Tag Archives: Bill O’Reilly

Old and New Birthers: Skepticism About Obama's Birth Eligibility Spreads

Freeway sign in Bethel, Pennsylvania -- one of many such signs across America


Unlike FoxNews’ Glenn Beck and Bill O’Reilly, although he avoided Obama’s birth eligibility during the ’08 presidential campaign, Rush Limbaugh eventually did voice his doubts.
Last Tuesday, November 23, on his radio show, Rush again called into question the constitutional eligibility of Obama to serve as president, declaring him to be a phony.
The comment came during his analysis of the disclosure that Mullah Akhtar Mohammad Mansour, a purported representative of the Taliban negotiating with the Afghan government, actually is an impersonator. Limbaugh said:

“The imposter got into the equivalent of the White House in Afghanistan. Did they not ask this guy for some kind of identification? They clearly didn’t. They clearly didn’t ask this guy for his birth certificate. How in the world could they trust in a leader and even give money to somebody who has not been properly vetted? Well, because it happened here in the United States. We have an imposter for all intents and purposes serving in the White House.”

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hv9q_nR9EBY&feature=player_embedded]
H/t ObamaReleaseYourRecords.
Then there is a new convert to the growing ranks of Obama eligibility skeptics. He is Ulsterman — the blogger for NewsFlavor to whom DeepThroat2, the anonymous “White House insider,” has been leaking insider information on the Obama administration and the Democratic Party.
In his post of November 22, 2010, “The Ulsterman Report: Reflections on the White House Insider,” Ulsterman wrote:

…what of the “certification file” allegedly mentioned by Nancy Pelosi? Does such a file actually exist? Was it Pelosi’s knowledge of the certification process that has allowed her to ultimately remain in power despite overseeing historical losses against Democrats during the midterm elections? Or does Pelosi have knowledge of something else? While Insider has repeatedly described any mention of Barack Obama’s eligibility status as “birther” nonsense, they have also initiated that subject themselves on occasion. Why? If the issue is so silly, so beyond the realm of possibility, why bring it up at all? Perhaps as Insider has also hinted at, there does appear to be something there, but that something might prove so debilitating to the nation’s political process that it leaves Insider not wanting to play any part in such a damaging outcome? Of this I am certain – Insider knows far more on this subject than they have yet indicated.
As for myself regarding the subject of the “birther” issue, I now openly admit to having “found religion” as it were. There indeed does appear to be something amiss. President Obama has spent millions hiding what most would indicate as rather basic information. Education records. Writings. Travel records. And yes, clear and comprehensive proof of birth and/or citizenship. Until recently, I was among those who discounted claims of a cover-up surrounding Barack Obama’s birth story as the silly rants of those with far too much time and resulting paranoia on their hands.
No more.
Throughout the Insider interview series, good people have come forward to offer an abundance of information that at the very least, raises the distinct possibility that a determined and ongoing cover up has in fact been underway surrounding this nation’s current president – and any time there is a cover up, there exists the resulting and required question of WHY? And so I am now left asking that very question, more often, and more loudly. I hope to be able to ask it of Insider soon.

All I can say is this:

Welcome, Mr. Ulsterman! Though late, you are most welcome to join the Obama Truth-Seekers — Americans who still think for ourselves, have the courage of our intelligence and convictions, and refuse to be intimidated by mockery (“birthers”) from seeking the truth about The Fraud.

~Eowyn  

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Liberal Crones Walk Off "The View"

Liberals The Left like to portray themselves as “tolerant” “open-minded” people who champion “diversity” and “multiculturalism.” Alas, like the other lies they never tire of telling about themselves (“We care about the poor!” “We are not racists!” “We are pro-women!” etc. etc.), that’s a lie. 
A raison d’être of Fellowship of the Minds is to dig up evidence of the Left’s hypocrisy. Here’s the latest.
I’m no fan of Fox News gasbag Bill O’Reilly. Yesterday, The View’s leftwing crones Whoopi Goldberg (has this self-proclaimed “comedienne” ever been funny?) and Joy Behar stormed off the set during an interview with O’Reilly.
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=25uyFwWPOZg&feature=player_embedded]  
As recounted by Yahoo’s Michael Calderone, the cast debated whether there should be an Islamic “community center” (which contains a mosque) built in Lower Manhattan, a mere stone’s throw from Ground Zero, O’Reilly declared that “Muslims killed us on 9/11” to back up his position that it’s “inappropriate.”
Goldberg exclaimed, “Oh my God!” (which is pretty funny for an atheist), before uttering a few words bleeped out. To which O’Reilly responded, “Muslims didn’t kill us on 9/11? Is that what you’re saying?” Goldberg called O’Reilly an “extremist” as several of the co-hosts responded to O’Reilly’s statement that “Muslims” — and not Muslim radicals, extremists or terrorists — killed “us” on 9/11.
Behar, who had told O’Reilly that Muslims have a right to build it because “this is America,” said that she could no longer “sit here now” with O’Reilly. Behar and Goldberg then stalked off the studio.
Yes, indeed, liberals are such “open-minded tolerant” people who champion “diversity” and “multiculturalism”! It’s just they have a really narrow and selective definition for all those words:

  • They are “open-minded” except when it comes to ideas that dissent from theirs.
  • They’re “tolerant” of only those who agree with them.
  • They champion “diversity” of skin color and sexual orientation practices, no matter how bizarre, but not diverse political and moral beliefs.
  • They are all for “multiculturalism” but not when it comes to the classic beliefs and values of Western civilization.

Sanctimonious, preachy, and boring HYPOCRITES!
And if they manage to wrestle power, this is what the Left really want to do to all who disagree with them — which is exactly what they did/do in every country in which they attained absolute power:
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAz7jyG0qfw]
Who are the people who still watch those boring hags of “The View”?
H/t fellows Anon and May!
~Eowyn 

Please follow and like us:
error0