Sandy Hook: The boys who were evacuated TWICE

Among the many curious things about the Sandy Hook school massacre is the phenomenon of doppelgängers.
There are those who say that some of the school children allegedly killed by Adam Lanza miraculously appeared in the Sandy Hook children’s choir months later, not just alive but looking 2-3 years older.
Then there is 6-year-old Noah Pozner who managed to achieve the phenomenal feat of being killed twice — first at Sandy Hook Elementary School (SHES) in Newtown, Connecticut on Dec. 14, 2012; the second time two years two days later at the Army Public School half a world away in Peshawar, Pakistan on December 16, 2014. (See “Dead again: Sandy Hook child victim Noah Pozner also killed in Pakistan Taliban shooting!”)
Now, thanks to the sharp eyes of FOTM reader who calls himself (with tongue firmly in cheek) Barry Soetoro, Esq., we’ve found two more doppelgängers. They are two boys, presumably students at SHES who, strangely, were evacuated twice from the school on that fateful day in 2012.
One of the many curiosities about Sandy Hook is the dearth of images of children being evacuated from SHES on the morning of Dec. 14, 2012. SHES children were estimated to number about 600, but the dash cam videos from three police cars parked in front of the school that morning showed no children being evacuated.  (See “Sandy Hook hoax: Where were the 100s of students being evacuated?”)
Instead, only two photos of SHES children being evacuated had been made available to the American people, both taken by local newspaper Newtown Bee reporter Shannon Hicks, who claimed she had taken the photos at around 10 AM on Dec. 14, 2012, after police had entered the school to find Lanza supposedly dead by his own hands after killing 20 first-graders and 6 adults.
Here are the two photos (please make note of the green SUV in both pics):
Sandy Hook evacuationConnecticut School Shooting
The two photos show two different groups of students being evacuated, right?
Are you sure? Look again.
Notice the blond boy in a navy top and blue jeans at the head of the line in the first picture? Let’s call him Boy #1. Can you spot him in the second picture?
See the smaller shorter boy in a grey top and blue jeans at the end of the line in the first picture? Let’s call him Boy #2. Can you spot him in the second picture?
I’ve cropped the two pictures to better show the students, and arrayed one on top of the other so that you can compare the two. (Click image to enlarge)
Sandy Hook evacuation cropped
You might say, “Ha! The children probably moved around while they were being evacuated, so that Boy #1 fell behind and went from being first in line to the back.”
But wait!
How could the two boys shift their positions in the line so quickly?
See the green SUV in the two pics?
The SUV is the key. There is simply no way for the two boys to have so quickly changed their positions in the lineup, not to mention the other kids in the two photos are entirely different. All of which point to the two photos as being of two different groups of students (except for boys #1 and #2) being evacuated.
That leaves only one explanation: Boy #1 and Boy #2 were evacuated TWICE. Now why would they do that?
Will wonders ever cease. muttley
There are other reasons to question the authenticity of Hicks’ photos, which most likely had been taken in a school drill, instead of on the day of the alleged massacre. See Professor Jim Fetzer’s “Sent worldwide, Shannon Hick’s ‘iconic’ Sandy Hook photo was faked“.
For all the posts we’ve published on Sandy Hoax, go to our “Sandy Hook Massacre” page.
H/t Barry Soetoro, Esq.
~Éowyn

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Mike howrightismike
Member
Mike howrightismike

Great find!

Steven Broiles
Member

More duct tape please. 🙂
Great post Doc.

TrailDust
Admin
TrailDust

Wow! 😀

TXGuitarMan
Guest
TXGuitarMan

It seems even more staged when you see that they take the boy at the head of the line and the boy at the end of the line in the first picture and move them both, together, first then last, right to the exact daggum middle of the line in the second picture. There are no coincidences!

trackback

[…] le 25 Janvier 2015, par le Dr. […]

mairin1
Guest
mairin1

Something really bothers me about that second photo . . . I mean, if you were a parent, and the school was on lock-down because of a shooter, would you really stand idly around the parking lot of the school? Wouldn’t you be afraid of something like. . . . oh, I don’t know, gunfire? Sounds like the firehouse had been set up as a meeting place, so why would the police allow parents on the parking lot where they could be a target of an active shooter, or at the very least, be compromising a crime scene?

mairin1
Guest
mairin1

So despite a huge police presence, including SWAT teams, the only ones available to escort the children off the premises where there still may be an active shooter appear to be a safety officer and a few disinterested teachers? And the police were so efficient, that with minutes of the “carnage”, they were able to confirm it was safe to leave the building in an arms up/hands out formation (because no one suspected there may be a shooter in the wood or anything that maybe targeting the kids as they exit . . . because that has never happened before)… Read more »

joad
Guest
joad

actually as an art student and someone who stared way too long at stuff in class from many angles to draw said stuff, and also took photography as one of my electeds, the SUV is not the object to base your viewpoint from as an observer….it is the base of the picture, the first thing you would lay out or paint in for perspective as you filled in the rest of the page..in this case the parking lot asphalt and the painted lines for the cars..particularly the dark polymer crack repairs in the asphalt and the angle of the kids… Read more »

terrygunzales
Guest
terrygunzales

Everybody please post a comment for Lenny Pozner on his YouTube videos asking him how Noah P. could have been killed in yet another school shooting in Pakistan two years after he was killed in the Sandy Hook school shooting. Poor Lenny, no parent should ever have lose the same child twice the same way.

