Tag Archives: Project Veritas

D.C. police arrest Trump inauguration domestic terrorists

Mere days before President Trump’s inauguration, using hidden cameras, James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas captured video and audio evidence of a radical Left group plotting to disrupt and cause mayhem at the inauguration.

Members of DisruptJ20 were captured on video in Pizzagate’s Comet Ping Pong pizzeria discussing how they would disrupt the pro-Trump Deploraball on the night of January 19 at the National Press Building, Washington, DC, by releasing butyric acid stink-bombs into the ventilation system and setting off fire alarm sprinklers.

Those plans are outright terrorism and in violation of D.C. Code 22-3571.01(6) that carries a 5-year prison sentence:

“It shall be unlawful for anyone to willfully or knowingly, with the intent of intimidating or frightening people, causing panic or civil unrest….”

One of the terrorists, Luke Kuhn of the D.C. Anti-Fascist Coalition, was heard on the video threatening the D.C. government and the police:

“The message has to be, we do not recognize the city government either. If you try to close us down we will look for your house, we will burn it. We will physically fight the police if they try to steal one of our places. We will go to war and you will lose.”

For the video, see “Video evidence of the Left’s terrorist plans for Trump inauguration”.

Well, it looks like the D.C. police took the threats seriously by arresting three of the DisruptJ20 terrorists: Scott Ryan Charney (aka Scott Green), Colin Dunn and Luke Kuhn.

Scott Ryan Charney was the first to be arrested.

As reported by Andrea Noble of the Washington Times, Scott Charney was arrested on January 19, the night before the inauguration, for conspiracy to commit assault. Charney, 34, was one of the three men caught on Project Veritas’ camera.

Court documents indicate that police relied on the Project Veritas video, as well as emails sent between protest organizers, including emails sent by Charney to several individuals stating that he had conducted reconnaissance at the National Press Club, and believed his group “would be able to accomplish their objective ‘with no negative consequences for our side, nor any collateral damage.’”

Here’s the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department’s press release.

On February 15, Project Veritas tweeted that Luke Kuhn and Colin Dunn had also been arrested:

disruptj20-arrests1disruptj20-arrests2

Police should also look into Luke Kuhn’s pedophile activities, based on his writings that were unearthed by citizen journalists on Reddit.

inauguration-terrorists5

(1) On Sept. 22, 1997, Kuhn wrote in an essay titled “Ronald McDonald the child-molesting clown”:

“a burger loaded with E. Coli or Mad Cow disease will do a child far more damage than some seedy sexual encounter in the woods behind the school could ever dream of.”

(2) In an email on April 14, 1998, Kuhn wrote:

I have been a sexually-active bisexual since I was 12 years old…. Here in Montgomey County, MD, one of the things the Utopian Anarchist Party (a youth militia when you get right down to it) has been doing is running an underground railroad for runaways…. Keep up the good fight, for you are waging a holy war against the devils of psychiatry and minimum age laws…. I know one thing, if I had had parents who put me in a mental hospital for being Gay-or for being an anarchist, I would probably have burned them out for it.”

(3) On June 19, 1998, Kuhn wrote:

“I am writing in response to the lurid tales that have been circulating for the past week accusing the UAP [Utopian Anarchist Party] of running ‘child-pornography’ and other such commercial operations involving young people…. Yes, I did post a few articles to Boychat,which I found through a law-enforcement Web site. Why? What better place to post articles about the Mary Kay Latourneau case. Yes, I support the right of young people to CHOOSE to be sexually active if they so desire. As I stated in my original posts on the subject, I started having sex by my own choice when I was 12. My partner was 15 or 16. He asked first, but I kept going back for more-and never, ever regretted it.”

H/t PJMedia

~Eowyn

Advertisements

Video evidence of the Left’s terrorist plans for Trump inauguration

Using hidden cameras, Project Veritas has video and audio evidence of the radical Left’s plans to disrupt and cause mayhem at the Trump inaugural this Friday.

