Secrecy continues over Sandy Hook massacre

secrecy
Since it happened, the horrible massacre — of 20 children and 6 adults by alleged gunman Adam Lanza at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown Connecticut nearly a year ago on December 14, 2012 — has been shrouded in secrecy. Officials have refused to make public the following:

  • The 911 recording on the morning of December 14, 2012.
  • Autopsy results of the dead — Lanza and his 27 victims, including Lanza’s mother, Nancy, whom he had killed before he drove to the school that morning.
  • Death certificates of Lanza and his victims. Note that death and birth certificates are normally public record. Lanza’s death certificate is especially important because Social Security Death Index (SSDI) had his date of death as December 13, 2012, a day BEFORE the massacre.  SSDI later changed the date to December 14 only after bloggers had discovered the Dec. 13 date of death.
  • Mental health records, if any, of Adam Lanza.
  • Surveillance tape, if any, of the school’s newly-installed security and surveillance system.
  • Even the workers who recently tore down the school were sworn to confidentiality.

And it looks like officials are determined to continue to enshroud the massacre in secrecy.
The Associated Press reports, Nov. 24, 2013, that tomorrow, a prosecutor will release a report on the investigation into the massacre, but there’s one catch — the report will not be a full accounting of the crime. There will be no state police report, which is expected to total thousands of pages. It is not clear when the full report would be released.
Although alleged gunman Lanza allegedly took his own life, which means there will be neither a prosecution nor trial, Danbury State’s Attorney Stephen Sedensky III has gone to court to fight the release of 911 tapes and resisted calls from Governor Dan Malloy to divulge more information sooner.

Stephen SedenskyStephen Sedensky III

In defense, investigators cited the scale of the criminal investigation and consideration for the “feelings” of victims’ families, some of whom have lobbied for tighter restrictions on public information and complained of being harassed by conspiracy theorists.
But Dan Klau, a Hartford attorney who specializes in First Amendment law, said the decision to release a summary report instead of the full evidence file is a reversal of standard practice and one of the most unusual elements of an investigation marked by secrecy.
Klau said, “What I found troubling about the approach of the state’s attorney is that from my perspective, he seems to have forgotten his job is to represent the state of Connecticut. His conduct in many instances has seemed more akin to an attorney in private practice representing Sandy Hook families.”
Sedensky said he could not comment.
So far, investigators have released little more than search warrants, which detailed an arsenal of weapons found inside the Lanza home. The information that authorities have not revealed includes the timeline of the police response to the shooting, any mental health records for Lanza and whether investigators found any clues to a possible motive for the rampage.
The withholding of 911 recordings, which are routinely released in other cases, has been the subject of a legal battle between The Associated Press and Sedensky before the state’s Freedom of Information Commission, which ruled in favor of the AP. A hearing is scheduled Monday in New Britain Superior Court on whether the judge can hear the recordings as he considers an appeal.
One argument raised by Sedensky is that if identities of 911 callers are released, they could be harassed by conspiracy theorists accusing them of being “crisis actors.”
Morgan Rueckert, an attorney representing 22 of the Sandy Hook victims’ families, said some families still receive harassing phone calls from conspiracy theorists, but they are also concerned by the amount of attention that’s been paid to the case and the ease with which records, once released, could be widely published and duplicated on the Internet. “I think it’s appropriate under these circumstances to take a harder look now at what should be released and in what manner,” Rueckert said.
A Connecticut law passed this year in response to the massacre creates exemptions to the freedom-of-information law for the release of photographs, film, video and other images depicting a homicide victim if those records constitute “an unwarranted invasion” on the privacy of the surviving family members.
But why would the release of Adam Lanza’s or Nancy Lanza’s autopsy report and death certificate “invade” the privacy or hurt the “feelings” of the victims’ families?
Have Sedensky and the victims’ families considered this:
By your insistence on non-disclosure, you are feeding precisely the “conspiracy theorists” you’re using to justify your secrecy.
Those who have nothing to hide do not fear the light.
Click here for FOTM’s “Sandy Hook Massacre” page containing links to all the posts we’ve done on this subject.

UPDATE (Nov. 25):

The state’s attorney report came out today. It details every step Adam Lanza allegedly took as he “shot his way” into the school building, as well as evidence seized from his possessions, including news about school shootings, a school shooting video game, and materials on pedophilia and rights of pedophiles.
Click here for the HufPo article. Click here for the full report.  (H/t FOTM’s Steve)
~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
The Grey Enigma
6 years ago

Reblogged this on The Grey Enigma.

TrailDust
Admin
TrailDust
6 years ago

On this cold night in the North East, the chill of evil still clings to that little town in Connecticut.

CalGirl
CalGirl
6 years ago

Should we be afraid of the truth, or the vagaries and evils of things kept secret? Secrets make you sick.

Glenn47
Glenn47
6 years ago

This whole thing smelled to High Heaven from day one. Having worked many emergency scenes over the years, nothing was done according to proper protocol.
Other schools shootings have been open and forthcoming, this one. Not so much. In O’s own words, only those that have something to hide………..

pnordman
6 years ago

Color this useless curiosity, but I have always wondered why he killed his mother. Did I miss something?

Glenn47
Glenn47
6 years ago
Reply to  pnordman

Exactly, why kill the one person that was your 24-7 caregiver and schooled him.

Matt
Matt
6 years ago

I checked some of the hyper links above regarding previous posts here. I didn’t see this anywhere, although I may have missed it. This is another instance where published info has been changed after the fact to fit the storyline.
https://www.naturalnews.com/038633_Sandy_Hook_Google_search_results_December_11.html

glenn47
glenn47
6 years ago
Reply to  Dr. Eowyn

Haven’t had the time to read the whole thing, but they certainly have had enough time to write it up to suit the situation.

bob klinck
bob klinck
6 years ago

In Canada videotapes of murders made by the murderers have been destroyed after trial on the pretext of consideration for the victims’ families. While I can understand steps being taken to prevent such material from becoming widely available, what we are seeing here is destruction of criminal evidence by judicial authorities. Because the entire truth about a crime cannot be known, every case is inherently perpetually active. What if, for example, after the initial prosecution another possible party to the crime was identified? Something on the videotapes whose previous significance was not recognized could provide indications of involvement or otherwise;… Read more »

Earl Murphy
6 years ago

What type of pharmaceuticals was he on, and what are their side effects.. More then likely the cause of his suicide/murders

Glenn47
Glenn47
6 years ago
Reply to  Earl Murphy

According to some professional investigators. They can find no evidence Adam even existed. They have said his photo was a photo shopped one.
All the families involved, Had all recently moved to the area and many were crisis actors.
Go though all the great info FOTM has posted and be the judge.

trackback

[…] * See “Secrecy continues over Sandy Hook massacre“ […]

joandarc
joandarc
6 years ago

Thank you Dr. Eowyn for this revealing post. I cannot understand why the need for restrictions on limiting the information provided to the public. . .It would seem to me that family members would want everyone to know the truth. What is their point?