Tag Archives: Congress

Fake News MSM caught lying about coronavirus infection numbers and Pelosi, Schiff, Schumer, AOC, Omar, Tlaib and over 100 politicians received dontions from virus test kit suppliers

I was asked the other day if I had been tested for covid-19.  I said “no”. The person said “why?” I responded with “It’s a waste of time and money”

Is getting tested for covid-19 a waste of time?   I’ve listed some basic information about covid-19 that people sometimes overlook.

*Sars cov-2 is the virus that causes covid-19.  In this report, to reduce confusion they both are covid-19.
  1. In the search of a cure, big pharma gets to bypass hurdles that they normally would held up at.  They get to move some of their products with fewer regulations.  This means more profit for them.
  2. “What do you do if you have covid-19?”  Nothing.  If you feels sick enough to want to go to the hospital, then go to the hospital.  If not, you just deal with it until it passes.
  3. There is no cure.
  4. Majority of people, if not all,  that die from covid-19 have underlying problems.  The problem is that when a person dies that has tested for covid-19 they often put the virus as the cause of death.  Even if that person died from underlying problems.
  5. “Testing lets us know if we have it. It will keep us from spreading the virus”.  Maybe.  Is the chance of spreading it worth the damage created by a country shut down?  How many times do we know exactly when we first came in contact with the common cold, the flu, HIV, etc?  The flu kills more people and we never shut down the country.   By the time we realize that we have the flu we could have passed it to hundreds.  Generally speaking, the average person with the flu  isn’t going to go around and give it to other people.  Of course, there are some that will.  Just like the people do with covid-19.
  6. Testing for covid-19 is a waste of time.  After being tested a person has to wait anywhere from 2 to 15 days for the results.  After 15 days you won’t need the results because you will either be sick or not.  If you find you you have it you will be asked if you feel sick.  It depends on who your results are coming from.  If you don’t feel sick you will be told to take care of yourself, stay away from others and go  to the hospital if your condition gets worse.  People that are high risk or have underlying problems may be asked to get themselves checked out.  It really depends on how you feel.  Most people that test positive will not feel anything at all.  This is what they tell people that have the flu
  7. Testing for covid-19 has not cured anyone of the virus.
  8. Hospitalization is pretty much the same for covid-19 victims as they use for people in the hospital because of the flu.
  9. Covid-19  positive people at home are told to do the same as people at home with the flu.  Covid-19 just has a bunch of hype behind it.  Factual evidence is provided toward the end of this article.
  10. There is no way to stop the virus.  The only  way to stop it 100%  is by making everyone in the world stop moving and stand in one place.  If we all stayed in one place, didn’t move an inch for the next 14 to 15 days we would stop the virus from being passed..   We would know who had it and who didn’t.  Then we could separate the infected from the non-infected and wait another 14 to 15 days for it to pass.  Then it will be done.  But that will never happen.  The shut down only slows it down.  It’s not going to stop it.  It’s not going to kill it.
  11. “What about the other things going on that are more dangerous and kill more often?  Do we shut down and hide for those to pass?”  If we did that we would never be able to leave our homes, ever.  That would be stupid.  You will never be able to get things delivered because there wouldn’t be anyone making the products to deliver.  The economy in every country would crash.  Exactly where America is heading.
  12.   Democrats want to keep America locked down for another 5 months. They want everyone to mail in their votes because cheating is the only way they can win.   If they win,  they will step in and “save the country”.  That’s how democrats do it.  They create the problem then step in and act like they are going to fix it.  “Mass shooting were not producing the results they wanted so they ran with this”

Shelter in place for another 5 months? Here’s what Stanford researchers are projecting and why.   CLARA COUNTY, Calif. (KGO) — As the Bay Area heads into another weekend of sheltering-in-place due to the novel coronavirus pandemic, many folks are asking how much longer will it take before restrictions are lifted. That’s one of the questions that a Stanford research team set out to answer by developing an interactive tool that models the spread of COVID-19 over time with interventions such as quarantine and social distancing.

“We estimate that shelter-in-place would have to remain in place for about five months or more in order to actually completely suppress the epidemic,” said Stanford biology professor Erin Mordecai.

A 5 month shut down will completely destroy our county.  That is what the democrats want. All I hear is panic that was created by democrats and the MSM .  Just about everywhere I go, all I hear about is testing.  How “we need more test”.  How “more people need to be tested”.  How “we have a shortage of tests”.   Every actor, music artist, athlete, news media outlet, everyone under the control of the democrats are trying their best to convince people that they need to test.  It’s like 1 giant advertising campaign.  And policy is not the only product being sold.

The democrats are not the only ones that have been benefiting off covid-19.  How about the suppliers of the test kits.  I’ve provided a list of some of the top providers of covid-19 supplies. This could be by coincidence but the majority of the suppliers I investigated had made political donations to the democrats.  To be fair,  some have donated to the republican party.  Still,  democrats received more money  than the republican party.

These are a few of the companies that I looked into. .  I listed  the percentage of their contributions that went to the democrats for 2018 and 2020.  On line 1 and 2 you will see a second company listed with no data.  They are owned by the same company listed on that line.  The percentages are the same.

  1. DANAHER CORP.. 88% 2020,  94% 2018.   Integrated DNA Technologies
  2. THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC. PAC.  67% 2020,  56% 2018.  Qiagen
  3. LABCORP.  51% 2020, 34% 2018.
  4. CEPHEID  87% 2020, 94% 2018 .    Also owned by Danaher
  5. HOLOGIC 78% 2020, 54% 2018.

The following are some names of politicians that received donations from 1 or more of the companies listed.  This list is not complete.  It’s about 20%  complete for the companies I researched.  You will see some names listed more than once. That’s because it’s a different company.  I wouldn’t worry about seeing a name once or twice.  4 or more, which there are, I think should be investigated. The last 50 or so names were small donations.  2 were for only 1 dollar.  These were probably just to mask the people receiving the “payoff”.  Dollar for dollar, the democrat party received more money than the republicans by a substantial amount.   Remember that this is a partial list  from less than half of the companies I listed and researched.  There are a lot more suppliers out there.

  1. Brown, Sherrod (D-OH)
  2. Cassidy, Bill (R-LA)
  3. Cornyn, John (R-TX)
  4. Enzi, Mike (R-WY)
  5. Isakson, Johnny (R-GA)
  6. Jones, Doug (D-AL)
  7. Lankford, James (R-OK)
  8. Portman, Rob (R-OH)
  9. Rubio, Marco (R-FL)
  10. Sinema, Kyrsten (D-AZ)
  11. Tillis, Thom (R-NC)
  12. Warner, Mark (D-VA)
  13. Young, Todd (R-IN)
  14. Blunt, Roy (R-MO)
  15. Cassidy, Bill (R-LA)
  16. Collins, Susan M (R-ME)
  17. Markey, Ed (D-MA)
  18. Portman, Rob (R-OH)
  19. Tillis, Thom (R-NC)
  20. Braun, Mike (R-IN)
  21. Cassidy, Bill (R-LA)
  22. Collins, Susan M (R-ME)
  23. Cornyn, John (R-TX)
  24. Daines, Steven (R-MT)
  25. Ernst, Joni (R-IA)
  26. Gardner, Cory (R-CO)
  27. Graham, Lindsey (R-SC)
  28. Grassley, Chuck (R-IA)
  29. Kennedy, Joe III (D-MA)
  30. McConnell, Mitch (R-KY)
  31. McSally, Martha (R-AZ)
  32. Brady, Kevin (R-TX)
  33. Brownley, Julia (D-CA)
  34. Bucshon, Larry (R-IN)
  35. Burgess, Michael (R-TX)
  36. Butterfield, G K (D-NC)
  37. Cardenas, Tony (D-CA)
  38. Cheney, Liz (R-WY)
  39. Correa, Lou (D-CA)
  40. Curtis, John (R-UT)
  41. DeGette, Diana (D-CO)
  42. DelBene, Suzan (D-WA)
  43. Escobar, Veronica (D-TX)
  44. Eshoo, Anna (D-CA)
  45. Ferguson, Drew (R-GA)
  46. Gottheimer, Josh (D-NJ)
  47. Guthrie, Brett (R-KY)
  48. Houlahan, Chrissy (D-PA)
  49. Hoyer, Steny H (D-MD)
  50. Krishnamoorthi, Raja (D-IL)
  51. Mast, Brian (R-FL)
  52. McAdams, Ben (D-UT)
  53. McCarthy, Kevin (R-CA)
  54. Neal, Richard E (D-MA)
  55. Neguse, Joseph (D-CO)
  56. Pallone, Frank Jr (D-NJ)
  57. Peters, Scott (D-CA)
  58. Price, David (D-NC)
  59. Schneider, Brad (D-IL)
  60. Smith, Adrian (R-NE)
  61. Stefanik, Elise (R-NY)
  62. Walden, Greg (R-OR)
  63. Walorski, Jackie (R-IN)
  64. Blumenthal, Richard (D-CT)
  65. Booker, Cory (D-NJ)
  66. Burr, Richard (R-NC)
  67. Cassidy, Bill (R-LA)
  68. Cornyn, John (R-TX)
  69. Durbin, Dick (D-IL)
  70. Fischer, Deb (R-NE)
  71. Gardner, Cory (R-CO)
  72. Grassley, Chuck (R-IA)
  73. Hassan, Maggie (D-NH)
  74. McConnell, Mitch (R-KY)
  75. McSally, Martha (R-AZ)
  76. Murray, Patty (D-WA)
  77. Perdue, David (R-GA)
  78. Romney, Mitt (R-UT)
  79. Sasse, Ben (R-NE)
  80. Schumer, Charles E (D-NY)
  81. Scott, Rick (R-FL)
  82. Scott, Tim (R-SC)
  83. Shaheen, Jeanne (D-NH)
  84. Sinema, Kyrsten (D-AZ)
  85. Tillis, Thom (R-NC)
  86. Toomey, Pat (R-PA)
  87. Wyden, Ron (D-OR)
  88. Young, Todd (R-IN)
  89. Perdue, David (R-GA)
  90. Peters, Gary (D-MI)
  91. Shaheen, Jeanne (D-NH)
  92. Tillis, Thom (R-NC)
  93. Toomey, Pat (R-PA)
  94. Warner, Mark (D-VA)
  95. Warren, Elizabeth(D-MAS1)
  96. McConnell, Mitch(R-KYS1)
  97. Maloney, Sean Patric(D-NY18)
  98. Cassidy, Bill (R-LAS1)
  99. Pallone, Frank J (D-NJ06)
  100. Williamson, Marianne (D-PRES)
  101. Tillis, Thom (R-NCS1)
  102. Eshoo, Anna (D-CA18)
  103. Rubio, Marco (R-FLS2)
  104. Peters, Scott (D-CA52)
  105. Pascrell, Bill J (D-NJ09)
  106. Matsui, Doris (D-CA06)
  107. Holding, George (R-NC02)
  108. Harris, Kamala(D-CAS1)
  109. Klobuchar, Amy(D-MNS2)
  110. O’Rourke, Beto(D-PRES)
  111. Malinowski, Tom (D-NJ07)
  112. Schiff, Adam(D-CA28)
  113. Shaheen, Jeanne (D-NHS2)
  114. Keating, Bill(D-MA09)
  115. Evans, Dwight (D-PA03)
  116. Dingell, Debbie(D-MI12)
  117. McGrath, Amy (D-KYS1)
  118. Booker, Cory (D-NJS2)
  119. Plame, Valerie(D-NM03)
  120. Castro, Julian(D-PRES)
  121. Gabbard, Tulsi(D-HI02)
  122. Davids, Sharice(D-KS03)
  123. Gandhi, Pritesh (D-TX10)
  124. Ocasio-Cortez, Alexandria (D-NY14)
  125. Sherrill, Mikie (D-NJ11)
  126. Cornyn, John (R-TXS1)
  127. Demaio, Carl (R-CA50)
  128. Kelly, Mark(D-AZS1)
  129. Ross, Deborah(D-NC02)
  130. Pelosi, Nancy(D-CA12)
  131. Nunes, Devin (R-CA22)
  132. James, John(R-MIS1)
  133. Gideon, Sara(D-MES2)
  134. Morelle, Joseph D(D-NY25)
  135. Harrison, Jaime (D-SCS2)
  136. Cobb, Tedra (D-NY21)
  137. Stefanik, Elise(R-NY21)
  138. Omar, Ilhan(D-MN05)
  139. Long, Carolyn(D-WA03)
  140. Jones, Mondaire(D-NY17)
  141. Boroughs, Adair (D-SC02)
  142. Hill, Katie(D-CA25)
  143. Casey, Bob(D-PAS2)
  144. Gillibrand, Kirsten(D-NYS1)
  145. Tlaib, Rashida (D-MI13)
  146. Soto, Darren (D-FL09)
  147. Inslee, Jay(D-PRES)
  148. Jones, Doug (D-ALS1)
  149. Porter, Katie (D-CA45)
  150. Rosen, Jacky(D-NVS1)
  151. Buttar, Shahid(D-CA12)
  152. Bowman, Jamaal(D-NY16)
  153. Hickenlooper, John (D-COS2)
  154. Jones, Gina (D-TX23)
  155. Bourdeaux, Carolyn (D-GA07)
  156. Van Drew, Jeff(R-NJ02)
  157. Jayapal, Pramila(D-WA07)
  158. Warner, Mark(D-VAS2)
  159. Lujan, Ben Ray(D-NM03)
  160. Ryan, Tim (D-OH13)
  161. Sweet, Betsy (D-MES2)
  162. Wilkes, Mckayla (D-MD05)
  163. McBath, Lucy (D-GA06)
  164. Levin, Mike (D-CA49)
  165. Kennedy, Joe III(D-MA04)
  166. Murphy, Christopher S (D-CTS1)
  167. Cisneros, Jessica(D-TX28)
  168. Gravel, Mike (D-PRES)
  169. Sites, Jeffrey(D-OH04)
  170. Bollier, Barbara (D-KSS1)
  171. Ehr, Phil(D-FL01)
  172. Walsh, John(D-COS2)
  173. Harper, Morgan(D-OH03)
  174. McCarthy, Kevin (R-CA23)
  175. Bennet, Michael(D-COS1)
  176. Baer, Dan(D-COS2)
  177. Bullock, Steve(D-MTS2)
  178. Peters, Gary (D-MIS1)
  179. Masto, Catherine Cortez (D-NVS2)
  180. Moulton, Seth(D-MA06)
  181. Houlahan, Chrissy(D-PA06)
  182. Pressley, Ayanna (D-MA07)
  183. Islam, Nabilah (D-GA07)
  184. Van Duyne, Beth (R-TX24)
  185. Mace, Nancy(R-SC01)
  186. Cox, TJ (D-CA21)
  187. Parson, Rebecca(D-WA06)
  188. Arballo, Phil(D-CA22)
  189. Freshour, Shannon (D-OH04)
  190. Rouda, Harley(D-CA48)
  191. Aguilar, Pete(D-CA31)
  192. Smith, Tina (D-MNS1)
  193. Slotkin, Elissa (D-MI08)
  194. Zornio, Trish(D-COS2)
  195. Cunningham, Cal (D-NCS1)
  196. Lieberman, Matthew(D-GAS2)
  197. Ramirez, Cristina Tzintzun (D-TXS1)
  198. Bishop, Dan(R-NC09)
  199. Kahele, Kai(D-HI02)
  200. McGovern, James P (D-MA02)
  201. Merkley, Jeff(D-ORS1)
  202. Ernst, Joni (R-IAS2)
  203. Gardner, Cory (R-COS2)

 

That’s quite a list.  I’m not sure what to think.   I had to stop looking. But don’t let that stop you from having a look..  You can start at OpenSecrets.com.

Lets take a look at the suppliers.

The following comes from ThomasNet.com Take notice that  they mention a shortage of Covid-19 test kits.   They also mention how “regulations have opened up”.

Currently, there is still a shortage of COVID-19 test kits in the United States. Although originally only the CDC’s test kits were approved for use, more and more resources have become available as regulations have opened up due to the need for more testing.

  • The CDC, despite initially faulty reagents making its first test kits unreliable, is now offering accurate RT-PCR Diagnostic Panels and positive and human specimen controls. These kits should be used only in CLIA certified labs and are meant to be processed with the Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast DX Real-Time PCR Instrument with SDS 1.4 software, which is specialized equipment that requires specific training. As of March 14th, public health laboratories using the CDC’s assay to test for the virus aren’t required to get CDC confirmation of their samples.
  • State, academic, and independent labs have been developing kits for their own testing as the FDA has loosened regulations. These labs must still validate their results according to FDA regulations and submit them for emergency use authorization within 15 days.
  • Commercial companies have been increasingly putting coronavirus kits out into the market in recent weeks as regulations have loosened. While some are still very specialized and require specific instrumentation, easier and more automated tests are being developed. Test kits that work in a half hour by simply changing the color of a piece of paper are currently in the concept stage.

Additional shortages in test-related supplies like swabs, virus control samples, and RT-PCR instruments have limited the amount of testing laboratories are capable of. Some labs are awaiting government approval as well, and there is no standard machinery for every test, which means some labs don’t have the equipment for some of the tests available. However, as the FDA has issued emergency approval for more and more tests, the greater variety is allowing more laboratories to start testing with their own equipment, and without the need for special training. Because the need has been so great, the FDA has started allowing companies to distribute tests without official review as of March 16, as long as the manufacturers submit validation and data within 15 days.

Some private companies including Lab Corp and Quest Diagnostics have started offering testing services for the virus already, in addition to state and hospital labs. Many labs are still getting the testing up and running, however, so they aren’t able to test at full capacity yet. 

The following is some basic data on the suppliers and developers.

  1. Thermo Fisher Scientific  The company currently sells emergency use and research use test kits. 
  2. LabCorp Currently offers a test for COVID-19 as well as hundreds of other tests.
  3. Cepheid  Working on a test kit for coronavirus and hopes to release it in the second quarter of this year. 
  4. Hologic  The company, whose test was recently approved and which runs on its Panther Fusion system, is headquartered in Marlborough, MA.
  5. Danaher Test kits are not yet FDA approved, but they can be used by laboratories with CLIA certifications. Company owns  Cepheid, Beckman Coulter, Radiometer, Leica Biosystems, and HemoCue.
  6. Roche Diagnostics  Received emergency approval from the CDC for its coronavirus kits, which use automated equipment that already exists in dozens of laboratories across the U.S. Its kits are now for sale. 
  7. bioMérieux Planning to release 3 tests. One is to be submitted for FDA approval at the end of March, and two others, to be finished by Q2 and Q3, will be automated versions, one of which will also test for 21 other types of viruses. 
  8. Integrated DNA Technologies Currently sells both research only and emergency use coronavirus tests. 
  9. Abbott Laboratories Test approved by the FDA March 18th and has immediately started shipping them out. Tests are run on m2000TM RealTime Systems, which exist in over 175 laboratories and hospitals nationwide. 
  10. Quidel Tests run on existing molecular testing machinery and currently are available for sale.
  11. Qiagen Selling tests to detect COVID-19, ramping up production in its factories to keep up with the demand.
  12. Quest Diagnostics,  offers tests.
  13. Grifols  Offers diagnostics for infectious diseases.
  14.  GenMark Diagnostics  Developed research-only test kits for coronavirus, and is currently applying to the FDA to allow their tests for emergency uses. 
  15. Co-Diagnostics Offering its coronavirus test kits through the CDC’s IRR. 
  16.  Sherlock Biosciences, Developing a paper test that will change color once samples of CRISPR processed DNA from swabs have been applied. They are hoping to submit the test for FDA approval.. 
  17. Philips Sells medical supplies.

Suppliers Developing COVID-19 Test Kits

 

Company

U.S. Headquarters

Test Kit Status

Annual Revenue

1

Thermo Fisher Scientific

Waltham, MA

For sale

250+*

2

LabCorp

Burlington, NC

For sale (performs the testing itself)

250+

3

Cepheid

Sunnyvale, CA

Release in the second quarter of 2020

250+

4

Hologic

Marlborough, MA

For sale

250+

5

Danaher

Washington, D.C.

For sale

250+

6

Roche Diagnostics

Indianapolis, IN

For sale

250+

7

bioMérieux

Durham, NC

End of first quarter of 2020 (research use only); unknown (emergency use authorization)

250+*

8

Integrated DNA Technologies

Coralville, IA

For sale

100-249.9

9

Abbott Laboratories

Abbott Park, IL

For sale

100-249.9

10

Quidel

San Diego, CA

For sale

100-249.9

11

GenMark Diagnostics

Carlsbad, CA

 For sale (Research use only); under FDA review (emergency use authorization)

50-99.9**

12

Co-Diagnostics, Inc.

Salt Lake City, UT

For sale through the CDC’s IRR website

25-49.9**

13

Qiagen

Minneapolis, MN

For sale

5-9.9

14

Sherlock Biosciences

Cambridge, MA

In development

The following comes from kaloramainformation.com and ThomasNet.com.
Top Suppliers of General Medical Testing Kit

Data from 2018

 

Company

U.S. Headquarters

Annual Revenue

Year Founded

1

Roche Diagnostics

Indianapolis, IN

63.5

1998

2

Thermo Fisher Scientific

Waltham, MA

25

1956

3

Philips

Cambridge, MA

20

1891

4

Danaher Corporation (owns Beckman Coulter and Cepheid)

Washington, D.C.

15.5

1919

5

Siemens Healthineers

Malvern, PA

15.2

2015

6

Becton Dickinson

Franklin Lakes, NJ

12.1

1897

7

LabCorp. Laboratory Corporation of America

Burlington, NC

10.3

1978

8

Quest Diagnostics

Secaucus, NJ

7.4

1967

9

Grifols

Los Angeles, CA

4.8

1987

10

Hologic

Marlborough, MA

3

1986

 The following comes from kaloramainformation.com

These are manufactures of medical test kits in general.

IVD Market Top 25 Companies

  •  Alere Inc.
  •  Arkray
  •  Beckman Coulter / Danaher
  •  Becton Dickinson
  •  Bio-Rad Laboratories
  •  bioMérieux
  •  Cepheid / Danaher
  •  Danaher Corp. (including Radiometer A/S)
  •  Grifols
  •  Hologic
  •  Illumina
  •  Instrumentation Laboratory / Werfen
  •  LabCorp, Laboratory Corporation of America
  •  Luminex
  •  Ortho Clinical Diagnostics
  •  PerkinElmer
  •  Qiagen N.V.
  •  Quest Diagnostics
  •  Quidel
  •  Roche Diagnostics (including Ventana Medical Systems)
  •  Philips
  •  Siemens Healthineers
  •  Sysmex Corporation
  •  Thermo Fisher

For more test kits click here.

 

I know that I’ve mentioned on several occasions that test kits only equal more positive test results and more covid-19 related deaths.  I discussed why in my post How Fake News MSM and the democrats lied to you about covid-19 testing.  

I’m not going to repeat what I already wrote but I would advise you to go back and review it if you have any problems putting it all together.

I pointed out how what the democrats and the Fake NewsMSM had been reporting the wrong data.  Their counts on people infected with covid-19 and covid-19 causes of death were high.  Complete lies.  They are still doing it today.  Fake news CBS News reported the following,

The coronavirus death toll surpassed 10,000 in the United States on Monday, according to Johns Hopkins University. There are more than 347,000 confirmed cases across the country.

CBS is not  the only Fake News organization reporting these numbers. It’s the same for just about all the Fake News Organizations. To read more of this garbage click here.

The  actual number of deaths are provided in the image.

aprilFor source click CDC.

 

Lets take a look at the actual number of infections.

cases reported

Remember that this report of cases includes presumptive positive test.  These are not confirmed tests.  Explained in the next graphic.

pres

 

At this point we can see the obvious.  The fake news CBS is lying.  Deaths surpassing 10,000 if far more than what the CDC reports at 1,880.  They reported 347,000 confirmed tests. CDC reports 304,926 of both confirmed and unconfirmed.  Already we see Fake news of lying.  If they did their actual job and looked for the real confirmed cases they would come up with the following.

158,700 actual confirmed positive cases. CBS more than doubled the confirmed positive. That’s out of the 1,019,261 total tested.  That’s about 15%  confirmed positive.  This tells  us that 85% of the people being tested come up negative.(Calculated with available data.  Even if data was fully updated the end results, percent ratio will be around the same.)

results

Personally I question the results from commercial labs , but whatever.  We work with what we have.

Given the information available we can calculate what percent of covid-19 related deaths out of the amount of people tested.  1,889/1,019,261=0.0018533035=.18533035 %.  That’s nothing compared to influenza at 8.2 % mortality rate which is above the epidemic rate at 7.2%

Source for this info click here.

Now look at the illness onset.  Does it look like things are getting worse.

 

onset

To view this source click here.

You will notice in the chart above that there is a decline in illness onset. You should also be seeing a decline in new covid-19 cases as well as covid-19 deaths.  A headline on Bloomberg.com  from April 5, 2020 for example .

New York Reports First Decline in Daily Coronavirus Deaths

Why do you think that is?  It’s because there is a shortage of test kits.  The supply of test kits should start replenishiong. As the inventory grows, more cases will appear.

You should also notice that all the new companies with the new “home tests” are being blocked.    They might get approved in 2 weeks or a month from now  but until then they are going to be blocked.  Some companies get to bypass regulations because of the demand but that does not include the makers of home tests.

 No COVID-19 testing at home yet but quicker options coming

WASHINGTON (AP) — Home testing for the new coronavirus may sound like a good idea, but U.S. regulators say it’s still too risky.

They’ve stopped companies that quickly launched home-testing kits until they can show their products can accurately detect the virus.

For now, the only way Americans can get tested is at hospitals, clinics or drive-thru sites, with a doctor’s order.

After a botched rollout, testing in the U.S. has ramped up thanks to high-volume testing  machines and new rapid tests. Last week, federal officials said total tests -topped 1.4 million, and labs are processing nearly 100,000 tests daily. That’s the threshold many experts say is needed to track the virus.

Coronavirus screening: Calif. COVID-19 task force lead hopes to have enough tests for general public by next month.

The testing space has been a challenging one for us. I own that and I have a responsibility as your governor to do better and to do more testing in the state of California,” said Governor Gavin Newsom.

COVID-19 testing backlog decreased, more testing on the way, Gov. Newsom announces.

Gov. Newsom confirmed over 126,000 people have been tested for COVID-19 and 13,000 of those are still awaiting results. Staggering numbers that led to a state partnership with two California universities and a task force to increase the volume of tests.”Partnership with UC Davis and UC San Diego to create a minimum of 5 to 7 hubs where we will work with different vendors,” said Gov. Newsom.Leading the COVID-19 test task force is Dr. Charity Dean, Assistance director of California’s Public Health Department and Paul Markovich, president and CEO of Blue Shield of California.