Members of one group, DC Anti-Fascist Coalition, are captured on video in the infamous Comet Ping Pong pizza restaurant discussing how they would force everyone to evacuate from the Deploraball on the night of January 19 at the National Press Building, Washington, DC, by releasing butyric acid stink-bombs into the ventilation system and setting off fire alarm sprinklers.

These plans, of course, are outright terrorism and in violation of D.C. Code 22-3571.01(6) that carries a 5-year prison sentence:

“It shall be unlawful for anyone to willfully or knowingly, with the intent of intimidating or frightening people, causing panic or civil unrest….”

Project Veritas has notified the FBI, Homeland Security and DC police of the terrorist plans.

Note: Butyric acid is an oily, colorless liquid that smells like human vomit, and tastes acrid, with a sweetish aftertaste similar to ether. Inhalation of butyric acid may result in soreness of throat, coughing, a burning sensation, and laboured breathing. Ingestion of the acid may result in abdominal pain, shock, and collapse. Physical exposure to the acid may result in pain, blistering and skin burns, while exposure to the eyes may result in pain, severe deep burns and loss of vision.

Here are the individuals plotting to commit terrorism at the Inauguration:

inauguration-terrorists2inauguration-terrorists5inauguration-terroristsinauguration-terrorists4

Below are the Leftist groups who are planning to disrupt Trump’s inauguration (Sources: MSN and Project Veritas):

  1. Americans Take Action
  2. Answer Coalition: an anti-war group that plans to demonstrate at two locations along the inaugural parade route down Pennsylvania Avenue — at the U.S. Navy Memorial and Freedom Plaza, a large plaza about six blocks from the White House.
  3. DC Anti-Fascist Coalition
  4. DisruptJ20: a coalition of groups that named themselves after the January 20th date of the inauguration. Planned activities include:
    • Attempt to shut down or cause delays at the security checkpoints going in to the inauguration ceremony.
    • A march that will begin at Columbus Circle, outside Union Station, then travel about a mile and a half to McPherson Square, a park about three blocks from the White House, where a rally is planned.
  5. Industrial Workers of the World
  6. Occupy Inauguration: plans to rally on the morning of Inauguration Day at Meridian Hill Park, about a mile and a half directly north of the White House. Speakers at the rally will include 2016 Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein. At 12:30 p.m. they plan to march from the park to McPherson Square, joining with DisruptJ20 demonstrators coming from Union Station.
  7. Progress Unity Fund
  8. Women’s March on Washington: 200,000 people are estimated to march on the day after Trump’s inauguration. Christopher Geldart, the District of Columbia’s homeland security director, said he expects the march to draw 100,000 people coming just by bus because 1,800 buses have registered to park in the city on Jan. 21.
  9. Workers World Party

See also “Caches of weapons found in D.C. 6 miles from where Trump will be inaugurated“.

~Eowyn

This is rich: Clinton News Network warns us about “fake news”

clinton-news-network

From the network that:

From CNN’s post: It’s time for a new rule on the web: Double, no, triple check before you share. Especially if it seems too good to be true.

Why? Look no further than Donald Trump’s Twitter account. Trump claimed Sunday morning that “Twitter, Google and Facebook are burying the FBI criminal investigation of Clinton.”

Not only was there no proof of this, but it was pretty easy to disprove. The FBI email inquiry was at the top of Google News; FBI director James Comey’s name was at the top of Facebook’s “trending” box; and Twitter’s “moments” section had a prominent story about the controversy. (I guess I’ll have to take their word for it. I don’t use Google nor Facebook. As for Twitter, well, just ask Jack.)

You can trust Facebook...

You can trust Facebook…

Nevertheless, Trump’s wrong-headed “burying” claim was his most popular tweet of the day. About 25,000 accounts retweeted it and almost 50,000 “liked” it, helping the falsehood spread far and wide.

The rise of social media has had many upsides, but one downside has been the spread of misinformation. Fake news has become a plague on the Web, especially on social networks like Facebook. As I said on Sunday’s “Reliable Sources” on CNN, unreliable sources about this election have become too numerous to count.

