Tag Archives: DNC

Democrat big donors: donating to Hillary's losing campaign was like burning money

This morning, our DCG posted that Hillary Clinton’s losing campaign cost a record $1.2B, which was twice as much as what the Trump campaign spent.
So it should come as no surprise that at least some of Hillary’s big donors think their money was wasted — they might as well have set fire to the piles of cash.
donating-money-to-hillary-clintons-presidential-campaign
Jonathan Easley reports for The Hill, Dec. 1, 2016, that Democrat big donors went whole hog for Hillary to the tune of more than $550 million, believing she would dispatch Trump, deliver Democrats the Senate, help the party make inroads into the GOP’s House majority, as well as cement Obama’s legacy.
Instead, not only did Hillary lose, Democrats are now in disarray, in the throes of a full-scale and expensive rebuilding project with a rudderless Democratic National Committee (DNC) that won’t elect a new leader until more than a month after Trump is sworn into office.
Adding insult to the injury: The names of many donors were released in the WikiLeaks emails, which has rattled some of the party’s big-money men and women.
John Morgan & Marc Nathanson
John Morgan, an Orlando attorney and one of Clinton’s top fundraisers in Florida, said:

“I may very well be done with political giving entirely. My message to anyone reading this is, ‘Don’t call me, I’ll call you.’ From here on out, I’m giving to charities. I’d much rather give money to build a new Boys & Girls Club than to give to the [Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee].”

Investor Marc Nathanson, one of Clinton’s top donors and fundraisers in 2016, says he has no interest in participating in the party’s rebuilding efforts. While he would continue to give money and support to Democratic candidates in gubernatorial and mayoral races in his home state of California, he will stay on the sidelines. He said:

“The feeling I get from big donors out here in California is that they’re not only extremely disappointed, but they’re shell-shocked. So to turn around and say, now it’s time to rebuild the national party and the DNC, I just don’t see it.”

The big donors’ sore feelings are a huge problem for the DNC, which is trying to rebuild its image and reinvigorate a defeated party in time for challenging midterm elections in 2018. It’s also a worry for top liberal activists as they prepare for war with President Trump and a GOP Congress that is hell-bent on rolling back President Obama’s accomplishments.

Some Democrats believe the fundraising panic is being overblown, arguing that in Trump, the party has a fearsome boogeyman that will keep horrified donors in a giving mood. They’re optimistic that jilted donors will change their tune once the DNC elects a new leader and as the midterm elections near. Democrats face a daunting map in the 2018 midterm elections, when they’ll be defending 25 of the 46 seats they currently hold in the Senate. A filibuster-proof majority is within reach for Republicans.

Democrats with a rosier view point to the following:

  • A Nov. 14 donor event in Washington, D.C., including George Soros, was notable for its “bigger than expected turnout.”

gara-lamarche-david-brock-james-alefantis

  • Gara LaMarche, the president of Democracy Alliancea big money group that funds the Black Lives Matter protests and riots — has been touring the liberal donor hubs of Los Angeles, San Francisco and Boston to discuss the “progressive” movement’s way forward with top donors. LaMarche said, “There is deep frustration with the Democratic Party and the political consultant class among the donors who put a lot of money into the electoral efforts, who don’t feel their money was spent well. They want to know what went wrong. But there is also an emergency response to protecting policies, whether it’s abortion or EPA regulations or ObamaCare, that is mobilizing and energizing the wider set of progressive donors.”

  • David Brock of the liberal watchdog group Media Matters for America — the Democrat activist whose former boyfriend is James Alefantis, owner of Comet Ping Pong pedo pizzeria — has invited 225 current donors and 175 prospective donors to a meeting in Palm Beach, Fla., over Trump’s inaugural weekend. Brock has ambitious plans to create Democrat counterparts of the Koch Brothers, Breitbart, and the influential citizens watchdog group Judicial Watch.

But even the prospect of the 2018 midterm election isn’t enough to get some angry donors back in the game. One DNC official told The Hill the donors are “tired. They’re upset about the election, and there was significant trauma surrounding the Russians. They’re upset and they’re tired.”

“significant trauma surrounding the Russians”? Ha, ha, ha, ha.

