Tag Archives: Chief Justice John Roberts

Attorney Lin Wood says he has evidence of blackmail of SCOTUS Chief Justice John Roberts and other elites

  1.  

L. Lin Wood, 68, is an attorney based in Atlanta, Georgia, who had specialized in personal injury litigation.

He first drew media attention when he represented Richard Jewell, the security guard who was falsely accused in the Centennial Olympic Park bombing in Atlanta in 1996. It was the Jewell case that transformed Wood from a personal injury lawyer to a nationally known defamation lawyer.

As the attorney for Covington high school student Nick Sandmann in defamation lawsuits, Wood succeeded in winning settlements from CNN ($275 million), the Washington Post ($250 million) and other media outlets for their deliberate misrepresentation of Sandmann’s encounter with a Native American activist in January 2020. See my post, “Victory against fake news: CNN settles defamation lawsuit with Convington student Nick Sandmann“.

Lin Wood has been active in contesting the purported results of the 2020 presidential election and, sometimes in association with attorney Sydney Powell, has filed lawsuits claiming voter fraud and other election irregularities.

In the last few days, beginning on January 1, Wood has been tweeting explosive claims, for which he has received death threats, that:

  1. Convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, who we are told committed suicide while imprisoned in Manhattan, is still alive. (See “Guard claims Jeffrey Epstein was wheeled out of prison, alive“)
  2. Wood has evidence that political elites, especially Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, are being blackmailed by U.S. and foreign intelligence agencies for raping and killing children. The agencies include the CIA, FBI, Chinese Communist Party, Mossad, and MI6.
  3. Wood says he has the “keys” to the blackmail files of actor-musician Isaac Kappy, who had outed Hollywood pedophiles and who supposedly committed suicide by jumping off a freeway bridge in May 2020. Wood says he is “handing over” the files to President Trump. (See “SCOTUS clerk overheard real reason why justices refused to hear Texas election lawsuit” and “Will Chief Justice John Roberts be blackmailed (again) to rule in favor of same-sex marriage?“)

John Roberts in Jeffrey Epstein’s Lolita Express flight logs

Below are Wood’s tweets (I took screenshots of the tweets in case Twitter takes them down):

H/t Elizabeth and FOTM reader BL

~Eowyn

Drudge Report has gone to the dark side. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by a military veteran!

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

SCOTUS clerk overheard real reason why justices refused to hear Texas election lawsuit

A week ago, on December 11, 2020, in a 7:2 decision, the Supreme Court dismissed a lawsuit by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton challenging the election results in the four battleground states of Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia and Pennsylvania. Trump had won those states in 2016 and was winning on election night 2020 until the counting of votes was abruptly halted. When the counting resumed the next morning, lo and behold, Biden surged ahead.

Texas’ lawsuit was joined by 106 GOP members of Congress and supported by 17 GOP-controlled states — Missouri, Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, and West Virginia.

State of Texas v. Pennsylvania, et al., argued that officials in the four battleground states conducted the 2020 general election in violation of the U.S. Constitution because they had illegally altered election laws, causing a flood of mail-in votes without appropriate ballot integrity measures in place. Texas maintained the resulting irregularities put the ultimate outcome of the presidential election in doubt.

But the Supreme Court, in an unsigned one-page order, dismissed the suit on the grounds that Texas lacked legal standing or right to sue under the Constitution because the state had not shown a valid interest to intervene in how other states handle their elections. All three justices whom Trump had nominated — Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Barrett — sided with the majority. The two lone dissenters were Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, who disagreed with the ruling on standing, arguing that the Supreme Court should hear the case, but did not otherwise find for the plaintiffs.

Now we know why SCOTUS squashed the Texas lawsuit.

Chief Justice John Roberts, whom conservatives already regard as suspect for his vote that ensured the Supreme Court’s rulings for “gay” marriage and Obamacare (see here), quashed the Texas lawsuit in fear of riots. In other words, Roberts and the other 6 justices were so intimidated by the terrorist tactics of the Black Lives Matter riots, they relinquished their sworn duty to the American people to uphold justice and the U.S. Constitution.

First reported on December 12 by the Hal Turner Radio Show “from a source deep inside the US Supreme Court,” this is now verified by a C-SPAN video tweeted by Howard Mortman, who identifies himself as “C-SPAN Communications Director“.

I first saw the video yesterday on a tweet by Kyle Becker. But this morning, I discovered that Twitter had already taken down Kyle’s tweet (see here). So I’ve saved Mortman’s video and uploaded it to FOTM‘s media library.

The video is a C-SPAN clip of an unidentified grey-haired man testifying before the Electoral College on December 14. Epoch Times has identified the grey-haired man as a GOP Texas elector, Matt Patrick.

Here’s the video (transcript to follow):

This is what Matt Patrick said:

“It was written by someone who is a current staffer for one of the Supreme Court justices. I’ll just describe the report to you that I read, and you can make of it what you will.

He said that the justices, as they always do, went into a closed room to discuss cases they’re taking, their debate. There’s no phones, no computers, no nothing, no one else is in the room except for the nine justices. It’s typically very civil, you don’t usually hear any sound, they just debate what they’re doing. But when the Texas case was brought up, he [the staffer] said he heard screaming through the walls. As Justice Roberts and the other liberal justices were insisting that this case not be taken up, and the reason — the words that were heard through the wall when Justices Thomas and Alito were citing Bush v. Gore — from John Roberts were ‘I don’t give a f__ about that case, I don’t wanna hear about it. At that time, we didn’t have riots.’

So what he was saying was that he was afraid of what would happen if they did the right thing. And I’m sorry, but that is moral cowardice. And we in the SREC*, I’m a SREC member, we put those words in very specifically because the charge of the Supreme Court is to ultimately be our final arbitrator, our final line of defense for right and wrong, and they did not do their duty. So I think we should leave these words in because I want to send this oral message to them. Thank you.”

*Note: SREC is the State Republican Executive Committee, the 64-member governing board of the Republican Party of Texas.

A spokesperson for the U.S. Supreme Court has denied what was claimed in the C-SPAN video.

The spokesperson told The Epoch Times via email yesterday that the court “has been conducting its conferences remotely by phone since March when the building closed due to the pandemic.”

According to the Supreme Court’s website, the justices have not met in person for months because of the COVID-19 China virus pandemic:

The Court will hear all oral arguments scheduled for the November and December sessions by telephone conference. In keeping with public health guidance in response to COVID-19, the Justices and counsel will all participate remotely. The oral arguments are scheduled to begin at 10 a.m. On days when more than one case will be heard, there will be a three minute pause before the second case begins,” the court’s website says.

Jim Pickle, also a Republican elector in Texas, disagreed with Patrick on sending a message to SCOTUS on the grounds of hearsay. Pickle said:

“Sending a message like this to a body of legislators or judicial officers is not going to get the attention you want to get. Nobody knows what happened in that conference room on purpose. Hearing yelling, the triple hearsay, quadruple hearsay now, about what is going on in that room, you cannot make your decision on that basis.”

John Roberts in Jeffrey Epstein’s Lolita Express flight logs

H/t FOTM reader Tim Shey.

~Eowyn

Drudge Report has gone to the dark side. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by a military veteran!

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

Every passenger on Jeffrey Epstein’s flight logs will be named

The rich and famous pals of suicided sex-offender Jeffrey Epstein are in a panic because every passenger on his flight logs will be named.

Christopher Bucktin reports for the UK Mirror, Sept. 20, 2020, that Denise George, the attorney general of the U.S. Virgin Islands where Jeffrey Epstein’s pedo island is located, has subpoenaed the logs for every flight made by  Epstein’s aircrafts (4 helicopters and 3 planes, including the infamous “Lolita Express”) over the course of 21 years, from 1998 to his supposed suicide last year.

Jeffrey Epstein (l); Gurney Man (r)

AG George has filed a lawsuit against Epstein’s estate for 22 counts, including aggravated rape, child abuse and neglect, human trafficking, forced labor and prostitution.

In addition to the passenger lists, the subpoena also demands any personal notes the pilots made, the names and contact details of anyone who had worked for the pilots or who “interacted with or observed” Epstein or any passengers associated with him, as well as any “complaints or reports of potentially suspicious conduct”.

David Rodgers, one of Epstein’s pilots, provided logs in 2009 showing Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, homosexual pedophile actor Kevin Spacey, “supermodel” Naomi Campbell, Epstein’s recruiter Ghislaine Maxwell (who is now in custody), and attorney Alan Dershowitz were among those who flew on Epstein’s “Lolita Express” jet. (Distractify)

According to the Washington Examiner, the flight logs also show that Donald Trump had flown once in a plane owned by Epstein. On January 5, 1997, Trump joined Epstein, Epstein’s brother Mark, Ghislaine Maxwell, and others on a flight from Palm Beach International Airport to Newark Liberty International Airport.

Trump and Epstein were neighbors and friends in Palm Beach in the 1990s, though they eventually had a falling out. In July 2019, Bradley Edwards, a lawyer who represented Epstein’s victims, stated in court documents that Trump had barred Epstein from his Mar-A-Lago estate “because Epstein sexually assaulted an underage girl at the club.” (New York Post)

In July 2019, Bill Clinton released a press statement that he had taken a total of four trips on Epstein’s airplane in 2002 and 2003. But a Washington Examiner review of the flight manifest records shows that Clinton actually went on at least 27 flights on Epstein’s “Lolita Express” during at least six trips, not four.

Lawyers for Epstein’s victims say the Epstein flight logs that are revealed did not include flights made by chief pilot Larry Visoski, who flew for Epstein for more than 25 years.

According to the Mirror, a “legal source” said that the flight records that Attorney General George has subpoenaed “will make the ones [pilot David] Rodgers provided look like a Post-It note. There is panic among many of the rich and famous.”

Was Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts one of Epstein’s passengers?

Alan Duke of Lead Stories calls it “fake news,” but doesn’t address the above image of a flight log with John Roberts’ name.

If Roberts indeed was a passenger on Epstein’s plane(s), that could explain “Will Chief Justice John Roberts be blackmailed (again) to rule in favor of same-sex marriage?“. If Roberts is outed, he would have to resign, which means President Trump will get to nominate another to SCOTUS, and Demonrats’ heads will really explode!

See also:

~Eowyn

Drudge Report has gone to the dark side. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by a military veteran!

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0