Senate hearing of Kavanaugh and his accuser – Live

Below is the live hearing.

Born on November 28, 1966, Ford is a 52-year-old professional with a Ph.D., but curiously speaks in a little-girl voice, ending nearly every phrase or sentence with a totally inappropriate question-mark inflection, as if she’s a little girl asking permission.

She also speaks of the alleged assault that allegedly happened 36 YEARS AGO, in a choking, tearful voice. But, like the Sandy Hook crisis actors, there’s no tears, not one.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eoRnYO7xcQY&feature=push-lsb&attr_tag=q0sqq7GzxhYwBzOg%3A6

Meanwhile, two men have come forth to the Senate Judiciary Committee that they assaulted Christine Blasey (Ford) in 1982, not Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh.

From the Judiciary Committee (source: Daily Wire):

Committee staff have a second interview with a man who believes he, not Judge Kavanaugh, had the encounter with Dr. Ford in the summer of 1982 that is the basis of her allegation. He described his recollection of their interaction in some detail.

The Committee also had a phone interview with a second man who also believed that he may have assaulted Ford in the summer of 1982.

Also, Julie Swetnick, the woman represented by porn lawyer Michael Avenatti, who claims that she’d witnessed Kavanaugh participate in gang-rapes, sued her previous employer for sexual harassment using a law firm run by Debra Katz, the lawyer for Ford. A separate report further raised questions about Swetnick’s credibility after it was revealed that her ex-boyfriend had filed a restraining order against her and insisted that she’s “not credible at all” and that he has evidence to demonstrate that her claims about Kavanaugh are false.

~Eowyn

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

106
Leave a Reply

avatar
22 Comment authors
Dr. Eowyn: Expert Analysis of Christine Blasey Ford’s body language & handwriting - James FetzermollyGlenn47CrustaceanSVCPA Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Yahoo
Guest
Yahoo

What’s with the baby voice ? Did she have helium for breakfast.

CogitoErgoSumantra
Guest
CogitoErgoSumantra

Thanks for making me laugh today. It was the first time…

molly
Guest
molly
pigpen51
Guest
pigpen51

She has been coached for sure. Act humble, with a tiny voice, to gain sympathy. She says just how badly this affected her, but it didn’t stop her from getting 2 masters degrees, and also a doctorate. Must not have bothered her that much. I am going to watch a bit of this, but not all of it. I doubt that it is going to make any difference. I fully expect the Republicans to ignore this issue, and vote Kavanaugh in, before the end of this weekend. And the Democrats are going to scream bloody murder. I think that the… Read more »

silhouette
Guest
silhouette

I want to know how much she’s being paid for her theatrics.

Yahoo
Guest
Yahoo

All the World is a Stage. Today more than ever.

GrayEagle48
Guest

I am so sick of the resistors win at any cost. It is unAmerican. This is not governing, this is war on WE THE PEOPLE. slander. No one has an automatic right to be believed, with out proof.

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

I don’t know why I bother to bring this up, but it IS a crime to lie to Congress.

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

Yeah, like I said. It’s a crime to lie to Congress. Maybe they should confirm him and THEN have an investigation and charge them. That would put an end to this. After all, I thought we were in charge.

DCG
Admin

Why wasn’t this womyn concerned when Kavanaugh came up for the D.C. Circuit position?

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

Well, the timing wasn’t right. The whole plot could have been compromised. It’s actually pretty clever. Without this the FBI would have no jurisdiction. Now that they’ve made it a “federal issue” i.e. somebody lying to Congress, they could do an investigation. Of course he’s already had six background checks already.

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

I just saw where they have already purchased their new website for opposition to the NEXT SCOTUS appointee.

TrailDust
Admin

Yeah, the wounded little teenage girl voice seemed completely coached. I wasn’t watching on FOX, and didn’t notice my TV was on ABC. The “newscasters” on ABC were shilling for Ms. Ford in the most shameless way.

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

“Wah Brett, I jes’ don’ know what will happen to Tara. An’ I don’ know nothin’ ’bout berthin’ no babies either”.

TrailDust
Admin

If someone finds some video footage of Ms. Ford from previous years, would her voice and general style be like we see and hear in today’s hearing?

yahoo
Guest
yahoo

Yes ! Very curious to know !

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

They have obviously been all over this cleaning her up and making anything negative “disappear”. Not too surprising since her father works with the CIA.

This is a classic “hit job”. The whole line of questioning is improper. This is not a trial. This is not an opportunity to advertise the vagaries of female victimhood. The question is, does she have proof of misconduct from the candidate? If not, let’s vote.

the postman
Guest

Cool. Where did you find that her father is CIA? I was investigating this possibility myself this morning when I got side-tracked with the page I posted earlier.

CogitoErgoSumantra
Guest
CogitoErgoSumantra

“The question is, does she have proof of misconduct from the candidate? If not, let’s vote.”

EXACTLY.
But facts and the truth *don’t matter* to progressive wackos; they’re only interested in obtaining their goals at any means. And anybody they can drag along with them via emotions or “how my heart feels” just adds to their advantage. Destroying opposition lives in the process? Even better.

Gingersmom2009
Guest
Gingersmom2009

Yes ^^^ Initially there were mixed ratings, mostly on the low side with 4 really bad ones posted on 9/16. The next day those recent ones were scrubbed. The day after that it was ALL scrubbed. Now magically it returns.

CogitoErgoSumantra
Guest
CogitoErgoSumantra

This?
https://web.archive.org/web/20180920033517/https://www.ratemyprofessors.com/ShowRatings.jsp?tid=278898

Still looks washed… but I like this “average” rated review:
This sem she gave 5 tests among which only 4 were counted and first 4 tests were take home. So, if you pay attention in class and attend all the lectures, u wont need any notes cuz she sends ppt to ur email. She’s not good at explaining much but if u want easy A then take her.

sixbunnies
Guest
sixbunnies

CogitoErgoSumantra, the link you give for the professor’s rating is for Christine Ford at Bucks Community College, Newtown, Pa. Blasey Ford teaches using her maiden name, Christine Blasey.

CogitoErgoSumantra
Guest
CogitoErgoSumantra

Oops, I think that’s the wrong person/school:
Professor in the Psychology department
at Bucks County Community College, Newtown, PA

sixbunnies
Guest
sixbunnies

Dr. Eowyn, the link you give for the professor’s rating is for Christine Ford at Bucks Community College, Newtown, Pa. Blasey Ford teaches using her maiden name, Christine Blasey.

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

Maybe she needs a drug test?

Kevin Lankford
Member
Kevin Lankford

It appears obvious they intend to avoid the coincidence of her actual “bio” and self-admitted youthful drinking and promiscuity. I think the dems and rinos alike, regardless of the unbelievability, will use this fabricated controversy as their excuse, their pretext, for voting down kavanaugh.

Qatholic
Guest
Qatholic

“Did you pay for the polygraph yourself?”
[stammers] “Uh, I don’t think so.”
“Do you know who did pay for it?”
Can’t recall the exact wording but the gist was that no she didn’t know.

Zigggy
Guest
Zigggy

This is such a freaking farce. I was listening for a bit with my headphones here at work but had to stop because I couldn’t stop loudly scoffing at her answers.
Also- THAT VOICE!!! Ugh!

the postman
Guest
Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

Looks an awful lot like that Sparky Bush spawn.

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

Not that this will change anything but the plot grows thicker:

https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/explosive-revelation-two-men-step-forward-and-claim-it-was-them-and-not-kavanaugh/

Why do I have visions of David Brock and the Obongonauts down in the basement in Kalorama ginning this stuff up? They are trying to make a case for delaying this and asking for another investigation. They’ll probably cave, they’re cowards at heart.

Mad Celt
Guest
Mad Celt

This is a confirmation hearing, not a criminal trial and after 35 years what is there to investigate? Interrogate people, sure, but there’s no physical evidence in existence. 35 year old memories are very rarely reliable and certainly not actual proof. So far she has no collaboration from persons present, just her word it occurred as she describes. So she is being treated for an emotional problem, that’s no indication this ‘attempted rape’ is the sole source of her troubles. Nothing in psychology is that cut and dried. Testamony from her therapist should be required to expand this, if at… Read more »

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

Yep. The fact that they let the commies control this is telling. They need to take charge. If there is no criminal conviction, move on. If there was evidence of a criminal act that is still actionable, tell them to refer it to the proper authorities to see if they can get an indictment. Now, let’s vote.

yahoo
Guest
yahoo

comment image

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

This must be the payoff. Keep your eye on the magic envelope:

https://www.liveleak.com/view?t=9r6UL_1538072788

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

comment image

Dave
Editor

I haven’t watched any of this circus.

My derision for the commie-lib traitors has reached the point they literally make me physically sick to even look at them – much less listen to them.

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

Hear, hear. I can’t watch it. I can’t stand to watch those smug talking heads lie their derrières off. This isn’t about differences in policy or opinion, this is a total overthrow.

All these creatures are soulless servants of evil.

DCG
Admin

I was watching a little then, fortunately, I had a lovely distraction…a tan lab ended up on my front porch. I spent the last couple hours getting River back to her owner 🙂

I saw on Twitchy that Kavanaugh did a good job with that evil b*tch Feinstein!

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

That’s nice. Better get him inside before the homeless get him. Oh, I forgot. You don’t live in Seattle anymore.

CogitoErgoSumantra
Guest
CogitoErgoSumantra

Ditto that revulsion, especially with Kamala Harris; her face, her voice, her posturing, and the way she cuts off Kavanaugh and treats him like a juvenile boy caught drunk and cheating on her… what a poseur.

CogitoErgoSumantra
Guest
CogitoErgoSumantra

hee hee hee…
Looks like a policeman at the hearing is getting interested in something Alissa Milano’s doing there behind Kavanaugh. I kept seeing him go over to look her way, but just now they had a bit of an interaction. She doesn’t look happy.

Let’s see now if she lasts the rest of today’s hearing, or if she gets escorted out.

DCG
Admin

“She doesn’t look happy.”

Imagine my distress…

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

Yeah (sniff!).

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

I hope they checked her for dart guns.

Lana
Guest
Lana

Let’s see they questioned her about what, an hour? Where were they questions on her drinking and her behavior. And now we are into the third hour of questioning him about his drinking and behavior.

CogitoErgoSumantra
Guest
CogitoErgoSumantra

“I do not think it means what you think it means.” – Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride. “Credible testimony”, “Credible allegation”, “Credible witness”, etc. I don’t think Booker knows the meaning of the word, “credible”. There has been no credible testimony to back Ford’s allegations, nor those of the other accusers. He and the rest on the Left keep trying to paint a false picture to influence the emotions of women and others on the progressive end of the spectrum of insanity. All they need do is convince a doubt in Murkowski and/or Collins (or Flake?) to vote against Kavanaugh… Read more »

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

Well you’re surely right, of course. That’s the plan. Trust me, I get it. I just keep trying to point out, as DCG says, “its Kabuki theater”. On paper “we’re” in charge, right? OK, who’s “we”? Is it the old Republican/Democrat thing? Or is it the New World Odor thing? How is it that there has been as much (maybe more) damage done since Trump took office as when Obongo sat their laughing at our collective ignorance? It’s a rhetorical question. If WE had any say in it we wouldn’t be looking at this today. They are BOTH playing their… Read more »

Lana
Guest
Lana

Flake wants to run for President. Does he really think he is going to vote no on Kavanaugh and get votes from conservatives?

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

Well, the same applied to Mc Stain and, until recently Swishy Graham. It’s hard to make it look legitimate if there aren’t some “wild cards” in the play.

SVCPA
Guest
SVCPA

Palo Alto was going to have a watch party. This is the same crappy little city that Zuckerberg lives in. For those of you not from the bay area, boy I do have stories, for another day though.
https://www.kron4.com/news/bay-area/as-palo-alto-professor-prepares-to-testify-mayor-says-metoo/1478813312

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

Well, I never thought I’d praise Lindsey Graham but I’ve got to give him credit for this:

https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=59135

Lana
Guest
Lana

That’s what I thought too. Haven’t been a fan of his, but he said what we all feel and know to be true, and God bless him for that one at least.

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

Herr Doktor Ford doesn’t know what “exculpatory” means?

https://12160.info/page/phd-dr-ford-i-don-t-know-what-exculpatory-means

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

I suppose that should be “Frau Doktor Ford”.

Lana
Guest
Lana

Shows the quality of education the professor has gone through….or her pea brain.

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

As I’m sure you know, Stanford is Spook Central when it comes to mind control. Being in the Psychology department at Stanford is extra “special”. Remember Holmes of Aurora fame? He wasn’t from Stanford, but he was in the PhD program to do what our heroine is doing. Now look at her. Unbrushed hair. 1,000 yard stare. Squeaky little voice. I wonder which “alter” they’re interviewing? That’s really how we got Obongo you know. They just sort of snatched him up out of his beach hustler lifestyle and dipped him for ticks. Mom and the grandparents had a long history… Read more »

Crustacean
Guest
Crustacean

Just had to check in to see the crazy stuff y’all are saying about this hearing. You have NOT disappointed! LOL As Dr. E has said, there are real conspiracies. But man, the folks who frequent this site see conspiracy EVERYWHERE. You whine that Dr. Ford is a political operative, but that would be a better description of Judge K. You whine that this is a smear job on a good man, then publish a photo of a passed-out, topless woman and claim it’s Dr. Ford, with zero evidence other than what resides in your fevered imaginations. This is not… Read more »

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

Uh oh, lobster stalking in process. How much are they paying you?

Crustacean
Guest
Crustacean

How much is who paying me, Lo-watt?

sixbunnies
Guest
sixbunnies

Crustacean, “shrimp boats are a’coming” for you, troll.

the postman
Guest

“You whine that, … blah, blah, blah…” You seem to be the one doing all of the whining. Besides, you whine that this is NOT a smear job on a good man, and yet, there’s absolutely no credible evidence against him. Nothing but lies meant to derail his nomination. “Dr. Ford would never in a million years add Mark Judge to the mix. His denial buttresses Judge K’s denial, and hurts her credibility.” If you’re 100% sure that Dr. Ford isn’t lying, then you’re 100% S4B. You act like the Democrats have a world of options at their disposal when… Read more »

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

Very nicely said. All of it true.

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

If you step back and think it through, just what, exactly, would anybody do about someone touching someone inappropriately THIRTY-SIX YEARS AGO? Rape would be hard to prosecute. “Copping a feel” isn’t even a crime as far as I know.

I frankly do not know any girls or women that weren’t “touched” during their youth. If they said “no” or “stop that” that’s what usually happened. If they went nuts and resurrected it THIRTY-SIX YEARS later, I’d call that insane.

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

Here’s what Juanita Broderick thinks of the whole thing:

https://sputniknews.com/us/201809281068406118-Clinton-Accuser-Double-Standard-Democrats-Kavanaugh/

Just look at ’em! What sort of unholy, soulless reprobate do you have to be to associate with this lot?

TrailDust
Admin

I think this day is a watershed moment in America. The mask has been torn off the Democrat party, and the ugly snarling wolf is showing for all to see. This could be an answer to prayer, the awakening of more people to the true nature of the people who are resisting President Trump. (Just my take on this. You are entitled to your own view.)

Glenn47
Guest
Glenn47

She has no creditiblity, a woman with supposedly multiple degrees and didn’t know what exculpatory was. She is an admitted drug, alcohol and rabid sexual experiences at a very young age. She has also admitted she usually didn’t know where she was or whom she was with. She couldn’t even tell us who drove her the 6 miles to the party. She couldn’t say who paid for her lie detector test, how can that be? There were screen shots caught of her now deleted FB page where she wrote, someone should claim Gorsuch raped them while he was waiting for… Read more »

CogitoErgoSumantra
Guest
CogitoErgoSumantra

Senate Judicial Committee Vote on the Nomination of Kavanaugh: And there they go, a walk-out of the progressive left I KNEW would occur. Kamala and others *didn’t even vote*. Booker merely shook his head. They knew from Day 1 that they couldn’t win with a *vote*, so even today, Blumenthal began by trying to delay it once again… and was squashed, decisively. He looked like a deer caught in the headlights. Way to represent your peeps! Good for Grassley in finally following rules. Looks like the local networks stopped carrying coverage after the vote. Fox, NBC, and CBS covered that… Read more »

CogitoErgoSumantra
Guest
CogitoErgoSumantra

BTW, Flake has reportedly committed to voting with Kavanaugh now. As the vote to continue (end of interrogations) has passed, I guess that will hold. The SJC final meeting to vote for Brett comes at 1:30pm today; the full Senate is set to vote Monday (and Tuesday?)… which will be too late for Kavanaugh to begin the new SCotUS session, but apparently he will be able to sit with the court once confirmed? I dunno. They’re also likely to hold a special session tomorrow, on Saturday(!) Why can’t the full Senate vote take place this afternoon? Anyone? Leahy now blathering… Read more »

CogitoErgoSumantra
Guest
CogitoErgoSumantra

Shellie Whitehouse and Dick Durbin are also still in session on the left. I know at least Kamala, Mazie, and Blumenthal left because they held their own mini-conference to bitch & moan to the media right outside the hearing room after leaving. For whatever reason, Booker remained behind in the session as well.

Lindsey Graham’s explaining why, legally, Ford’s story didn’t hold up.
Now it’s Durbin’s turn, joining in on the Ford bandwagon.

CogitoErgoSumantra
Guest
CogitoErgoSumantra

Shellie Whitehouse is now *slandering* Kavanaugh in the SJC.
Total fabrication and speculation about what was meant by entries in Kavanaugh’s calendar/diary entries. It’s like a novella… what BS.

I hope he loses his Senate seat for this, at minimum. A century or more ago, he’d have been cane-whipped, justifiably IMHO.

Still trying their best to destroy Kavanaugh’s reputation and ability to function in the future. On false allegations. Definition of defamation.

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

This is a travesty. Just like the Russia, Russia “investigation”. How dumb do you have to be not to understand that these assholes are not your friend? They should not have given her a hearing. They should have just confirmed him and let them do whatever they were going to do.

If they thought they had something criminal on him they still would have it. I can’t stand watching them sit there all sanctimonious and smug. Lying pieces of filth, that’s what they are.

Lophatt
Member
CogitoErgoSumantra
Guest
CogitoErgoSumantra

I saw that. I found her testimony neither compelling nor credible.
I think Trump was told to say that to maintain an air of non-partisanship. Diffuse the target from his own back, and by extension, from that of the GOP.

the postman
Guest

Backfire! Apparently the #walkaways are rolling in. Adiós ola azul!!!

https://www.infowars.com/backfire-democrats-walkaway-in-droves-following-kavanaugh-circus/

trackback

[…] Senate hearing of Kavanaugh and his accuser […]