Tag Archives: public health policy influence

Is the Coronavirus weaponized to use against Trump?

Ask yourself the following questions,

Question set A(Answer yes or no)

“Has the media ever lied to you?” “Would the media over sensationalize anything to fulfill their personal aspirations.?” ” Would the media weaponize the media and use it against Trump?”  “If so, have they done it in the past?”  “If so, and they were caught doing it, would they do it again?”

*Media meaning “Main Stream Media, proven untrustworthy, CNN, CBS, ABC, NBC, etc….whatever, Fake news,  HIJ, QRS…you get my point.”

Question set B(Answer yes or no)

” You catch someone on camera stealing from you.  They lie to you when you ask them about it.  Would you trust that person?”  “If given the opportunity, do think they will steal from you again?” “Would they lie to you again?” “Would you ever believe anything that person said about anything?”  “Because this person lies to you and cannot be trusted, would you continue to have that person in your life?”

Most of the people I know would end up with the same answer for each of the questions. The question “Because this person lies to you and cannot be trusted, would you continue to have that person in your life?” should be an easy no.  Most people don’t like to have people in their life that flat out lie and steal from them.  Keep in mind that I use the word “trust” loosely.  Obviously there are many different levels of trust for different people, situations, etc.

The point I’m trying to make is the media are nothing more than people.  People that lie as much,  if not more than that lying untrustworthy person you no longer want in your life.  There is no sane reason why any person should believe anything the media says or does.  Here’s the problem.  I’m not insane. You’re not insane.  So why do we watch it?  “Sometimes they lie, sometimes they don’t”. Nope, they’re always lying.  It has to be for “entertainment”.

That “entertainment” is destroying our country and it’s latest exploit seems to be the Coronavirus.

My research tells me that the Coironavirus is another bio weapon.  It also tells me that all is not what it seems.  Since I cannot provide my sources, consider that to be just  my opinion.

There are other “opinions” that are pretty much in alignment with what I have learned.  I believe there are some key points that should be reviewed.  The following was mentioned in the comments the other day.

 

William- “It is important to realize how infectious epidemics are created in the public mind by TPTB for their skeer value, as vectors of social control. The so-called coronavirus epidemic is the latest, following SARS, Zika, Bird flu, West Nile, etc., all of which were just background noise. And of course HIV/AIDS. My sense is that they have been experiments but sooner or later we’ll get the Big One and then we’ll have mandatory vaccines, quarantine internment camps, suspension of constitutional liberties. C-virus makes me uneasy, they are hyping it and it doesn’t seem to have characteristics of an infectious epidemic. They reported a huge spike in cases but this was due to diagnosing it on the basis of pneumonia with no lab tests for the “virus”, neglecting to mention that pneumonia is very common in China, accounting for 300 thousand deaths a year. Probably due to the appallingly bad air quality. So we see pictures of people wearing masks but they wear masks anyway. They did the same with AIDS ’93, changing the definition to include people with fewer than 200 T4 lymphocytes per mililiter (or microliter, I forget which) of blood in the presence of HIV. “Presence” being determined by antibody reactions to certain proteins, no “HIV” necessary. So the “HIV test” was a machine that went “ping”. This re-defintion arbitrarily doubled the number of AIDS cases overnight and by 1997 two-thirds of people diagnosed with AIDS weren’t even sick, the first time in history that a 100 percent fatal disease was diagnosed on the basis of “good health”. So they stopped publishing the figures, the little people don’t need to see this stuff anyway, they just get confused. And now Trump, in the SOTU, says we have to end the AIDS epidemic. But there is no AIDS epidemic and there never was. And now coronavirus. So yeah, I’m uneasy”

Myself- “Yes, I understand what you are saying. I think there is a good possibility that when things cool down with the corona virus there will be a push to try to pass mandatory vaccinations. Using the coronavirus, influenza to scare people into supporting the vaccinations. The highest estimate of influenza cases in the USA is 45 million illnesses.
That dates from 2010 to present. Highest estimate of deaths related to influenza would be close to 61,000.. They don’t tell people that a lot of those deaths are from other causes and not the influenza itself. Still, the amount of deaths is low considering the amount of people infected. So I’m thinking “scare tactic” to push an agenda. Makes me think about “Fun Vax”.
Thanks for the enlightenment on the whole HIV thing. Admittedly, HIV is not a topic I spend too much time on. I did take a class on it. But that was years ago when I saw things different than I do now.”

