Tag Archives: George Zimmerman trial

Trayvon Martin’s father says not his son’s voice in 911 call

In the first day of the Defense in George Zimmerman’s trial for the second-degree murder of Trayvon Martin, a major blow was dealt against the Prosecution.

Last Friday, Trayvon’s mother and brother had testified that the voice in the 911 call was that of Trayvon screaming for help. But Zimmerman’s mother and uncle also testified last Friday that it was Zimmerman screaming in the 911 call.

Today, however, the lead detective in the Zimmerman-Martin case testified that Trayvon Martin’s father had told him it was NOT his son screaming for help in the 911 call.

The 911 call captured the confrontation between Zimmerman and Martin shortly before Zimmerman fatally shot the teen. as such, the call is a crucial piece of evidence because it could determine who the aggressor was in the confrontation last year.

Testimony: Talking about the moment he played the tape to Tracy Martin the night after his son was shot, Serino told the court he asked him if the voice was Trayvon's and he said 'no'Matt Blake and Rachel Quigley report for the Daily Mail, July 8, 2013, that detective Chris Serino (above) took the stand for the second time in the trial. He was called after seven of Zimmerman’s friends told the court it was the neighborhood watch volunteer, not Martin, who was crying for help in the 911 call.Serino told the court that one or two days after the shooting, he had played the tape of the 911 call to Tracy Martin, Trayvon’s father, and his girlfriend. Serino asked Martin if the voice belonged to Trayvon. “‘He looked away and under his breath as I interpret it, said ‘no’,” Serino recalled.
Parents: Tracy Martin and Sybrina Fulton arrive today. Mother Sybrina testified on Friday that the calls for help belonged to her son

Trayvon’s parents: Tracy Martin (l) and Sybrina Fulton (r).

The Sanford, Florida detective’s testimony will further harm the state’s case against Zimmerman.

Seven of Zimmerman’s friends and coworkers also told the court this morning that the screams for help in the 911 tape belonged to Zimmerman.

After the call was played for Sondra Osterman (pic below) in the courtroom, defense attorney Mark O’Mara asked who it was. “Yes, definitely. It’s Georgie. I just hear it. I hear him screaming,” Osterman said. She testified she had first met Zimmerman in 2006 while working with him at a mortgage company. Osterman and her husband, Mark, describe themselves as the best friends of Zimmerman and his wife.

When asked by O’Mara if she detected ill will, spite or hatred in his voice when he said to the 911 dispatcher: “F***ing punks. These a*******. They always get away,” she answered no.

Prosecutors must show that Zimmerman acted with ill will, spite or a depraved mind in order to get a second-degree murder conviction.

Under cross-examination, prosecutor Bernie de la Rionda implied that Sondra Osterman and her husband, Mark, had a stake in the outcome of the trial because they had written a book about Zimmerman’s case and were donating the proceeds to their friend.

“I wouldn’t lie for him or for anybody,” Sondra Osterman said, adding that she was unsure how many copies her husband’s book, Defending our Friend: The Most Hated Man in America, has sold.

Another friend of Zimmerman, John Donnelly (below), also testified that the voice screaming for help in the 911 tape was that of Zimmerman.

He said he thinks of Zimmerman “as a son” and had spent $4,700 — donating to Zimmerman’s defense fund, his personal website, and buying him suits, shirts, and ties for the trial.

Donnelly became quite emotional after listening to the screams. “There’s absolutely no doubt in my mind that is George Zimmerman,” Donnelly told the jury while wiping his eyes. “And I wish to God I did not have the ability to make the determination.”

Emotional: John Donnelly, a friend of George Zimmerman, dries his eyes after listening to screams on the 911 tape entered in evidence, which he said belongs to the 29-year-old
Zimmerman’s best friend, Mark Osterman (pic below), testified about how Zimmerman had chosen and purchased his firearm and revealed that he could shoot with both hands and had recommended keeping the gun loaded.
Best friend: Mark Osterman testified about how Zimmerman had chosen and purchased his firearm and revealed that he could shoot with both hands

Another friend and former coworker of Zimmerman, Geri Russo, also testified that the yelling heard on the 911 tape is Zimmerman. She told the court, “I recognize his voice, I’ve heard him speak many times. I have no doubt in my mind that’s his voice.”

