Tag Archives: Michelle Obama

Barack Obama is registered to vote in Chicago

This is a follow-up on my post of just a few hours ago, “Barack Obama is not registered to vote in D.C., but Barry Soetoro is!

An alert FOTM reader, sharzie, wrote this comment:

But, didn’t we see him and Mooch cast their votes in their “home” town of Chicago last fall??? I guess if you are a Dem you can be registered to vote in as many districts or states as you please. No voter ID required.

So I decided to look into whether Obama is registered to vote in Chicago. But, in order to do that, I would need a physical address for the Obamas.

According to Wikipedia, Michelle Obama was born on January 17, 1964, and is 49 years old.

Using the people search engine Spokeo, I found the following addresses in Chicago, IL, for Michelle Obama:

  1. 5450 S East View Park, Chicago, IL 60615 (Spokeo says Michelle Obama, female, 49, birthday January 1964, lives at this address with Barack Obama, male, age 50s).
  2. 7436 S Euclid Ave, Chicago, IL 60649 (Spokeo says Michelle Obama, female, 49, birthday January 1964, lives at this address with Barack Obama, male, age 50s).
  3. 5470 S Everett Ave, Chicago, IL 60615 (Spokeo says Michelle Obama, female, 49, birthday January 1964, lives at this address with Barack Obama, male, age 50s).
  4. 5046 S Greenwood Ave, Chicago, IL 60615 (Spokeo says this Michelle Obama. female, 49, birthdays December 1963, lives at this address with her father and mother.)

Then I went on the Chicago Board of Election website for “Check your voter registration,” and typed in each address above, and in the space for last name I typed in “Obama.”

For the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd addresses (see #1, #2, #3 above), I got the same message:

“No voter found at this address with that last name.”

For the 4th address (5046 S Greenwood Ave), I got this message:

Please select voter:

MICHELLE OBAMA
BARACK OBAMA

So I clicked “BARACK OBAMA” and got this (click image below to enlarge!):

Obama voter registrationSo, Barack Obama is registered to vote in Chicago, IL.

So who is this Barry Soetoro, with the same birthdate as Obama (August 4, 1961), who lives at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., Washington, D.C. (address of the White House), whom the District of Columbia Board of Elections says had registered to vote on October 15, 2012, as a Democrat?

Whoever did that — whether he’s Obama himself or an imposter — committed voter fraud.

UPDATE (July 27, 2013):

Surprise! A week after I published this post, Barry Soetoro is no longer registered to vote in D.C.! Go here.

~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Humorous Screen Grabs (developing)

Have you noticed that some images online say more than their connected stories?  Here are a few. The numbers of grabs will grow as I come across them.  I invite all FOTM writers to add to this post. ~TD

moochel_vacation_mull

This caption could be attached to any picture of Michelle.


Aarrgghhh!!! TAKE IT OUT!!!


Ya think?!!!

“Terrorism suspected…” Ya think?!!!


…or at least America.

…or at least America.


Worried about the IRS?

Worried about the IRS?


Is it legal to say that?

Is it legal to say that?


Rioting Yoots!!!

Rioting Yoots!!!

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Let's play in another Caption Contest!

This is the 43rd world-famous FOTM Caption Contest!
Here’s the pic (h/t our beloved DCG):

Click pic to enlarge (you must!)

White House Feb. 12, 2013L to r: Kristin Jones, Personal Aide to FLPOS; Tina Tchen, CoS to FLPOS; FLPOS; POS (Photo by White House photog Pete Souza, Feb. 12, 2013) 

You know the drill:

  • The winner of the Caption Contest will get a gorgeous Award Certificate of Excellence and a year’s free subscription to FOTM! :D
  • FOTM writers will vote for the winner.
  • Any captions proffered by FOTM writers, no matter how brilliant (ha ha), will not be considered. :(

This contest will be closed in a week, at the end of next Monday, April 1, 2013.
To get the contest going, here’s my caption:

TGIF at the Monkey House a foul place where inhabitants have been inside for so long that they no longer notice the stench.”

For the winner of our last Caption Contest, go here.
~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

First Lady POS crowned queen

Two days ago, a sickening sycophant of a rabbi in Israel, Ovadia Yosef, called the POS a king.
Now comes news that the Brits, conditioned by centuries of monarchial rule, have fashioned the First Lady of Snot into a queen.
Buzzfeed reports that FLPOS topped the UK’s Sunday Times’ Style magazine’s 50 best-dressed people in the world list. The fawning magazine then “immortalized” the FLPOS on her very own British first class postage stamp design — a space traditionally reserved only for their Queen.
Mooch as queen
Pass me the barf bag! barfbag
Some queen. If you haven’t seen this video of snot dribbling out of the queen’s nose, you simply must.
On February 28, 2011, the First Lady of Snot gave a speech at the National Governors Association Meeting in the White House. Here’s the video, provided by the White House (fast forward to the end of the video where you’ll see the www.WHITEHOUSE.gov imprimatur).
Go ahead and verify the following for yourselves:
At the 10:47 mark: M.O. wipes her nose with a finger.
At the 11:16 mark: The sniffles begin.
At the 12:50 mark: Visible shiny mucus secretion from her nose.
Beginning at the 14:20 mark: A drop of mucus comes out of her left nostril.
Beginning at the 16:10 mark: The droplet of mucus is clearly visible.
At the 16:55 mark: M.O. wipes nose with right hand.
At the 17:02 mark: M.O. wipes nose with left hand. Right after that, I do believe I saw her tongue flicking up to lick the moisture.
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=DiOcVFLYFQI#!]
H/t ConservativeByte and FOTM’s Miss May
~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Pass me a barf bag, please

obamavogue2013
.
Inspiring America?
Those sycophants at Vogue make me ill.
The FLPOS only inspires me to throw up.
If you haven’t, please see my post of Feb. 11, “First Lady of Snot,” to see the real Michelle Obama.
~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

On Sale At Your Local Checkout Counter: Obama’s Impending Divorce

The National Enquirer’s lead story this week.

https://www.nationalenquirer.com/celebrity/exclusive-obama-secret-divorce-papers

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

We can do better, America!

Just a week away – VOTE for America’s future!

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kiGjE4_k0jI]

DCG

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Two CBS affiliates declared Obama the winner 18 days before election

Remember this?

And this?

And this?

Here’s the latest example:

On Oct. 19, 2012, two CBS affiliates — KPHO in Phoenix, Arizona, and WCPO in Cincinnati, Ohio — had already called the election with Obama as the winner.

Randy Hall reports for NewsBusters, Oct. 22, 2012, that during last Friday’s edition of “The People’s Court” at 3:30 p.m. on KPHO, Phoenix, a “lower-third graphic” scrolled across the bottom of the screen and stated that with 99% of all precincts reporting, Obama had won the nationwide vote, 43% v. 40% or 40,237, 966 votes v. Romney’s 38,116,216.

fake-election-photo.jpg

Here’s a blow-up of the banner:

After 17 seconds, the banner disappeared.

Soon after, WCPO in Cleveland posted a list of vote totals for the Nov. 6 election that again declared Obama the victor in the presidential election and even stated that Ohio’s Democratic incumbent Sherrod Brown was re-elected to his U.S. Senate seat. Below is a screen shot taken by the blog TexasDarlin:

Here’s a blowup of the WCPO screen shot showing that in Ohio, with 100% of precincts reporting, Obama won by a 7 point margin, 46% vs. Romney’s 39%:

WCPO’s election results site is now back to 0% precincts reporting.

A commenter on TexasDarlin, Mike Dolanson, poo-pooed questions about WCPO’s premature election results: “I worked at local TV stations for years. Stations test their on-air and online systems in the weeks leading up to elections. Random results are put in to make sure everything is ready and then zero’ed out. Occassionally, something isn’t right and it appears on the screen for a second or on the website for a brief time. That’s all. There is no fix — unless you’re paranoid.”

