Same-sex marriage: It’s not about monogamy

Rate this post

A booth at a San Francisco gay-themed street fair. If you don’t know what’s a butt plug, go here. You are forewarned!

Homosexuals’ insistence on same sex” marriage is puzzling.

If legal rights, such as property and inheritance, are their concern, those rights are achieved via civil unions, which gays now enjoy in many states in America.

So that couldn’t be the reason why.

Do homosexuals want the commitment symbolized by marriage?

That’s not it, either, because homosexuals are notoriously promiscuous, especially gay men. In fact, we have outspoken public homosexuals such as Andrew Sullivan, who admit that gay marriage does NOT mean monogamy. As Sullivan puts it: “there is more likely to be greater understanding of the need for extramarital outlets between two men than between a man and a woman.”

A January 28, 2010 article by Scott James in the New York Times said as much:

When Rio and Ray married in 2008, the Bay Area women omitted two words from their wedding vows: fidelity and monogamy. […] Love brought the middle-age couple together — they wed during California’s brief legal window for same-sex marriage. But they knew from the beginning that their bond would be forged on their own terms, including what they call “play” with other women. […]

A study to be released next month is offering a rare glimpse inside gay relationships and reveals that monogamy is not a central feature for many. […] New research at San Francisco State University reveals just how common open relationships are among gay men and lesbians in the Bay Area. The Gay Couples Study has followed 556 male couples for three years — about 50 percent of those surveyed have sex outside their relationships, with the knowledge and approval of their partners.

There are homosexuals who are honest enough to admit that promiscuity is inherent in being a gay man. John Blair Linn, who describes himself as “an active member of the Washington, DC, gay scene for 25 years” who is now “disillusioned with the ‘homosexual lifestyle’,” is the latest example.

In a searingly candid article for HenryMakow.com, “Insider: Gay Marriage is a ‘Total Farce’,” Sept. 5, 2012, Linn writes:

All that most homosexuals really care about is sex.  Very few are in actual committed relationships, and those that are almost always have open relationships, and these are widely accepted in the gay community. 

The gay bar is really the center of life for most homosexuals. They classify themselves as either “tops” (the one who screws) or “bottoms” (the one who gets screwed) and that is how they have structured their entire culture.

Unlike a man and a woman, two men need to know who plays the role of male, and who plays the role of female – set sexual positions – and homosexual relations are truly a hooking up arrangement.  The public is so brainwashed to blindly accept gay relationships. 

There is generally no stigma about any sexual behavior and those who belong to the S&M crowd are widely accepted by the general community. 

Sexual perversions are widespread among gay men and involve urine, feces, and painful sex.  Most gays are empty voids and fill their lives with sex and drugs.  There is also a lot of anger among gay men. They are angry at their disorder, and display their anger by lashing out at normal healthy society. […]

I believe that homosexuality is almost always a birth defect.  Some people are born crippled or with mental illness; the same goes for most homosexuals.

Homosexuality revolves totally around sex, pure and simple.  Few homosexual men ever form relationships, and nearly all homosexual men are attracted to much younger men.  Homosexuality is truly a compulsive disorder.

[…] homosexuals really love straight men.  They would do anything to get at an attractive straight man.

Otherwise, most homosexual men prefer younger homosexual men by about 20 years and after about age 45, they start to get depressed and end up hiring young male prostitutes and risking their lives for sexual thrills.

Read the rest of Linn’s confessional here.

“All that most homosexuals really care about is sex” and “homosexuals really love straight men”.

That is the real truth about gays, which is readily evidenced by reading Michael K’s blog, Dlisted, in which the openly-gay penis-obsessed blogger openly lusts after straight men such as Prince Harry and the actor Jon Hamm.

Back to Scott James of the New York Times. James writes that “gay nuptials are portrayed by opponents as an effort to rewrite the traditional rules of matrimony. Quietly, outside of the news media and courtroom spotlight, many gay couples are doing just that” — which is to “rewrite” the traditional institution of marriage into a meaningless institution of open promiscuity, devoid of the emotional commitment of fidelity.

Writing for OUT magazine, Michelangelo Signorile admits as much:

“A middle ground might be to fight for same-sex marriage and its benefits and then, once granted, redefine the institution of marriage completely, to demand the right to marry not as a way of adhering to society’s moral codes but rather to…radically alter an archaic institution. [Legalizing ‘same-sex marriage’] is also a chance to wholly transform the definition of family in American culture. It is the final tool with which to dismantle all sodomy statutes, get education about homosexuality and AIDS into public schools, and, in short, usher in a sea change in how society views and treats us.”

See also my posts:

~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:
0
 

0 responses to “Same-sex marriage: It’s not about monogamy

  1. This is way more information than I needed to know about 🙂

    “two men need to know who plays the role of male, and who plays the role of female” What? Why not just be men? I’m thoroughly disgusted…

     
  2. I’m going to take NAMBLA and the other freak show organizations to the woodshed for this. The photo shows they are beyond vile. I can’t blame God for destroying Sodom and Gomorrah thousands of years ago.

     
  3. Reblogged this on mystere's moonbat spanker and commented:
    Here’s what NAMBLA and the other hate mongering freaks want to hide from you.

     
  4. Indeed the lifestyle is all about sex, mostly perverted sex. Perhaps .05% care about marriage. It’s a lifestyle choice, shrinks have been aware of this fact forever. In case you have any doubts take a road trip to that great cesspool they call San Frisco, warning! it could make you sick –>
    http://www.zombietime.com/up_your_alley_2008/part_1_full/index.php

     
  5. It IS a choice. It is a choice to give into Satan. Homosexuality is a powerful demon. Even Jesus Matthew 17:21 Howbeit this kind goeth not out but by prayer and fasting.

     
  6. White Knuckle Driver

    And in the weather, mostly lousy with a strong chance of a sulfur shower…

     
  7. I can only say, I agree with Ruth Graham, if GOD don’t punish America, he has to apologize to Sodom and Gommorah. May GOD have mercy on
    America, we sure need it.

     
  8. All about “getting married,” but not about actually being married… none of the responsibilities, just the societal endorsement.

     
  9. Thank you Dr. Eowyn for another truthful, excellent and revealing post about homosexuality. Yes, what is their point? They do not want monogamy so why are they fighting for a marriage, which is monogamous? They already have civil unions authorized in certain states. They are angry and confused individuals, and want to destroy the family unit as defined and ordained by Our Lord. Ultimately, I believe they hate themselves.

     
  10. So awful. Just beyond words…..

     
  11. Homosexuality is an illness and it’s sufferers are trying to pass it off as normal. Sadly, so many educated people buy in to this notion. Even if some are somehow “born” gay, genetically pre-disposed to it, it makes no difference. People are born with all manner of conditions, disabilities, diseases, etc. Then one must also realise some make choices. Consider the current fad among young females towards bisexuality. this is a mostly heterosexual male-driven trend based upon the classic male fantasy of watching two hot females making out with one another and the male’s desire to join in. This particular behavior is much more prevalent than in the past. I blame the 60’s for all this madness.

     
  12. Who IS John Blair Linn? I mean, what do we really know about him, other than what this site repeats? And why is there nothing on the search engines about John Blair Linn, the gay guy, himself? If you do a search for John Blair Linn, you find nothing about a gay person named that. You will find info about John Blair Linn, an 1800s English poet. Obviously, they are not the same. There ARE countless sites that refer to the henrymakow.com site but it seems that it was the only source for this info. Since there is no credible proof, other than henrymakow.com, that this person even exists, I do question the authenticity the article and I question that the gay guy even exists. I believe henrymakow,com conjured up this whole person and interview. Can anyone prove me wrong?

     
    • This is Henry Makow’s response in an email to me:

      Due to the intimidation gays use, John Blair Linn is a pen name. He is exactly who he says he is.

      henry

      As for you, Ladero, I have a question for you:

      Who IS Ladero? You use an anonymized IP address and gives a phony e-mail address. What do we really know about you, other than the alias you use? Since there is no credible proof that Ladero even exists, I do question the authenticity of your comment and I question that Ladero even exists. I believe you conjured up this whole person and comment. Can anyone prove me wrong?

      John Blair Linn aside, why don’t you try invalidating all the other individuals I quoted and cited in my post? — Andrew Sullivan, Michelangelo Signorile, Michael K, Scott James of the New York Times, the photo of the San Francisco sex booth, and medical doctor John R. Diggs Jr. To quote Dr. Diggs:

      “The current media portrayal of gay and lesbian relationships is that they are as healthy, stable and loving as heterosexual marriages — or even more so. Medical associations are promoting somewhat similar messages.” But that portrayal is not consistent with facts. Due to promiscuity and the kinds of sexual behavior undertaken, “Sexual relationships between members of the same sex expose gays, lesbians and bisexuals to extreme risks of Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STDs), physical injuries, mental disorders and even a shortened life span.”

      Try arguing against these medical FACTS, Ladero-whoever-you-are.

       
  13. Your idea of informative is your opinion. As is your definition of bullying.

    This is a private blog and the owner reserves the right to remove comments. See our about page.

     
  14. Yeah, what I saw on the About page was that dissenting views will be deleted and your IP address will be reported to the police. The doctor said the tracking software could not detect my IP address. Guess I can’t be reported since the software could not find me? Have a great day, buddy.

     
    • Software may not be able to report you, yep.

      As I have already had several death threats here on our blog, my Second Amendment right doesn’t care about trolls. Nite bud…

       
  15. A common lack of monogamy….so much more the reason to deny recognition to same-sex marriages. There’s too much of that in hetero-sexual relationships now!

     
  16. is it me or is blondie a dyke?

     

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *