Tag Archives: Environment

Agenda 21: Rio+20 and ICLEI Hypocrites

   ICLEI Members Admit “Bait and Switch”                                       
6/18/2012   Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
To advance public action on global warming, participants attending the ICLEI World Congress admitted today that they are deliberately employing new terminology to misdirect opponents and gain acceptance of their efforts to reduce energy use and greenhouse gases. By utilizing terms like “sustainability” and “sustainable development,” the group wants to mask its objectives and disarm would-be critics who might otherwise oppose their agenda, ICLEI attendees confided with CFACT representatives at the conference.
Huxley Lawler, Executive Coordinator of Environment and Climate Change of the Gold Coast City Council in Australia (an ICLEI member), told CFACT Executive Director Craig Rucker bluntly that we don’t use the term climate change anymore. It’s sustainable development.” Rucker and CFACT staffer Abdul Kamara confirmed this in conversations with other delegates, including Paul Chambers, a Sustainability Manager for the Auckland Council in New Zealand. Chambers said it is important to use inexact environment protection terminology when dealing with conservative governments…….
The above is excerpt from a June 18, 2012 Press Release from CFACT.org, (Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow) an organization fighting at an international level to expose and stop the ultimate endgame  of  U.N. Agenda 21.

Please follow and like us:

This is an Incredible story!


In 1986, Peter Davies was on holiday in Kenya after graduating from Northwestern University .
On a hike through the bush, he came across a young bull elephant standing with one leg raised in the air.

The elephant seemed distressed, so Peter approached it very carefully.
He got down on one knee, inspected the elephants foot, and found a large piece of wood deeply embedded in it.
As carefully and as gently as he could, Peter worked the wood out with his knife,

after which the elephant gingerly put down its foot.
The elephant turned to face the man, and with a rather curious look on its face, stared at him for several tense moments.
Peter stood frozen, thinking of nothing else but being trampled.
Eventually the elephant trumpeted loudly, turned, and walked away.
Peter never forgot that elephant or the events of that day.
Twenty years later, Peter was walking through the Chicago Zoo with his teenaged son.
As they approached the elephant enclosure, one of the creatures turned and walked over to near where Peter and his son Cameron were standing.

The large bull elephant stared at Peter, lifted its front foot off the ground, then put it down.
The elephant did that several times then trumpeted loudly, all the while staring at the man.
Remembering the encounter in 1986, Peter could not help wondering if this was the same elephant.
Peter summoned up his courage, climbed over the railing, and made his way into the enclosure.
He walked right up to the elephant and stared back in wonder.

The elephant trumpeted again, wrapped its trunk around one of Peter legs

and slammed him against the railing, killing him instantly.

Probably wasn’t the same Damn elephant. 

This is for everyone who sends me those heart-warming bullsh*t stories.

~Steve~     H/T Our Miss May.

Please follow and like us:

Agenda 21: Lifestyle of the Green Economy


Please follow and like us:

David Brooks Finally Lays Something Worth Knowing On the Line- Agenda 21 Green Jobs are Toast

When the “Smart Grid” is Fully Operational, Kiss 28,000 Meter Reader Jobs Goodbye

There’s a wealth of other evidence to suggest that the green economy will not be a short-term jobs machine. According to Investor’s Business Daily, executives at Johnson Controls turned $300 million in green technology grants into 150 jobs — that’s $2 million per job.
Sunil Sharan, a former director of The Smart Grid Initiative at General Electric, wrote in The Washington Post that the Smart Grid, while efficient and environmentally beneficial, will be a net job destroyer. For example, 28,000 meter-reading jobs will be replaced by the Smart Grid’s automatic transmitters.
A study by McKinsey suggests that clean energy may produce jobs for highly skilled engineers, but it will not produce many jobs for U.S. manufacturing workers. Gordon Hughes, an economist at the University of Edinburgh, surveyed the landscape and concluded: “There are no sound economic arguments to support an assertion that green energy policies will increase the total level of employment….”
Read full story here

Please follow and like us:

If It Walks Like a Duck and Squacks Like a Duck—Agenda 21 in Rick Perry's Capital

Texans for Accountable Government

Please follow and like us:

Environmentalists Try to Ruin the Fourth of July

Fireworks shows need new environmental review

Environmentalists are doing everything in their power to change your behaviors and make life as difficult as possible for business owners and industry.  Now, they are coming after our Fourth of July Celebrations.
The Coastal Environmental Rights Foundation filed a suit against the La Jolla Community Fireworks Foundation to demand that an environmental review be performed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Superior Court Judge Linda Quinn ruled this past Friday in favor with the environmental group.
“San Diego issues thousands of these simple park-use permits over the counter with the only consideration being space, just as other cities do across the state,” said City Attorney Jan Goldsmith. “Existing law has never been interpreted to require a CEQA review for this. … This decision opens the door to absurd results. This is the reason appellate courts exist and we plan to ask for their help.
The future of La Jolla’s event was fuzzy Friday. Organizers likely can’t complete the time-intensive and costly CEQA analysis by July 4, but Robert Howard (representative for the fireworks group) said he would ask the court to allow this year’s event while the case is appealed.
City Councilwoman Sherri Lightner, whose district includes La Jolla, said she hoped to find a solution. “We have to strike a balance that protects the environment but also allows our finest traditions to continue,” she said.
Alex Roth, a spokesman for Mayor Jerry Sanders, framed the suit as part of a “bizarre crusade to stop fireworks. What’s next, a lawsuit against swimmers for polluting the ocean with their suntan lotion?” Roth said.
Marco Gonzalez, a lawyer for the environmental rights foundation, exulted over Friday’s win, which comes after months of criticism against him for challenging an American tradition. “If you were to sum it up with one word, I would say ‘vindication.’ It’s vindication for the environment … and it’s vindication for my client because of the amount of disparaging comments and general negativity that was thrown our way when we were told that our lawsuit was frivolous,” Gonzalez said. “There are a whole host of impacts that we know occur from fireworks shows, from marine mammals to marine birds to water quality to traffic to noise to the air,” Gonzalez said. “We want it studied and we want it mitigated.” Gonzalez has repeatedly said that protecting water quality and coastal species is patriotic.
Tony Manolatos, a spokesman for City Councilman Kevin Faulconer, stood by the council’s exemption for fireworks. “I think banning fireworks on the Fourth of July is un-American,” he said, “and I think the majority of San Diegans would agree.”
I’ve been to plenty of firework shows here in Seattle.  Sure, there’s noise (duh!) and traffic (duh!), yet I’ve never seen any dead fish or marine mammals or birds floating around the Puget Sound the day (or days) after the events. But that’s not really the issue, right?  It’s ‘vindication’ after all.

Please follow and like us:

Psychology for Liberals: Monkey See-Monkey Do

How do you “condition” liberals to knuckle-under to the Green Agenda when it comes to their own neighborhoods?   The New York Times looks at the NOT- IN- MY- BACKYARD Syndrome of dyed-in-the-wool liberals making a fuss when environmentally-friendly green projects get up close and personal.   They don’t like it!  file lawsuits ! 
What does a progressive government agency do if their own disciples balk?  They call in a shrink, a”persuasion consultant”. 
Remember when your Mother used to say, “Just because all the other kids  ___________ (fill in the blank), it doesn’t mean that you are, too.”  
Well, the “persuasion expert” recommends  just the opposite! 
If all the other kids are doing it, you should, too!   
I think this is called “Group Think.”  or

 Monkey See – Monkey Do!   


Please follow and like us:

Microchip Implant Allows Islamaniac Terrorists to Talk to God

The Fellowship in its never ending quest to bring you the latest scientific news has found a new breakthrough in the medical field.  Field technicians at Semper Fi U. have made an astounding discovery.
Dr. I. Killem Okeydokey explains the procedure for our reporter on the scene Tina Kickbutt:
“The implant is  specifically designed to be injected in the forehead. When properly installed, it will allow the terrorist to speak to God. It comes in various sizes:  Generally from .223 to .50 cal.

The exact size of the implant will be selected by a well-trained and highly skilled technician, who will also make the injection. No anesthetic is required.
The implant may or may not be painless. Side effects, like headaches, nausea, aches and pains are extremely temporary. Some bleeding or swelling may occur at the injection site. In most cases, you won’t even notice it!”
Please enjoy the security we provide for you.
Best regards,

~Steve~     H/T our intrepid reporter Miss Tina

Please follow and like us: