Senate hearing of Kavanaugh and his accuser – Live

Below is the live hearing.

Born on November 28, 1966, Ford is a 52-year-old professional with a Ph.D., but curiously speaks in a little-girl voice, ending nearly every phrase or sentence with a totally inappropriate question-mark inflection, as if she’s a little girl asking permission.

She also speaks of the alleged assault that allegedly happened 36 YEARS AGO, in a choking, tearful voice. But, like the Sandy Hook crisis actors, there’s no tears, not one.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eoRnYO7xcQY&feature=push-lsb&attr_tag=q0sqq7GzxhYwBzOg%3A6

Meanwhile, two men have come forth to the Senate Judiciary Committee that they assaulted Christine Blasey (Ford) in 1982, not Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh.

From the Judiciary Committee (source: Daily Wire):

Committee staff have a second interview with a man who believes he, not Judge Kavanaugh, had the encounter with Dr. Ford in the summer of 1982 that is the basis of her allegation. He described his recollection of their interaction in some detail.

The Committee also had a phone interview with a second man who also believed that he may have assaulted Ford in the summer of 1982.

Also, Julie Swetnick, the woman represented by porn lawyer Michael Avenatti, who claims that she’d witnessed Kavanaugh participate in gang-rapes, sued her previous employer for sexual harassment using a law firm run by Debra Katz, the lawyer for Ford. A separate report further raised questions about Swetnick’s credibility after it was revealed that her ex-boyfriend had filed a restraining order against her and insisted that she’s “not credible at all” and that he has evidence to demonstrate that her claims about Kavanaugh are false.

~Eowyn

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Rate this post

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

106
Leave a Reply

avatar
22 Comment authors
Dr. Eowyn: Expert Analysis of Christine Blasey Ford’s body language & handwriting - James FetzermollyGlenn47CrustaceanSVCPA Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Yahoo
Guest
Yahoo

What’s with the baby voice ? Did she have helium for breakfast.

pigpen51
Guest
pigpen51

She has been coached for sure. Act humble, with a tiny voice, to gain sympathy. She says just how badly this affected her, but it didn’t stop her from getting 2 masters degrees, and also a doctorate. Must not have bothered her that much. I am going to watch a bit of this, but not all of it. I doubt that it is going to make any difference. I fully expect the Republicans to ignore this issue, and vote Kavanaugh in, before the end of this weekend. And the Democrats are going to scream bloody murder. I think that the… Read more »

silhouette
Guest
silhouette

I want to know how much she’s being paid for her theatrics.

Yahoo
Guest
Yahoo

All the World is a Stage. Today more than ever.

GrayEagle48
Guest

I am so sick of the resistors win at any cost. It is unAmerican. This is not governing, this is war on WE THE PEOPLE. slander. No one has an automatic right to be believed, with out proof.

DCG
Editor

Why wasn’t this womyn concerned when Kavanaugh came up for the D.C. Circuit position?

TrailDust
Admin

Yeah, the wounded little teenage girl voice seemed completely coached. I wasn’t watching on FOX, and didn’t notice my TV was on ABC. The “newscasters” on ABC were shilling for Ms. Ford in the most shameless way.

TrailDust
Admin

If someone finds some video footage of Ms. Ford from previous years, would her voice and general style be like we see and hear in today’s hearing?

Kevin Lankford
Member
Kevin Lankford

It appears obvious they intend to avoid the coincidence of her actual “bio” and self-admitted youthful drinking and promiscuity. I think the dems and rinos alike, regardless of the unbelievability, will use this fabricated controversy as their excuse, their pretext, for voting down kavanaugh.

Qatholic
Guest
Qatholic

“Did you pay for the polygraph yourself?”
[stammers] “Uh, I don’t think so.”
“Do you know who did pay for it?”
Can’t recall the exact wording but the gist was that no she didn’t know.

Zigggy
Guest
Zigggy

This is such a freaking farce. I was listening for a bit with my headphones here at work but had to stop because I couldn’t stop loudly scoffing at her answers.
Also- THAT VOICE!!! Ugh!

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

Not that this will change anything but the plot grows thicker:

https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/explosive-revelation-two-men-step-forward-and-claim-it-was-them-and-not-kavanaugh/

Why do I have visions of David Brock and the Obongonauts down in the basement in Kalorama ginning this stuff up? They are trying to make a case for delaying this and asking for another investigation. They’ll probably cave, they’re cowards at heart.

Mad Celt
Guest
Mad Celt

This is a confirmation hearing, not a criminal trial and after 35 years what is there to investigate? Interrogate people, sure, but there’s no physical evidence in existence. 35 year old memories are very rarely reliable and certainly not actual proof. So far she has no collaboration from persons present, just her word it occurred as she describes. So she is being treated for an emotional problem, that’s no indication this ‘attempted rape’ is the sole source of her troubles. Nothing in psychology is that cut and dried. Testamony from her therapist should be required to expand this, if at… Read more »

yahoo
Guest
yahoo

comment image

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

This must be the payoff. Keep your eye on the magic envelope:

https://www.liveleak.com/view?t=9r6UL_1538072788

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

comment image

Dave
Editor

I haven’t watched any of this circus.