East Bay company to have hand-held COVID-19 testing devices ready by next month

Markovich wants to make sure that anyone in need of a test can get one.”We’ve set a goal to get to 10,000 per day in the next two weeks to 25,000 per day by the end of this month. By the end of the summer in August getting to the capacity of 50,000 a day,” said Markovich.An increase of COVID-19 testing will hopefully mean a decrease in deaths. At least 300 people have died of COVID-19 in California.When we asked Markovich for a timeline of when his team plans to have available tests for the general public to get tested he said, “Well if we hit our targets, I would say within a month we should be able to do that. Ideally we want to be in a position to do that as we start relaxing the stay at home measures.”Governor Gavin Newsom also announced that more test sites are set to open. Abbott Laboratories committed to opening 75 testing sites in California. The state also announced the website, covid19supplies.ca.gov, supported by Salesforce.During this supply shortage, the website will allow people and manufacturers to offer resources.

More examples of the “shortages”

sahgort

 

Here is what insider Dr Fauci has to say about the “deaths to come”. The following is from time.com.  Generally I don’t like to “copy pasta” a complete article but in this case it is necessary source to make my point.

‘We Are Struggling to Get It Under Control’ Dr. Anthony Fauci Says About the U.S. COVID-19 Outbreak

Dr. Anthony Fauci, the top American infectious disease specialist,warned Sunday that the U.S. is “struggling” to curb the outbreak of COVID-19, but said that there are signs that mitigation efforts are working.                                                                                                        In an appearance on CBS’s Face the Nation, Fauci, the head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and a leading member of President Trump’s coronavirus task force, explained that while the country’s efforts are having an impact, he could not say “we have it under control.” “That would be a false statement. We are struggling to get it under control,” Fauci said. Fauci warned that the rate of new cases will likely get worse before it gets better. While the immediate goal is to reduce the number of new cases, the effects of mitigation efforts would not be visible for “days, if not weeks.” He warned that there is a “bad week” ahead, although the rate of new coronavirus cases may “flatten” by within the week, or somewhat later“As the cases go down, then you get less hospitalizations, less intensive care and less death,” said Fauci. “So even though you’re getting a — really improvement in that the number of new cases are starting to flatten, the death will lag by, you know, one or two weeks or more. So we need to be prepared that even though it’s clear that mitigation is working, we’re still going to see that tail-off of deaths.”                                                                                                                                               Fauci’s comments came the same morning as New York Governor Andrew Cuomo announced that the number of deaths has been dropping for the first time in the state, and that there were fewer deaths on Saturday than on Friday. He said that it could be a “blip” in the data— or the “beginning of a shift.”

This is from Fake News CNN

US coronavirus fight enters crucial weeks as the number of cases tops 330,000

(CNN)The next two weeks will be crucial in the United States’ fight against the coronavirus, warn health officials, who are urging Americans to continue practicing social-distancing measures.

Dr Fauci is being made out as some kind of hero by the Fake News MSM and democrats.  When we see this sort of “over the top” praise coming from the Fake News or democrats we should always question the person they are building. With that being said, here is what they used to think about Dr Fauci during the AIDS epidemic.

 

Date: Fri, 12 May 1995 04:16:51 -0400
From:DaveACTUP+@aol.com
Subject: ACT UP zaps Tony Fauci

I was one of the organizers of the action in SF against Fauci. Here is the
text of the flyer that we distributed to the diners at the Project Inform
dinner.

Hope it helps to clarify our position. Take care. ACT UP!

************************************************

"You are responsible for all government funded AIDS treatment research. In
the name of right, you make decisions that cost the lives of others. I call
the decisions you are making acts of murder."
Larry Kramer
"An Open Letter to Dr. Anthony Fauci"
San Francisco Examiner, June 26, 1988

Anthony Fauci, you are a murderer and should not be the guest of honor at any
event that reflects on the past decade of the AIDS crisis. Your refusal to
hear the screams of AIDS activists early in the crisis resulted in the deaths
of thousands of Queers. Your present inaction is causing today's increase in
HIV infection outside of the Queer community.  We are outraged that Project
Inform, an organization that supposedly works on behalf of the infected
community, would insult us by bringing you to our city. You can't hide the
fact that you are nothing but a despicable Reagan-era holdover and drug
company mouthpiece.

With 270,000 dead from AIDS and millions more infected with HIV, you should
not be honored at a dinner. You should be put before a firing squad.

Clinical trials: government sanctioned mass murder of PWAs

Anthony Fauci, you are a murderer because you oversee government sponsored
clinical trials that test and retest combinations of immunosuppressive, toxic
therapies that kill people with HIV. The majority of U.S. clinical trials
involve worthless antivirals like AZT combined with some other drug
(generally another toxic antiviral). What these tests have proven is that you
are able to piss away billions of dollars testing dangerous compounds that DO
NOTHING to improve the quality of life, to stop opportunistic infections or
to extend survival for people with HIV. AZT, 3TC, ddI, ddC, d4T and the
current crop of protease inhibitors are nothing but poison. Ten years of the
plague has shown us that trying to kill the virus kills people with AIDS, and
you, Dr. Fauci, know it.

How long will it take you to start focusing on the immune system, how to
boost it and how to prevent the opportunistic infections that are killing
people with AIDS? Even you admit that "the immune response against HIV is
extremely powerful and is clearly more effective than any of the therapeutic
approaches currently available in controlling virus replication." Still , you
give your blessing to clinical trials of highly profitable toxins that
destroy PWAs' already compromised immune systems.

CD4s and viral load: a marketing exec's wet dream

Anthony Fauci, you are a liar because you have known for years that CD4
counts are a travesty of a surrogate marker that, through drug company
coercion, have been elevated to the status of "a standard." Now that everyone
else knows it too, you and your corporate drug company cronies are urging
researchers to foist another useless marker, peripheral blood viral load
counts, on our frightened, desperate community. Peripheral blood viral load
fluctuates in blood circulation and offers virtually no indication of the
health or disease progression in HIV+ people. According to a recent article
in the April 1995 issue of Lancet concerning viral replication, "the
principle that virus suppression will produce a major clinical benefit must
remain an article of faith." Information like that isn't stopping doctors of
death like Marcus Conant from insisting that "patients should be treated
earlier with combination therapy, and we should be using markers such as PCR
and branched DNA to measure viral load as surrogate markers in clinical
trials."

Your scheme isn't too difficult to figure out; promote another invalid
surrogate marker that has no relation to health or life expectancy of PWAs;
develop a test that costs $200-$300 to measure this invalid marker; encourage
the creation of more deadly drugs that effect this invalid marker; and then
compare the pathetic results you get from these deadly drugs to the more
pathetic results you got from AZT and other nukes. In the eyes of the
government everybody wins. Companies that sell drugs and market tests get
rich and PWAs who sacrifice their bodies in your trials of death are
eliminated from the face of the earth.

The fact that your clinical trials aren't meant to save our lives is no
secret. A December 1994 BETA article "A Remarkable Combination: AZT plus 3TC"
reports that the Phase II/III studies of these drugs were "designed to
evaluate the effect of the combination on laboratory markers of HIV disease
progression, such as viral load and CD4 counts, not critical endpoints, such
as opportunistic infections and survival."

AIDS activists from ACT UP San Francisco and DNCB Now! have been screaming
for over a year that HIV+ people need to activate their cell mediated
immunity and raise their CD8 counts. These activists were invited to the NIH
to present a forum and share their knowledge and experience with researchers.
Finally some researchers are coming around and hearing our voices. Doctors
like Susan Buchbinder who in the August 1994 issue of AIDS stated that
"elevated levels of CD8 cells in healthy long-term HIV+ individuals suggest
that these cells play an important role in delaying disease progression."

Because of your 1995 Annual Review of Immunology article we know that you
know this, Dr. Fauci, but still you prattle on about those CD4s that tell us
nothing at all.

Selling out: from "Murderer" to "Tony"

One thing that 10 years of the plague has taught us is how easily people and
organizations can be bought off. You are one of those people, Dr. Fauci.
Project Inform is one of those organizations. During this time of crisis you
are complacent; part of a government bureaucracy that values thriving
pharmaceutical  company entrepreneurism over the health of people with HIV.

You are a pill-pushing pimp that cooperates with drug companies in forcing
dangerous concoctions down the throats of a desperate community that is
brainwashed into believing that taking a pill, any pill, will help them. AIDS
drugs are not sold to help people, they are sold to make a profit. The
situation is so out of control that drug companies now create and sell drugs
like Marinol, a synthetic derivative of the natural compound marijuana.

