Tag Archives: Paul Ryan

John Boehner: Paul Ryan for president

Shut up Bonehead.
John Boehner cries again
Via NY Post: Former House Speaker John Boehner said Wednesday he’d support his successor, Paul Ryan, for president if Republicans can’t agree on a nominee at the party’s convention in July. “They all had a chance to win. None of them won. So I’m for none of the above. I’m for Paul Ryan to be our nominee,” Boehner said at the Futures Industry Association in Boca Raton, Fla. His remarks were reported by Politico.
Donald Trump has been the consistent GOP front-runner, but it’s unclear if he’ll amass the 1,237 delegates required to win the nomination on the first ballot.
Ryan, the Wisconsin congressman, served as Mitt Romney’s vice presidential running mate in 2012 and has endorsed Ohio Gov. John Kasich for president this year. During his speech, Boehner referred to the fourth GOP presidential candidate, Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, as “Lucifer.”
In an interview on CNBC Tuesday night, Ryan didn’t slam the door on the possibility of becoming the compromise GOP candidate. “People say, ‘What about the contested convention?’ I say, well, there are a lot of people running for president. We’ll see. Why knows?” Ryan said.
But by Wednesday morning, his office was shooting down the speculation. “The speaker is grateful for the support, but he is not interested. He will not accept a nomination and believes our nominee should be someone who ran this year,” said Ryan spokeswoman AshLee Strong.
DCG

Please follow and like us:
0
 

Democrats cut military pensions in favor of tax credits for illegals

Democrats coddle illegals
Michael Dorstewitz writes for BizPac Review, Jan. 11, 2014:
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., blocked a last-ditch effort by Republicans Thursday to restore full military pensions. Their proposal would have been paid for by denying tax credits to undocumented immigrants.
Pensions to retired and disabled veterans were cut last month in a budget compromise hammered out by Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wa., and Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wisc., according to the Washington Free Beacon.

Sen Kelly Ayotte

Sen Kelly Ayotte


Sen. Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H., attempted to restore the pensions in the form of an amendment to a bill to extend long-term unemployment benefits. It would have been financed by requiring anyone claiming the Child Tax Credit to have a valid Social Security number, effectively denying the credits to illegal immigrants.
The Free Beacon reported:

Ayotte’s office said the bill would save approximately $20 billion over 10 years.
According to the Treasury Inspector General for the Tax Administration (TIGTA), the refund provides incentives for aliens to enter the country illegally and cost taxpayers $4.2 billion alone in fraudulent payments in 2010.

“The investigations of this tax refund found that they were claiming it for people who were, No.1, not authorized to work in this country, and secondly, for children that may not even exist,” Ayotte said in a floor speech.
Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., called Ayotte’s efforts to require undocumented immigrants to present valid Social Security numbers — referred to as SSNs — nothing more than “partisan” politics.
“Talk about fiddling while Rome burns,” Boxer said, according to the Free Beacon. “If you are one of the 1.3 million people in this country—222,000 in my state—whose house is burning down because they’re going to lose the safety net of $300 a week to feed their families, to take care of their kids, to heat their homes, and my colleague talks about letters [SSN]?”
Ayotte’s amendment failed by a 42-54 vote, with Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.V., the single Democrat voting with the GOP.
“It’s a sad day when a common-sense amendment to responsibly pay for legislation that helps struggling Americans, repeals unfair military retirement benefits and reduces the deficit can’t even get a vote in the Senate,” Ayotte said in a statement, the Free Beacon reported. “We need to be able to have votes on behalf of our states, on behalf of the American people, and if we disagree, let’s vote them down. I don’t see what the issue is there, unless you’re worried that it’s going to pass because it just makes too much sense.”
H/t FOTM’s Wild Bill Alaska
~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:
0
 

The Queen's Riddle?

get-attachment (13)

“Your Majesty, how do you run such an efficient government?

Are there any tips you can give me?”

“Well,” said the Queen,

get-attachment (1)

“The most important thing is to surround yourself with intelligent people.”

Obama frowned, and then asked,

get-attachment (2)

“But how do I know if the people around me are really intelligent?”

The Queen took a sip of champagne.

“Oh, that’s easy; you just ask them to answer an intelligent riddle, watch”
The Queen pushed a button on her intercom.
“Please send Tony Blair in here, would you?”
Tony Blair walked into the room and said,

Yes, your Majesty?”

get-attachment (4)

The Queen smiled and said,

Answer me this please Tony.