Not only are those Democrat big donors “useful idiots,” they actually believe the Democrats’ fake news!

~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

Head of Democratic Party Donna Brazile: no Obama economic recovery, people are in despair

Yesterday, I received a rare phone call from my brother. He just needed to commiserate with the only person he knows who isn’t liberal and who shares his political views about the upcoming presidential election.
He complained that his wife, their two adult sons, and his friends all support Hillary Clinton and think Obama is great.
I said, “Have you asked them why they like Obama?”
He answered, “They say the economy is great! Unemployment is low, interest rates are low, the economy recovered from the recession.” He also said that his wife thinks Donald Trump is “crazy”.
Not surprisingly, they get their news from the MSM and don’t pay attention to the Alternative Media. God help us from intentionally low-information voters, otherwise called useful idiots.
So this post is for my brother. Perhaps he can email this to his sons, wife, and friends. (Probably not. This is the same brother who was silent in 2008 when one of his friends, whom I don’t know, accused me of being “evil” and a “racist”. My brother had forwarded an email from me, without my consent, of a photo of Obama carrying Fareed Zakaria’s then-recently published book, The Post-American World. My brother then very helpfully forwarded his friend’s email to me, in which his friend called me an “evil racist”.)
obama-with-fareed-zakarias-book
Donna Brazile, a longtime Democrat apparatchik who, in July 2016, replaced Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman-Schultz as Chair of the Democratic Party Committee, sent an email to John Podesta, Chair of Hillary’s 2016 presidential campaign committee, in which Brazile said:

“I think people are more in despair about how things are – yes new jobs but they are low wage jobs… HOUSING is a huge issue. Most people pay half of what they make to rent…”

Here’s a screenshot of Brazile’s email from WikiLeaks:
donna-brazile-to-john-podesta-one-a-week-email
What Brazile wrote in her email is confirmed by a recent Harvard University Business School study, “Problems Unsolved & A Nation Divided: The State of U.S. Competitiveness 2016,” which found that the Obama economic recovery is a myth. As the 72-page report’s title suggests, not only has the economy not recovered from the 2008 recession, it has continued to deteriorate.
In the words of the report’s authors Michael E. Porter, et al.:

“America retains and enjoys many strengths. However, various economic indicators show that the U.S. economy has failed to deliver strong growth and shared prosperity for nearly two decades. These structural issues pre-date the Great Recession and are compounded by political paralysis. […]

While a slow recovery is underway, fundamentally weak U.S. economic performance continues and is leaving many Americans behind. The federal government has made no meaningful progress on the critical policy steps to restore U.S. competitiveness in the last decade or more. […]

U.S. competitiveness has been eroding since well
before the Great Recession. America’s economic
challenges are structural, not cyclical. The weak
recovery reflects the erosion of competitiveness, as
well as the inability to take the steps necessary to
address growing U.S. weaknesses.

Our failure to make progress reflects an unrealistic and ineffective national discourse on the reality of the challenges facing the U.S. economy and the steps needed to restore shared prosperity. Business has too often failed to play its part in recent decades, and a flawed U.S. political system has led to an absence of progress in government, especially in Washington.”

You can read the report here.

For those who prefer charts instead of words, the following charts from the Harvard study — on labor force participation, job creation, news business formation, productivity, household income, entitlements vs. investments — all show a continuing decline under the Obama presidency, except for the gap between entitlements and investment, which has widened.
us-economic-performance-chartsSource: ZeroHedge
Donald Trump is right in his concluding remarks at the third presidential debate last Wednesday, Oct. 19, 2016, on why the American people should elect him as president:

“When I started this campaign, I started it very strongly. It’s called ‘Make America Great Again’. We’re going to make America again.
We have a depleted military, it has to be helped, it has to be fixed. We have the greatest people on earth in our military. We don’t take care of our veterans. We take care of illegal immigrants — people that come into the country illegally — better than we take care of our vets. That can’t happen. Our policemen and women are disrespected. We need law and order, but we need justice too. Our inner cities are a disaster: you get shot walking to the store; they have no education, they have no jobs.
I will do more for African Americans and Latinos than she can ever do in ten lifetimes. All she’s done is talk — to the African Americans and to the Latinos. But they get the vote and then they come back, they say ‘we’ll see you in four years.’
We are going to make America strong again. We are going to make America great again, and it has to start now. We cannot take four more years of Barack Obama, and [pointing to Hillary] that’s what you get when you get her.

https://youtu.be/VLdmEDOAA4A?t=1h30m35s
Donald Trump is not perfect or a saint; he is his own worst enemy. But if you’re sick of what’s happened to this country for the last 8 or more years, if you are no better, or even worse, since Obama became president in 2009, then voting for Hillary Clinton is the stupidest thing you can ever do.
eric-trump-tweet-on-hillary-and-jobs
Listen to what she says: Hillary Clinton has no new ideas. If you elect her, you’ll get not only four more years of Obama, America will be saddled with a predominately left-wing Supreme Court who will set this country’s course for generations to come.
the-hillary-supreme-court
~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

Hacked emails show Democratic National Committee to be corrupt arm of Hillary

Sun, 24 Jul 2016 20:31:11 +0000

eowyn2

Ask a Democrat about Richard Nixon, and you’ll get an earful about Nixon’s dirty campaign tricks. There’s a reason why his nickname is Tricky Dick.

But it’s a case of the pot calling the kettle black, as shown by some 2,000 Democratic National Committee (DNC) emails hacked by Guccifer 2.0 and recently released by WikiLeaks.

Those emails show that the DNC is thoroughly corrupt. Long before Hillary Clinton won the 2016 Democratic primary elections and became her party’s presumptive presidential nominee, the DNC had become her tool, planning and undertaking dirty tricks to protect her and to undermine her opponents Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump.

If Democrats have even a shred of honesty, they would acknowledge that Hillary Clinton is worse than Richard Nixon — many times worse. At least Nixon did not heartlessly abandon four Americans to die in Benghazi, Libya.

Hillary anti-Christ hellfire

Chuck Ross reports for The Daily Caller, July 22, 2016, that WikiLeaks released nearly 20,000 emails it says are from the accounts of Democratic National Committee (DNC) officials, which could cloud the upcoming Democratic party convention that begins Monday in Philadelphia. The emails were obtained by a self-described Romanian hacker (or hackers) going by the name Guccifer 2.0 through the DNC’s computer systems, but many suspect the hackers to be a team of Russians.

In addition to DNC emails, other documents released by the hacker(s) include internal planning memos and databases of Democratic donors. The DNC, chaired by Florida Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, has admitted that their systems were infiltrated.

The emails, dated from Jan. 2015 to May 25, 2016, come from the accounts of DNC officials. According to WikiLeaks, which is operated by Julian Assange, the release is “part one” of a series it is calling “Hillary Leaks.”

So far, this is what the DNC emails reveal:

(1) Collusion between journalists and the DNC to protect Hillary

In an email from DNC national press secretary and deputy communications director Mark Paustenbach to DNC communications director (and former White House Director of Hispanic Media) Luis Miranda, Paustenbach said Politico‘s chief investigative reporter Ken Vogel “gave me his story,” which was unflattering to Hillary, to read “ahead of time,” before the story goes to Vogel’s editors. Paustenback then asked Miranda to “Let me know if you see anything that’s missing and I’ll push back.”

Mark Paustenbach, Luis Miranda, Ken Vogel

Here’s a screenshot I took of that email from WikiLeaks (click image to enlarge):

In his story, Vogel wrote that although the Hillary Victory Fund was billed as a joint fundraising effort between the Clinton campaign, DNC and state Democratic parties, only a small fraction of funds raised actually went to state parties.

Given a heads up by Vogel, Hillary’s campaign pushed back on the report with a spin by Clinton spokesman Josh Schwerin, who told CNN: “Funds raised through the Hillary Victory Fund are now being used to fund and staff organizing programs in Ohio, Virginia, Florida and states across the country that will register voters, recruit volunteers and organize Democrats to turn out and support candidates up and down the ballot.”

