakers said the focus was on conservative radio shows such as the one hosted by Limbaugh, accusing them of trading in crude stereotypes of blacks, women and Latinos.  “It’s ugly. It’s violent. They’re inciting others to violence,” said Alex Nogales, head of the National Hispanic Media Coalition.  The resolution specifically cites recent remarks by Limbaugh and KFI’s John Kobylt and Ken Chiampou.
Spare me this selective outrage.  Where were these people when “hateful, vile, despicable speech” was coming from these liberals on the radio and tv?

  • Keith Olbermann calls Michelle Malkin a lipstick meatbag
  • Bill Maher calls Sarah Palin a “dumb t*at”
  • Ed Schulz calls Laura Ingraham a right-wing slut
  • Sly Sylvester (talk show host) said “…I had heard at one point Rebecca Kleefisch (Republican Lieutenant Governor of Wisconsin) pulled a train, but that must have been a different story I was reading about.”
  • David Letterman calls Sarah Palin a slut
  • Keith Olbermann implied that female conservative commentator S. E. Cupp should never have been born
  • Jimmy Fallon’s drummer played “Bit*ch” song during Michele Bachmann’s appearance on his show (ABC called it “quite the trick”)
  • Cloris Leachman calls Sarah Palin a slut on the Wendy Williams show

And beyond that, since when did government believe it’s their role to monitor free speech?  Who gets to define “hateful”, “vile”, and “despicable”? Be very leery of any resolution that a government agency adopts concerning our First Amendment or any of our rights.  Because in this day and age it is nothing more than an attempt to silence you, especially if you are a conservative.
DCG

Please follow and like us:
error0
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20
 

Apparently "slut" is now a good thing…

 

The Sluts Unite Oath

  • I believe that sex represents more than just the creation of children.
  • I believe it is an enjoyable, healthy and a profound part of the human experience.
  • I also believe that the responsible use of birth control is an essential component of a mature, civilized society.
  • And if these beliefs make me a slut in some people’s eyes, then so be it.
  • I will stand united with my fellow sluts, now and always.

You can choose an avatar to show your support!
From the website:
Sluts Unite is a sex-positive movement that brings people together who believe in tolerance, acceptance and personal freedom. It is our goal to take what was intended to be a hateful, derogatory word and change it into something positive through the power of the collective.
At the bottom of their website, it is noted that this site is “A Sir Richard’s initiative“.  Sir Richard’s is a condom company. 
So while liberals rant and rave about Rush Limbaugh using the term slut, they now have a website devoted to using the word and spreading it on social websites.  And of course there is the “SlutWalk“.
So if conservatives use slut it is “hateful”. But if liberals use it themselves it is “empowerment”.  I hate to tell them they can’t have it both ways.  Pick a side and be consistent.
DCG

Please follow and like us:
error0
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20
 

Hanoi Jane and Fembot Steinem speak…

FCC should clear Limbaugh from airwaves

CNN: Ironically, the misogyny Rush Limbaugh spewed for three days over Sandra Fluke was not much worse than his regular broadcast of sexist, racist and homophobic hate speech:

These are just a few samples from the arsenal of degrading language Limbaugh deploys on women, people of color, lesbians and gays, immigrants, the disabled, the elderly, Muslims, Jews, veterans, environmentalists and so forth.

Limbaugh doesn’t just call people names. He promotes language that deliberately dehumanizes his targets. Like the sophisticated propagandist Josef Goebbels, he creates rhetorical frames — and the bigger the lie the more effective — inciting listeners to view people they disagree with as sub-humans. His longtime favorite term for women, “femi-nazi,” doesn’t even raise eyebrows anymore, an example of how rhetoric spreads when unchallenged by coarsened cultural norms.
 
At least this most recent incident has turned a spotlight back on the vile, damaging statements Limbaugh has been promulgating for years. His sponsors are dropping him; his stations have begun to follow suit. VoteVets, a coalition of Iraq and Afghanistan veterans, released a statement by female vets, including Katherine Scheirman, former chief of medical operations in the U.S. Air Forces, demanding that the American Forces Network drop Limbaugh from its programming.
 
They state, “Our entire military depends on troops respecting each other — women and men. There simply can be no place on military airwaves for sentiments that would undermine that respect.”

This isn’t political. While we disagree with Limbaugh’s politics, what’s at stake is the fallout of a society tolerating toxic, hate-inciting speech. For 20 years, Limbaugh has hidden behind the First Amendment, or else claimed he’s really “doing humor” or “entertainment.” He is indeed constitutionally entitled to his opinions, but he is not constitutionally entitled to the people’s airways.
Blah, blah, blah.  Read the rest here.
This is not political?  Did these women speak out about these comments?