Christofer Tamulevich
Guest

The two boy #1’s are not the same boys – look at the hair! The two boy #2’s don’t have the same pants or shoes either. This POST is a FAIL!

Reyna
Guest

My favorite Sandy Hook CRISIS ACTORS are Nicole Hockley (fake mother of Dylan) and David Wheeler (fake father of Benjamin).
The Newtown CT “shooting” was a GUN GRAB hoax, to trick Americans into surrendering their AR15 rifles. Adam Lanza didn’t exist — he was invented in PhotoShop.comment imagecomment image
Forensic PROOF Sandy Hook was fake:
https://ppsimmons.blogspot.ca/2015/02/sandy-hook-police-couldnt-find-shotgun.html
To learn WHY they staged Sandy Hoax, watch the shocking Documentary HERE:
https://ppsimmons.blogspot.ca/2014/12/shocking-facts-sandy-hook-coverup.html

Mike
Guest
Mike

There’s something wrong with the official version of the Sandy Hook shooting, but this here is a red herring; they are different kids. Of the black shirted kids, one appears a little older and taller and his pants aren’t as baggy. The grey shirts are a closer match and it’s difficult to say, but it appears that minutes went by between the two shots (judging by the different adults) so it’s two different classes and different kids.

JC
Guest
JC

Sandy Hook “school evacuation” looks fake.comment image

truther
Guest
truther

I honestly believe it was all a hoax…with that being said, I don’t think these are the same kids. Look at their shoes. They’re different between pictures. Why go through the trouble of changing shoes to fake a photo but keep the same clothes?

Johnny Doughty
Guest
Johnny Doughty

The boys are not the same….different shirt logo and shoe style on “boy #1” This wasted my time!

Maya Bohnhoff (@kaath09)
Guest

It takes only a moment of comparison to see that those are two different boys wearing the same colored shirt.
The differences are many: Their hair isn’t the same color. Neither, when you look closely, are their pants. One is wearing pure black trousers, the other is wearing jeans that have that marbled effect. One has his gray shirt tucked into a black belt. And if that’s not enough, their shoes are a different color. One is wearing light colored sneakers, the other’s shoes are black.
Look more closely and more objectively.

Maya Bohnhoff (@kaath09)
Guest

Look at the pic above with the sobbing girl holding the boy’s shoulder. The “sloppy edits” are artifacts from low res imagery, but the hands on the shoulder? Look carefully at the position of her arms. Her left hand is _under_ her right hand. What you’re seeing that looks like a weird hand shape is her left thumb sticking out from under her right hand.
Please, be more careful. The stakes here are high.

Hbhgv
Guest
Hbhgv

Stop!!! I was in the shooting across the hall no joke

Summer
Guest
Summer

Kid #1 definitely is not the same..I’m not sure about kid #2… My biggest problem with these pictures is the placement of the words “Parent Drop Off” painted onto the parking lot. Using the green SUV as a guide look at the way it’s painted in the aerial view. It’s painted perpendicular to the green SUV. Now look at the pic of the parents standing around watching the evacuation where you can also see the words “Parent Drop Off” right under their feet. The letters in those 3 words are painted in a different direction. Yes I can see in… Read more »

Jed
Guest
Jed

Clearly, it’s NOT the same kids in pic one and two. Compare the shoes on boy#2 on both pics and compare the shirt and hair on boy #1 pics.

Randy
Guest
Randy

It doesn’t take a rocket surgeon to see that these photos were taken from two very different angles, one from the side, the other more from the front and the latter one shows less depth of field making it appear the two boys are closer together. Look at the direction of the arrow painted on the ground.

te5la
Guest
te5la

Boy #1’s hair is NOT blown by wind (top pic). It is obviously parted by a comb on the right side. In the lower pic, #1 has hair combed straight down in bangs. Different kids.

fatsolio
Guest

Different kids. The kids with the light top have different coloured shoes and the kid in the first pic has a hole or white spot on his black pants in the left shin area that the kid in the second pic doesn’t have.
The other kids clearly don’t have the same black shirt as the graphic is different.

chris graham
Guest
chris graham

I do not think they are the same kids but Im a little concerned about the girl farthest left with the pink pants and the girl in front of her appearing to be laughing. All those kids should be traumatized

Eernation
Guest
Eernation

They are two different boys. Look at their hair. Boy 1 has a mohawk. The boy 1 in the 2nd pic doesnt. Where are the papers in his right?

Tori
Guest
Tori

Boy number 2 in top picture has dark sneakers and dark jeans
Boy number 2 in bottom picture has more faded colored jeans and has light colored sneakers
Boy 1 in top picture has almost a Mohawk looking hair style while boy number 1 in bottom pictures hair is a different style completely