(2) Proposal to undermine Bernie Sanders by publicizing he’s a Jew

In an email on May 5, 2016, from DNC chief financial officer Brad Marshall to Miranda, Paustenbach and CEO of DNC Amy Dacey, Marshall proposes that “we get someone” in Kentucky and West Virginia to ask Bernie Sanders about his (religious) belief — whether he believes “in a God” — in order to impress on Southern Baptists that Bernie is a Jew and an atheist.

Amy DaceyHere’s a screenshot of the email (click to enlarge):

WikiLeaks DNC email2(3) DNC approved of fake CraigsList ad to smear Trump as a sexist pig

In an email to Paustenbach and Miranda on May 18, 2016, DNC deputy communications director Christina Freundlich sought their approval for placing a fictitious ad on CraigsList, soliciting “hot women” to work for Donald Trump, who are prepared to endure public humiliation if they gain weight, and to be greeted by Trump “with a kiss on the lips” or a grope “under the meeting table”. The fake ad was approved by DNC communications director Luis Miranda.

Christina Freundlich

Here’s a screenshot of the email (click image to enlarge):

Wikileaks DNC email3

Hillary Clinton is not yet president. Imagine what she and the Democrats would do if she is. Dirty campaign tricks are piffling compared to the “tricks” to come.

H/t Big Lug

~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

Chair of Democratic National Committee admits Obama is lazy

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jV8kF87CFGQ]
Florida Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman-Schultz is the Chair of the Democratic National Committee.
Chuck Ross reports for The Daily Caller that Wasserman-Schultz was interviewed on MSNBC last Wednesday, July 30, 2014, ahead of a Republican-backed measure to sue Obama for overstepping his executive authority, especially in his unilateral actions to implement Obamacare.
In the interview, the DNC chair inadvertently agreed with a complaint levied most often by Republicans that Obama has not put much effort into his job.
Wasserman-Schultz said, “I’m going to go to the House floor and actually debate why we shouldn’t be voting for the first time in American history to sue the president of the United States for doing his job, and doing his job actually less often and at a rate that is lower than any other president since Grover Cleveland.
Of course Wasserman-Schultz blames the POS’s laziness on “the Republicans refuse to do anything”!
GOP's faultCleveland, one of the lowest-rated U.S. presidents, was president for two non-consecutive terms from 1885 to 1889 and from 1893 to 1897.
According to an analysis by the New York Post, Obama has played golf 185 times since taking office in 2009. The POS has hit the links 81 times during his second term — more than doubling the rate of his first term. President Ebola also spends a lot of time raising money for fellow Democrats, attending 75 fundraisers since his 2012 re-election.
See also “Obama blames Americans for being lazy.”
~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

Code Pink bringing their, um, privates to the RNC

Bring your Vagina to the RNC

Eve Ensler famously said: “My vagina’s furious and it needs to talk.”  Our vaginas need to talk, too.  They need to talk about the way women’s rights are threatened worldwide–from anti-choise legislation to inappropriate rape jokes to economic inequality to war and occupation overseas that disproportionately affect women’s lives…
Join CODEPINK and V-Day to bring your vagina to the Republican National Convetion in Tampa, FL August 27 – 30!
Together, we will bring our resilient, creative, powerful vaginas to Republican fundraisers and to the convention hall.  We’ll also take part in the Coalition March on the RNC and other peace and justice actions.
I’m sure they’ll be protesting inappropriate rape jokes at the DNC too.  You know, the ones from the likes of Bill Maher and John Stewart? Whoops, maybe not.
Let’s just hope they keep those vaginas fully clothed!
DCG
 

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

Obama adviser thinks stay-at-home moms are lazy slackers

Yesterday, interviewed by CNN’s Anderson Cooper on the “war on women” (whatever that means), Hilary Rosen, an adviser to stalking horse for Obama and the Democratic National Committee, lobbed an insult at the wife of Mitt Romney, Ann.
Rosen said:

“Guess what, his wife has actually never worked a day in her life.”