My derision for the commie-lib traitors has reached the point they literally make me physically sick to even look at them – much less listen to them.

CogitoErgoSumantra
Guest
CogitoErgoSumantra

hee hee hee…
Looks like a policeman at the hearing is getting interested in something Alissa Milano’s doing there behind Kavanaugh. I kept seeing him go over to look her way, but just now they had a bit of an interaction. She doesn’t look happy.

Let’s see now if she lasts the rest of today’s hearing, or if she gets escorted out.

Lana
Guest
Lana

Let’s see they questioned her about what, an hour? Where were they questions on her drinking and her behavior. And now we are into the third hour of questioning him about his drinking and behavior.

CogitoErgoSumantra
Guest
CogitoErgoSumantra

“I do not think it means what you think it means.” – Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride. “Credible testimony”, “Credible allegation”, “Credible witness”, etc. I don’t think Booker knows the meaning of the word, “credible”. There has been no credible testimony to back Ford’s allegations, nor those of the other accusers. He and the rest on the Left keep trying to paint a false picture to influence the emotions of women and others on the progressive end of the spectrum of insanity. All they need do is convince a doubt in Murkowski and/or Collins (or Flake?) to vote against Kavanaugh… Read more »

SVCPA
Guest
SVCPA

Palo Alto was going to have a watch party. This is the same crappy little city that Zuckerberg lives in. For those of you not from the bay area, boy I do have stories, for another day though.
https://www.kron4.com/news/bay-area/as-palo-alto-professor-prepares-to-testify-mayor-says-metoo/1478813312

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

Well, I never thought I’d praise Lindsey Graham but I’ve got to give him credit for this:

https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=59135

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

Herr Doktor Ford doesn’t know what “exculpatory” means?

https://12160.info/page/phd-dr-ford-i-don-t-know-what-exculpatory-means

Crustacean
Guest
Crustacean

Just had to check in to see the crazy stuff y’all are saying about this hearing. You have NOT disappointed! LOL As Dr. E has said, there are real conspiracies. But man, the folks who frequent this site see conspiracy EVERYWHERE. You whine that Dr. Ford is a political operative, but that would be a better description of Judge K. You whine that this is a smear job on a good man, then publish a photo of a passed-out, topless woman and claim it’s Dr. Ford, with zero evidence other than what resides in your fevered imaginations. This is not… Read more »

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

If you step back and think it through, just what, exactly, would anybody do about someone touching someone inappropriately THIRTY-SIX YEARS AGO? Rape would be hard to prosecute. “Copping a feel” isn’t even a crime as far as I know.

I frankly do not know any girls or women that weren’t “touched” during their youth. If they said “no” or “stop that” that’s what usually happened. If they went nuts and resurrected it THIRTY-SIX YEARS later, I’d call that insane.

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

Here’s what Juanita Broderick thinks of the whole thing:

https://sputniknews.com/us/201809281068406118-Clinton-Accuser-Double-Standard-Democrats-Kavanaugh/

Just look at ’em! What sort of unholy, soulless reprobate do you have to be to associate with this lot?

TrailDust
Admin

I think this day is a watershed moment in America. The mask has been torn off the Democrat party, and the ugly snarling wolf is showing for all to see. This could be an answer to prayer, the awakening of more people to the true nature of the people who are resisting President Trump. (Just my take on this. You are entitled to your own view.)

Glenn47
Guest
Glenn47

She has no creditiblity, a woman with supposedly multiple degrees and didn’t know what exculpatory was. She is an admitted drug, alcohol and rabid sexual experiences at a very young age. She has also admitted she usually didn’t know where she was or whom she was with. She couldn’t even tell us who drove her the 6 miles to the party. She couldn’t say who paid for her lie detector test, how can that be? There were screen shots caught of her now deleted FB page where she wrote, someone should claim Gorsuch raped them while he was waiting for… Read more »

CogitoErgoSumantra
Guest
CogitoErgoSumantra

Senate Judicial Committee Vote on the Nomination of Kavanaugh: And there they go, a walk-out of the progressive left I KNEW would occur. Kamala and others *didn’t even vote*. Booker merely shook his head. They knew from Day 1 that they couldn’t win with a *vote*, so even today, Blumenthal began by trying to delay it once again… and was squashed, decisively. He looked like a deer caught in the headlights. Way to represent your peeps! Good for Grassley in finally following rules. Looks like the local networks stopped carrying coverage after the vote. Fox, NBC, and CBS covered that… Read more »

CogitoErgoSumantra
Guest
CogitoErgoSumantra

Shellie Whitehouse is now *slandering* Kavanaugh in the SJC.
Total fabrication and speculation about what was meant by entries in Kavanaugh’s calendar/diary entries. It’s like a novella… what BS.

I hope he loses his Senate seat for this, at minimum. A century or more ago, he’d have been cane-whipped, justifiably IMHO.

Still trying their best to destroy Kavanaugh’s reputation and ability to function in the future. On false allegations. Definition of defamation.

the postman
Guest

Backfire! Apparently the #walkaways are rolling in. Adiós ola azul!!!

https://www.infowars.com/backfire-democrats-walkaway-in-droves-following-kavanaugh-circus/

trackback

[…] Senate hearing of Kavanaugh and his accuser […]