  • Keith Olbermann calls Michelle Malkin a lipstick meatbag
  • Bill Maher calls Sarah Palin a “dumb t*at”
  • Ed Schulz calls Laura Ingraham a right-wing slut
  • Sandra Bernhard issues “gang rape” warning to Sarah Palin
  • Sly Sylvester (talk show host) said “…I had heard at one point Rebecca Kleefisch (Republican Lieutenant Governor of Wisconsin) pulled a train, but that must have been a different story I was reading about.”
  • David Letterman calls Sarah Palin a slut
  • Keith Olbermann implied that female conservative commentator S. E. Cupp should never have been born
  • Jimmy Fallon’s drummer played “Bit*ch” song during Michele Bachmann’s appearance on his show (ABC called it “quite the trick”)
  • Cloris Leachman calls Sarah Palin a slut on the Wendy Williams show

Like I said, double standards.  If it wasn’t for those, liberals wouldn’t have any standards at all.
DCG

Please follow and like us:
error0
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20
 

Rush just calls em as he sees em. This is rich. Epic Fail for Carbonite


In full disclosure  , I use Mozy, so screw carbonite and any others who follow. 😀
OK, we have a slut that has all kinds of sex and expects the Gov to pay for it.

I’m not judging her, hey what ever. The part about Gov paying is what irks me. So El Rushbo calls her a slut. He apologized and I wish he did not.

So some advertisers pull adds. Now funny part..  Carbonite pulls because, now get this.

“ultimately contribute to a more civilized public discourse”:

and now the rest of the story.. LOL———–

Investors flee Carbonite after Limbaugh announcement

On Saturday, Carbonite CEO David Friend released a statement on his company’s website declaring that Carbonite had decided to “withdraw” advertising from Rush Limbaugh’s radio show in the wake of his controversial remarks involving Georgetown Law student Sandra Fluke because it will “ultimately contribute to a more civilized public discourse”:
Even though Mr. Limbaugh has now issued an apology, we have nonetheless decided to withdraw our advertising from his show. We hope that our action, along with the other advertisers who have already withdrawn their ads, will ultimately contribute to a more civilized public discourse.
 
However, it hasn’t done much to contribute to his company’s stock price. Since the market opened on Monday through its close today,
Carbonite stock (NASDAQ:CARB) has plummeted nearly 12 percent, outpacing the drop of the NASDAQ index in that same time period by nine-and-a-half points. It was also one of the biggest decliners on the NASDAQ on Tuesday.
Can you say oop’s. Love it when a plan blows up in their little PC faces.
~Steve~                                                     H/T  Drudge

Please follow and like us:
error0
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20
 

As usual, liberals display their double standards…


You’ve most certainly heard of the controversy surrounding Rush Limbaugh and his comments about the college student professional “reproductive activist“.  In speaking of her statement regarding contraception (she her friend needs $3,000 to pay for it over three years), he called her a slut and a prostitute.   Rush has since apologized yet it’s not good enough for her
Liberals are going ballistic and calling for Rush to be taken off the air.  They have succeeded in having multiple advertisers withdraw from his show (for the time being).
George Soros’ strongarm Media Matters is all over this, including providing a daily posting of those who advertise on his program and those that have withdrawn.  Huffington Post is calling for a boycott.  The DNC has chimed in, of course, stating, “The attacks coming from the GOP on women’s health are way over the line — and very dangerous.”
There are even two petitions on the tax-funded Whitehouse website that people created.  One calls for the FCC to investigate Rush Limbaugh for making intimidating statements.  The other calls for Rush to be removed from Armed Forces Radio for his abusive, divisive, and insulting language.
Yet I have to wonder, why are these outlets so silent when it comes to trashing conservative women?  Here’s just a few examples:

  • Keith Olbermann calls Michelle Malkin a lipstick meatbag
  • Bill Maher calls Sarah Palin a “dumb t*at”
  • Ed Schulz calls Laura Ingraham a right-wing slut
  • Sandra Bernhard issues “gang rape” warning to Sarah Palin
  • Sly Sylvester (talk show host) said “…I had heard at one point Rebecca Kleefisch (Republican Lieutenant Governor of Wisconsin) pulled a train, but that must have been a different story I was reading about.”
  • David Letterman calls Sarah Palin a slut
  • Keith Olbermann implied that female conservative commentator S. E. Cupp should never have been born
  • Jimmy Fallon’s drummer played “Bit*ch” song during Michele Bachmann’s appearance on his show (ABC called it “quite the trick”)
  • Cloris Leachman calls Sarah Palin a slut on the Wendy Williams show

You get the idea…
Not once did I ever hear about Media Matters, Huffington Post, the DNC, or for that matter, President Obama, calling for these people to be boycotted and removed from the air/media for their abusive, divisive, and insulting language.
Double standards.  If it wasn’t for those, liberals wouldn’t have any standards at all.
DCG

Please follow and like us:
error0
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20
 

Sheriff Arpaio's Obama findings ignored by most media

On March 1, 2012, something extraordinary took place in America.
An elected county sheriff held a press conference to present the findings of a 6-month investigation into the murky background of a sitting U.S. president.