I honestly had never seen a woman who has never worked a day in her life! So I found a picture of Ann Romney when she was younger and the mother of five, just so readers of Fellowship of the Minds can see what a woman who “has actually never worked a day in her life” looks like:

64-year-old Ann Romney is also a grandmother of 16.
+++
In addition to being an Obama and DNC adviser, Hilary Beth Rosen worked for  the music industry (Recording Industry Association of America) from 1994 to 2003 as first its president, then chairman and chief executive, and its chief Washington lobbyist. She then became a political commentator for CNBC and MSNBC.
An out lesbian, Rosen had twins (boy and girl) with her partner, attorney and fellow LBGT activist Elizabeth Birch. Sadly, the couple split up in 2006.
Here’s a pic of Rosen (left), Birch (r), and their (adopted?) twins:

Shame on you, Hilary Rosen, for demeaning the work and value of mothers and wives. And you call yourself a feminist?
The real “War on Women” is being waged by sick ideologues like Hilary Rosen and her advisee, the illegal squatter in the White House.
~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

Obama Targets Anti-Fraud Voter ID Law

Let me ask you a simple question:

When you go to the DMV to get a driver’s license, don’t you have to show identification proving you are who you say you are?

When you go to the Post Office to get a passport, don’t you have to show valid identification proving you are who you say you are?

When you go buy something in a store without using cash, don’t you have to show your driver’s license to prove you are who your credit or debit card says you are?

Then why is it that when we go to the voting booth to exercise one of the most important acts as an American citizen, we shouldn’t produce valid ID to prove we are who we say we are? And if you favor voter ID, you’re called a racist?
To prevent voter fraud, many states have passed voter-ID laws. Some of those states even provide a valid identification for free to residents who do not have a driver’s license.
The Supreme Court has upheld those voter ID laws.
But the Obama administration is attacking those exact same laws, using the contorted justification that asking for voter ID discriminates against minorities.
Really? Does Obama have such a low opinion of America’s racial/ethnic minorities that he thinks they’re too stupid to know how to acquire a voter ID card?
Judicial Watch reports, Dec. 7, 2011, that the Obama Administration is once again utilizing the Department of Justice (DOJ) as a political tool, this time to challenge voter identification laws.
The powerful chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee (Florida Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz) is calling ID laws a “full-scale assault” on minority voters designed to “rig” elections for Republicans.
Eight states have strict laws that require a voter to provide picture identification in order to cast a ballot. All but two of the states—Georgia and Indiana—passed their measures this year. But the DOJ’s bloated civil rights division says those measures are “discriminatory” in purpose or effect. Targets of the DOJ’s discrimination probe are Kansas, Wisconsin, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Mississippi.
Reiterating the administration’s “commitment to robust civil rights enforcement,” Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Thomas Perez confirmed last week that DOJ lawyers are reviewing some of the recently-enacted state laws to ensure that they are not racially discriminatory. “We have received numerous inquiries about recently enacted state laws relating to voter identification requirements, voter registration requirements and changes to early voting procedures,” Perez said, adding that “we are carefully reviewing these laws.”
In 2008 the U.S. Supreme Court upheld Indiana’s voter ID law, ruling that the state’s interest in protecting the integrity of the voting process outweighed the insufficiently proven burdens the law may impose on voters. “There is no question about the legitimacy or importance of the State’s interest in counting only the votes of eligible voters,” the nation’s highest court said in its decision.
The ruling makes the DOJ’s aggressive intervention all the more questionable, like some of its other politically-motivated actions. Earlier this year Judicial Watch obtained internal government records that show political appointees at the DOJ ordered a voter intimidation case against the New Black Panther Party dismissed. Clad in military attire and armed with weapons, members of the radical group intimidated white voters with racial insults and profanity during the 2008 presidential election and were scheduled to be prosecuted.
H/t beloved fellow Tina.


