Tag Archives: Amnesty

As President Lucifer announces his amnesty plan…


…ask yourself, “Is this act of mercy just a bit misguided?”


Oh, and don’t bother calling the White House. They’ve been told not to relay messages to him when he’s golfing.


If the “unaccompanied minors” seem a bit displeased with your American prosperity, don’t bother Congress; they’re not listening.

Your best bet is to contact your representatives at:

Congressional candidates debate in Spanish in California

welcome to Meximerica

Welcome to Mexicalifornia!

Andrea Castillo reports for The Fresno Bee that on Oct. 4, 2014, a unique debate took place at Fresno State University in California’s inland valley city of Fresno.

Sponsored by Univision Fresno, the debate was between two candidates — incumbent David Valadao (R-Hanford) and his Democrat challenger, Amanda Renteria — running to represent the 21st Congressional District in the U.S. House of Representatives.

What was unique about the debate was that it was conducted entirely in Spanish.

Amanda Renteria (l); David Valadao (r)

Amanda Renteria (l); David Valadao (r)

What is ironic is that Valadao’s native tongue isn’t even Spanish but Portuguese, being the child of Portuguese immigrants who taught him their native language before he learned English. Valadao picked up Spanish during and after high school, mainly by speaking to workers on his family’s ranch. In contrast, Renteria is the daughter of a Mexican immigrant who grew up speaking both Spanish and English.

The debate was geared toward Latino voters and focused on topics including immigration, water, agriculture and the economy.

Valadao, 37, and Renteria, 39, share similar views about many key issues: Both support comprehensive immigration reform, including a path to citizenship for those here illegally, and that the government should help reunite immigrant children with their families after the youngsters enter the U.S. alone.

But Renteria noted that Valadao had voted against the California Dream Act in 2011, which allows unauthorized immigrants, including thousands in the Valley, to qualify for private scholarships and state financial aid. She said, “When children feel like they have a future they will feel different about having a baby. They will wait.”

Both candidates also agree that the Valley needs more water infrastructure, such as dams. But they differed on questions about reducing high school dropout rates, economic recovery plans, and especially the minimum wage.

California already has a high minimum wage, but Renteria said it needs to continue increasing because working families shouldn’t be poor. Valadao disagreed, saying the state already approved minimum wage increases to $9 an hour as of July 1 and $10 an hour starting Jan. 1, 2016, and that increasing business and job opportunities and making sure there is enough water are more important.


H/t Allan Wall of VDare

See also:


10 things that will happen now that Obama’s reelected

Even before the ink dried on America Conservative 2 Conservative’s sundancecracker’s “10 Guarantees,” one of the guarantees (No. 9) already is fulfilled.

The stock market crashed today. The Dow Jones Industrial Average briefly plunged more than 350 points in its biggest one-day loss in nearly a year.

Here are the Ten Guarantees, brought to us by the 59,971,178 Amerikans who voted the POS to a second term of destroying Amerika:

1.  Obamacare will be 100% implemented.

2. “Card Check” will be passed by fiat.

3.  Amnesty for illegal aliens will be done by executive order.

4.  Two leftist Supreme Court Justices will be appointed → Gay marriage will be affirmed into law.

5.  Taxes will increase ON EVERYONE who pays them, i.e., the 50.5% of Americans who actually pay federal income taxes.

6.  The National Debt will increase beyond $20 Trillion.

7.  The Dollar will further devalue.

8.  Gold prices will skyrocket.

9. Stock Market will tumble beginning tomorrow.

10. Inflation will hit everyone directly; energy costs and food costs will massively jump.

The above 10 Guarantees are just the beginning. You and I both can think of other horrors to come.


Nanny mayor forces moms to breastfeed

He’s pro-abortion, pro-amnesty for illegal aliens, and pro-gun control. He enacted an Agenda21-like plan called PlaNYC: A Greener, Greater New York “to fight global warming and protect the environment.” He’s extended a smoking ban to all commercial buildings. He’s banned trans fats.

Now the nosy mayor of New York, Michael Bloomberg, wants the city’s hospitals to lock up infant formula so as to force more mothers to breastfeed their newborn babies.

Mary Kay Linge reports for the New York Post, July 29, 2012, that starting Sept. 3, New York city will keep tabs on the number of bottles that participating hospitals stock and use — the most restrictive pro-breast-milk program in the nation.

Under the city Health Department’s voluntary Latch On NYC initiative, 27 of the city’s 40 hospitals have also agreed to give up swag bags sporting formula-company logos, toss out formula-branded tchotchkes like lanyards and mugs, and document a medical reason for every bottle that a newborn receives.

While breast-feeding activists applaud the move, bottle-feeding moms are bristling at the latest lactation lecture. “If they put pressure on me, I would get annoyed,” said Lynn Sidnam, a Staten Island mother of two formula-fed girls, ages 4 months and 9 years. “It’s for me to choose.”

Under Latch On NYC, new mothers who want formula won’t be denied it, but hospitals will keep infant formula in out-of-the-way secure storerooms or in locked boxes like those used to dispense and track medications. With each bottle a mother requests and receives, she’ll also get a talking-to. Staffers will explain why she should offer the breast instead.

“It’s the patient’s choice,” said Allison Walsh, of Beth Israel Medical Center. “But it’s our job to educate them on the best option.”

Lisa Paladino, of Staten Island University Hospital, said: “The key to getting more moms to breast-feed is making the formula less accessible. This way, the RN has to sign out the formula like any other medication. The nurse’s aide can’t just go grab another bottle.”

Some of the hospitals already operate under the formula lockdown. “New York City is definitely ahead of the curve,” said Eileen DiFrisco, of NYU Langone Medical Center, where the breast-feeding rate has surged from 39 to 68% under the program.

Breast-feeding in the first weeks gives a baby a critical healthy start, many medical experts say. It helps the digestive system develop and protects the baby with the mother’s immunities. Nursing also helps the mother recover from childbirth.

But not everyone is convinced. “They make formula for a reason, and the FDA makes sure it’s safe,” said Roxanne Schmidt, whose 14-month-old twins were fed with formula from birth. “Locking it up is just wrong.”


That isn’t the point, is it?

It’s not about whether breast milk is better than infant formula. The crux of the issue is whether THE GOVERNMENT gets to play “Big Nanny Brother Knows Best” to force us to do what’s supposedly in our best interest.

Truly, the Left are pretentious know-it-all elites who have a high opinion of themselves and utter contempt for the people — we whom Katie Couric, in a moment of candor, calls the “great unwashed.”

H/t FOTM’s beloved moxielouise, who sent this news tip with a perfect quip: “I guess he wants to get babies used to the idea of being ‘on the teat’ for the future….”


Terrorists are entering U.S. from Mexico

Justin Farmer reports for WSB TV2 Atlanta that thousands of illegals have been captured at the U.S.-Mexico border, but they are not Mexicans. Instead, they are what the federal government calls Special Interest Aliens (SIA) — people trying to come across the border into the United States who are from countries and states that sponsor terrorism and/or harbor terrorists, including Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen.

But the federal government denies this and is keeping all this from the American public because of the Obama administration’s political agenda of amnesty for illegals, despite:

  • Federal court documents filed in San Antonio federal court in May testifying to these SIA;
  • A 2009 GAO (U.S. Government Accountability Office) report confirming that terrorists have been picked up at the border;
  • Texas Congressman Michael McCaul who says he has seen intelligence reports on SIA;
  • and confirmation of this phenomenon by retired INS (Immigration and Naturalization Service) agent Michael Cutler and border sheriffs such as Arizona Sheriff Paul Babeu.

H/t Western Journalism and FOTM’s beloved moxielouise.


U.S. Border Patrol agents get new training to be wusses

Obama not only bypassed Congress and extended amnesty to young illegal aliens via an Executive Order, his henchman Eric Holder’s Dept of (In)Justice is suing the state of Arizona for trying to enforce the federal government’s own immigration laws. Now, the U.S. Border Patrol is given new “training tactics” that involve running, hiding, throwing things, but — GASP! — no shooting those big bad guns!

Design by BKeyser

Tim Brown reports for the Freedom Outpost, June 26, 2012, that Local 2544 of the National Border Patrol Council, Tucson, Arizona, posted this statement in regards to the new “training tactics” they are being taught:

06-20-12 In another nauseating series of “Virtual Learning Center” brainwashing courses that Border Patrol agents are forced to sit behind a computer for hours and endure, we are now taught in an “Active Shooter” course that if we encounter a shooter in a public place we are to “run away” and “hide”. If we are cornered by such a shooter we are to (only as a last resort) become “aggressive” and “throw things” at him or her. We are then advised to “call law enforcement” and wait for their arrival (presumably, while more innocent victims are slaughtered). Shooting incidents cited in the course are Columbine, the Giffords shooting and the Virginia Tech shooting.

These types of mandatory brainwashing courses and the idiocy that accompanies them are simply stunning when they are force-fed to law enforcement officers. Anyone with an ounce of common sense knows that any three of the above shootings would have been stopped cold by an off-duty law enforcement officer or a law abiding citizen with a gun. The Fort Hood shooting would have been stopped cold by someone with a gun as well. The shooters in these situations depend on unarmed and scared victims. It gives them the power they seek. We could go on and on with examples of shootings that could have been stopped by someone with a firearm. One of the videos in this course actually shows a terrified female hiding behind a desk as an example of how to “hide” from some deranged shooter. Multiple quizzes throughout the course and a final test ensure repeatedly that we know that we only have three options when encountering some murderous thug in a public place. 1. Run away; 2. Hide; and 3. Only put up a fight as a last resort by acting aggressively and throwing things at the shooter. Not one mention anywhere of “if you are carrying a gun and you have the opportunity take the shooter out”. Calling 911 in these instances is obvious, but we all know that waiting on the arrival of uniformed law enforcement will ensure more people are killed, injured, or taken hostage. Telling law enforcement officers that in all instances they are to run away and hide from some thug while innocent victims are butchered is simply inexcusable and pathetic.

It is always comforting to know that for those of us who carry a weapon when we are off-duty, if we should encounter such a situation, stop a shooter and save countless lives, we can look forward to being disciplined or fired by the Border Patrol because we should have run away to hide and then maybe thrown objects at the deranged killer instead of taking action and stopping him with a firearm. This, in addition to the scrutiny and second-guessing that will come from local authorities and the inevitable possibility of lawsuits and criminal conviction.

Welcome to the New Patrol.

Now that the U.S. Military has had a Gay Pride Month celebration, it shouldn’t be long now before the U.S. Border Patrol has its girly-man celebration as well.

H/t FOTM’s beloved moxielouise.


Obama Foments Race War in America

This is just plain freakin’ UNBELIEVABLE. I never thought — never ever even imagined — that I would live to see a President of the United States actually calling the American people “enemies.”

That’s what Barack Dajjal Obama did the other day.

In a radio interview that aired on the Spanish-language television network Univision on Monday, October 25, Obama assured Hispanics he would push an immigration overhaul amnesty for illegal aliens after the midterm elections, despite fierce opposition from as many as 63% of American voters. Here is the transcript of what he said:

Well, here’s what we’re going to do. We’re going to see how well we do in this election. And I think a lot of it is going to depend on whether we still have some support, not only from Democrats but some Republicans.

But they’re going to be paying attention to this election, and if Latinos sit out the election instead of saying, “We’re gonna punish our enemies and we’re gonna reward our friends who stand with us on issues that are important to us.” If they don’t see that kind of upsurge in voting in this election, then I think it’s gonna be harder. And that’s why I think it is so important that people focus on voting on November 2.

In other words, Obama is encouraging a RACE WAR, pitting Hispanics and Latinos against the majority of Americans who, in poll after poll, consistently oppose amnesty for illegal “immigrants” and for illegal “immigration” itself, which is nothing other than an invasion of sovereign America. (See “Most Americans Against Illegal Immigration.” See also our page on Illegal Immigration for more.

Listen to him for yourself. Here’s the audio of what Obama said:

Obama is doing exactly what his fellow road-traveller, former CEO of the criminal syndicate ACORN, Bertha Lewis had done — fomenting a race war in America over illegal immigration.