Sheriff Joe Arpaio at the March 1 press conference

The sheriff is Joe Arpaio of Arizona’s Maricopa County. He did not undertake the investigation at his own initiative but was formally asked to do so by 250 members of an Arizona Tea Party group. The investigation was conducted by an all-volunteer team, the Cold Posse, comprised of former law enforcement officers and lawyers with law enforcement experience. The posse interviewed dozens of witnesses, examined hundreds of documents, and took numerous sworn statements from witnesses around the world.
The investigators concluded that the online image of Obama’s purported long-form birth certificate and his Selective Service registration likely are forgeries. As lead investigator Mike Zullo put it:
“Absent the authentic Hawaii Department of Health 1961 birth records for Barack Obama, there is no other credible proof supporting the idea or belief that President Barack Obama was born in Hawaii, as he and the White House have consistently asserted. In fact, absent the authentication of Hawaii Department of Health 1961 birth records for Barack Obama, there is no other proof he was born anywhere within the United States.”
One would think that’s bombshell news that the media, whether they like it or not, would be sure to cover and report.
Not so.
As you can see from this pic taken at the press conference, media presence was sparse:

So did the media report on the press conference?
GiveUsLiberty tells us how the national media responded to the “planet’s biggest news story”:

  • Fox News TV – Silence
  • NBC – Silence
  • CBS – Silence
  • NYT – Silence

These media did cover the press conference:

CBS 5 KPHO, a CBS affiliate in Phoenix, AZ, did report on Arpaio’s press conference on the day of the conference:

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ikaajbOEWpk]
The mainstream media’s refusal to report on the press conference can be explained by American journalists being overwhelmingly liberal or Democrat, as evidenced by study after study since the 1981 ground-breaking study by Robert Lichter and Stanley Rothman which found that 81 percent of the journalists interviewed voted for the Democratic presidential candidate in every election between 1964 and 1976.
But the media’s liberal bias does not explain why the press conference is ignored by even the major non-liberal talk show hosts Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, and Glenn Beck.
I went onto conservative Rush Limbaugh‘s website and typed “Arpaio” in the Search bar. The most recent reference Rush made to Arpaio was on February 22, 2012 — more than a week before the press conference. In other words, Rush completely ignored Sheriff Arpaio’s press conference.
I also went searching for “Arpaio” on conservative Sean Hannity‘s website. Hannity’s most recent reference to Arpaio was on November 29, 2011.
I did the same thing on conservative Mark Levin‘s website. Levin’s most recent reference to Arpaio was on December 16, 2011.
In the case of libertarian Glenn Beck, he did something even worse than ignoring Arpaio’s press conference – Beck treated the sheriff’s investigation with derision, calling Obama’s eligibility a “ridiculous” issue. This is what Beck said on his radio show of March 2, 2012:

“Just when Obama was starting to run out of things to say about Republicans, Sheriff Joe Arpaio decides to come out and launch a big investigation into Barack Obama’s birth certificate. Why he decided to bring this ridiculous issue, one that only gives Obama an opportunity to call the right (justifiably so, in this case) ‘crazy’ – is beyond explanation. But, he’s doing it anyway.”

With friends like Beck, Limbaugh, Hannity, and Levin, who needs enemies? Americans who care about the integrity of the Constitution’s stipulation that only a “natural born citizen” can be the President of the United States of America truly are political orphans.

H/t beloved Anon and Tina.

~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:
error0
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20
 

With friends like McCain, who needs….

The day after the Iowa caucuses made Mitt Romney the GOP frontrunner by a razor-thin margin of 8 votes, that 2008 loser and RINO named John McCain — who recently gave Americans a new law that makes it legal for our government to indefinitely detain us without charge or trial — gave his coveted [snark, snark] endorsement to Romney.

McCain is the leader of the Republicans on the Senate Armed Services Committee that approved SB 1867, with its detention without trial of U.S. citizens (Sec. 1031). That bill was signed by Obama on the last day of 2011 and is now law, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.
Yours truly (and Rush Limbaugh too!) thought at the time that McCain isn’t doing Mitt any favor with his endorsement, but I never thought our cynicism would be proven right so quickly.
Yesterday, at a Mitt Romney campaign event in South Carolina, McCain said:

“I am confident, with the leadership and the backing of the American people, President Obama will turn this country around.” (see video here)


Rob Groce of the Charleston Democrat Examiner observes that McCain’s gaffe was:

A Freudian error of sorts, apparently, but don’t forget that these guys don’t exactly have a loving relationship. McCain’s verbal gaffe might just have been revenge.

In June 2008, before the general election, Romney more or less told media he thought Obama could do a better job than McCain in the White House. “I frankly don’t think that Sen. McCain, despite his service and his length of experience, that that’s going to be able to stand up to the message that Barack Obama has brought forward.”

And here’s what McCain thought about Mitt back in 2008!
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=IS33Hkgnls4]
~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:
error0
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20