The conflict of interest, so apparent between you and the pharmaceutical
corporations, has now been embraced by those in the AIDS community who claim
that they are leaders. In their present state, organizations like Project
Inform, San Francisco AIDS Foundation, and ACT UP Golden Gate are all so
embroiled in conflict of interest that they must be viewed as enemies by
PWAs. Project Inform is still pushing AZT. San Francisco AIDS Foundation's
BETA reads like a promo piece for Glaxo. And many of today's so-called AIDS
activists are nothing more than public relations representatives whose job it
is to create a demand for the latest overpriced cure du jour. In the
meantime, grassroots efforts like the AIDS Cure Act are assailed by these
sellout AIDS organizations that have no desire to ever see a cure.

Ten years of hope? Fuck that. Try a decade of death and greed. Go back to
Washington you bastard.

source

That’s not something the democrats or MSM is going to go out on a limb to show you.  Sure it’s from 1995, but old habits can be hard to break.

Closing Rant

Lets go back to Tuesday, September 11, 2001 2,996 Americans were killed.  Another 25,ooo injured.  America was under attack.  We didn’t know  if more attacks going to happen.  For all we knew our neighbor could have been a terrorist.  There wasn’t any place to hide.  Every single Americans life was in danger.  All the result that came from an enemy that a lot of Americans didn’t know they had.  A unseen enemy that killed more Americans on US soil in modern history.  Was there a stay at home order then? Did we shut down the country?  How about when the swine flu hit America? What about Pearl Harbor when it was attacked by Japan killing 2,403 Americans with another 1,143 injured(Japan didn’t want to attack because they knew every American owned a gun)?

  “Much of the Pacific fleet was rendered useless: Five of eight battleships, three destroyers, and seven other ships were sunk or severely damaged, and more than 200 aircraft were destroyed”.   

Was this enough to make people stay at home and shut down the country?  The answer is no in all cases.  Think about it.  Almost 3,000 people were killed.  25,000 iunjured plus a strike on the Pentagon,  the headquarters building of the United States Department of Defense,  wasn’t enough to shut the country down.  Why?  Because shutting down the country would cause more damage that the current danger they were facing.  This was something everyone could agree on.

  So what changed?  Why did the democrats and the MSM lie to every American and create a situation where Trump had to take such extreme actions.   By creating fear and panic, the democrats and MSM were able create a situation that limited Trump’s options.  The democrats wanted and still are trying to destroy President Trump and America.  What changed is that we have the democrats conspiring with the MSM, working to overthrow our government.  4 years of nonstop attacks on a sitting US President. 

That’s not “oversite.” There is no just cause to investigate the President.   Yet the democrats and MSM continue to work against the will of the people.  Against our president.  With total disregard for the damage they have inflicted on our country.   That’s an attack on our whole way of life.  Attacking a US President is the same as attacking every American.  The democrats and the MSM  are guilty of Treason and Espionage and so much more. 

By now people should be able to see what the democrats are up to.  They are fully exploiting the covid-19 situation.  I personally believe the democrats and the MSM are responsible for the existence  of the covid-19 pandemic.   So I’m renaming  covid-19 since it’s 2020.  Covid-19 is now DNCLIE-20 or MSMFN-20

Besides the economy, I believe we have a danger far worse then the pandemic will ever be.  That’s if the democrats are able to get control of the White House.  How?  by doing what I’ve been warning about for the last 4 years.  It’s how they won California.  If you have been paying attention you will see the democrats are pushing the shut down for a longer period of time.  They are also pushing early voting by mail or voting by mail in general.  This is the main cheat the democrats use to win elections. They’re trying to convince people that voting by mail is more secure.  Lie and scare them into submission.

It’s extremely easy to vote by mail.  I’ll give you an example.  I vote by mail.  I registered and voted without ever providing 1 piece of evidence.  For the primaries in California, I just wrote my info down and mailed it in.  I did the same in 2016.  Things went a little different that year.  They asked for proof of who I was.  I ignored them but still got a ballot.  

The democrats  are using the MSM, Hollywood, Academia, Social Media, everybody and everything in their control to continue to lie to America and create more panic.  I can hear it now, “Stay home or covid-19, the planet killer will get you”,  “hide in your homes”, “We want you to feel safe when you vote”.  Deceiving Americans as they manipulate the ballots, spread lies about Trump, steal from the government and  do their best to crash the economy.  Then if successful, blame Trump for the damage.  The democrats are all in.  Using covid-19 as a political tool is not below the democrats.  If you believe in freedom, justice, equality and liberty then there is no way you can allow any democrat to gain complete control of the usa. 

Things to think about

Forget about my personal comments and look at the facts I presented today.  Mainly look at the amount of deaths are being reported, actual confirmed cases and real mortality rate.  Look at all the politicians that have recieved donations from the test kit manufactures.  Look at the push to buy test kits.  Look at behind  pushing a longer shut down. Do you believe the test are a waste of time?  Are we already infected with a type of coronavirus and the wuhan virus has nothing to do with the strains discovered here in the USA? Do you believe that democrats are conspiring with the MSM?  Do you think this shut down creating a more problems then we would have if we just let covid-19 run it;s course? Do you believe that the democrats want to force mail in voting so they can cheat?  Do you believe that the democrats are exploiting the pandemic?  Do you believe Dr. Fauci is an insider working with the democrats?  Do you believe the democrats and the MSM are causing people th panic?  Do you believe that President Trump is getting all the relevent information he needs?  Do you think that his advisors, staff, etc are doing a good job at keeping him informed?  Do you believe the pandemic is a distraction? How about a  smokescreen created by the democrats with help from foreign governments? Do you blame China for the pandemic or does it come from US Soil?  Do you feel this may be a way to destroy the economy worldwide?  One thing that should be perfectly clear is is that shut down needs to end and justice needs to be served.

Please tell me your thoughts

Respectfully

Deplorablre Patriot

“Testing is a waste of time and money”

Disclaimer-  The owner of Fellowship of the Minds(FOTM), Dr Eowyn allows myself along with the rest of the editors/authors here at FOTM the freedom to post what we choose. My views and opinions expressed here at FOTM are mine alone and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Dr Eowyn , Fellowship of the Minds or any other editor/author at Fellowship of the Minds.. Any content I provide is not intended to malign any religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, individual or anyone or anything.  Everything that I post is my responsibility alone.  Deplorable Patriot

Additional sources

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/about/testing.html
https://www.internationalreagentresource.org
/https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/testing-in-us.html
https://business.financialpost.com/pmn/business-pmn/labcorp-makes-coronavirus-test-available-for-ordering-in-u-s
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/about/testing.html
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2020/03/06/coronavirus-test-kit-how-can-get-tested-us-covid-19-virus/4973697002/
https://www.internationalreagentresource.org/
https://www.propublica.org/article/cdc-coronavirus-covid-19-test
https://www.wsj.com/articles/hospitals-companies-race-to-develop-tests-to-spot-coronavirus-linked-illness-11583245423
https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/officials-say-coronavirus-tests-are-here-where-are-they-n114
https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-care/many-private-labs-want-do-coronavirus-tests-they-re-facing-n1156006
https://www.businessinsider.com/us-coronavirus-testing-problems-timeline-2020-3#hahn-said-the-government-plans-to-ship-4-million-additional-tests-by-the-end-of-next-week-18
https://www.labcorp.com/information-labcorp-about-coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2020/03/11/814189027/no-guarantee-youll-get-tested-for-covid-19-even-if-your-doctor-requests-it
https://www.wired.com/story/fda-approves-the-first-commercial-coronavirus-tests-in-the-us/
https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucejapsen/2020/03/18/us-approves-abbott-labs-coronavirus-test-for-hospital-use/#2a78a41a5111
https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/business/technology/story/2020-03-19/biotech-firms-in-san-diego-get-emergency-approval-to-deliver-coronavrus-tests
https://www.evaluate.com/vantage/articles/news/policy-and-regulation/few-groups-have-developed-covid-19-diagnostics-will
https://www.biocentury.com/article/304556/covid-19-could-give-crispr-diagnostics-their-first-proof-of-principle
https://www.npr.org/2020/03/13/815522836/u-s-coronavirus-testing-gets-a-breakthrough
https://www.wired.com/story/fda-approves-the-first-commercial-coronavirus-tests-in-the-us/
https://www.fiercebiotech.com/medtech/roche-begins-shipping-400-000-coronavirus-test-kits-per-week-u-s
https://www.wired.com/story/everything-you-need-to-know-about-coronavirus-testing/
https://www.modernhealthcare.com/technology/labs-face-challenges-creating-diagnosis-testing-covid-19
Coronavirus Suppliers and Manufacturers in the USA

 

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0 0
 

Your tax dollars in action. Are you getting what you paid for?

Never before have I seen the amount of attention that members of the House of Representative  or the Senate are currently  receiving  from the media.  Maybe it was because I wasn’t paying attention.  Well, today I am.  Maybe I should have titled it “Your tax dollars in action, Are you getting who you paid for?”

Not a day goes by that I don’t hear someone from a legislator serving in the U.S. Congress accuse the POTUS wasting taxpayer money in one way or another.   One day it’s Trump wasting money by traveling to  his home in New York, the next day he’s setting up government contracts so his business will profit.  Almost all accusations come from democrats  and obviously are “made up” with no supporting proof.  Sometimes they openly admit the accusations are untrue and their motive is only to cause damage to President Trump’s reputation.  They get away with it because, like any other lie or story they fabricate, they are protected by hiding behind “Congressional Immunity. ”  Clearly the founding fathers didn’t have this sort  of abuse in mind.

Without getting into details, “How much do we pay POTUS?  How much do we pay legistators ?

According to Title 3 of the US code, a president earns a $400,000 salary, $50,000 annual expense account, $100,000 nontaxable travel account, and $19,000 for entertainment. POTUS still remains on the payroll after leaving office. ( In 2001 Congress raised the   salary from $200,000 to $400,000 and added an extra expense allowance of $50,000 a year).

Legislators serving in the US Congress have earned $174,000 annually. House leadership earns more.  Speaker of the House at $223,500,  Majority Leader and Minority Leader at $193,400.  Senate Leadership is Majority Leader at $193,400 and Minority Leader at $193,400.

In addition to their pay each legislator  is eligible  for the following,

In the U.S. Senate, the Senators’ Official Personnel and Office Expense Account (SOPOEA).  Anywhere  from $3,043,454 to $4,815,203 for each Senator.

In the House of Representatives ,  the Members’ Representational Allowance (MRA). Anywhere from $1,207,510 to $1,383,709.

Total wages annually  is $93,217,100, with a total of $481,520,300 to SOPEA(high end) and a total of $601,913,415 to (MRA).

For a more detailed report on legislator pay click Here

COMPARISON

PRESIDENT  total is $569,000 annually(president doesn’t  take a paycheck so total is 0)

SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES  total is $1,176,650,815 annually (congress wants a raise).

*Totals are generalization .  Not accurate to exact dollar but pretty dam close

Without getting into details such as security, etc. clearly more tax dollars  are spent on legislators.  What about election season?  What up  when POTUS is campaigning ?  What about when a legislator  is running for president? Can they campaign  and still complete their duties their current job requires?

With Trump it’s easy.  He is able to do his job and campaign  at the same time.  With the legislators it’s an entirely different story.  Apparently  legislators cannot campaign  and effectively do their jobs.  Let’s take a look at some of the legislators that are running for president.  Let’s check their  attendance when it comes to voting on new legislation.   After all, we are paying them to be there, to vote for us.

Sen. Harris [D-CA]

Kamala

Sen. Booker [D-NJ]

 

Booker

Sen. Sanders [I-VT]

bernie

Sen. Gillibrand [D-NY]

gil

Sen. Warren [D-MA]

Warren

 

Sen. Bennet [D-CO]

Bennett

Sen. Klobuchar [D-MN]

amy

Rep. Swalwell [D-CA15]

swallowed-.jpg

Rep. Ryan [D-OH13]

ryan

Rep. Gabbard [D-HI2]

tulsie.jpg

 

Rep. Moulton [D-MA6]

multon.jpg

 

 

Data Sourced from GovTrack

Click here for more candidates details

 

 

As you can see, the Democrat candidates cannot campaign and fulfill the duties their job requires. Since they are still receiving  a paycheck, ultimately, they are ripping off the American taxpayer.  If they cannot be honest now, why should anyone think they would be an honest president?  This is a situation where political party loyalty  does not matter.  Every American should be outraged.

Congress has oversite over the Executive Branch and the Judicial Branch.  It works, up to a point.  That point is when Congress has become lawless and gone rogue.  One example is when Congress doesn’t get what they want , they turn to extorsion methods, like they are doing with the Supreme Court. Another would be how they charged the Attorney  General(AG) with contempt ,  for not providing specific information which would have required  the AG to break the law.  Currently the democrat majority  in the House of Representative  has gone rogue.  It’s lawless behavior has made them one of the most powerful criminal organizations in the world.  Congress has oversite over Congress.  It is unlikely that they will remove one of their own.   They continue to run America into the ground with a strong socialist twist.  In some cases, a communist twist.  The Senate and POTUS seem to be keeping them in check.  Still, I believe that may not be enough.  Eventually it will take American Patriots to march on DC and physically remove these criminals and jail them, where they belong.

Respectfully

Deplorable patriot

 

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0 0
 

President Donald J. Trump, Until The Wheels Fall Off

Executive order to end infestation of jellyfish

 

When people ask me what I think about President  Donald J. Trump, often my response is “I’m with him  until the wheels fall off.”

Back in the day

In 1973 a group of bikers made a vow to remain together “Until the Wheels fall off.”  It was the Wheel Lords Motorcycle Club.  They lived  the street chopper counterculture lifestyle.  They would hang out, ride  and party with the “Hells Angels” and “Unforgiven Sinners.”   That was a thing back in the 1070’s.  Young men joined motorcycle clubs to live the freedom of the open road.  They lived true to their words in that vow.  They were loyal to each other until the end.  “Until the wheels fell off”.

When a person says “Until the wheels fall off”  they are saying is that they are with you “until the end of the road”, “until they cannot go on any longer”. They have given their word, their loyalty.   That is my understanding.  Some of you might be  thinking, “What does this and a group of bikers have  to do with Trump?”.  The answer would be “They don’t have anything to do with Trump”.    I mention the bikers because I’ve said in the past, “I’m with Trump “Until the wheels fall off”.  It doesn’t matter what he does.  It means I’m not going to bail if things get rough or he makes a decision I don’t agree with.  The second reason why I mention them is because I’m finding it hard to understand why some Trump supporters  bailed on  him after he re- opened the government.   If a group of bikers can be loyal to each other, why is it so hard to stand with the man you help get elected.   Who do you have lined up that is better?  Sure, I’m the only one saying “Until the wheels fall off” but to those of you that bailed on him after he re-opened the government,   “Where is your loyalty?”  He makes a decision you don’t agree with and you turn on him.  Up to this point he has done more in two years than any other President has done for their whole term.    This doesn’t matter to those that bailed.  “He signed the paper so he needs to go.”  The first word that comes to mind is “Jellyfish”.  Jellyfish are spineless.

I saw where a “Jellyfish” had made the comment “He signed the papers, he backed down to Pelosi and we are not getting a wall.  I’m finished with Trump”.

Lets talk about it

As far as being “finished with Trump”,  Thanks for your vote, good luck to you. When Trump signed his name to re-open the government, many people think  the Democrats beat him.  Some say “So much for the wall”.  Others will say “He did it so the Federal employees get paid”, ” Trump caved”, “Trump lost”, “Trump is Weak”, “Why did he sign the papers?” , etc.  It does look like the Democrats got over on him.  People forget this Trump we are dealing with.  When he signed his name, what else do you think he signed his name on?  The two images are from a source of mine.  This is what was included when he signed his name that day.

15 day notice given to use military to build wall

We are getting a wall

Trump gets Federal employees paid.  Trump puts Democrats on notice.  Trump ends shutdown.  My source has yet to fail me.  I’ll include two links for better resolution Image 1 and  Image 2.

The Government ShutdownTrump, the wall

My take on the “Shutdown”

In the event of a Government Shutdown the Federal government has only the essential employees working that is needed to run the country.  It’s the same at the White House.  Trump had essential staff working.  That would more than likely  be the Bosses, leaders of each department still in operation.  During that time they have to be more efficient.  Streamline their operation.  During the shutdown they found out that they were getting more done than they were with a full staff.  How is that possible?

It is common knowledge that there are many people in Trumps administration that are working against him.  Part of “the  Deep state”.  During the shutdown these people were at home or someplace else.  What matters is they were not working.  Which means no one is around to SABOTAGE.  This is the only time where Trump is able to do a through “house cleaning “.  This is a good indicator to why the Democrats are pushing a bill that would end all government shutdowns.

I cannot say that this was planned.  Trump is famous for taking a losing situation and making it a win.  I don’t think he has ever said he lost at anything.   I’m with Trump, until the wheels fall off.

Respectfully

Deplorable Patriot

 

 

 

 

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0 0
 

Lawsuit demands US remove 'In God We Trust' from money

I can’t imagine going through life as a professional victim.

Michael Newdow

Michael Newdow


Michael Newdow is infamous for suing for all the butthurt in his life. He’s unsuccessfully sued against the inclusion of the words “under God” in public schools’ recitals of the Pledge of Allegiance. Since 2005 he’s been suing to have the words “In God We Trust” removed from US currency. He’s now filed another lawsuit and this time it’s personal.
Fox News reports that Newdow filed the lawsuit Monday in Akron, Ohio. Throughout much of his lawsuit, the word appears as “G-d.”
Newdow claims “In God We Trust” violates the separation of church and state. One plaintiff says his Atheism is “substantially burdened because he is forced to bear on his person a religious statement that causes him to sense his government legitimizing, promoting and reinforcing negative and injurious attitudes not only against Atheists in general, but against him personally.”
The lawsuit represents 41 plaintiffs from Ohio and Michigan, including many unnamed parents and children who are atheists or are being raised as atheists. Defendants include Congress, Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew and various federal agencies.
Methinks he’ll be unsuccessful again.
DCG

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0 0
 

Obama Accumulates More Debt Than All Presidents Combined.

Now this will make your head go Boom!

sangry_blowsupheart_100-100—————————————————————————————————-

+106%: Obama Has More Than Doubled Marketable U.S. Debt

By Terence P. Jeffrey       February 18, 2014 – 1:37 PM

(CNSNews.com) – The marketable debt of the U.S. government has more than doubled–climbing by 106 percent–while President Barack Obama has been in office, increasing from $5,749,916,000,000 at the end of January 2009 to $11,825,322,000,000 at the end of January 2014, according to the U.S. Treasury’s latest Monthly Statement of the Public Debt.

During the eight-year presidency of George W. Bush, the marketable debt of the U.S. government almost doubled–climbing 93 percent–from $2,977,328,000,000 at the end of January 2001 to $5,749,916,000,000 at the end of January 2009.

( Bush was a Boob Too)

During the time that Bush and Obama have been in office, the marketable debt of the U.S. government has nearly quadrupled, increasing by $8,847,994,000,000.

MARKETABLE DEBT-CHART

However, despite the massive increase in the government’s marketable debt during Bush’s eight years, Obama managed to accumulate more additional marketable debt in his first five years in office than all the presidents who preceded combined.

Let’s read that again..

However, despite the massive increase in the government’s marketable debt during Bush’s eight years, Obama managed to accumulate more additional marketable debt in his first five years in office than all the presidents who preceded combined.

The marketable debt of the U.S. government includes all debt securities sold by the U.S. Treasury that can be held by individuals, corporations or other entities outside the U.S. government and that can be sold in the secondary market.

It does not include money the Treasury has borrowed out of government trust funds—such as the Social Security Trust Fund—to spend on other government expenses when those trust funds were running surpluses.

The marketable debt of the U.S. government now includes Treasury bills, which mature in 52 weeks or less; Treasury notes, which have maturities between 2 and 10 years; Treasury bonds, which mature in 30 years; Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS), which have maturities of 5, 10 and 30 years; and Floating Rate Notes (FRNs), which are sold on 2-year terms.

At the end of January 2009, the month Obama took office, the marketable debt of the U.S. government was $5,749,916,000,000, according the Treasury’s Monthly Statement of the Public Debt. This included $1,792,889,000,000 in Treasury bills held by the public; $2,825,174,000,000 in Treasury notes held by the public; $591,174,000,000 in Treasury bonds; and $516,209,000,000 in TIPS.

It also included $23,754,000,000 in marketable Treasury bills, notes, bonds, TIPS and Federal Financing Bank notes that, according to the Treasury, were held by federal agencies.

In addition to the $5,749,916,000,000 in marketable debt as of the end of January 2009, the Treasury also reported $4,882,164,000,000 in nonmarketable debt owed by the government at that time, including $4,291,027,000,000 in nonmarketable intragovernmental debt.

By the end of January 2014, the marketable debt of the U.S. government had increased to $11,825,322,000,000. This included $1,484,438,000,000 in Treasury bills held  by the public; $7,922,464,000,000 in Treasury notes held by the public; $1,421,110,000,000 in Treasury bonds held by the public; $959,058,000,000 in TIPS held by the public, and $15,000,000,000 in FRNs held by the public. There was also $23,252,000,000 in marketable debt held by government agencies.

In addition to the $11,825,322,000,000 in marketable debt as of the end of January 2014, the Treasury also reported $5,467,698,000,000 in nonmarketable debt, including $4,961,625,000,000 in nonmarketable intragovernmental debt.

From January 2009 to January 2014, the marketable debt of the U.S. government increased $6,075,406,000,000—or about 106%

The Federal Reserve is now the largest owner of the U.S. government’s marketable debt. As of Feb. 12, 2014, according to the Fed’s latest balance sheet, the Fed owned $2,261,099,000,000 in U.S. Treasury securities.

Entities in the People’s Republic of China are the second largest owners of the U.S. government’s marketable debt. As of the end of December, according to data released by the U.S. Treasury today, the Chinese owned $1,268,900,000,000 in U.S. Treasury securities—down from $1,316,700,000,000 at the end of November.

In January 2014, according to the Treasury, the U.S. paid an average interest rate of only 1.998 percent on its marketable debt. In January 2009, when Obama took office, the Treasury was paying an average interest rate of 3.116 percent on its marketable debt; and, in January 2001, when President George W. Bush took office, the Treasury was paying an average interest rate of 6.620 percent on its marketable debt.

That means that the average interest rate on the U.S. government’s marketable debt is currently less than a third of what it was in 2001—when the U.S. had only $2,977,328,000,000 in marketable debt, or about 25 percent of the marketable debt it has now.

Also in January 2001, the Federal Reserve owned only $518,441,000,000 in U.S. Treasury securities, or about 23 percent of what it owns now.

~Steve~

https://cnsnews.com/news/article/terence-p-jeffrey/106-obama-has-more-doubled-marketable-us-debt

 

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0 0
 

ObamaCare Imploding! Obama Making It Up As He Goes.

Ladies and Gentlemen This POS is breaking the law as it is written everytime he waves his magic pen and changes the goal post. When will they freaken impeach him????

images

——————————————————————————————–

Obama’s New Delay of Employer Mandate Violates Plain Language of Law.

By Terence P. Jeffrey           February 10, 2014 – 6:14 PM

(CNSNews.com) – President Barack Obama’s Treasury Department issued a new  regulation today that for the second time directly violates the plain and unambiguous text of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act by allowing some businesses to avoid the law’s Dec. 31, 2013 deadline to provide health insurance coverage to their employees.

Initially, on July 2, 2013, the administration unilaterally delayed the deadline for the employer mandate until 2015. Now, the administration is unilaterally delaying it for some businesses until 2016.

n its official summary of PPACA, the Congressional Research Service said: “(Sec. 1513, as modified by section 10106) Imposes fines on large employers (employers with more than 50 full-time employees) who fail to offer their full-time employees the opportunity to enroll in minimum essential coverage or who have a waiting period for enrollment of more than 60 days.”

The text of the law itself describes an “applicable large employer” as follows: “The term ‘applicable large employer’ means, with respect to a calendar year, an employer who employed an average of at least 50 full-time employees on business days during the preceding calendar year.”

The final words in the section of PPACA mandating that employers with more than 50 full-time employees provide their employees with “minimum essential coverage” imposes a specific statutory deadline for doing so. It says: “EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this section shall apply to months beginning after December 31, 2013.”

Last summer, the administration unilaterally moved this hard statutory deadline back one year to 2015 for all employers with more than 50 full-time employees. Now, without any action by Congress, the administration is moving it back again for some employers—despite the plain language of the law.

The Treasury Department has issued a fact sheet explaining how the Obama administration’s new declaration changes the meaning of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

The fact sheet says:

“To ensure a gradual phase-in and assist the employers to whom the policy does apply, the final rules provide, for 2015, that: The employer responsibility provision will generally apply to larger firms with 100 or more full-time employees starting in 2015 and employers with 50 or more full-time employees starting in 2016.”

The fact sheet goes on to say:

“To avoid a payment for failing to offer health coverage, employers need to offer coverage to 70 percent of their full-time employees in 2015 and 95 percent in 2016 and beyond, helping employers that, for example, may offer coverage to employees with 35 or more hours, but not yet to that fraction of their employees who work 30 to 34 hours.”

It further says:

“While the employer responsibility provisions will generally apply starting in 2015, they will not apply until 2016 to employers with at least 50 but fewer than 100 full-time employees if the employer provides an appropriate certification described in the rules.”

And also:

“Employers that are subject to the employer responsibility provisions in 2015 must offer coverage to at least 70 percent of full-time employees as one of the conditions for avoiding an assessable payment, rather than 95 percent which will begin in 2016.”

In sum, the law says that employers with “at least 50 full-time employees” must provide “minimum essential coverage” in the “months beginning after December 31, 2013” or pay a fine. The new declaration from the Obama administration’s Treasury Department says this part of the law no longer applies. It says employers with between 50 and 99 employees need not provide coverage until 2016 and larger employers need only provide coverage to 70 percent of their employees next year.

Great Links from Drudge

~Steve~

https://cnsnews.com/news/article/terence-p-jeffrey/obama-s-new-delay-employer-mandate-violates-plain-language-law

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0 0
 

National Park Service Goon Shoots Unarmed Man on Houseboat

Park_Service_Flag_Blue

AKA: Federal Goons with Guns

Author’s Note: For future reference, I will be referring to any and all federal agencies that I feel have no business being armed with anything beyond a radio as being federal goons with guns. If that offends you, tough grits.

-And before you start telling me about the dangers of bears and snakes, you should know I spent half of my 30 years in the land surveying bizz all over the eastern half of the country – most of it in the woods, and the only two times I felt threatened was when I was shot at by a couple of irate (human) property owners.

That’s when it is time to call for-real local law-enforcement officers, not glorified feds who are probably ex-Peace Corps types, or worse –  PETA rejects, who are poorly trained and have no business being armed in the first place.