Your mother and father have a child.
It is not your brother and it is not your sister.
Who is it?”

Without pausing for a moment, Tony Blair answered

“That would be me.”

“Yes! Very good.” said the Queen.

get-attachment (7)

Obama went back home to ask Joe Biden the same question.

“Joe, answer this for me.”

“Your mother and your father have a child.
It’s not your brother and it’s not your sister.
Who is it?”

“I’m not sure,” said Biden.

get-attachment (8)

“Let me get back to you on that one.”
He went to his advisors and asked everyone, but none could give him an answer.

Frustrated, Biden went to work in congressional gym and saw Paul Ryan there.

get-attachment (9)

Biden went up to him and asked, “Hey Paul, see if you can answer this question.”

“Shoot Joe.”
Your mother and father have a child and it’s not your brother or your sister.

Who is it?”

Paul Ryan answered,

“That’s easy, it’s me!”

get-attachment (11)

Biden smiled, and said, “Good answer Paul!”

Biden then, went back to speak with President Obama.

“Say, I did some research and I have the answer to that riddle.”

“It’s Paul Ryan!”

Obama got up, stomped over to Biden, and angrily yelled into his face,

get-attachment (12)

“No! You idiot! It’s Tony Blair!”

..AND THAT MY FRIENDS IS PRECISELY WHAT’S GOING ON AT THE WHITE HOUSE.

~Steve~          A Great Big Giant H/T To My Bud I_Man

 

Please follow and like us:
0
 

Fiscal Cliff deal: The good, bad, and ugly


Last night, Jan. 1, 2013, at 10:45 pm, the U.S. House of Representatives approved a deal to avert the fiscal cliff, by a final vote of 257 to 167.
The House vote came less than 24 hours after the Senate had overwhelmingly approved the bill 89 to 8, with both parties’ support. The bill now goes to the POS for his signature. Instead of signing the bill, he’s already left D.C. to resume his vacation in Honolulu which was so rudely interrupted by the fiscal cliff negotiations. [snark]

The Fiscal Cliff deal:

  • The top tax rate increases from 35% to 40% on annual income over $450,000 for married couples and $400,000 for single people. This is the first time in more than two decades that a broad tax increase has been approved with GOP support.
  • “Temporary” Bush tax cuts for couples making less than $450,000 and individuals making less than $400,000 per year are made “permanent” (which means “until Congress changes their mind”).
  • More than 100 million “middle class” families (those earning less than $250,000 a year) will be protected from significant income tax increases set to take effect this month, but their payroll taxes will rise with the expiration of a temporary tax cut adopted two years ago.
  • No estate taxes on inheritance of $5 million, or $10 million for married couples.
  • Federal dairy policies will be extended through September, averting a threatened doubling of milk prices.
  • Extension of unemployment benefits to 2 million people for another year.
  • Automatic cuts to the Pentagon and other agencies that had been set to take effect today will be delayed for two months.
  • Pay raise for members of Congress, which was effectuated by Obama’s executive order, is nixed.
  • Automatic spending cuts (sequestration) from last year’s debt ceiling deal are postponed until March 2013, which means — oh joy — there’ll be a Fiscal Cliff II next month!

The Bad:

Buried in the fine print of the 150-page deal are some New Year’s gifts to some of Washington’s favorite cronies. Under the plan, the federal government would eat nearly $100 billion in forgone tax revenue over the next two years by extending special tax credits for select businesses that had been set to expire:

  • $430 million for Hollywood through “special expensing rules” to encourage TV and film production in the United States. Producers can “expense” up to $15 million of costs for their projects. All this for a film industry that enjoyed a record box office last year.
  • $331 million for railroads by allowing short-line and regional operators to claim a tax credit up to 50% of the cost to maintain tracks that they own or lease.
  • $222 million for Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands through returned excise taxes collected by the federal government on rum produced in the islands and imported to the mainland.
  • $70 million for NASCAR by extending a “7-year cost recovery period for certain motorsports racing track facilities.”
  • $59 million for algae growers through tax credits to encourage production of “cellulosic biofuel” at up to $1.01 per gallon.
  • $4 million for electric motorcycle makers by expanding an existing green-energy tax credit for buyers of plug-in vehicles to include electric motorbikes.

