Rumors that Prince Harry & Meghan Markle had a surrogate baby

On May 6, 2019, nearly a year after their wedding, Britain’s Prince Harry, 34, and his American wife, the former minor Hollywood actress Meghan Markle, 37, announced on Instagram that their son was born that “early morning,” weighing 7 lb. 3 oz.

Two days later, on May 8, in a press conference, Harry and Meghan, aka the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, introduced their baby to the world — Archie Harrison, 7th in line to the throne, who had been overdue by at least a week.

All of which has not dampened the rumors that Archie is a surrogate baby, birthed by a woman who is not Meghan Markle.

Markle is a rabid anti-Trumper, who calls President Trump a “misogynist,” “divisive,” and “syphilis”. Reportedly, she told a friend that the baby will be raised “gender-fluid,” without “gender-stereotyping” — whatever that means.

Prince Harry makes devil’s horn hand sign at Invictus Games in Toronto, Sept. 23, 2017

Dismissed as a ridiculous “conspiracy theory” — as if there are no real conspiracies — the notion of surrogacy and, therefore, a fake pregnancy, is intriguing and bears some scrutiny. Here are the reasons for the rumors:

(1) Breaking protocol for royal births, Archie’s birth announcement was made on Instagram before the official birth announcement by Buckingham Palace. The Palace’s easel announcing Archie’s birth went up about 4.35 p.m., about two hours after the social media announcement — a delay that suggests information about the birth had been kept from the Palace. The Palace’s easel announcement also lacks the signatures of the attending medical professionals. (Harry Markle)

Below are the easel announcements of the birth of Prince Willliam’s first son, Prince George (left), and that of Archie (right):

(2) Markle’s delivery was way overdue. On October 15, 2018, when Kensington Palace announced her pregnancy, Markle had already had her 12-week scan. A week later, she told someone whom she was greeting in a line up that she was 16 weeks pregnant. At the time of the pregnancy announcement, reporter Emily Andrews said: “We understand that she was around 14/15 weeks, and so, we think that the baby is due in early April. I think maybe March, I think the baby might be born in March.” (Town&Country)

(3) Unkown place of delivery: The birth announcement made no mention of a hospital, nor does it bear the signatures of medical witnesses. The media had photographers on standby in all the hospitals, but they did not report on the birth. All of which suggests a home delivery, which was risky for a first birth by a woman of Markle’s age, 37.

(4) The strange baby bump: Skeptics had noted that the baby bump that Markle constantly cradled had behaved in a strange way — changing shapes from day to day, looking big one day and flat a few days later, creasing or folding in the middle (like Beyoncé’s baby bump), wobbling, and shifting from side to side. (Harry Markle)

Here’s a video of Markle’s folding baby bump:

Below is a video of Markle’s wobbling baby bump:

Contrast Markle’s wobbling-from-side-to-side baby bump with that of this pregnant woman:

Also, what heavily-pregnant woman do you know who can so easily bend and squat down as 7-8 months pregnant Meghan?

Heavily pregnant Meghan Markle easily bends-squats down

More pics of Meghan’s strange baby bump here.

See also:

~Eowyn

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

16
Leave a Reply

avatar
12 Comment authors
MaryChemtrailssuckDave MasonLittlefaithhturt Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Auntie Lulu
Guest
Auntie Lulu

Wow! That really blows my mind. I find it so difficult to believe that Prince Harry would not want his child born of the actual woman he is married to. But then, so many things that I never thought possible in our crazy world, seem to have come to fruition.

The fact that they named this unfortunate little boy . . . “Archie,” just blows my mind. What with all the dignified male names coming from the British hierarchy–I just cannot believe that “Archie” was the best they could come up with.

Watertender
Member
Watertender

Archie is a fine name! Isn’t Grandpa Charlie’s nickname Jughead?? Oh no, wait… That was Dickhead!!

William
Member
William

I understand they considered Prince Dickhead but ruled it out. Not royal enough

William
Member
William

So Meaghan thinks Trump is syphilis. I would remind her that Prince Charles said he wanted to be reincarnated as a virus. Chuck needn’t wait, he’s already a virus, as are the entire “royal family”. Pathogens. And Prince Harry flashing the devil sign; you don’t have to advertise it Harry, we already know

Chemtrailssuck
Guest
Chemtrailssuck

Prince Charles looks like he got a venereal disease on his face and ears.