Yet another former coworker, Leanne Benjamin, also identified Zimmerman as the screaming voice on the 911 call.
“I know his voice,” Benjamin told jurors. “I know what his voice sounds like when he gets excited or loud.”

Today’s testimony supports speculation which emerged over the weekend that Zimmerman will walk free amid claims the prosecution’s case has crumbled. Experts say that lawyers acting on behalf of the State of Miami have failed to show that Zimmerman did not reasonably believe the gunshot was ‘necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm’ to himself.

ABC News’ legal expert Dan Abrams said while parts of Zimmerman’s account lack credibility, the prosecution has not done enough to convince a jury: “‘Now that the prosecution’s case against Zimmerman is in, as a legal matter, it is difficult to see how jurors find proof beyond a reasonable doubt that it wasn’t self defense.”

It is a notion shared by Fox NewsJon Lott, former chief economist at the United States Sentencing Commission, who claims the prosecution’s argument is so thin that it should “never have been brought” to court, “but they let politics influence their decision.”

That is also the opinion of former California Alameda County Public Defender Jay Gaskill. See his analysis of the trial here.


Please follow and like us:

Democrat public defender: Zimmerman acted in self-defense

Jay Gaskill is a licensed attorney who was the Public Defender of Alameda County in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Gaskill is also a registered Democrat who, despite his party ID, is my friend. LOL

It is therefore significant that, based on the trial testimonies thus far, Gaskill believes that George Zimmerman was acting in justified self-defense when he struggled with and then shot Trayvon Martin. Gaskill also believes that, given the facts, the prosecution should never filed and pursued a murder charge against Zimmerman. That the prosecution did do that suggests they’re acting from PC pressure, in a case that Obama, as the President of the United States, had unseemly and irresponsibly politicized with his incendiary remark: “If I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon.”

FOTM is grateful for Mr. Gaskill’s permission to republish his essay from his Out*lawyer’s Blog.


ht_george_zimmerman_head_dm_120419_wmainZimmerman’s head wounds from his “encounter” with Martin.

Martin versus Zimmerman or Politically Correct Prosecution vs. Justice

Legal commentary & OPINION

By Jay B. Gaskill, Attorney at Law

June 28, 2013

Trayvon Martin died in a struggle, not – as one breathless media-bot proclaimed just before trial – from being “gunned down.”

The evidence now unambiguously shows that, at the time of the fatal shot, Mr. Zimmerman was down; and Mr. Martin was on top of him, administering a first class beating.

The following is a reasonably accurate summary of the general law as it applies to self-defense cases –

“The circumstances under which he acted must have been such as to produce in the mind of a reasonable prudent person, similarly situated, the reasonable belief that the other person was then about to kill him or to do him serious bodily harm. In addition, the Defendant must have actually believed that he was in imminent danger of death or serious bodily harm and that deadly force must be used to repel it. If evidence of self-defense is present, the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the Defendant did not act in self-defense.”

On the face of it – and from the prosecution’s case so far – it appears that Mr. Zimmerman has a strong self-defense case right out of the box.  Few prosecutors I know would – except in extremis and under relentless political pressure –file and pursue a murder charge in a case like Mr. Zimmerman’s.

If the prosecution can salvage anything from this disaster it might be a manslaughter case based on the doctrine of “imperfect self-defense”, on the notion – so far unproven – that Mr. Zimmerman provoked the struggle and then acted with unnecessary and unreasonable force when he began to lose the fight.

This probably won’t work.  No evidence has surfaced that Zimmerman initiated the use of force and the legal test of his response to being pummeled is what a reasonable person would do if similarly situated. 

Were it my defense case, I would argue – and this can be done very persuasively – that Mr. Zimmerman faced a deadly threat because he was carrying a firearm against a crazed opponent who could not be counted on to use restraint if he (Martin) got control of it during the struggle.

When violently attacked, there is no duty to flee or to turn the other cheek.

I know it is premature to comment, but as the facts have so far unfolded, it would appear to be a grave miscarriage of justice if Mr. Zimmerman were convicted of murder (absent some compelling new evidence, so far not even hinted at).  A manslaughter conviction would be more of a misfire, than a miscarriage, a repellant sop to those fevered souls who had hoped to turn this tragedy into some kind of racial cause-celeb.

I am deeply sorry the Mr. Martin died and that Mr. Zimmerman must go through this nightmare parody of a political trial.

Or so it seems from my remote viewing platform.


Please follow and like us: