Tag Archives: Meghan Markle

Beyoncé exposed her crotch at premier of Disney children’s movie ‘Lion King’

Yesterday, July 14, the Disney movie “The Lion King” premiered in Leicester Square, London, UK.

Among the “celebrities” in attendance were Prince Harry and Meghan Markle (in a one-size-too-small $4,343 dress designed by Jason Wu), Beyoncé, who voices Nala in the movie, and her satanist husband, Jay Z.

The Lion King” is a live-action remake of the 1994 animated movie of the same name, which 34-year-old Prince Harry says is his favorite movie of all time, having watched it more than 20 times. Arrested development, anyone?

This is what 37-year-old Beyoncé wore for the premier of a children’s movie — a yellow gown slit to the waist, which exposes her legs, and which, when she walks, reveals her (unshaved) crotch.

Warning: Not Safe For Work (NSFW)

From a public health perspective, I sure wouldn’t want to sit down where she had sat without giving the seat a thorough wipe-down with bleach.

Well, at least we now know for sure that her blonde hair comes from a bottle.

See also:

~Eowyn

Drudge Report has gone to the dark side. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

EXIF data of photo of Prince Harry-Meghan Markle’s baby christening say it was taken 2 months prior

On May 6, 2019, nearly a year after their wedding, Britain’s Prince Harry (PH), 34, and his American wife, the former minor Hollywood actress Meghan Markle (MM), 37, announced on Instagram that their son was born that “early morning,” weighing 7 lb. 3 oz. Other details of the baby’s birth are kept “private”.

Two days later, on May 8, in a press conference, PH and MM, aka the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, introduced their baby to the world — Archie Harrison, 7th in line to the throne, who had been overdue by at least a week. By some calculations, the baby’s due date should have been in March or April. (Town&Country)

Prince Harry & Meghan Markle introduce baby Archie to the world, May 8, 2019

On the morning of July 6, 2019, 2-month-old Archie was christened (baptized) in a private ceremony (no reporters) in the private chapel at Windsor Castle. (Town&Country)

Reporter Roya Nikkah wrote in the Sunday Times that Archie’s private christening “is in contrast to the decision by the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge  [Prince William and Kate] to let cameras capture their children at their christenings, together with the arrivals of family members and godparents, before holding private services.”

PH and MM did release two photos taken by photographer Chris Allerton a few hours after the christening ceremony — a black-and-white photo of PH, MM, and Archie; and a color group photo (see below), in which Archie’s anonymous godparents are missing.

Photo published on Town&Country

Front row, from left to right: Camilla (wife of Prince Charles), Prince Harry, Meghan Markle holding Archie, Kate (wife of Prince William).

Back row, from left to right: Prince Charles, Princess Diana’s two sisters, Prince William.

Many noted how inappropriate Harry‘s scruffy brown suede shoes were. Notice that he wore the same shoes and same light-grey suit, but a different tie, to both the May 8 press conference and the July 6 christening.

Digital photos are embedded with EXIF (Exchangeable Image File Format) data, such as ISO speed, shutter speed, aperture, white balance, camera model and make, date and time when the photo was taken, lens type, focal length and much more.

PhotographyLife explains:

Being able to read such data can be of great importance not only for beginners, but also for other photographers who want to find out what settings and tools were used to create a particular photograph…. [S]pecific tools that are capable of reading this information must be used to view it. For example, some image viewers and post-processing tools like Lightroom are capable of viewing and extracting such information…while some operating systems are capable of reading this data to display relevant data.

To find out how you can view EXIF data on the Mozilla Firefox and Chrome browsers, go here.

Below is an example of the EXIF data of a photo. I painted a red box around “original date and time”, i.e., when the photo was originally taken.

Using the “File info” feature in Photoshop, a tumblr poster called gofakeyourselfmeghan found the following EXIF data of the baby christening group photo, showing the original date and time of the photo to be May 8, 2019, 10:56 PM (22:56:06) — the same day when PH and MM “introduced” Archie to the world.

I verified this by downloading the EXIF viewer add-on for Mozilla Firefox browser, then I right-clicked on the christening group pic on meghansmirror.com. (I used the christening pic published on the Meghan’s Mirror blog because the same pic published on Town&Country and other news sites is stripped of EXIF data, which is curious to say the least.) This is the EXIF data I got:

A UK tweeter enlarged Prince William’s watch, which shows the time 10:56, consistent with the EXIF data’s 10:56PM original time:

Don’t be fooled by claims of the photo’s “creation date” of July 6, 2019. That date refers to when the photo was published, not when the photo was originally taken. You can see that for yourself by going to Town&Country:

  • Right-click the group pic
  • On the drop-down menu, click “View image info”
  • A new page called “Page Info” will pop up
  • Click “General”

I took this screenshot of the pic’s “Page Info”, showing July 6, 2019 as the date when the pic was published, not the date when the photo was taken.

The question that must be asked is why the deception? Why are UK taxpayers told that baby Archie was christened on July 6, when the EXIF data say the christening took place two months prior, on May 8, 2019?

See also:

~Eowyn

Drudge Report has gone to the dark side. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Brits sign petition to stop taxpayer funding of Meghan Markle & Prince Harry

A year and nearly 2 months after former D-list Hollywood actress Meghan Markle’s wedding to Prince Harry, her honeymoon with both Harry and the British people appears to be over.

On June 8, 2019, at Trooping the Colour — the official celebration of Queen Elizabeth’s 93rd birthday — Harry, 35, sternly reprimanded Meghan, 37, to “turn around” at the National Anthem.

The UK media’s coverage of Markle and readers’ comments on both Markle and Harry have become increasingly critical and hostile. See, for example, Piers Morgan, “Meghan Markle is a ruthless social climbing actress who has landed the role of her life and is determined to milk it for all she can — and that’s why the Palace is beginning to turn on her, Daily Mail, Dec. 4, 2018.

A Welsh even started a petition on Change.org to “stop UK funding for Meghan Markle & Prince Harry’s lifestyle”. To date, the petition has 2,597 signatories; the goal is 5,000.

The petition says (Note: I added the pics and news links):

Since the Royal Wedding of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle we, the people have been shocked by the exorbitant spending of this married couple. It is said that Meghan Markle (now the Duchess of Sussex) has spent well over one million pounds (£1000000.00) on just clothes in just under one year.

Britain is facing Brexit and economic hardship. Many thousands are homeless and children are going to school with no breakfast, times are undoubtedly hard for working class Brits. Yet, the taxes that we pay, is going towards an American (not even British) woman’s wardrobe allowance, also this allowance is not supporting British designers,  but mega expensive designers in America, Canada, or Europe.

She has shown little or no understanding of British culture, traditions or history. When visiting Ireland, she posed in front of a statue depicting the Irish potato famine; painfully thin starving Irish people, dressed in rags, struggling to live. I find it hard to look at this statue without crying, but I don’t think that the devastating impact that the Irish potato famine had on Ireland’s social history, registered with her, she looked indifferent, insincere and smug, whilst posing at the statue wearing several thousand pounds worth of Chanel clothing.

See also “Prince Harry and Meghan Markle heckled…at famine memorial in Dublin,” Irish Mirror, July 11, 2018.

To be blunt, she is of no benefit to Britain.  She has no respect for us, & no knowledge of our ancestry or history. When she visited Birkenhead, which is one of the poorest parts of Britain, she again dressed herself in thousands of pounds worth of designer clothes, gaily accepting the gifts bestowed on her by the working class people, for whom every penny counts. she completely missed seeing the stark contrast between her, in her £2000 dress, £3000 coat …and poverty staring her straight in the face.

I could list dozens of examples showing her astonishing disregard for the working class people of UK,  but instead I will bring attention to her baby shower. Held in New York. And which cost the British and American taxpayers over half a million pounds. She flew by private jet, stayed in the most expensive penthouse available, and made full use of American and British  government security services, which are paid by American and British workers taxes.

See “Meghan Markle’s alienating the palace after lavish baby shower, says Diana’s aide,” Page Six, Feb. 23, 2019; “Meghan Markle Responded to That Baby Shower Backlash & She’s Unbothered,” Yahoo!, June 28, 2019.

I’d also like to bring attention to Meghan Markle’s unwanted involvement in politics. Whilst in Ireland, she made a very public statement approving abortion. This is a sensitive issue amongst every person in the western world but particularly Irish people, the majority of which are Catholic. the Irish abortion laws are nobody’s business, but the Irish themselves. She had NO right whatsoever to comment.

See “Meghan Markle ‘Pleased’ Ireland Legalized Abortion,” Daily Wire, July 11, 2018.

Meghan Markle has also made it quite clear that she prefers Obama to Trump, likening President Trump to a “used tampon” (sorry).

See “Trump says he was surprised Meghan Markle was ‘nasty’ about him,” New York Post, June 1, 2019.

She recently accused British universities of racism by not hiring enough black people and even called eminent professors “Male Pale and Stale”.

See “Meghan Markle wants to tackle discrimination in ‘male, pale and stale’ universities,” The Mirror, Feb. 18, 2019.

I am astounded by her lack of tack or respect for ALL citizens. She disrespected the King & Queen of Tonga, by not following royal protocol, and barely made any appearances at the invictus games in Sydney Australia.

Her sense of entitlement is astonishing and if she wants to continue with such behaviour I think it’s only fair, she funds herself. Meghan Markle is now a publically funded figure. Therefore the public has every right to criticise both her and Prince Harry’s behaviour & actions. If she does not agree, she should STOP accepting public funds, simple as that. Prince Harry is married to her and therefore this petition applies to him also.

To sign the petition, click here.

See also these FOTM posts:

And these other articles:

~Eowyn

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Rumors that Prince Harry & Meghan Markle had a surrogate baby

On May 6, 2019, nearly a year after their wedding, Britain’s Prince Harry, 34, and his American wife, the former minor Hollywood actress Meghan Markle, 37, announced on Instagram that their son was born that “early morning,” weighing 7 lb. 3 oz.

Two days later, on May 8, in a press conference, Harry and Meghan, aka the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, introduced their baby to the world — Archie Harrison, 7th in line to the throne, who had been overdue by at least a week.

All of which has not dampened the rumors that Archie is a surrogate baby, birthed by a woman who is not Meghan Markle.

Markle is a rabid anti-Trumper, who calls President Trump a “misogynist,” “divisive,” and “syphilis”. Reportedly, she told a friend that the baby will be raised “gender-fluid,” without “gender-stereotyping” — whatever that means.

Prince Harry makes devil’s horn hand sign at Invictus Games in Toronto, Sept. 23, 2017

Dismissed as a ridiculous “conspiracy theory” — as if there are no real conspiracies — the notion of surrogacy and, therefore, a fake pregnancy, is intriguing and bears some scrutiny. Here are the reasons for the rumors:

(1) Breaking protocol for royal births, Archie’s birth announcement was made on Instagram before the official birth announcement by Buckingham Palace. The Palace’s easel announcing Archie’s birth went up about 4.35 p.m., about two hours after the social media announcement — a delay that suggests information about the birth had been kept from the Palace. The Palace’s easel announcement also lacks the signatures of the attending medical professionals. (Harry Markle)

Below are the easel announcements of the birth of Prince Willliam’s first son, Prince George (left), and that of Archie (right):

(2) Markle’s delivery was way overdue. On October 15, 2018, when Kensington Palace announced her pregnancy, Markle had already had her 12-week scan. A week later, she told someone whom she was greeting in a line up that she was 16 weeks pregnant. At the time of the pregnancy announcement, reporter Emily Andrews said: “We understand that she was around 14/15 weeks, and so, we think that the baby is due in early April. I think maybe March, I think the baby might be born in March.” (Town&Country)

(3) Unkown place of delivery: The birth announcement made no mention of a hospital, nor does it bear the signatures of medical witnesses. The media had photographers on standby in all the hospitals, but they did not report on the birth. All of which suggests a home delivery, which was risky for a first birth by a woman of Markle’s age, 37.

(4) The strange baby bump: Skeptics had noted that the baby bump that Markle constantly cradled had behaved in a strange way — looking big one day and flat a few days later, creasing or folding in the middle (like Beyoncé’s baby bump), wobbling, and shifting from side to side. (Harry Markle)

Here’s a video of Markle’s folding baby bump:

Below is a video of Markle’s wobbling baby bump:

Contrast Markle’s wobbling from side-to-side baby bump with that of this pregnant woman:

Also, what heavily-pregnant woman do you know who can so easily bend and squat down as 7-8 month pregnant Meghan?

Heavily pregnant Meghan Markle easily bends-squats down

make celebrity GIFs like this at MakeaGif

~Eowyn

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Prince Harry and Meghan will raise their child as ‘gender fluid’

Megan Markle, the biracial American wife of Britain’s Prince Harry, a former little-known actress, is expected to give birth to the couple’s first child this spring.

Vanity Fair reports, February 28, 2019, that “according to a source close to the couple,” Markle “is understood to have told at least one friend that they want to raise their baby without gender-stereotyping . . . in line with Meghan’s ideas about how to raise children.” The couple have already planned a gender-neutral nursery of whites and grays, instead of conventional blue and pink colors.

A source told Vanity Fair: “Meghan has been talking to some of her friends about the birth and how she and Harry plan to raise their baby. Her exact word was fluid. She said they plan to raise their child with a fluid approach to gender and they won’t be imposing any stereotypes.”

But according to the UK Express:

Kensington Palace was forced to issue a rare statement about intimate details on the royal couple and their anticipated baby, after Vanity Fair made the claim yesterday….

[A]fter initial silence from Kensington Palace, officials last night were forced to issue a statement on the claims.

They said simply: “This story is totally false.”

Prince Harry makes devil’s horn hand sign at Invictus Games in Toronto, Sept. 23, 2017

See also:

~Eowyn

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
error0