So that’s what I recommended a “triple check before you share” rule.

New web sites designed to trick and mislead people seem to pop up every single day. For their creators, the incentives are clear: more social shares mean more page views mean more ad dollars.

But the B.S. stories hurt the people who read and share them over and over again. Many of these fakes reinforce the views of conservative or liberal voters and insulate them from the truth. The stories prey on people who want to believe the worst about the opposition.

A recent BuzzFeed study of “hyperpartisan Facebook pages” found that these pages “are consistently feeding their millions of followers false or misleading information.” (There you have it. From the expert journalism of “BuzzFeed.”)

The less truthful the content, the more frequently it was shared — which does not bode well for the nation’s news literacy during a long, bitter election season. “Right-wing pages were more prone to sharing false or misleading information than left-wing pages,” the BuzzFeed reporting team said.

Judge Judy shakes head rolls eyes

On a few occasions, made-up or highly misleading stories have even snuck into Facebook’s “trending” box — a problem that the company says it is trying to address.

In a few cases, Trump aides and family members have themselves been duped by fake news stories, including a hoax version of ABC News with a story headlined “Donald Trump Protester Speaks Out: ‘I Was Paid $3,500 To Protest Trump’s Rally.'”

A close look at the web site reveals that it is not, in fact, the actual ABC News. But the site tricked Trump’s son Eric Trump in early October. “Finally, the truth comes out,” he tweeted, promoting a link to the bogus story.

As soon as I spoke about this on television on Sunday, CNN detractors filled my inbox with messages saying that CNN is the ultimate example of “fake news.”  But that’s a deliberate attempt to confuse the issue. Whatever faults CNN has, news organizations small and large try very hard to report the truth.

baby laughing

Fake news sites and Facebook feeds, on the other hand, traffic in misinformation. My sense is that there are three buckets of these sites:

#1, Hoax sites with totally made-up news headlines that try to trick you;

#2, Hyperpartisan sites that aren’t lying, per se, but are misleading, because they only share good news about your political party and bad news about the other party;

#3, “Hybrids” that purposely mix a little bit of fact and then a lot of fiction.

These sites aren’t going away, so it’s up to Internet users to spot fake news and avoid spreading it.  Fact-checking sites like Snopes can help — they are devoted to ferreting out hoaxes and tricks.

Josh Stearns from Democracy Fund

Josh Stearns from Democracy Fund

Josh Stearns, a longtime media activist who now works at Democracy Fund, said newsrooms also have a role to play.

“Fact checking has taken center stage in this election, but newsrooms need to go beyond fact checking politicians statements and help debunk viral misinformation too,” he told me. “At a time when trust in media is at an all time low, journalists should call out these fake news stories and help citizens tell fact from fiction.”

clinton-news-network2

Trump’s false claim about Google, Facebook and Twitter “burying” bad news about Clinton criticized what he called the “very dishonest media.” Ironically, he was using Twitter to blast Twitter.

Trump may have gotten the idea from an inaccurate Zero Hedge blog post alleging a “social media blackout.” The blog post contained false information. I asked the Trump campaign to provide a source for the wild claim, but no one has responded.

DCG

NY Assemblyman demands elections official resign for linking minorities to voter fraud

Demorats don’t like it when you call out their shenanigans…

voter fraud6

From NY Post: A Bronx lawmaker demanded the resignation of a city Board of Elections official for linking minorities to voter fraud.

Alan Schulkin

Alan Schulkin

Manhattan Board of Elections Commissioner Alan Schulkin was secretly recorded claiming Mayor de Blasio’s municipal ID program was contributing to “all kinds of fraud” while also endorsing a stricter voter ID program in New York to deter voter fraud.

During a discussion with an undercover videographer from the conservative group Project Veritas last December, Schulkin also said busloads of people in minority neighborhoods are taken from “poll site to poll site.”

When the undercover videotaper asked if this happened in Black and Hispanic neighborhoods, the commissioner answered, “Yeah . . . and Chinese, too,” according to the video tape. He also talked about how Muslims can hide their identify in burkas.

Luis Sepulveda

Luis Sepulveda

Bronx Assemblyman Luis Sepulveda said Schulkin said the comments make Schulkin unfit to be a Democratic representative on the elections board. “His comments about alleged voter fraud coming from Black, Latino Asian and Muslim communities reeks of racism and is factually incorrect,” said Sepulveda.

“There is minimal evidence of voter fraud. Schulkin’s comments were disgraceful and demonstrate that he is incompetent to serve as a Commissioner. Resign immediately!”

A spokesman for Mayor de Blasio also took strong exception to the commissioner’s comments. “These allegations are not only false, they’re racist. Voter fraud fear-mongering is a right-wing smokescreen designed to not only disenfranchise the poor and people of color, but thwart efforts to deliver sorely needed electoral reforms in New York and across country. New Yorkers deserve public officials who are committed to defending democracy, not undermining it,” said spokesman Austin Finan.

Finan shot down Schulkin’s claim that the municipal ID program is susceptible to fraud, saying there are appropriate safeguards. “Got my @IDNYC earlier this year. They didn’t just hand it over. Application and enrollment requirements were significant and appropriate,” he said.

Schulkin was appointed in 2014 with the support of Council Speaker Melissa Mark Viverito, and Manhattan Council members Corey Johnson, Margaret Chin, Mark Levine, and Ydanis Rodriguez, sources said.

Manhattan Democratic Party leader Keith Wright supported another candidate, but lost out in the power struggle with the Council leadership , sources said. “It’s very disturbing what I’ve been reading in the paper — if true,” Wright said of Schulkin. Mark Viverito issued a terse statement saying Schulkin’s comments are “uninformed opinions have no basis in fact.”

A City Hall official said Schulkin is not likely to be reappointed when his term is up at year’s end.

Schulkin addressed the controversy during a Board of Elections Committee meeting on Tuesday. He said he doesn’t have a racist bone in his body and claimed his secretly recorded videotaped comments were taken out of context.

Meanwhile, Republicans pounced on Schulkin remarks as reason to tackle voter fraud. “If there is evidence of voter fraud, we should hold a hearing on it. If a Board of Elections commissioner says we need a voter ID law, we should explore the idea and make recommendations to the state Legislature,” said City Councilman Joe Borelli (R-SI).

Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe said Schulkin should be treated as a hero for his candor, not fired. “This is a man who wants to do the right thing and stop criminal acts, but the powers he would face are so powerful, he sees no path forward. “ O’Keefe said.

DCG

Democrat voter fraud has already begun: Hillary supporter commits voter registration fraud in Las Vegas

In the State of Nevada as in other states, voter registration drives must follow state laws and rules.

ProjectVote.org’s 9-page document, Helping Voters Register Under Nevada Law, specifies that “Voter registration drives in Nevada have to follow certain state laws and rules”.

The State of Nevada’s Title 24, Chapter 295 (NRS 293.505) on “Appointment, powers and duties of field registrars; prohibited acts of field registrars, clerks, employees of voter registration agencies or persons assisting voters; penalty” specifies the following:

2. The county clerk shall appoint at least one registered voter to serve as a field registrar of voters who, except as otherwise provided in NRS 293.5055, shall register voters within the county for which the field registrar is appointed. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 1, a candidate for any office may not be appointed or serve as a field registrar. A field registrar serves at the pleasure of the county clerk and shall perform such duties as the county clerk may direct. The county clerk shall not knowingly appoint any person as a field registrar who has been convicted of a felony involving theft or fraud. The Secretary of State may bring an action against a county clerk to collect a civil penalty of not more than $5,000 for each person who is appointed as a field registrar in violation of this subsection. […]

10. A county clerk, field registrar, employee of a voter registration agency or person assisting a voter pursuant to subsection 13 of NRS 293.5235 shall not:

(a) Solicit a vote for or against a particular question or candidate;

(b) Speak to a voter on the subject of marking his or her ballot for or against a particular question or candidate; or

(c) Distribute any petition or other material concerning a candidate or question which will be on the ballot for the ensuing election, while registering an elector.

A violation of each these requirements is punishable as a Class E felony.

The video below shows a female field registrar in Las Vegas committing voter registration fraud by carrying anti-Trump literature and driving a car with a California license plate, raising doubt that she is a Nevada registered voter — in violation of NRS 293.505 subsections 2 and 10.

The woman (below), wearing the red Stanford University t-shirt and carrying a stack of “Stand Up to Trump” flyers, violated the State of Nevada’s NRS 293.505 subsections 2 and 10, and should be prosecuted as a Category E felon, “for which a court shall sentence a convicted person to imprisonment in the state prison for a minimum term of not less than 1 year and a maximum term of not more than 4 years. […] In addition to any other penalty, the court may impose a fine of not more than $5,000, unless a greater penalty is authorized or required by statute.”

Nevada field registrar carrying anti-Trump literature

The Horn News points out that this is not the first time the Clinton campaign has run into controversy in Nevada. In September 2015, Project Veritas‘ hidden camera captured Clinton campaign staff in Nevada not only skirting election law but mocking it. Christina Gupana, a Hillary campaign worker and Las Vegas attorney, advised her fellow campaign workers to “do whatever you can, whatever you can get away with just do it.”

Adam Paul Laxalt is the attorney general of State of Nevada, who oversees elections. Tell him about the clear voter registration fraud committed by the California woman in red by sending him this post. Here’s Laxalt’s contact info:

Office of the Attorney General
100 North Carson Street
Carson City, NV 89701
Telephone: 775-684-1100
Fax: 775-684-1108
Email: Click here or aginfo@ag.nv.gov

H/t FOTM‘s Glenn47 and maziel

~Eowyn

Thank you James O’Keefe

insane-academics

Score one more for Project Veritas

Published on Nov 3, 2015
Assistant Director of Equal Opportunity at Vassar College caught on hidden camera shredding constitution and “The Constitution is an oppressive document” says Carol Lasser, Professor of History-Oberlin College.

http://www.projectveritas.com


Well, there you have it from the horse’s mouth. Now we know how America became ignorant enough to elect President Lucifer twice.

Insane Academe: Catholic university in Florida eager to host ISIS student club

America’s colleges and universities are more than left-wing, they’ve gone stark raving mad.

In 2015 America, would a university allow a student club celebrating genocidal killers like Hitler and the Nazis? Would a U.S. university host a student club glorifying serial killers and mass murderers? Would a U.S. university approve a student club that glorifies chopping off people’s heads and raises funds for the murderers? Would that university actually funnel hundreds of dollars to support that student club?

Then, to top it off, would the university that does all that be a CATHOLIC university?

You think the thought of the above is outrageous? Think again.

James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas conducted a sting operation on Florida’s Barry University and uncovered just how utterly perverse the university is.

Here’s the account, O’Keefe Exposes Another University Sympathetic to ISIS,” March 29, 2015:

Award-winning journalist and New York Times’ best-selling author James O’Keefe released a second video in as many weeks today exposing university brass sympathetic to ISIS. Last week, O’Keefe released a video showing a dean at Cornell University advising a Project Veritas investigative journalist on how to start and fund a pro-ISIS club on campus.

Today’s video reveals several high-level officials and a professor at Barry University actually sanctioning a club with the stated purpose of sending material aid to ISIS. Barry University is a prestigious south Florida institution whose alumni include the current Prime Minister of Haiti and the current Attorney General of the Bahamas.