To that, other commenters made these excellent ripostes:

  • cbas: “So why not put all zeros in the results instead of random numbers?”
  • Jim Wafwot: “Why not put exact numbers for each party so they show 45% – 45% ?”
  • Reidmere: “I own a radio site, and when working on ‘test’ pages that you want to have live, you put it on an unlinked URL, not your homepages. Any professional tech knows this. Poor excuse: And this is coming from a programmer and web dev.”
  • a: “Maybe if they say Obama wins they may think that people won’t bother to vote for Mitt….it is some kind of scam.”
  • Guy S: “Some will claim this is simply an accident as stations prepare for the election and test pages for broadcast. Sorry, I’m not buying it. I interned at a PBS TV Station in Boise, Idaho as a cameraman and believe you me, the directors are anal about what is and is not done. And that’s PBS! To say that an ABC or CBS affiliate would ‘accidentally” run something like this stinks to high heavens!”

One CBS affiliate making a mistake, I can understand.

But TWO? And BOTH “mistakes” are in Obama’s favor?

What are the chances of that happening “by accident”?

~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Barack and Michelle Have a History of Poor Money Management

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmHTdbctPrc&feature=youtu.be]

The above video clip from last month shows the president hasn’t progressed from the magical thinking of financial reality he first practiced with MichelleIn August, 2011, Fellowship of the Minds published this “Magic Beans” financial strategy practiced by the newlywed Obamas. 

Would you believe the “smartest man in the room” and his lovely and talented helpmeet, Michelle, have a poor track record in budgeting family finances?  Their behavior as the “First Couple” confirms these people are clueless on the value of money and where it comes from.  Indeed, Michelle referred to the first substantial income they had as a couple as “magic beans”, (the royalties from “Dreams of My Father”).  Prior to that, it sounds like they would have qualified for a Dr. Phil-style intervention for profligate spending.

~LTG

President Obama’s troubling mantra: In debt, we trust

By Richard Henry Lee

Friday, May 1st 2009, 4:36 PM

It is no surprise that President Obama supports unprecedented spending and borrowing in the federal budget since he has never suffered any consequences from the excessive spending and borrowing in his private life.

And I’m not just talking about the First Lady’s $540 sneakers.

A close examination of their finances shows that the Obamas were living off lines of credit along with other income for several years until 2005, when Obama’s book royalties came through and Michelle received her 260% pay raise at the University of Chicago. This was also the year Obama started serving in the U.S. Senate.

During the presidential primary campaign, Michelle Obama complained how tough it was to make ends meet. During a stop in Ohio, she said, “I know we’re spending – I added it up for the first time – we spend between the two kids, on extracurriculars outside the classroom, we’re spending about $10,000 a year on piano and dance and sports supplements and so on and so forth.”

Let’s examine how tough things were for this couple using various public records.

In April 1999, they purchased a Chicago condo and obtained a mortgage for $159,250. In May 1999, they took out a line of credit for $20,750. Then, in 2002, they refinanced the condo with a $210,000 mortgage, which means they took out about $50,000 in equity. Finally, in 2004, they took out another line of credit for $100,000 on top of the mortgage.

Tax returns for 2004 reveal $14,395 in mortgage deductions. If we assume an effective interest rate of 6%, then they owed about $240,000 on a home they purchased for about $159,250.

This means they spent perhaps $80,000 beyond their income from 1999 to 2004.

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Three Strike Outs

A Chesterfield County elementary school in Virginia rejected First Lady Michelle Obama’s request to speak on Thursday, citing school policy.

Tim Bullis, the school division’s community relations director, told the Richmond Times-Dispatch that School Board policy 6100 prohibits “the use of school facilities during the school day for political purposes.” 

This is the third time in the last month the Obama campaign has been denied use of a venue the campaign would have preferred in Virginia

Full Story on BigGovernment.com

Please follow and like us:
error0