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

Wow, Royal Globalists. “Gender fluid”? A girl named Archibald? A boy named Sue?

So this is a half-white baby, like Obongo? So it can look forward to being confused both genetically and in gender? Then it can be confused as to whether it’s British or American.

What will the announcements say? An “it” was born as a British Subject/American Citizen (you decide). What an utter load of crap.

Eddie
Guest
Eddie

I got a gender fluid for ya Megtard. See-men.

operaghost
Guest
operaghost

Hi Lophatt, Well, technically speaking, since Markle is already half-black since her father is a white male, this baby would be 1/4 black, yes? And if her mother was less than 100% black, then that 1/4 could be less than that even (no idea about Markle’s maternal grandparents whatsoever) I suppose. I am not a royal defender whatsoever, mind you 🙂 The only point I can see against the conspiracy is that Markle did gain quite a lot of weight with the pregnancy. Regardless of the wobbling bump, you can see it in her rounder face, in her upper arms,… Read more »

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

Well, of course you are correct regarding the percentages. I suppose I should be more scrupulous with these things, but….maybe I just don’t care. I think my point didn’t revolve around how many chromosomes got strained through a sock. I think, as far as I’m concerned, that this is a rather sad illustration of how intensely they want their whole “globalist” empire to come to fruition. Earlier in my life I would not have imagined the royals allowing Harry to stray so far from the bloodlines. Dotty mutants were the norm, not the exception. Miscegenation was not a practice I’m… Read more »

Dave Mason
Guest
Dave Mason

I’ve suspected that Markle is a transgendered individual. The baby bumps were all part of the staging. The elites want transgendered leaders……..Michelle Obama, Amal Cooney, that creepy leader in New Zealand. It all makes sense when you look at the body configurations.

Alma
Member
Alma

“Archie is not in the hierarchy of the British throne -no true blue blood, no lineage, no title. Queen Mum wanted the whole episode to be over soon, Harry and family will soon be packing to Africa for a while, the palace concentrates on Wills marriage as the future of the crown hangs on the balance between Charles and Wills. Looks are deceiving and Queen Mum appears happy but inside the palace quarters a battle is raging on the four corners. Harry’s marriage to Meg would put an end to scandals and whirlwind tours. From the very beginning of Harry’s… Read more »

hturt
Guest
hturt

the ‘peasant’ masses always believe anything they are feed by the ‘upper’ crust! If anyone has critically looked at merkle and then her supposed mother, well, figure it out, dumbas*! then look at ‘stonehenge’ — one of the biggest scams to be pulled over the masses around the beginning of the 20th century — the ‘elites’ knew if they pulled that off the ‘masses’ of stupid humans, if that is what they are, would accept any lie they are told. The child is without doubt a surrogate just like the barry and michael’s two ‘daughters’ belonged to some good communist… Read more »

Littlefaith
Guest
Littlefaith

Maybe these demons don’t have their own children because they will be subjected to satanic ritual abuse …These people are so ugly ..especially inside. Looking at the picture of Melania and Prince douche bag Devils horns ..doesn’t Melania look like a mind controlled slave ..she always seems to be expressionless

Chemtrailssuck
Guest
Chemtrailssuck

Read “Thanks for the Memories” by Bryce Taylor, a mind controlled slave, she said she had her baby stolen from her, she suspected from the “royal’ family.

She probably had a fake “baby” in there and the fluid filled balloon did something screwy. Heck we had a “president” with a trans sexual as a “wife”, anything is possible these days.

Not only that, but the way they walk, they don’t “waddle” like you do when pregnant.

Mary
Guest
Mary

Had not heard of the Brice Taylor book. Thank you.

trackback

[…] environmentalists Prince Harry, 34, and his D-listed actress-wife Meghan Markle (MM), 38, and “baby” Archie, recently took a secret trip via a private jet to Ibiza, a Mediterranean island off the […]