Democrats have engaged in voter fraud in 2008 and, most recently, in 2010. Head of the DOJ and U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder even admitted that he wouldn’t prosecute the New Black Panthers ’cause they’re “his people.” It’s high time we start calling the DOJ under Obama the Department of Injustice.
Maybe that’s why, more than a year ago, the DOJ changed its website’s banner from the red-white-and-blue to this ominous black:

~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

Obama Hires New Minister of Propaganda

Nazi Germany had a Minister of Propaganda, the infamous Joseph Goebbels. His full title was Reich Minister of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda (Volksaufklärung und Propaganda).
Meet Jesse Lee, Obama’s propaganda minister, whose formal title is Director of Progressive Media and Online Response.
A week ago, on May 23, 2011, the White House appointed 31-year-old Jesse Lee to the newly created position “to help maintain the President’s online presence as he prepares for his 2012 Presidential reelection bid.”
Clearly, Lee means to be Obama’s Rottweiler because his first tweet about his new position included a picture of the demonic red-eyed cyborg assassin, the Terminator.
Formerly Obama’s Online Programs Director, Lee’s new duties as Director of Progressive Media and Online Response Propaganda Minister include “dealing with negative or factually incorrect stories about Obama” — a task formerly handled by the Democratic National Committee’s rapid response team.
Lee even has his own webpage on WhiteHouse.gov.
Lee is experienced with the Internet. As Obama’s Online Programs Director, appointed February 23, 2009, Lee ran the Whitehouse.gov website and innovated techniques to engage individuals on the Internet.  Before that, he was hired to do Internet work for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) in 2003; worked in their online division from 2004 to 2006; was Senior New Media Advisor to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi in the 110th Congress; performed online response for the DNC during the 2008 presidential election; and did online outreach in the New Media department of Obama’s presidential transition team.
In September 2009, Lee defended Obama against criticism from Glenn Beck by claiming that Beck and Fox News lie. At the time, Jim Kuhnhenn of the Associated Press noted that “calling a news networks’ assertions ‘lies’ is unusually confrontational”.
That modus operandus is a harbinger of Jesse Lee, the propaganda minister. As Paul Joseph Watson of Prison Planet.com writes on May 24, 2011, “White House Hires ‘Terminator’ To ‘Squash Negative Stories’ About Obama“:

In a bid to ‘squash negative stories’ about Barack Obama that appear on the Internet, the White House has hired a dedicated propagandist whose role will be to savage people who tell “lies” about the President, in a chilling reminder of how prosecutors threatened people with jail time during the 2008 campaign if they criticized Obama.

“The Obama administration has created and staffed a new position tucked inside their communications shop for helping coordinate rapid response to unfavorable stories and fostering and improving relations with the progressive online community,” reports the Huffington Post.

The man tasked with the role of “disseminating push back” against Obama’s online critics by direct order of the White House will be Jesse Lee, a blogger who has previously put out White House spin in response to claims made by Glenn Beck.

“The post is a new one for this White House. Rapid response has been the purview of the Democratic National Committee (and will continue to be). Lee’s hire, however, suggests that a portion of it will now be handled from within the administration. It also signals that the White House will be adopting a more aggressive engagement in the online world in the months ahead.”

[…] “If you’re going to post something online about Obama that isn’t true, Lee is going to be the one to handle you,” reports Chris O’Shea, noting that the move is about “squashing any negative stories” that could derail Obama’s re-election bid.

Lee obviously sees himself taking the role of ‘Terminator’ in destroying ‘conspiracies’ and ‘disinformation’ about the Obama 2012 campaign, similar to how Obama-supporting prosecutors and sheriffs in Missouri threatened people with jail time for telling “lies” about Obama during the 2008 campaign. News agencies in Pennsylvania and Ohio were also sent threatening letters demanding they stop airing ads exposing Obama’s anti-gun stance.

This has nothing to do with circulating “lies” about Obama, this is about intimidating, silencing and smearing anyone who dares tell the truth about Obama’s record or his highly dubious personal history.

Fellow conservative bloggers! You are forewarned!
Put on the armor of God and get ready for the Battle of Helm’s Deep against the onslaught of Orcs and Uruk’hai.
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aUO6AS_c40c&feature=related]
~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

Mystery Behind Obama's Trip to Hawaii in 2008

Thanks to my friend, Kelleigh, I just found a VERY INTERESTING  blog,          The Daily Pen written by an attorney based in Mombosa, Kenya.  He has put together very detailed information about the whole mystery of Obama.  This article deals with the ordeal Team Obama had to go through just to get him qualified as a candidate on the Hawaii Presidential Ballot.  The documentation of Pelosi’s fraud is presented at Exhibit A.  (right click to Save Picture to your computer then enlarge it to read the fine print to compare the side-by-side documents for yourself)
Read the entire article on his blog—- it’s long and incredibly juicy!   If there was a Pulitzer Prize for investigative blogging, this guy would be a front runner.
Read Entire article:   https://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2011/01/o-con-had-legal-help-from-non-partisan.html
~LTG

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

Is Obama Behind Public Union Demonstrations?


