Tag Archives: Jim Stone

Las Vegas shooting massacre: Where are the broken windows on 32nd floor?

We are told that on the night of Sunday, October 1, 2017, 64-year-old retired accountant and multimillionaire Stephen Craig Paddock fired an automatic weapon from his suite on the 32nd floor of the Mandalay Bay hotel in Las Vegas, at an outdoor Route 91 Harvest country western music concert across the street, killing 58 people and wounding more than 500. See:

The media published this pic of Mandalay Bay hotel after the shooting, showing two shot-out windows presumably of Paddock’s suite on the 32nd floor.

Note that the 32nd floor is 6 floors down from where the purple-grey vertical concrete sidings begin. Those sidings are lit up at night. I painted the numbers 1-6 in yellow. The two broken windows are, from right:

  • Broken window #1 is the first window to the left of the second vertical purple-grey siding.
  • Broken window #2 is the second window to the left of the third vertical purple-grey siding.

Self-described independent journalist and former NSA operative Jim Stone found a very interesting photo from the night of the October 1, 2017 mass shooting in Las Vegas.

As is Stone’s wont, he doesn’t give the source of the pic, but I can verify its authenticity because I found it on Dynamite News, in an October 2 article titled, “Las Vegas: Mass casualties in Mandalay Bay shooting”. Here’s the pic on Dynamite News:

Stone provided a high-resolution, enlarged version of the pic (see below). I painted the yellow arrow and the two yellow circles to indicate the 32nd floor and where the two broken windows should be.

↓Click to enlarge↓

Here’s a cropped and enlarged view of the above pic, showing the 32nd floor windows:

There’s something light-colored in window #2, but I don’t see any broken windows, do you?

In other words, the two windows on the 32nd floor do not appear shot-out on the night of October 1 right after the mass shooting, but they are broken on October 2 when the media took the picture of Mandalay Bay hotel in daylight.

Why’s that?

Here’s another strange thing that Jim Stone brings to our attention.

In the video above of the Route 91 Harvest country-music concert, sound of gun shots begin at the 0:00:05 mark, lasting 10 seconds, with the band playing throughout. Note that the stage is lit up.

The band stops playing when the gunshots end. You hear chatter among the audience as people begin to realize what just happened.

Beginning at around 0:00:22, the stage lights dim, then go completely dark at 0:00:25. A woman’s voice can be heard above the din of the crowd, “Oh, my God.”

At 0:00:31, bright strobe lights are lit above the stage, all the better to illuminate the crowd, who begin to flee in panic. The sound of gun shots resumes beginning at the 0:00:52 mark.

“Larger strobe lights can be used in ‘continuous’ mode, producing extremely intense illumination.” (Wikipedia) Why did the music festival turn on the extremely bright strobe lights AFTER the automatic weapon was first fired, not knowing if the shooting would continue, thereby further endangering the concert audience?

See also:

~Eowyn

Advertisements

Islam’s female genital mutilation comes to America

I’ve posted before on Jim Stone — the expat blogger who claims to be an ex-NSA spook, and urges Americans to a violent uprising (“a violent outcome may be unavoidable”) although he, living in Mexico, will neither participate in nor suffer the consequences. At the time, I remarked that Stone seemed to have gone round the bend.

Yesterday, he gave more evidence of having “jumped the shark” when he defended the oh-so-misunderstood and innocuous Koran (Quran) and Sharia law. He writes:

“[I]n the Quran itself, there are at most 5 lines that might be construed as violent, but most of what is there pertaining to war is instruction on how to pray in battle and other mundane items . . . .

The Quran is to a large extent a book of law. And if you read the texts the founding fathers wrote, there is little, if anything in the Quran that is not compatible. All this talk about Shariah being horrible is either the product of a spewing fool or an outright lie . . . .”

Then, in big bold letters, Stone concludes with menacing bravado to his adoring readers who continue to send him $ donations:

“If anyone has any argument with this, remember, I have read at least 5 different translations [of the Koran] from cover to cover and spoken at length with Muslims, so don’t bother trolling me, you will not find a victim of ignorance here, waiting for your mail.”

Interestingly, though well plugged into the latest news, Stone conveniently made no mention of the fact that those misunderstood and maligned Muslims have brought the utterly barbaric practice of female genital mutilation to America.

Female genital mutilation (FGM) is the ritual removal of some or all of the external female genitalia, performed in many Islamic countries, as well as some African Christian and Animist groups. UNICEF estimated in 2016 that 200 million women living today in 30 countries—27 African countries, Indonesia, Iraqi Kurdistan and Yemen—have undergone the procedures.

Typically carried out by using a blade, FGM is conducted from days after birth to puberty and beyond; most girls are cut before the age of five. Procedures may include clitoridectomy (removal of the clitoral hood and clitoral glans); removal of the inner labia; piercing; cauterizing of the genital area; and removal of the inner and outer labia and closure of the vulva. In this last procedure, known as infibulation, a small hole is left for the passage of urine and menstrual fluid; the vagina is opened for intercourse and opened further for childbirth.

Michael W. Chapman reports for CNSNews that on April 13, 2017, Jumana Nagarwala, 44, a Henry Ford Hospital emergency room doctor in Detroit, Michigan, was arrested and charged with the felony crime of female genital mutilation (FGM) on minor girls between the ages of 6 and 8 years old.

In the April 12 complaint for an arrest warrant, FBI Special Agent Kevin J. Swanson states:

“Some members of a particular religious and cultural community (hereafter ‘the Community’) are known to  practice FGM on young girls in the Community as part of their religious and cultural practice. [W]hen FGM is performed in the Community, varying amounts of a girl’s clitoris or clitoral hood, or prepuce, are removed by the person who is performing the cutting. According to some members of the Community who have spoken out against the practice, the purpose of this cutting is to suppress female sexuality in an attempt to reduce sexual pleasure and promiscuity.”

Acting Assistant Attorney General Blanco said in an April 12 statement:

“According to the [criminal] complaint, despite her oath to care for her patients, Dr. Nagarwala is alleged to have performed horrifying acts of brutality on the most vulnerable victims. The Department of Justice is committed to stopping female genital mutilation in this country, and will use the full power of the law to ensure that no girls suffer such physical and emotional abuse.”

Acting U.S. Attorney Daniel Lemisch said:

“Female genital mutilation constitutes a particularly brutal form of violence against women and girls. It is also a serious federal felony in the United States. The practice has no place in modern society and those who perform FGM on minors will be held accountable under federal law.”

FBI Special Agent Kevin J. Swanson recounts how Dr. Nagarwala was apprehended:

  • The FBI and Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) received information that Dr. Nagarwala was performing FGM on 7-year-old girls in a medical clinic in Livonia, the Eastern District of Michigan.
  • The FBI obtained a court order to review Dr. Nagarwala’s phone records and discovered a series of calls between the doctor’s phone and a phone in Minnesota associated with a Minnesota family whose daughter had just turned 7 years old (Victim One).
  • On Feb. 3, 2017, the Minnesota telephone number  contacted a tower in Farmington Hills, Michigan, near multiple hotels. Farmington Hills has a very active Muslim community and hosted CAIR Michigan’s 15th annual banquet.
  • The FBI discovered Victim One and another 7-year-old girl, Victim Two, were staying at the same hotel with their parents in Farmington Hills.
  • Interviewed by the FBI on April 10, Victim One said she and Victim Two had been taken to Detroit from Minnsota on a “special girls” trip. After arriving at the hotel, they were taken to Dr. Nagarwala for a procedure to “to get the germs out.” Victim One said she took off her pants and underwear and laid on an examining table with her knees near her chest and her legs spread apart. Nagarwala “pinched” her on the “place [where] she goes pee”. The girl was given a pad to wear in her underwear and told not to talk about the procedure.
  • Another doctor later examined the girl and confirmed that her “genitals are not normal in appearance” — the “labia minora has been altered or removed, and her clitoral hood is also abnormal in appearance.”
  • Victim Two said Dr. Nagarwala “took off her pants and underwear and put her on the table,” then gave the girl “a shot” in her upper right thigh, so painful that she screamed. She could barely walk, and  felt pain all the way down to her ankle. The girl’s parents told her that the procedure is a secret and that she is not supposed to talk about it. The parents subsequently told Minnesota Child Protective Services and a federal agent that they took their daughter to Dr. Nagarwala “for a ‘cleansing’ of extra skin.”

Swanson stated in his affidavit that “this investigation has identified other children who may have been victimized by Nagarwala between 2005 and 2007, including children in Michigan.”

When questioned by an HSI special agent and Michigan child protective services personnel, Dr. Nagarwala said she knew FGM was illegal in the United States, but denied having performed FGM on any minor children, or any knowledge of FGM being performed by anyone in her community.

A spokesman for Henry Ford Health confirmed that Dr. Nagarwala is employed by Henry Ford Health System in Detroit, but that the alleged mutilations did not occur in a Henry Ford facility and the health system does not support such practices.

H/t FOTM‘s CP and MomOfIV

Update (April 20 2017):

Jim Stone is doubling down. He actually calls the female genital mutilation story a “hoax” and “war propaganda,” and claims “Muslims do not do female genital mutilation.”

Muslims do not do female genital mutilation? Stone lies.

A 2013 UNICEF report states that female genital mutilation is practiced in “29 countries across Africa and the Middle East” and that “More than 125 million girls and women alive today have been subjected to FGM/C in the 29 countries in Africa and the Middle East in which it is concentrated, and 30 million girls are at risk of being cut within the next decade.”

Update (April 23, 2017):

According to the Detroit Free Press, two more individuals have been arrested: Dr. Fakhruddin Attar, 53, of Livonia and his wife, Farida Attar, 50. He is accused of letting Dr. Nagarwala use his clinic to perform the procedure, while his wife is accused of holding the girls’ hands to comfort them during the cuttings.

All three defendants — Dr. Nagarwala and the Attars — belong to a small, Indian-Muslim community known as the Dawoodi Bohra.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that at least 513,000 girls have been cut or face the risk of being cut in the U.S., a roughly threefold increase from 1990. In 1996, Congress passed a law that made genital mutilation of girls under 18 a crime punishable by up to five years in prison. Seven years later, Congress passed another law that made it illegal to transport girls out of the U.S. for the purpose of cutting.

The FBI has set up a tip line and is asking  anyone who has information about female genital mutilation to call 800-CALL-FBI (800-225-5324).

~Eowyn

Expat blogger, who lives in Mexico, goads Trump supporters to violence

Since last year’s presidential campaign, I’ve been following a blogger named Jim Stone (not his real name), who claims to be a former NSA spook and calls himself a “truthseeker” “freelance journalist”.

Very little is known about “Jim Stone”. I found only these on the web:

I’ve found Jim Stone to be useful because he seems to have his ear to the ground. He is among the first to pick up important stories either before or ignored by Drudge Report. I also like him because he’s a Trump supporter.

That being said, Stone is an acquired taste because:

  • His writing is of the quick-dash unpolished variety, often unsourced.
  • His website Jim Stone does not have a stable URL as other websites do, e.g., Fellowship of the Minds‘ URL is always http://fellowshipoftheminds.com. In the case of Jim Stone, the only stable URL is the prefix http://82.221.129.208. When you enter http://82.221.129.208 into your browser, you’ll get the Jim Stone URL of that day, which is http://82.221.129.208 followed by (something something).html. As an example, Jim Stone‘s URL yesterday is 82.221.129.208/baaasepagee9.html. But if you go to that URL today, you’ll get the same page that you read yesterday. The only way to access fresh content is to enter the prefix URL (http://82.221.129.208) and hit “enter”.
  • Stone gives himself special credibility by claiming that, of all the many Alternative Media websites, his site alone is under constant cyber attack by TPTB, which accounts for his site’s weird format, as well as justifies Stone asking his readers for financial donations to sustain him each month.

Beginning a couple of days ago, however, something shifted. Stone is calling on Trumpers to turn to violence as the only solution. Here’s what he wrote yesterday:

A violent outcome may be unavoidable

It is getting hard to do my job of stopping that.

What do I think my job is? To inform people well enough to cause the elite to back off, and not force a violent revolution. But as the days go by, and we get to see just how corrupt the system is, and how mysteriously stupid Trump seems to be on certain topics, and how his hands are completely tied with what he does know about, it is beginning to look like an insurmountable task to prevent the worst possible outcome.

Remember Joe Stack? The guy who supposedly wrote a big manifesto and flew his plane into an IRS building? The IRS version of that event is totally debunked on this web site, but there was a key line in the manifesto Joe Stack probably wrote (this manifesto said nothing about suicide and was obviously about taking direct action against corruption). What was that line? “Violence is not only the answer, it is the only answer”. Joe stack [sic] knew years ago what is becoming more than evident now. Let’s hope to God Trump is the man to save it all, because if he ends up failing we will be completely out of alternative options.

Every day now I am ending up reading headlines which if discussed can only be solved with violence – from the CIA leaks, to car crash murders, to mysterious suicides, tainted vaccines marching ahead like there is no resistance at all – so many different things, because every time something new develops it makes it more and more obvious that we really are running out of options. I am getting tired of reporting this stuff with no hope in sight unless it is a sight mounted on a gun barrel.

If they are going to stop Trump at every turn, including the latest ruling by a federal judge to block Trump’s new immigration ban, it only proves they have absolutely no interest in the American people and are perfectly willing to break all laws to violate that will, simply because they have infiltrated and placed corruption at all levels which make it possible to. If they have eliminated the peaceful options, what else is left?

There are several problems to Stone’s call to violence:

  1. Who (other than Jim Stone) says all the peaceful options are eliminated and only violence is left? Put another way, what evidence is there that violence is the only solution?
  2. Even assuming that violence is the only solution, Stone is urging us to just do it, without any organization or planning — which is insane.
  3. A resort to violence is suicidal and doomed to failure, unless we have the police and the military on our side.

But there is another, even bigger problem than the above three.

How dare Jim Stone urge us to violence when he doesn’t even live in the U.S.? Stone and his wife live in Mexico. That means he won’t be undertaking the violence to which he calls us, nor will he suffer the consequences.

Jim Stone’s irresponsible call to violence is the crossing of that proverbial Line of Rubicon. Beware of this man.

~Eowyn

New study finds link between child vaccination and autism – CENSORED

The much-maligned anti-vaccine movement is fueled, in good part, by parents’ suspicion that childhood vaccination causes autism.

The clinical term is Autism Spectrum Disorder: a developmental disability that ranges from mild disabilities of speech and language impairments, to serious developmental disabilities such as cerebral palsy and autism.

Indeed, the statistical data confirm that autism is on the rise. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC):

  • In 2000, 1 in 150 children were diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD).
  • In 2012, the number of children with ASD increased to 1 in 68.
  • ASD is about 4.5 times more common among boys (1 in 42) than among girls (1 in 189).

Now, a new study of 666 home-schooled children has confirmed that there is an association between childhood vaccination and autism.

The study is a survey (questionnaire) of 415 mothers who are members of home-school organizations in 4 states: Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Oregon. The mothers were asked whether their children had been vaccinated, and about the children’s health conditions. Among the health conditions are neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD), defined as Autism Spectrum Disorder, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, and/or a learning disability.

The study found a “significant association” between vaccination and autism. (A statistically significant association means the probability that the association occurred by chance is extremely unlikely.) The study also found that the association between vaccination and autism is compounded if the child is male and/or preterm, i.e., born prematurely at fewer than 37 weeks gestational age.

The study was conducted by a research team of four, comprised of:

  1. Dr. Anthony R. Mawson, Professor at the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Jackson State University (JSU).
  2. Dr. Brian D. Ray of the National Home Education Research Institute, an organization in Salem, Oregon which conducts homeschooling research, and publishes the journal Home School Research.
  3. Dr. Azad R. Bhuiyan, Associate Professor, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, JSU.
  4. Binu Jacob, a former graduate student at JSU.

Mawson, et al., published their research findings in an article titled “Vaccination and Health Outcomes: A Survey of 6- to 12-year-old Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Children based on Mothers’ Reports,” in a 2016 issue of the journal, Frontiers in Public Health 4:270 (2016).

Frontiers in Public Health describes itself as an open access “peer-reviewed journal aimed at the scientific community interested in the broad area of public health.” The journal’s editorial board is comprised of:

  • Joav Merrick, Health Services, Division for Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, Ministry of Social Affairs, Jerusalem, Israel. Merrick is the journal’s main editor. His title is “Field Chief Editor”.
  • Rustam Aminov, Technical University of Denmark
  • Ross Bailie, University of Sidney, Australia
  • Nina Bhardwaj, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY
  • John B. F. de Wit, University of New South Wales, Sidney, Australia
  • Jimmy Thomas Efird, East Carolina University, Greenville

But if you go to the article’s link (http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpubh.2016.00270), you will not find it. Instead, you ‘ll get this message:

Error 412

The requested content is not yet available.
Article 231518 is not yet publicly available.

That means the journal pulled the article, which, unless it was for a legitimate reason (e.g., research errors), is a form of post-publication censorship.

Fortunately, Rich Winkel of Thought Crime Radio found the article on Google Cache: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:3ulOESkkTPAJ:journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpubh.2016.00270+&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

I tried to access the article on Google Cache, but got another Error message:

404. That’s an error.

The requested URL /search?q=cache:3ulOESkkTPAJ:journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpubh.2016.00270+&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us was not found on this server. That’s all we know.

That means the article has been scrubbed from even Google Cache!

But Winkel did manage to capture the article’s Abstract before it was scrubbed:

Front. Public Health | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00270

Vaccination and Health Outcomes: A Survey of 6- to 12-year-old Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Children based on Mothers’ Reports

Anthony R. Mawson1*, Brian D. Ray2, Azad R. Bhuiyan3 and Binu Jacob4

  • 1Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health (Initiative), Jackson State University, USA
  • 2National Home Education Research Institute, USA
  • 3Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health (Initiative), USA
  • 4Former Graduate Student, Jackson State University, School of Public Health (Initiative), USA

ABSTRACT

Background: Vaccinations have prevented millions of infectious illnesses, hospitalizations and deaths among US children. Yet the long-term health outcomes of the routine vaccination program remain unknown. Studies have been recommended by the Institute of Medicine to address this question.

Specific Aims: To compare vaccinated and unvaccinated children on a broad range of health outcomes, and to determine whether an association found between vaccination and neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD), if any, remains significant after adjustment for other measured factors.

Design: A cross-sectional survey of mothers of children educated at home.

Methods: Homeschool organizations in four states (Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Oregon) were asked to forward an email to their members, requesting mothers to complete an anonymous online questionnaire on the vaccination status and health outcomes of their biological children ages 6 to 12.

Results: A total of 415 mothers provided data on 666 children, of which 261 (39%) were unvaccinated. Vaccinated children were significantly less likely than the unvaccinated to have been diagnosed with chickenpox and pertussis, but significantly more likely to have been diagnosed with pneumonia, otitis media, allergies and NDDs (defined as Autism Spectrum Disorder, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, and/or a learning disability). After adjustment, the factors that remained significantly associated with NDD were vaccination (OR 3.1, 95% CI: 1.4, 6.8), male gender (OR 2.3, 95% CI: 1.2, 4.3), and preterm birth (OR 5.0, 95% CI: 2.3, 11.6). In a final adjusted model, vaccination but not preterm birth remained associated with NDD, while the interaction of preterm birth and vaccination was associated with a 6.6-fold increased odds of NDD (95% CI: 2.8, 15.5).

Conclusions: In this study based on mothers’ reports, the vaccinated had a higher rate of allergies and NDD than the unvaccinated. Vaccination, but not preterm birth, remained significantly associated with NDD after controlling for other factors. However, preterm birth combined with vaccination was associated with an apparent synergistic increase in the odds of NDD. Further research involving larger, independent samples is needed to verify and understand these unexpected findings in order to optimize the impact of vaccines on children’s health.

Keywords: Acute diseases; Chronic diseases; Epidemiology; Evaluation; Health policy; Immunization; Neurodevelopmental disorders; Vaccination, Acute diseases, chronic diseases, Epidemiology, Evaluation, Health Policy, Immunization, Neurodevelopmental disorders, Vaccination

Citation: Mawson AR, Ray BD, Bhuiyan AR and Jacob B (2016). Vaccination and Health Outcomes: A Survey of 6- to 12-year-old Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Children based on Mothers’ Reports.Front. Public Health4:270. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00270

Received: 17 Sep 2016; Accepted: 21 Nov 2016.

Edited by: Amit Agrawal, Gandhi Medical College, India

Reviewed by: Kelly Hsieh, University of Illinois at Chicago, USA; Linda Mullin Elkins, Life University, USA

Copyright: © 2016 Mawson, Ray, Bhuiyan and Jacob. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Prof. Anthony R. Mawson, School of Public Health (Initiative), Jackson State University, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, 350 West Woodrow Wilson Avenue, Jackson, 39213, Mississippi, USA, amawsn@gmail.com

Needless to say, the scrubbing from a journal as well as from Google Cache of an already-published article that confirms parents’ suspicion that vaccines are linked to autism, will only fuel more conspiracy talk.

Our skepticism concerning the article’s scrubbing has good reasons given the credentials of the study’s lead author and the fact that the article was approved for publication by an editor and two peer reviewers.

anthony-mawson

The lead author of the study is Dr. Anthony Mawson, a naturalized U.S. citizen who was born in England and received his Ph.D. in epidemiology from Tulane University. Mawson is currently a Visiting Professor of Epidemiology and Biostatistics at the School of Public Health in Jackson State University (JSU). He is a well-published scientist with 59 publications in various journals:

  • For Mawson’s page at JSU, click here.
  • For Mawson’s cv (or resume), click here. According to his cv, Mawson has submitted a co-authored article (with Brian D. Ray and A. Bhuiyan, the same co-authors of the now-scrubbed Frontiers in Public Health article), provisionally titled “Vaccination and health outcomes,” to BMC: Health Services Research, an open-access, peer-reviewed journal.

Professor Mawson can be reached at:

  • 5359 Briarfield Road, Jackson, MS 39211
  • Tel: 601-991-3811; 601-622-2597 (cell phone)
  • Email: amawsn@gmail.com

H/t Jim Stone

UPDATE (Dec. 6, 2016):

My undertanding is that since the journal Frontiers in Public Health had accepted Mawson et al.‘s paper, it should be published and subjected to the usual process of public review and replication. Instead, the journal’s Chief Editor withdrew the paper because of “numerous complaints” based simply on the paper’s Abstract.

Please contact the journal’s Editorial Office and ask for the paper to be published. Here’s the email address:

publichealth.editorial.office@frontiersin.org

Update (May 10, 2017):

Thanks to reader RP, here’s Dr. Mawson’s censored article in its entirety.

Also, Mawson’s study did find a publication outlet — a 2017 issue of the Journal of Translational Science, 2017. See “Pilot comparative study on the health of vaccinated and unvaccinated 6- to 12-year-old U.S. children“.

I recommend you read TruthAlert’s well-reasoned and well-sourced post, “Some thoughts on the globalist agenda, vaccines and population control“.

~Eowyn

Hillary uses Jill Stein to steal election via vote recounts in battleground states

She had the lying MSM working for her.

She had polls rigged for her.

She had dead people voting for her.

Still she lost the election, at 232 Electoral College votes vs. Trump’s 290 Electoral College votes. (Source: Yahoo!News)

But you didn’t think Hillary “Why aren’t I 50 points ahead?” Clinton would give up so easily, do you?

Hillary showing

The death threats to Electoral College voters aren’t working. So now it’s this new angle:

Trump and Russia hacked the election!

We’re demanding vote recounts in the battleground states — Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Michigan!

Why those three states?

Because, according to a Nov. 22 report in New York magazine, “a group of prominent computer scientists and election lawyers” — including voting-rights attorney John Bonifaz and director of the University of Michigan’s Center for Computer Security and Society J. Alex Halderman — “believes they’ve found persuasive evidence that results in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania may have been manipulated or hacked. The group is so far not speaking on the record about their findings and is focused on lobbying the Clinton team in private.” In an article on Medium.com, Halderman claims that “a foreign government” could have hacked the election because of “suspicious patterns in voting results in Wisconsin,” which other data experts say can be explained away by education and race variables.

There’s only a 107,000 combined vote margin separating Trump from Hillary in Wisconsin, Pennyslyvania and Michigan.

But it would be unseemly for Queen Hillary to demand a vote recount, although her lawyer Marc Elias coyly says the Queen will “participate” in vote recounts even though (1) she hasn’t found “any actionable evidence of hacking or outside attempts to alter the voting technology”; and (2) she doesn’t expect to overturn the election of Donald Trump as president. But she’s participating in vote recounts anyway because she just wants “to ensure the process proceeds in a manner that is fair to all sides” — which is just so noble of Queen Hillary that I’m moved to tears!

So Green Party candidate Jill Stein will be Hillary’s stalking horse. The same Jill Stein who got zero Electoral College vote and a paltry 1.04% of the popular votes (or 1.39 million votes) in the 2016 presidential election. All of which makes complete sense that Stein is contesting the election results by demanding a recount of votes in those battleground states. /sarc

jill-stein

To recount millions of votes, Stein will need money, lots of money.

Rob Cotton reports for Inquisitr, Nov. 24, 2016:

“Stein and her running mate, activist Ajamu Baraka, had set a deadline of Friday, November 25 at 4 p.m. to reach the fundraising goal, as the $1.1 million required for filing in Wisconsin will be due on that date. In Pennsylvania, the Stein/Baraka campaign needs $500,000 by November 28. An additional $600,000 is needed to file in Michigan by that state’s November 30 deadline. An additional amount of $2-3 million will be needed for legal fees.

$1.1 million + $500,000 + $600,000 + $2-3 million = $4.2 to $5.2 million.

Jill Stein made her intentions known on her Facebook page around 4 p.m. Wednesday afternoon, Nov. 23. By this afternoon (Nov. 26), Stein has raised more than $5.8 million, with the goal now upped to $7 million. See for yourself at Jill2016.

In other words, in just 3 days Stein raised $5.8 million, all by crowd funding! The same Jill Stein who was the only candidate on the November ballot to rely on public money — four federal payments totaling $456,000 under the Presidential Election Campaign Fund — for her own failed presidential campaign.

So who are these millions of Americans who are donating to Stein’s vote recount war chest?

Bots!

As in robots. Machines. Not real people.

How do we know this?

Because the donations came in and are still coming in in REGULAR intervals — even at 3 a.m. when most Americans are asleep.

Two days ago, freelance journalist Jim Stone wrote:

“JILL STEIN’S ELECTION RECOUNT IS BEING PAID FOR BY A BOT! A bot is pulling cash from a central fund, and giving it out at a pre determined rate. Go to Jill Stein’s fundraiser page and watch the progress. You will see that her funding is coming in at a PERFECTLY CONSISTENT 160,000 an hour. I watched this yesterday and last night carefully, and noted that at night, when everyone is sleeping and right through the time when the whole world slows down, her donations for this came in like clockwork, with no deviation from the steady pace whatsoever. The only way that can happen is if a bot was set up to fake her getting donations from multiple people, and whoever set it up did not consider the fact that practically everything would come from America, and practically everyone is asleep at 3AM. LAST NIGHT IT SHOULD HAVE SLOWED DOWN. IT DID NOT. IT JUST MARCHED RIGHT TOWARD THE FINISH LIKE AN OBEDIENT SOLDIER. It went straight to 2.65 million by six AM. I can calculate: IT WILL GO TO 4.5 MILLION IN 28.125 HOURS. Oh, a few people will pitch in for real, so I’ll say 27 hours . . . . Yes folks, we are watching the election steal as it happens. They could not do it by threatening electors, so now we have this. And it is all based on false claims, because Michigan CANNOT BE HACKED. Michigan has a CERTIFIED [paper] VOTE. There is NO WAY THIS IS LEGIT. And that means ONE THING – there are liars doing it, powerful liars who know in advance they are going to find what they are looking for.”

Yesterday, the Wisconsin Elections Commission said it had received Stein’s petition for a recount.

What you can do:

(1) Spread the news by publicizing this post on social media and via email.

(2) Keep the recount honest by:

  • Volunteering for the recount. Sign up here.
  • Politely warning the election officials in the 3 battleground states that you’ll be watching:

~Eowyn

Is WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange dead? – the connection with Pamela Anderson

WikiLeaks and its co-founder and editor-in-chief Julian Assange are the unsung heroes of the 2016 Revolt of the Deplorables — the overthrow of Hillary Clinton and the election of Donald Trump to the presidency.

If it were not for WikiLeaks‘ publishing of the hacked emails of Hillary, the DNC, and her campaign chair John Podesta, we would never know about their machinations, deceit, corruption, media collusion, lawlessness, and satanism. See, for example:

On the evening of Oct. 16, 2016, the Alternative Media was alit with rumors that Julian Assange had died.

What triggered the rumor was WikiLeaks‘ activation of its “dead man switch” — decryption keys (like passwords) for its files. WikiLeaks quickly put the rumors to rest with a tweet that they had activated the “dead man switch” contingency plan after Assange’s Internet service was intentionally cut off by a state actor. The internet is one of the few, if not the only, available ways for Assange to maintain contact with the outside world because he has been locked up in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London for more than four years, after he sought political asylum in 2012.

Two days later in a tweet, WikiLeaks identified the Obama administration — specifically Secretary of State John Kerry — as the “state actor” behind the severing of Assange’s Internet connection. (For more, see “The Evil Empire strikes back: WikiLeaks’ Internet connection severed; RT’s bank accounts frozen”)

Although since then Assange’s voice was heard in a telephone call, freelance journalist Jim Stone maintains Assange has been assassinated. The notion of assassination is not far-fetched given Democratic Party operative Bob Beckel’s call to assassinate Assange as far back as 5 years ago in December 2011, as well as then-secretary of state Hillary Clinton once asking, “Can’t we just drone this guy?”.

Stone writes:

“Wikileaks confirmed gone, I believe this is 100 percent real

15 of the top people at Wikileaks were nailed at the same time Julian Assange had his ‘internet cut’. I watched the live cam all night and they took Assange away in a black armored van. If he was still at the embassy, he’d have appeared at the window and has not. Now it appears one of the top wikileaks staff has spoken out, and I believe this is 100 percent accurate because it matches my own observations PERFECTLY

Stone refers his readers to a curious exchange on November 17 on the internet forum 8chan, in which someone with the alias wikileaks!/VUsDxRzwY who claims to be a WikiLeaks employee wrote:

“I’m one of the 15 WikiLeaks personnel that were raided at the same time Julian’s intemet was cut at the Ecuadorian embassy. I was issued a national security letter and a gag order, and all my computer equipment was seized. We had several contingency communication plans in place, and I have been unable to contact Julian or any WikiLeaks personnel except for one through our alternative communication channels. Julian is missing as are most of the WikiLeaks personnel that I had regular communications with. WikiLeaks personnel are NOT in control of the official Tvvitter account. The WikiLeaks IAMA on Reddit was NOT conducted by WikiLeaks personnel….

There has been an incredible charade to keep up the appearance that Julian is fine. Several trusted people are obviously under duress as I cannot imagine any reason why they would promote the charade.

I want to stress that we are no longer in control of WikiLeaks. I advise whistleblowers to NOT SUBMIT LEAKS since we are not in control of our infrastructure. The people in control of our infrastructure WILL use it to IDENTIFY and PROSECUTE whistleblowers.”

That 8chan page has since been deleted, but not before someone captured a screenshot (click to enlarge):

wikileaks-staffer-on-8chan

The next day, Nov. 18, WikiLeaks tweeted that the WikiLeaks staffer on 8chan is a fraud:

“Black-PR campaign posts going around recently trying to suppress submissions to WikiLeaks. False, but who benefits?”

To which twitterer Johan asks:

“Why haven’t we seen the video proof of life that you promised for Assange? Is WikiLeaks compromised?”

Another twitterer named Yor writes:

“Their [WikiLeaks’] Twitter, reddits, failed AMA [ask me anything]. The concern is real and we get radio silence.”

The Dark Canuck writes on Godlike Productions, Nov. 18:

“It is too bizarre. The other day a cat appeared at the window of the embassy wearing a collar and tie. To me this is pure mockery.

We haven’t seen Julian so much as peak his head around the curtain in over a month. The first face we see at the window is this cheshire cat.”

Another poster Emmc2 writes on Godlike Productions:

“It’s all too weird:
1) Wikileaks tweets photo of armed police outside the embassy.
2) Internet gets cut
3) Massive DDoS attack [referring to the DDoS cyber attack on the U.S. east coast and across Europe on Oct. 21, 2016]
4) Strange, out of character, misspelled tweets from Wikileaks.
5) Missing letters in tweets spell out “help him”.
6) No proof of life for Assange
7) Wikileaks tweets an odd questionnaire asking what we would like as proof of life.
8) Pamela Anderson visits Assange (wtf)
9) Podesta email leaks continue.
10) Assange ‘appears’ by phone for some conference. Not a valid proof of life.
11) Pamela Anderson visits Assange a second time!

Wikileaks suffered a massive DDoS attack and there has been NO credible proof of life ever since…. The US Govt had a history of using celebrities for espionage. Pamela Anderson is a decoy. They knew that she would generate news stories and photos with her visits and therefore perpetuate The LIE that Assange is still in the embassy and well. Why didn’t Pamela tweet any selfies with Assange?? That’s certainly within reason to expect. Why would a liberal go out of her way to visit the man who was actively working on taking down the most prominent liberal candidate in history [Hillary Clinton]? It makes no sense whatsoever.

Then the anonymous Wikileaks employee posts those messages. Everything that person said makes perfect sense. Especially with what we’ve uncovered regarding ‘Pizza Gate’ [a reference to Comet Ping Pong, a pedophile pizza restaurant in D.C. linked to John Podesta’s brother, Tony]. This is huge. A real life Bourne Identity/Homeland unfolded in real time before our very eyes. And it’s still going on. Be smart. Be careful. Don’t stop. Let the light in.”

All of which brings us to Pamela Anderson, 49, the aging actress whose air-brushed naked image adorned the cover and centerfold of pornographic Playboy magazine 15 times, and who recently co-authored an op/ed with a “celebrity” rabbi decrying pornography and porn addiction. Notwithstanding her op/ed, Anderson continues to be photographed scantily clad, with her silicone-inflated breasts bulging over her low-cut tops.

Indeed, Anderson did visit Assange on the same day that his Internet connection was severed. As reported by Time:

pamela-anderson-visits-julian-assange-oct-17-2016As WikiLeaks continues to publish emails apparently obtained from Hillary Clinton campaign chair John Podesta, the website’s founder Julian Assange received an unlikely visitor over the weekend.

Pamela Anderson, the Canadian-American actress best known for her work on the 1990s TV series Baywatch, visited Assange at the Ecuadorean embassy in London.

The Associated Press reports that the 49-year-old actress, who says she supports Assange and has concerns for his family and well-being, came bearing gifts. Among them was a vegan lunch.

Think Pamela Anderson as honeypot is farfetched?

Remember my post “Evidence that Hillary Clinton and her associates are satanists” — on the association of Hillary Clinton, Huma Abedin, and the Podesta brothers with a satanic “performance artist” named Marina Abramovic?

marina-abramovic-holding-baphomet-head

Abramovic is known for her “spirit cookinga “sacrament” in Thelema, a religion founded by British occultist-satanist Aleister Crowley whose motto was “Do As Thou Wilt,” in which menstrual blood, breast milk, urine and sperm are mixed to create a “painting.” Mike Cernovich identifies spirit cooking as an “occult practice used during sex cult rituals, as explained in the book Spirit cooking with essential aphrodisiac recipes.”

Abramovic is also known for a so-called performance art event of the simulated dismemberment and cannibalism of two human females, at the Annual Gala of the Museum of Contemporary Art (MoCA) on Nov. 12, 2011. The females were lifesize cakes — a blonde and a brunette who were the representations of, respectively, Debbie Harry (of the rock band Blondie), and Abramovic herself.

Here are some images from the simulated cannibalism art event:

cannibalism-art-gala-abramovic-harrycanniablism-art-gala-bloody-carcass
Among the “celebrity” attendees at the simulated cannibalism was none other than Pamela Anderson, as seen in a photo gallery of the MoCA occult gala on Imgur:

cannibalism-art-gala-pamela-anderson

Other “celebrities” in attendance included Hollyweirdos Minnie Driver, Kirsten Dunst, Lisa Edelstein, Will Ferrell, Jamie King, Johnny Lee Miller, Nicole Richie, and Angelina Jolie’s brother James Haven, as well as others whom I don’t recognize.

Admittedly, all of this is bizarre. On the other hand, this election has been stranger than fiction.

In the end, there’s a very simple way for WikiLeaks to prove that Assange is alive:

Have him appear at a window of the Ecuador Embassy and wave to us.

H/t MoxXV at Reddit

See also “5 Signs Julian Assange Is Missing Or Dead” and this video, especially the weird thing that happened to Assange’s shirt collar at the 3:19 mark:

UPDATE (Jan. 11, 2017):

Yesterday, Jan. 10, 2017, Assange demonstrated he’s alive!

julian-assagne-proves-hes-aliveUPDATE (Feb. 7, 2016):

Is Pamela Anderson banging Assange?

The blonde bimbo has visited Assange four times in the past three months at the Ecuadorean Embassy in London. One political activist observes, “She seems to be wearing sexier outfits every time she visits.” (Page Six)

~Eowyn

The face of evil: Barry Diller, supporter of Hillary Clinton

Barry Diller is one of the Hollyweirdos who had said they would move from the U.S. if Donald Trump were elected President.

Calling Trump a mean and nasty “self-promoting hukster,” Diller, a Hillary Clinton supporter, was so certain that a Trump presidency would never happen, he said he’d put his money on it. As quoted by Bloomberg on Oct. 6, 2015:

 “If Donald Trump doesn’t fall, I’ll either move out of the country or join the resistance.”

Ever noticed that I like to find photos of people about whom I blog? I do that because I believe we can know a lot about a person from his/her visage.

So who is Barry Diller?

Let’s begin with a recent candid, frighteningly evil pic of him:

barry-diller

If you think Hollywood peddles garbage and poison, one of the people responsible for the Hollywood swamp is Barry Diller.

Barry Diller, 74, is a powerful Hollywood and business mogul who was a CEO at Paramount Pictures (1974-84) and Fox Inc. (1984-92), and is currently the chairman of  IAC/InterActiveCorp — a media and internet company that owns Home Shopping Network, Expedia Inc., About.com, Match.com, The Daily Beast, Vimeo, The Princeton Review, and assorted local TV stations.

Chelsea Clinton is on the Board of Directors of IAC/InterActive Corp.

In 20015, New York Times named Barry Diller “the highest paid executive,” with a total compensation that year of $295 million. With an estimated net worth of $2.6 billion, Diller’s already considerable power is magnified by his mentoring of other Hollywood moguls such as Michael Eisner and Jeffrey Katzenberg.

Born to Jewish parents in San Francisco, Diller is a known homosexual, but married fashion designer Diane von Fürstenberg in 2001. Diane, also born to Jewish parents, designed those ugly shirts for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign. She kept the von Fürstenberg last name after her divorce in 1972 from husband no. 1, Prince Egon of Fürstenberg, with whom she had been married for only 3 years.

Diane von Furstenberg

Jim Stone perceptively writes:

“This election was beyond all doubt a battle between good and evil.

For a change, the side of good won. And I have a PRIME way to show the contrast between good and evil, in a way people can see.

Take a look at this picture of the top guy in the MSM, Barry Diller.

barry-diller

As you can see, if he has his make up on, (his false face, to cover his black hole of a soul,) he looks all right (left photo). This is the face all the evil politicians show. To the right however, you can clearly see that this guy is a Freddie Kruger when the mask comes off, he’s so evil he does not even look human – more like some sort of a demonic alien. If you look you can see the skin wrinkles on his head form the shape of devil horns. Maybe that is what ‘devil horns’ really are.

This man was Trump’s main opposition, it was this prick who more than anyone else controlled a scamming media that did nothing but lie and back stab. A picture really can be worth more than words.

Now look at an image of Trump when he’s not mad, and one where he is. See a difference? Trump always looks like one of us!”

donald-trump

Jim Stone concludes that “Pictures really can say it all. Here is your war between good and evil”:

donald-trump-vs-barry-diller

~Eowyn