In O’Keefe’s latest video, several Barry University officials as well as a professor appear a little too eager to guide a Project Veritas investigative journalist through the process of forming a pro-ISIS club. Derek Bley, Coordinator for Leadership Development & Student Organizations, was fully aware that the proposed student group was being formed to aid ISIS and he expressed no ethical qualms whatsoever. Disturbingly, Bley’s only concern appeared to be the use of the acronym “ISIS” in the club’s name: “We’re not here to limit people and their clubs…  but I would recommend maybe coming up with one or two other possible names just in case this one does not get through.”

The Project Veritas journalist also had a discussion with Frederique Frage, Associate Director of International and Multicultural Programs, and Daisy Santiago, International & Multicultural Programs Coordinator, both of whom were incredibly supportive of the proposed mission of the pro-ISIS club, just not its name.

Frage and Santiago appeared to be concerned only with the club’s name in a joint meeting with the Project Veritas journalist. In the open office setting where the meeting took place, Frage said: “By all means we support any student wanting to start their own organization… the only thing, as far as the name, the thing is, because technically our country is at war with ISIS.” And Santiago opined: “We talked about maybe saying [Sympathetic Students] in support of in the Middle East… as opposed to [saying] ISIS.”

Note: In other words, Barry University official Frederique Frage fully recognizes that it is improper to host a pro-ISIS student club because doing so would be aiding and abetting an enemy of the United States. There’s a word for Frage and Barry University: Traitor.

In a truly shocking and incredible development, Professor Pawena Sirimangkala signed the necessary documentation to give the Project Veritas journalist everything she needed to start the pro-ISIS club (our journalist, of course, did not). Unbelievably, just prior to signing the documentation, our journalist told Professor Sirimangkala that the name of the club had been changed, but the mission of the club was going to remain the same. Incredulously, Professor Sirimangkala simply responded: “perfect, perfect… I’ll sign… I’m glad to do it.”

“It is disturbing to see our nation’s university system festooned with professors and administrators that are sympathetic to ISIS,” stated James O’Keefe, President of Project Veritas. “First, we saw this horrifying support at Cornell University and now we have numerous officials at Barry taking things even further. As demonstrated at Cornell and Barry, our nation’s university system is being overrun by those who subscribe to ivory-tower political correctness and that is truly dangerous to our nation and our nation’s students. It is time to stop looking the other way and address this very serious issue.”

Useful Idiots of Barry University

Founded in 1940, Barry University is a private, Catholic university in Miami, Florida. It has more than 4,000 students, a campus of 54 buildings, and 40,000 alumni.

Here’s contact info for the President of Barry University:

Sister Linda Bevilacqua

Sister Linda Bevilacqua, OP, PhD
E-mail: OfficeofthePresident@barry.edu
Phone: 305-899-3000 or 1-800-756-6000
Address: 11300 NE 2nd Avenue, Miami Shores, FL 33161-6695

 

 

 

H/t FOTM’s MomOfIV

See also:

UPDATE:

Barry University has issued a statement denying all this. Briefly, President/Sister Bevilaqua says in an official statement that:

  1. “Barry University does not and never will allow or authorize the formation of an ISIS-related humanitarian aid group on campus. There has been no formation of any such group at Barry University. No paper work requesting such an organization has ever been filed with the proper authorities at the University.”
  2. “The images and video released were edited and spliced to unfairly represent the university and staff being featured.”

Regarding #1: Well, of course, no such pro-ISIS group has actually been formed in Barry University! Project Veritas’ sting was about university officials being approached about the possible formation of such a student club, to which official after official applauded and provided advice, including a professor giving her signature to the (bogus) application. Can President Bevilaqua deny that?

Regarding #2: President Bevilaqua needs to show, not merely assert, just how Project Veritas had “edited and spliced” the images and video “to unfairly represent the university and staff.” Is the university denying that its officials Derek Bley and Frederique Frage said what they said to the undercover student? Is the university denying that Professor Pawena Sirimangkala had signed the undercover student’s application to form the pro-ISIS club? — all of which was captured on camera?

In short, I don’t buy Bevilaqua’s denial. Watch Project Veritas’ video for yourself!

~Éowyn