In a recent interview on FoxNews, Bill O’Reilly said: “I don’t think it’s a stretch to say that President Obama may be behind the scenes in this Wisconsin brawl. It might be he and his guys directing what happens out there.”
O’Reilly is not prone to paranoia or conspiracy theories. Heck, O’Reilly is not even a birther! LOL
Given Obama’s Feb. 17 characterization of Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker’s efforts to trim the state’s $3.6 billion deficits as an “attack on unions,” the notion that Obama is not just sympathetic to unions but may be orchestrating the demonstrations is not wholly far-fetched.
To make my case, I present you with six exhibits or pieces of evidence.

Exhibit 1:

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=DQj-xBH30-I]
On January 15, 2008, when Obama was still a mere senator before he was elected president, he said this to the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), the fastest growing  labor union in the United States representing about 1.8 million workers:

“[Political candidates] all sing we love the SEIU. The question you’ve got to ask yourselves is do they have it in their gut, do they have a track record of standing alongside you in picket fights, do they have a track record of going after the companies that aren’t letting you organize, do they have a track record of voting the right way but also helping you organize to build more and more power…. I come from an organized background, so I know. I’ve been working with SEIU before I was elected to anything….”

Exhibit 2:

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fun924xk8g0]
On August 23, 2009, now President Obama once again rallied the SEIU troops:

“Hope and Change is not just the rhetoric of a campaign for me. Hope and Change has been the causes of my life…. We have a lot of good friends of labor who are running in this election. I admire all of them. But the question I do want SEIU to ask yourselves is not who can talk about your agenda, but who can change the politics in Washington so that we can actually make your agenda a reality. And I believe I can do that. But…I can’t do this by myself. That’s why I am not just asking you to trust my ability to change this country, I’m asking you to trust in yourselves. I’m asking you to bet not just on me, I’m asking you to bet on us…. That’s what you did with me in 2004 because I probably wouldn’t be standing here if it hadn’t been for the SEIU endorsement back then….”

Exhibit 3:

Obama and Trumka


Richard Trumka, President of the AFL-CIO, is very close to Obama. Trumka recently said: “I’m at the White House a couple times a week. Two, three times a week. I have conversations everyday with someone in the White House or in the administration. Everyday.”

Stern is the white-haired guy.


Bill O’Reilly points out that this means Trumka, as of January 28 this year, has been to the White House 46 times since Obama was elected. We also know that Andy Stern, former SEIU president, had made 58 visits to the Obama White House.

Exhibit 4:

Organizing for America had planned and sponsored the unions’ “emergency rallies” on February 15 and 16 in Wisconsin. This is what Wikipedia tells us about the organization: “Organizing for America is a community organizing project of the Democratic National Committee. Founded after the presidential inauguration of Barack Obama, the group seeks to mobilize supporters in favor of Obama’s legislative agenda.”

Exhibit 5:

MoveOn.org is calling for a nationwide march on state houses at noon tomorrow (Saturday, Feb. 26), to counter Wisconsin’s and other states’ efforts to trim multibillion dollar deficits by reining in public employee unions. MoveOn.org calls these efforts “Republicans…using the wrecked economy as an excuse to slash vital programs and hurt workers. The American Dream itself is under attack. So we’re helping lead an emergency call for rallies in every state capital this Saturday at noon to support folks in Wisconsin and oppose these attacks, wherever they occur.” MoveOn.org is a Progressive Democratic Party political action committee, financed by George Soros, Peter Lewis (of Progressive Auto Insurance), and Linda Pritzker (of the Hyatt hotels).

Exhibit 6:

On February 17, 2011, a Tweet from Bob Woodhouse, the Democratic National Committee’s communication director, said the White House was “proudly” playing a role in the Wisconsin public employee union protest.
~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0