Tag Archives: Cass Sunstein

COVID-19: A pandemic to eliminate ‘useless eaters’

This essay is to provoke thought. It does not mean I necessarily subscribe to its thesis.

The term “useless eaters” originated in Nazi Germany. The German words for “useless eaters” or “useless mouths” is Unnütze Esser – those deemed unworthy of life, who included Jews, people with serious medical problems or disabilities, those unable/unwilling to work, and other Untermenschen (sub-humans).

Did you know that:

  • Obama’s Science Czar John Holdren, in a 1977 textbook, advocated the formation of a one-world government that would use a “global police force” to enforce totalitarian measures to depopulate the world?
  • Cass Sunstein, a legal scholar who worked for the Obama administration, once proposed focusing government policies on saving years of life rather than individual lives? (Yahoo! News)
  • The EPA during the George W. Bush administration, weighing the benefits of power-plant emission regulations, determined that people over 70 were worth just 67% of the lives of younger people? (Yahoo! News)
  • The “Dead Zone” TV show from 2003 was about a “mysterious flu virus” that “originated from China” which causes high fever and respiratory distress, and talks about quarantine/lockdown, wearing protective masks, and the anti-malarial drug Hydroxychloroquine as the cure? (H/t maryaha)

If you are a mad scientist intent on culling the world’s population down to a sustainable number, à la the Georgia Guidestones‘ 500 million, how would you go about doing it?

Would you target mainly the useless eaters who contribute little to society but are a financial burden, including:

  • The old, whose health costs increase with every year, especially those who must be cared for in nursing homes. Nearly one-third of lifetime medical expenditures is incurred during middle age, and nearly half during the senior years. For those age 85 and over, more than one-third of their lifetime expenditures will accrue in their remaining years.
  • The sick, with chronic debilitatng and incurable  illnesses, such as diabetes, respiratory ailments like COPD, and cardiac diseases.
  • The obese, who disproportionately consume healthcare costs. The CDC estimated that medical-related costs of obesity may be as high as $147 billion a year, or roughly 9% of medical expenditures, and that an obese person costs an average of $1,400 more in medical expenses a year than someone who is at a healthy weight. Other researchers estimated the costs may be even higher.

The selective depopulation must be done stealthily and surreptitiously, with minimum protest from the eaters — useless and useful — under the guise of some natural disaster that keeps everyone terrorized and immobilized in self-quarantine, and confounds even the best minds from suspecting the depopulation is human-contrived and -engineered.

The Wuhan coronavirus pandemic fits the bill:

  1. To begin, the virus is not natural but is man-made, i.e., contrived. According to a U.S. government analysis leaked to the Washington Times, the Wuhan Institute of Virology (China’s CDC) is the “most likely” source of the COVID-19 pandemic. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo confirmed the report. He said: “What we do know is that this virus originated in Wuhan, China. We know there is the Wuhan Institute of Virology just a handful of miles away from where the wet market [with the bats] was.” It is said China created the virus to demonstrate that its ability to identify and combat viruses is equal to or greater than that of the United States, and that the virus “accidentally” leaked from the lab.
  2. Curiously, unlike the seasonal flu coronavirus to which the young are most vulnerable, the Wuhan coronavirus targets mainly the old (over 65), the sick, and the obese:
  3. An effective vaccine for COVID-19 is unlikely. The Wuhan coronavirus has already mutated into at least 30 different strains, which means whatever vaccine that is developed will not be 100% effective, just as the vaccine for the seasonal flu is, at best, only partially effective. As an example, the 2019-2020 seasonal flu vaccine is only 45% effective — “effective” defined as reduction in doctor’s visits for the flu. That’s why we still don’t have a vaccine for the common cold or HIV.
  4. Further targeting the elderly and sick — who especially are urged to get the seasonal flu shot — is the perverse fact that, according to a new Pentagon study, having received a flu shot actually increases the risk of getting the Wuhan virus by 36%! Many other studies also point to the increased risk of viral respiratory infections from the flu shot.

Then we have the curious fact that back in November 2019, more than a month before the CDC sounded the alarm on the COVID-19 coronavirus, the U. S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) posted a job ID for “public health advisor – quarantine program”. (See Deplorable Patriot’s “Pandemic a planned ‘scamdemic’?“)

A new study suggests the pay-off from the Wuhan virus killing off old and sick “useless eaters” in the number of years they would have lived — and consumed societal resources — if it were not for COVID-19 (The Economist):

~Eowyn

Drudge Report has gone to the dark side. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by a military veteran!

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0 0
 

Obama Admin to Concoct Phony ePeople for Propaganda

Sunstein also thinks government should stop sanctioning marriage; federal law should be interpreted by presidents "and those around him" instead of judges; and Americans should not have the right to “keep and bear arms.”


According to an article in Computerworld, the Obama administration has contracted for the development of software that could create multiple fake social media profiles to manipulate and sway public opinion on controversial issues.
This has the fingerprints of Obama’s Information Czar Cass Sunstein all over it.
In a 2008 co-authored paper, “Conspiracy Theories,” published in the Journal of Political Philosophy, Sunstein decries the proliferation on the Internet of false conspiracy theories that he claims may ultimately lead to violence. Sunstein then outlines a plan for the government to stealthily infiltrate ‘”conspiracy theory” groups. He proposes that “government agents (and their allies) might enter chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine percolating conspiracy theories by raising doubts about their factual premises, causal logic or implications for political action.” [Sources: Wikipedia and “Obama Czar Wants to Limit Free Speech“]
Here’s the Computerworld article that, woefully, is rather poorly written.
H/t beloved fellow Tina.
~Eowyn

Army of Fake Social Media Friends to Promote Propaganda
By Darlene Storm – Computerworld – Feb 23, 2011
It’s recently been revealed that the U.S. government contracted HBGary Federal for the development of software which could create multiple fake social media profiles to manipulate and sway public opinion on controversial issues by promoting propaganda. It could also be used as surveillance to find public opinions with points of view the powers-that-be didn’t like. It could then potentially have their “fake” people run smear campaigns against those “real” people. As disturbing as this is, it’s not really new for U.S. intelligence or private intelligence firms to do the dirty work behind closed doors.

EFF previously warned that Big Brother wants to be your friend for social media surveillance. While the FBI Intelligence Information Report Handbook (PDF) mentioned using “covert accounts” to access protected information, other government agencies endorsed using security exploits to access protected information.
It’s not a big surprise that the U.S. military also wants to use social media to its benefit. Last year, Public Intelligence published the U.S. Air Force social media guide which gave 10 tips for social media such as, “The enemy is engaged in this battlespace and you must engage there as well.” Number three was “DON’T LIE. Credibility is critical, without it, no one cares what you have to say…it’s also punishable by the UCMJ to give a false statement.” The Air Force used the chart below to show how social media influences public opinion.

The 6th Contracting Squadron at MacDill Air Force Base sought the development of Persona Management Software which could be used for creating and managing fake profiles on social media sites to distort the truth and make it appear as if there was a generally accepted agreement on controversial issues. “Personas must be able to appear to originate in nearly any part of the world and can interact through conventional online services and social media platforms.” What happened to don’t lie and the Uniform Code of Military Justice?
Everything revealed after Anonymous leaked emails from private security firm HBGary Federal is disturbing on many levels. However, the Daily Kos said with the Persona Management Software it would take very few people to create “an army of sockpuppets” which could distort the truth while appearing to be “an entire Brooks Brothers riot online.”
So again I ask, what happened to number three . . . the rule about not lying that was also “punishable by the UCMJ to give a false statement”?
President and CEO of Plessas Experts Network, Inc, Kirby Plessas pointed out some of the unethical and potentially illegal activities that Aaron Barr’s leaked emails suggested like “Chumming and baiting” which sounded like “entrapment of some sort.” There would be no warrant for the data collected on individuals which could then be stored for how long? “THIS is the entire reason Intelligence Oversight was created – to avoid this sort of thing from ever happening again.”
According to Redacted News, the leaked emails showed how names can be cross-referenced across social media sites to collect information on people and then used to gain access to those social ciricles. The emails also talked of how Facebook could be used to spread government messages:

Even the most restrictive and security conscious of persons can be exploited. Through the targeting and information reconnaissance phase, a person’s hometown and high school will be revealed. An adversary can create a classmates.com account at the same high school and year and find out people you went to high school with that do not have Facebook accounts, then create the account and send a friend request.
Under the mutual friend decision, which is where most people can be exploited, an adversary can look at a targets friend list if it is exposed and find a targets most socially promiscuous friends, the ones that have over 300-500 friends, friend them to develop mutual friends before sending a friend request to the target. To that end friend’s accounts can be compromised and used to post malicious material to a targets wall. When choosing to participate in social media an individual is only as protected as his/her weakest friend.

Lots of people have multiple online aliases, Facebook or Twitter accounts for both business and private life. What most bothers me is the lying and seemingly unethical means to an end. Although the government says it doesn’t approve of censorship, etc, when its secrets come to light, it seems to be Okay with recommending underhanded tactics.
Secretary Clinton delivered a speech called, “Internet Rights and Wrongs: Choices and Challenges In A Networked World.” To help promote and support Internet freedom, the State Department intends to award $25 million in grants. While that is great news, the EFF reported, “For every strong statement about preserving liberty, freedom of expression, and privacy on the global Internet, there exists a countervailing example of the United States attempting to undermine those same values.”
Secretary Clinton later told “This Week” anchor Christiane Amanpou that most Americans “are in favor of human rights, freedom, democracy. We know that ultimately the most progress that can be made on behalf of human beings anywhere is when those individuals are empowered, when they have governments that are responsive.” Clinton added, “At the same time, we recognize that this process can be hijacked. It can be hijacked by both outside and inside elements within any country.”
So while the U.S. government can talk a good talk, what it does and what it says often doesn’t seem to jive. Gasp, I know, it’s not a big shocker but sometimes I find that utterly frustrating. The President wanted an Internet Kill Switch, the FBI keeps pushing for backdoors on all-things-Net. What happened to a code of ethics? Does it disappear behind closed doors, dirty deeds done in the dark and used against the American people who are supposed to be free to express themselves?

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0 0