Tag Archives: Ronald Reagan

How Democrats are like cows

You’ll find out at the end of this video! LOL

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mmwDaYpgFMU]
Gosh, I miss Reagan….

H/t beloved Wendy

~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

The Most Important Video – Charlotte Iserbyt Puts It All Together

Wow!  This one is a Must See!  Charlotte ties everything together; Agenda 21, regionalism, communism, federal takeover of private education and homeschooling, changing our entire way of life and system of government. 
THIS MUST GO VIRAL!
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rznyswK7Qec]
https://www.americandeception.com
https://www.deliberatedumbingdown.com

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

30 years ago – Reagan's Christmas address…

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UU0tuah-x7M&feature=share]
How I miss this man…
DCG

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Ron Paul Gets Vicious

Ronald Reagan says there’s an 11th Commandment for Republicans: “Thou shalt not speak ill of another Republican.”
On Friday, Dec. 16, 2011, appearing on NBC’s Tonight Show with Jay Leno, the nominally Republican (but really Libertarian) candidate Ron Paul was asked what he thought of his opponents with whom he’s competing to be the GOP presidential nominee.
Paul described Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich as, respectively, a former Massachusetts governor and former Speaker of the House.
Then, stripping off his genial avuncular mask, Paul turned vicious.
About Congresswoman Michele Bachmann, he had three words: “She hates Muslims.” About former U.S. Senator Rich Santorum, Paul had five words: “He hates gays and Muslims.”
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Y7hu469z7k]
So Ron Paul now can read what’s in another’s heart?
By the way, Ron Paul supporters like to tout their man as being a Constitutionalist. Do they know that Paul thinks it’s “irrelevant” whether Obama is constitutionally eligible to be President?
H/t FOTM’s beloved Sage_brush.
~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Cocky Obama says it doesn't matter who the GOP nominee is

Last night, on CBS’s “60 Minutes,” The Narcissist defiantly proclaimed “it doesn’t really matter” who the Republicans nominate against him.
The Narcissist told interviewer Steve Kroft he’s ready to take on either Newt Gingrich or Mitt Romney and asked voters to contrast his vision with that offered by the GOP nominee.
The Narcissist predicted a clear choice for the voters: “The core philosophy that they’re expressing is the same. And the contrast in visions between where I want to take the country and… where they say they want to take the country is going to be stark.”
[Source: National Journal]

For the first time, I agree with The Narcissist.
If there’ll even be an election next year, it will be a clear choice for the voters. It’s either four more years for The Narcissist to complete his total destruction of America, or voters can choose to turn this country away from the road of ruinage.
I have a message for liberals and Democrats:

More than two years ago, Obama said he wants “a new legal basis” for the preventive indefinite detention of Americans. And the ever-obliging Senate has done exactly that on December 1, by passing S. 1867. Is this what you want for yourself and your children?

Watching the six GOP candidates in last Saturday’s Iowa debate (Rick Santorum, Rick Perry, Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, Ron Paul, Michele Bachmann), I was impressed with the humanity of them all — what decent people they are, and how much they clearly love America.

All, excepting Newt, who impressed me as articulate but arrogant and someone who can turn nasty very quickly. That worries me because, if he becomes the GOP nominee, he will lose as American voters generally pick, for President, the “nicer” guy who has a better smile. It also doesn’t help that Newt is pudgy and paunchy. What can I say? — American voters are shallow.
Citing research by UCLA Professor Albert Mehrabian indicating that non-verbal communication — including a speaker’s smile — can be even more important than what is actually said, communications consultant Jon Kraushar maintains that the history of U.S. presidential elections shows that the winners are those whose smiles convey a positive message that inspires rather than irritates voters. Think Ronald Reagan’s “aw shucks” sunny disposition….
Having said that about Newt, my conclusion about last Saturday’s Iowa debate is that, hands down, any one of the six is light years better than the narcissistic squatter in the White House.
~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Charlotte Iserbyt's Video with PDF Transcript is Here!

Earlier this year Alex Jones sent a camera crew to Maine to meet with Charlotte Iserbyt, Senior Policy Advisor at the Dept of Education in the first Reagan administration.   When she saw what was going on in the belly of the beast, she blew the whistle.   
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ezTIYd5UFRY&feature=results_video&playnext=1&list=PL427FB957AF7ACEC0]
Transcript of Video: Charlotte Iserbyt- America’s Road to Ruin 
She has two websites with the pdf files of many of the documents mentioned in the video: 
https://www.deliberatedumbingdown.com/pages/pdf_downloads.html
https://www.americandeception.com/index.php?page=home
 This transcript is invaluable because it’s in searchable PDF format.  So much information is presented.   Pretty juicy!
Also from Charlotte regarding Agenda 21:
We are starting a project in Maine, a bumper sticker project, which will tell it like it is:  regionalism is communism, and we will have a small hammer and sickle after regionalism.  We hope other states will follow.  They can use other words if they wish, but always the word communism and the hammer and sickle.  I.E.,  Land use regulations are communism; sustainable development is communism; regionalism is communism;  reinventing government is communism; restructuring is communism; perestroika is communism. 
LTG

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Remember This Guy?

“Socialism only works

in two places:

Heaven,

where they don’t need it,

and Hell,

where they already have it.”

-Ronald Reagan
‘Here’s
my strategy on

the Cold War:

We win, they lose.’

– Ronald Reagan

“The
most terrifying words in the English language are:

I’m from the government

and I’m here to help.’

-Ronald Reagan


‘The trouble with our liberal
friends is not that they’re ignorant; it’s just that they know so much that isn’t so.’

-Ronald Reagan

‘Of the
four wars in my lifetime, none came about because the U.S. was too strong.

– Ronald Reagan

“I
have wondered at times about what the

Ten Commandments would have looked like if Moses had run them through the U.S.
Congress.”

-Ronald Reagan

“The
taxpayer:

That’s someone who
works
for the federal
government
but doesn’t have to take the civil service
examination.”

– Ronald Reagan

Government
is like a baby:

An alimentary canal with
a
big appetite at one end
and
no sense of
responsibility
at the other”

 Ronald Reagan
“The nearest thing

to eternal life

we will ever see on this earth

is a government program.”

– Ronald Reagan

“It has
been said that politics is the second oldest profession.

I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first.”

– Ronald Reagan

“Government’s
view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases:

If it moves, tax it.

If it keeps moving, regulate it.

And if it stops moving,

subsidize it.”

– Ronald Reagan

“Politics
is not a bad profession. If you succeed, there are many rewards; if you disgrace
yourself,
you can always write a
book.”

– Ronald Reagan

“No
arsenal, or no weapon in the arsenals of the world, is as formidable as the will and moral courage of free men and women.”

Ronald Reagan
“If we ever forget that we’re one nation under GOD, then we will be a nation gone under.”

– Ronald Reagan

But they say Reagan was stupid! The same people who keep telling us Obama is the smartest man in the world!

H/t beloved fellow Tina.

~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

MSNBC host’s ‘slut’ comment doesn’t go over well

Ahh, the oh so tolerant left. 😀
This post comes from Glenn Becks site.

What a Putz.


Two days ago on his radio show, MSNBC host Ed Schultz made some truly disgusting comments about conservative personality and author Laura Ingraham. Schultz issued an apology in the opening of his TV show last night, before announcing he was going to take a one week suspension. But was his apology genuine, or did it come across as insincere drivel?
To recap, on radio, Schultz said:
“And what do the Republicans thinking about? They’re not thinking about their next-door neighbor. They’re just thinking about how much this is going to cost. President Obama is going to be visiting Joplin, Mo., on Sunday but you know what they’re talking about, like this right-wing slut, what’s her name?, Laura Ingraham? Yeah, she’s a talk slut. You see, she was, back in the day, praising President Reagan when he was drinking a beer overseas. But now that Obama’s doing it, they’re working him over.”
Ingraham’s response to Schultz via her Facebook page was quite funny:
“Re. the crude comments made about me by Ed Schultz on his radio program. First, I was surprised to learn that Ed Schultz actually hosted a radio show. Is it only available online? Second, I have to get back to recording the audio edition of my new book ‘Of Thee I Zing.‘ Now I’m tempted to insert one additional zing–about men who preach civility but practice misogyny.”
And finally, he apologized last night on his TV show, saying:
For rest of story Pls go HERE.
https://www.glennbeck.com/2011/05/26/msnbc-hosts-slut-comment-doesnt-go-over-well/

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Gap Grows Larger Between American People & Ruling Class

The Founders believed in We, The People.


Last July, an article in American Spectator confirmed what many of us (68%) had long thought:

There is a Political Class in America comprised of both elected politicians and unelected cultural elites, who not only don’t care what most Americans think, they hold us in contempt.

The article, “America’s Ruling Class — And the Perils of Revolution,” by , a professor emeritus of international relations at Boston University, makes a compelling case that the real divide in America is not so much between liberals and conservatives as between the bipartisan political-cultural ruling class (the “regime class”) vs. the American people (whom Codevilla calls the “country class,” as in America, the country). Whereas the majority of the “country class” are religious (Christians) and patriotic, the bipartisan ruling “regime class” — stripped of their lip-service rhetoric — are irreligious; arrogant and contemptuous of the American people; and do not love America or the American people. These traits are all symptomatic of a terrible narcissism. [Read excerpts of Codevilla’s 16-page article HERE.]
Now, there is more evidence of a yawning gap between this preening Ruling Class and the majority of Americans:
On illegal immigration:

On public employee  GOVERNMENT unions:

On Obama’s Secretary of Homeland Security (and TSA crafter) Janet Napolitano:

On Muslims in America:

On the fading American Dream:

Rebellion Against the Elite:

~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Obama's SOTU Sells Same Old Snake Oil


Happy Talk
By Peter Hannaford – American Spectator – Jan 28, 2011 
If you closed your eyes during the State of the Union address (and you allowed for the difference in voices), much of it could have been the words of Ronald Reagan. Gone was Mr. Obama’s usually peevish tone, replaced by upbeat, can-do, let’s-win-the-future words and tone. 
The purpose of this was to charm independent voters. Apparently it did, according to early polls. His “favorable” rating went up. Will the charm extend to policies that promote real economic growth? Unless you ignore his lifelong training, education and actions in three public offices, don’t count on it. For him, the government is the only engine of growth and the only institution to be trusted.
Despite paeans to capitalism and individual freedom, his remarks, at the core, were for more government spending. He spoke, of making “investments” in education, infrastructure and that old chestnut, “green energy jobs.”
Investments require capital. The federal government does not have any capital. Anything it spends must be paid for in one of three ways: (1) taxes; (2) borrowing (China comes to mind as a lender) or (3) printing more money (which leads to inflation). Despite his insistence, the spending he has in mind cannot be called investments, though he will doubtless continue to describe it that way. It is, in fact, an extension of his reviled “stimulus” program. (Remember the “Shovel-ready” projects that he later admitted never existed?)
He called for a five-year “freeze” on discretionary domestic spending. This category affects only 16 percent of federal spending. His grand claim is to “save” $400 billion over 10 years. “Freezing” any spending saves exactly nothing. His “savings” are as illusory as those promised under Obamacare.
The day after the speech, the Congressional Budget Office released a new report projecting that the national debt would rise to nearly $15 trillion by the September close of the current fiscal year. The president was 80 percent of the way into his speech before he mentioned, in passing, the fact that we have a serious national debt problem. Interest on that debt soaks up 40 cents of every federal dollar spent (there’s China again).
He glossed over the two 800-pound gorillas in the room, Social Security and Medicare, which are rapidly moving toward bankruptcy. He used his familiar straw-man device. He said any reform must not touch benefits for those retired or especially vulnerable — as if anyone had done that. 
Ignored completely were the findings — many of them bracing — of his own Deficit Reduction Commission, as if it had never existed.
Obama may continue to add the gloss of happy talk to his stump speeches, but they will remain, like this one, speeches dedicated to selling ever bigger government solutions to problems which require less spending, debt reduction, pro-growth tax policies and smaller government.
Peter Hannaford was closely associated with the late President Ronald Reagan for a number of years.

Please follow and like us:
error0