The Absurd:

  • This is how farcical the fiscal cliff brouhaha was: Members of the U.S. Senate had only 3 minutes to read the 154-page fiscal cliff bill and budget score, before they voted 89-8 to approve the bill. Senators received the bill at approximately 1:36 AM on Jan. 1, 2013 – a mere three minutes before they voted to approve it at 1:39 AM. I’ve taken longer to read the instructions for my new cell phone.
  • House Republicans also violated their pledge to allow three days for the public to read the legislation before they would vote on a bill. This was a promise the GOP made to voters before the 2010 elections.

The Ugly:

151 Republicans in the House voted “no,” which meant the GOP tally fell far short of a majority of the GOP caucus. That broke a long-standing preference by House Speaker John Boehner to advance only bills that could draw the support of a majority of his Republican members. So Boehner himself cast a rare vote: He supported the bill. So did Rep. Paul Ryan (Wis.), the GOP’s vice-presidential candidate last year.
40 House Republicans voted for the bill, including such GOP leaders on tax-and-spending policy as Sen. Patrick J. Toomey (Pa.) and Ronald H. Johnson (Wis.), a tea party star.

The Good:

  • Senate Republicans who voted against the bill include tea party favorites Rand Paul (Ky.) and Mike Lee (Utah), as well as Marco Rubio (Fla).
  • House Republicans who voted no include Majority Leader Eric Cantor (Va.) and Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy (Calif.).

The Really Bad:

Regardless of one’s political affiliation or beliefs, from an economic and fiscal perspective, the cliff deal has accomplished nothing. Here’s why:

  • The bill’s proposed spending cuts of $15 billion are less than 2% of the federal government’s deficit.
  • The bill’s tax increases will raise $620 billion over the next ten years — roughly $62 billion in new tax revenue per year.
  • $62 billion in new tax revenue per year is less than 6% of the $1+ trillion deficit the Obama regime has incurred every year for the past four years.
  • According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, the fiscal cliff bill will cause the national debt to be $4 trillion higher by 2022 than if all of the cliff’s tax increases and spending cuts had been allowed to take effect.

Sources: CNN, Washington Post, ABC News, CNS News.
~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:
0
 

Hitler Says “Cancel the Champagne”

Please follow and like us:
0
 

What Obama really said in that big speech last Thursday

Like many of you, I cannot bring myself to watch and listen to The Fraudulent One’s speeches, finding his visage and voice so deeply repellent.
Going back to the 2008 campaign season, I’d already noticed those eyes — dark pools of malice:

Since then, it’d only gotten worse….

Thank God we no longer have to douse ourselves with holy water before we watch Skippy speak. We have a translator service!
Here’s what The Evil One said in his epic speech on the budget deficit last Thursday — the one where he invited Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., to sit in the front row and then proceeded to berate the Congressman and his budget-cutting plan.

H/t FOTM’s beloved Hardnox!
~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:
0
 

Let the GOP Know Who’s Your Choice for 2012

No RINOs !!!!!!!!!!!

Let the Republican Party know whom you want to run for the presidency in 2012. Vote in this poll.

It’s a quick poll, with 10-11 questions.

One of the potential candidates about whom I know very little is Minnesota governor Tim Pawlenty, who recently announced his candidacy to be the GOP’s 2012 presidential nominee. So I looked him up on Wikipedia. You, too, can find out more about Pawlenty by going HERE.

Pawlenty’s strong suit (in contrast to Herman Cain and Allen West) is that he has executive experience, being in his second term as governor. He also appears to be a social and fiscal conservative. In the end, however, I decided against him because of two main reasons:

  1. Pawlenty was so much a RINO John McCain supporter that he served as a national cochair of McCain’s presidential exploratory committee in 2007, which led to Pawlenty becoming cochairman of McCain’s presidential campaign in 2008.
  2. A 2011 white paper by the Club for Growth, analyzing Pawlenty as a presidential candidate, found his political stance difficult to identify. The group praised him for reduced growth in spending and taxation, but found that he “has some simply inexcusable tax hikes in his record” and questioned his support of proposals such as “mandatory vegetable oil in gasoline, cap and trade, and a statewide smoking ban.” Chris Edwards, a director at the libertarian thinktank, Cato Institute, speculated that Pawlenty’s rightward tack in his second term was related to his impending presidential run.

Go vote for your choice to be the GOP’s nominee in 2012! CLICK HERE.

Do it now, because the poll ends on Wednesday, June 15, 2011.

H/t beloved fellow Tina.

~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:
0
 

Yet Another Reason Newt is Toast


I don’t know why Newt Gingrich even thinks he has the remotest chance of winning a GOP presidential primary, even less of becoming President. It must be his grandiose narcissism that distorts his reality assessment.
In case you need one more reason to not vote for Newt Gingrich, here’s Reason No. xxx:

Gingrich — who urges fiscal discipline for America — owes as much as $500,000 to Tiffany’s. [Source]

If, God forbid, I were Newt’s wife (no. 3), I’d check my jewelry box ’cause I doubt those Tiffany’s baubles went all to her. This is Wife No. 3 with whom Newt carried on an extramarital affair while he was still married to Wife No. 2, whom he cold-heartedly informed he wanted a divorce while she was in her hospital bed.
None of this really matters because a Zogby Poll of May 24, 2011 showed that support for the Newt had sunk to near-zero among Republican voters. That’s a steep fall because only 3 weeks ago a state-by-state opinion poll had Gingrich in the 30s and 40s when placed in a hypothetical contest against Barack Obama.
As Marjorie Haun of Technorati.com puts it, despite Gingrich’s extramarital affair and a likability deficit, it was not until he broke Ronald Reagan’s 11th Commandment, “Thou shalt not speak ill of any fellow Republican” — belittling Congressman Paul Ryan’s “Path to Prosperity” budget plan as “Right-wing social engineering” — that he spiraled into popular oblivion.
I hope he stays there.
~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:
0
 

More Theatrics From The Left


From The Agenda Project, whose goal is “to build a powerful, intelligent, well-connected political movement capable of identifying and advancing rational, effective ideas in the public debate and in so doing to ensure our country’s enduring success”, comes this video that is anything but rational.
They attack Rep. Paul Ryan‘s idea to overhaul Medicare.  In doing so, they show “Paul Ryan” pushing “grandma” in a wheelchair off a cliff and into a river.  A bit theatrical, don’t you think?
Ryan’s plan would overhaul Medicare and Medicaid. His budget, which has already been approved by the House, would turn Medicare into a voucher program for Americans under 55, or what Ryan calls a “premium-support model.”
At the end of the video they ask, “Is America Beautiful without Medicare?” Ryan’s plan doesn’t call for eliminating Medicare but rather privatizing it. Intelligent and rational indeed.  Guess when you can’t argue the facts, you go for the theatrics and feelings as is typical with liberals.
The Agenda Project was founded by Erica Payne, a progressive liberal.  This same organization dedicated to “intelligent” and “rational” ideas also sells t-shirts and mugs that say “f*ck tea” to demonize the TEA Party movement.  Keep it classy liberals.
The Weekly Standard has the video in case it gets removed from YouTube.
h/t LibertyScout
DCG

Please follow and like us:
0
 

Gingrich Slams Ryan Plan as 'Right Wing Social Engineering'

And now a word from our sponsor. Someone please tell this RINO his Career is over. Thanks , Steve.
Sunday, 15 May 2011 07:31 PM
By Tim Collie
Surprising many conservatives, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich stirred a lively debate Sunday by slamming Rep. Paul Ryan‘s plan to reform Medicare on NBC’sMeet the Press.”
In what one popular conservative website described as Gingrich “tacking left,” the now-declared presidential candidate dismissed a plan popular among many conservatives as “radical change” that he suggested was dangerous for Republicans to embrace heading into an election year.
The House budget chairman’s plan is designed to move to a system where seniors receive vouchers to buy private insurance. It has been endorsed by the majority of House Republicans.
But Gingrich said it was “too big a jump. I think what you want to have is a system where people voluntarily migrate to better outcomes, better solutions, better options.”
“I’m against Obamacare, which is imposing radical change, and I would be against a conservative imposing radical change,” he continued.
“I don’t think right-wing social engineering is any more desirable than left-wing social engineering,” Gingrich said. “I don’t think imposing radical change from the right or the left is a very good way for a free society to operate.”
To Read the rest of Gingrich ( Ahh, RINO“S) Drival, Pls Go  HERE
https://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/gingrich-ryan-medicare-radical/2011/05/15/id/396427?s=al&promo_code=C44A-1
~Steve~

Please follow and like us:
0