William- “Flu kills tens of thousands annually in this country, usually the very old, very young, and people with compromised immune function. And malaria kills a million people a year, year after year. So far the C-virus has killed 1500 people, or so we’re told. I don’t believe anything that comes out of China and I believe even less of what the MSM talking heads are spouting. But 1500 people is nothing, a statistical blip. TPTB use managed chaos as their MO and releasing a deadly pathogen into populations would be unpredictable and unmanageable. It’s far more effective for them to create a virtual epidemic/emergency as they did with HIV/AIDS. It’s utterly irrelevant as a public health issue, if they cut off funding for it it would disappear. Or “climate change”, they have taken normal stable climate and turned it into a crisis. At least in the minds of many many people. There’s a lot of stoopid in this land of ours. But all the infrastructure is ready, the quarantine camps ( I understand there is one in WA State that is being used to sequester Americans who have returned from China), the executive orders issued by GWB and Hussein that give absolute authority to the CDC, as well as the Model Emergency Health Powers Act (MEHPA) that is totalitarian in nature. So I hope things die down with corona. Most Americans aren’t really interested so it may be a dry run. I’m trying to convince myself of that anyway, so I can let go of it. Until the next one”

 

Now from Rush Limbaugh(Not in comments.  The following comes from Rush Limbaugh’s web page.)

“Overhyped Coronavirus weaponized against Trump”

RUSH: “Folks, this coronavirus thing, I want to try to put this in perspective for you. It looks like the coronavirus is being weaponized as yet another element to bring down Donald Trump. Now, I want to tell you the truth about the coronavirus. (interruption) You think I’m wrong about this? You think I’m missing it by saying that’s… (interruption) Yeah, I’m dead right on this. The coronavirus is the common cold, folks.

The Drive-By Media hype of this thing as a pandemic, as the Andromeda strain, as, “Oh, my God, if you get it, you’re dead.” Do you know what the — I think the survival rate is 98%. Ninety-eight percent of people get the coronavirus survive. It’s a respiratory system virus. It probably is a ChiCom laboratory experiment that is in the process of being weaponized. All superpower nations weaponize bioweapons. They experiment with them. The Russians, for example, have weaponized fentanyl. Now, fentanyl is also not what it is represented to be.

If you watch cop shows, then you probably… Stick with me on this. If you watch cop shows, you probably believe that just the dust from a package of fentanyl can kill you if you’re in the same room with it. Not true. Not true. Even the cheap kind of fentanyl coming from China that’s used to spike heroin… They use fentanyl ’cause it’s cheap. It gives a quick hit, doesn’t last very long, which is really cool if you’re trying to addict people.

But it doesn’t kill people the way it’s projected on TV. It can if you OD on it. But inhaling a little fentanyl dust is not going to cause you to lose consciousness and stop breathing as they depict on cop shows. It’s dangerous. Don’t misunderstand. But it isn’t the way it’s portrayed in popular criminal TV shows, cop shows, and so forth and so on. The coronavirus is the same. It’s really being hyped as a deadly Andromeda Strain or Ebola pandemic that, “Oh, my God, is going to wipe out the nation. It’s going to wipe out the population of the world.”

The stock market’s down like 900 points right now. The survival rate of this is 98%! You have to read very deeply to find that number, that 2% of the people get the coronavirus die. That’s less than the flu, folks. That is a far lower death statistic than any form of influenza, which is an annual thing that everybody gets shots for. There’s nothing unusual about the coronavirus. In fact, coronavirus is not something new. There are all kinds of viruses that have that name. Now, do not misunderstand. I’m not trying to get you to let your guard down.”

 

Maybe Rush reads FOTM.   Be sure to do your own research and please keep an eye out/on for that lying ……..  Personally, I think the MSM should go down for Treason.  There is a difference between Freedom of speech and what they are doing.   They are intentionally misleading Americans and trying to bring down POTUS.  They are trying to tank our economy. They are destroying America.  One lie at a time. The MSM have made themselves “the Enemy”.  A decision they made on their own.

To read, listen or watch the full story click here

Respectfully,

Deplorable Patriot

 

 

 

 

 

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0 0
 

No bias in this study? “1 in 16 women report their first experience with sexual intercourse was rape”

According to a study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association this week, for 1 in 16 women their first experience with sexual intercourse was a rape or under coercion.

The study is entitled, “Association Between Forced Sexual Initiation and Health Outcomes Among US Women.”

From the study summary:

Question: What is the prevalence of forced sexual initiation among women and girls in the United States and its association with reproductive, gynecologic, and general health outcomes?

Findings: In this cross-sectional, nationally representative study of 13,310 American women aged 18 to 44 years, 6.5% reported forced sexual initiation (mean age at forced sexual initiation, 15.6 years). Forced sexual initiation appeared to be associated with multiple adverse reproductive, gynecologic, and general health outcomes after adjustment for demographic confounders.

Meaning: These findings could help clinicians improve the medical care of women and girls and inform the development of public health policies aimed at reducing forced sexual initiation in the United States.

From the Abstract:

Importance: The #MeToo movement has highlighted how frequently women experience sexual violence. However, to date, no recent studies have assessed the prevalence of forced sex during girls’ and women’s first sexual encounter or its health consequences.

Objective: To estimate the prevalence of forced sexual initiation among US women and its association with subsequent reproductive, gynecologic, and general health outcomes.

Conclusions and Relevance: Forced sexual initiation in women appears to be common and associated with multiple adverse reproductive and general health outcomes. These findings highlight the possible need for public health measures and sociocultural changes to prevent sexual violence, particularly forced sexual initiation.

The authors of this study are the following:

Laura Hawks, MD: Department of Medicine, Cambridge Health Alliance, Cambridge Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Steffie Woolhandler, MD, MPH, Harvard Medical School; City University of New York, Hunter College, New York, New York.
David U. Himmelstein, MD, Harvard Medical School; City University of New York, Hunter College, New York, New York.

Let’s take a look at the Twitter accounts of these authors, shall we?

Laura Hawks/Twitter profile

Laura Hawks:

Retweet on May 15: “Thread alert! Hopping mad about dwindling abortion access? Welcome, we’ve been waiting for you. Here are some ways you can show up today in your state — please settle in for the long haul. We need you now, and we need you for the weeks, months, and years to come.”

Retweet on November 4, 2018: “@AndrewGillum and @staceyabrams are two candidates that are committed to ending mass incarceration. Before you vote find out where your candidate stands on criminal justice reform.”

Retweet on October 28, 2018: In America, white supremacists have killed more than a dozen minorities this week alone.”

Steffie Wooldhandler:

Her bio states the following: After several years of working in the movement against the Vietnam War, I sought a career that would allow me to continue my work for social change. I also loved math and science. Medicine was a career that allowed me to combine both my interests. Dr. Stephanie J. Woolhandler has advocated guaranteed access to health care for all members of society, including the Americans currently without medical insurance. In 1986 she helped found Physicians for a National Health Program, a not-for-profit organization for physicians, medical students, and other health care professionals who advocate a national health insurance program.

From Steffie’s Twitter bio: “Physician, Professor, Shadow secretary of DHHS @shadowingtrump”

Let’s go to @shadowingtrump and take a look at what that is all about, shall we?

From their Twitter bio: “21 progressive leaders unite in a one-stop site to debunk Trump daily & offer alternatives, agency-by-agency. Because truth trumps lies. Created by @markjgreen”

Recent @shadowingtrump tweets:

Trump’s hate is bad for your health. Rise in health uninsured may be linked to immigrants’ fears”

“With the failures of both his trade war and tax cuts, Trump’s reelect down to two arguments: “let’s see what happens”; “hate minorities & liberals.” He’s sinking.

“Doctors urge studies on how detention of border children is a willful health hazard.”

“Trump treats Gateway Pundit with infinitely more respect than the @nytimes—all historians will need to know about this abhorrent moment.”

David Himmelstein

David Himmelstein (from Wikipedia):

David U. Himmelstein is an American academic physician specializing in internal medicine. He is a distinguished professor of public health and health policy in the CUNY School of Public Health at Hunter College, an adjunct clinical professor at Albert Einstein College of Medicine, and a lecturer at Harvard Medical School. He is also the co-founder (with Steffie Woolhandler) of Physicians for a National Health Program, an organization advocating for single-payer healthcare in the United States.

I’ve never authored a research article yet I do have several questions regarding this study:

Given the political identity of the authors, was there a perceived bias in their study (questions and persuasion) to influence public health policies toward a desired outcome (single-payer healthcare)?

Is there a perceived bias in the authors’ (particularly Woolhandler) handling/framing of this study to influence “social change?”

Did the authors inquire about the background of these forced sexual initiation offenders and the resulting arrests in order to inform the development of criminal policies aimed at reducing forced sexual initiation in the United States?

And given the authors’ political identities, was there not some desired outcome to suggest that rape is common because Orange Man Bad (and the Justice Kavanaugh faux allegations)?

After all, the 2020 presidential election is just around the corner…

DCG

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0 0