Via spokesman.com:

Lake Roosevelt park ranger shot man near son, family says

Kip Hill The Spokesman-Review

The Kettle Falls man shot by park rangers at a campground over the weekend had been standing alongside his 9-year-old son when the bullet tore into his torso, family members say.

Few details of the shooting have been disclosed by the National Park Service or investigators with the Washington State Patrol.

The shooting injured Casey Hartinger, 43. It happened after a Saturday night confrontation between rangers and another man who owns a houseboat that was moored at the Kettle River Campground within the Lake Roosevelt National Recreation Area.

At least one park ranger boarded the houseboat in response to a noise complaint.

It’s unclear what prompted a ranger to open fire on Hartinger, 43, who was released Monday from Providence Sacred Heart Medical Center, apparently without being arrested.

However, the owner of the houseboat, 41-year-old Michael J. Sublie, faces possible federal charges of interfering with law enforcement.

Court documents describe a scuffle that included Sublie shoving a park ranger off the gangplank that stretched from the houseboat to the shore.

Hartinger and Sublie both live in Kettle Falls and are friends. Family members of both men said Monday that neither of the men was armed at the time.

Court documents include allegations that Sublie was uncooperative when rangers approached him. He refused to turn down the music blaring from his boat at about 10:30 p.m. – some 30 minutes after quiet hours had begun. And he refused to identify himself or remove his hands from his pockets as a ranger requested. Sublie was described by rangers as having “a heavy odor of alcoholic beverage” on his breath and at one point yelled obscenities at the rangers as he demanded they leave his boat.

A ranger tried several times to detain Sublie, but each time Sublie is accused of violently raising his arms to resist.

After several failed attempts to detain Sublie, the ranger was pushed backward off the gangplank, according to records.

Court filings do not mention when shots were fired or by whom. The two rangers who responded to the call were identified only by their initials.

Bob Hartinger, the father of the man who was shot, said he’d received word in a phone call from his 13-year-old granddaughter who was on the boat with her 9-year-old brother that Casey Hartinger had been wounded. The 9-year-old stood near his dad when the shots were fired, Bob Hartinger said.

“If the bullet hadn’t hit my son, it would have hit (my grandson) in the head,” he said.

You will find the rest at this link.

the-tyranny-liberty-cycle-of-government-L-v7LiL2

This time around, I think it will be stopping at Tyranny

I guess we should be thankful that no one’s dog was shot, nor that their 98 year-old wheelchair-bound grandmother was tasered – at least not this time.

Scuffle or not, there was no reason to shoot an unarmed man, no matter how drunk and belligerent he was at the time.

There are ways to subdue such people that do not involve attempted deadly force that can be employed by law enforcement officers that are properly trained and thus qualified.

And I have the same question Doc E had (even though she did not quite put it this way): WTF is up with this?

We are currently very late 1930s Germany – and very close to becoming something just as bad – if not ultimately worse.

Americans better pull their heads out of their rectums and start paying attention – and that right soon, because we are staring nose-to-nose eyeball-to-eyeball at our demise.

-Dave

(h/t: My buddy Earl)

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0 0
 

Obama Making his Own Laws – Again

I don’t knoW IF YOU RECALL, BUT AS PART OF OBAMMYCARE CONGRESS AND STAFF WERE SUPPOSED TO PARTICIPATE JUST LIKE US PEONS  WELL AS GOMER WOULD SAY “WELL GOOOOOLY’ SEE WHAT HAPPENED NOW.

 

Obama - He's dead

by KEITH KOFFLER on AUGUST 5, 2013, 9:24 AM
By what authority did President Obama decide to exempt members of Congress and their staffs from a provision of Obamacare that would deny them their federal subsidy and and make them buy insurance on the exchanges like everyone else?
Obama, as has been widely reported, promised Congress the other day that he would personally see to it that the federal benefit, which pays 75 percent of premiums, would be preserved even after Congress is forced onto the exchanges.
Lawmakers were complaining of a potential “brain drain” as high quality staffers left Capitol Hill instead of ponying up thousands more for health insurance.
Let’s be clear. Other brains would certainly have replaced the parting brains on Capitol Hill. It’s a cool job – makin’ laws for the rest of us – that others would have done before cashing in their padded resumes and scoring tons of dough in the private sector. The problem wasn’t a brain drain. The problem was a money drain.
And so, lo and behold, the administration’s Office of Personnel Management has dutifully determined that Congress will keep its taxpayer-funded health care gift.
According to the Wall Street Journal, OPM has no authority to pay for plans on the exchanges, which are not part of the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program.
This latest White House night at the improv is also illegal. OPM has no authority to pay for insurance plans that lack FEHBP contracts, nor does the Affordable Care Act permit either exchange contributions or a unilateral bump in congressional pay in return for less overall compensation. Those things require appropriations bills passed by Congress and signed by the President.
The White House, the WSJ notes, was eager to issue a decree instead of pursuing a legislative fix that would have uncomfortably opened up the Obamacare can of worms and invited Republican mischief.
So, as it has so often done when the law is inconvenient, the Obama administration has decided the laws are for stupid people.

(That’s Us If You Were Wondering.)

Your government has unlawfully decided to take action to financially benefit the ruling class, those who WHO ACTUALLY WRITE THE LAWS. Democrats took the lead on this, but Republicans are complicit too.
Be afraid.
~ Steve~                    https://www.whitehousedossier.com/2013/08/05/lawlessness-white-house/

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0 0
 

Will Dems Pay for Passing Obamacare in 2014?

Obama_witch_doctor

Disaster for Dems

ObamaCare & the 2014 vote

  • By BETSY MCCAUGHEY
  • Last Updated: 12:09 AM, March 25, 2013
  • Posted: 10:42 PM, March 24, 2013
headshot

Betsy McCaughey

Democrats hope to retake the House of Representatives in next year’s elections. They won’t — and they’ll have themselves to blame, because 2014 is when ObamaCare kicks in.
With a vengeance.
The authors of the Obama health law postponed the pain until after the 2012 election. Some popular provisions went into effect immediately, such as allowing children to stay on their parent’s plan until age 26. And the White House granted 1,472 waivers to various companies and unions, exempting them from insurance reforms so they wouldn’t drop coverage for employees and members before the presidential contest.

Kiss of death: ObamaCare’s disastrous impact means Nancy Pelosi, here being greeted by the president last year, won’t be speaker again soon.

AFP/Getty Images
Kiss of death: ObamaCare’s disastrous impact means Nancy Pelosi, here being greeted by the president last year, won’t be speaker again soon.

Yet a majority of voters on Election Day still opposed the health law (though, obviously, it wasn’t the deciding issue in the presidential race). And opinion will only sour more as the law takes full force starting in January.
People in their 20s and 30s will be clobbered — their health-insurance premiums will double (or more), insurers report. Nineteen percent of the president’s 2012 voters came from this age group. The biggest problem: The Obama law forces insurers to charge young, healthy people more to cover the cost of insuring the middle-aged and those with pre-existing conditions.
Middle-aged folks will benefit somewhat from overcharging the young, but the law’s mandatory benefits package and its billions in new taxes on insurers will drive up costs enough that overall premiums for a family of five will start at $20,000 (before subsidies, if any). Oh — and that doesn’t count the penalty for each smoker, roughly $3,000 a head.
(Subsidies may help some people cover sky-high premiums, though not the smoking penalty — but the letter of the law makes those subsidies unavailable in many states. The federal courts will eventually decide the issue.)
Many workers in industries such as retail, hospitality and home care will lose on-the-job health coverage, forecasts the ADP Research Institute — and many will also be demoted to part-time status because of ObamaCare.
Why? The president’s health law mandates that all employers with 50 or more full-time workers provide its “essential benefit package” if they offer insurance — and that package costs about twice what these industries now offer. Many employers will drop coverage, and pay the (smaller) fine; others will try to avoid that 50-employee limit by using more people part-time.
Even the government’s actuaries admit fewer people will get coverage at work after the employer mandate goes into effect than if the law had not passed.
You will find the rest of the article at this link.

Obamacare

I am praying Betsy McCaughey is right, as it appears the current congress cannot bring itself to even throw a speed bump in front of Obama’s health care plan from Hell. Okay, it really is not Obama’s plan, as it was written many moons ago and has been sitting in a rusty file cabinet ever since, but he will be forever associated with it.
There is just one teeny, tiny problem, though, as filling out an Obamacare application will include an opportunity to register to vote.
That could end up being a double edged sword given the low-information electorate we now have in this country.
And do not even get me started on the potential for voter fraud.
-Dave

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0 0
 

October 2012 Statistics On Airport Screening From Department Of Homeland Security

TSA
FULL BODY SCANS AT THE AIRPORT:
The T.S.A. disclosed the Airport Screening Results.
Terrorists Discovered
Transvestites
133
Hernias
1,485
Hemorrhoid Cases
3,172
Enlarged Prostates
8,249
Breast Implants
59,350
Natural Blondes
3
It was also discovered that 535 members of Congress had no balls.
Thought you’d like to know.       😀
~Steve~                             H/T  Joseph

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0 0