Prosecution rests in Zimmerman trial

Rate this post

Yesterday (Friday, July 5, 2013), prosecutors rested their case against George Zimmerman, standing trial for the second-degree murder of Florida teen Trayvon Martin.

Trayvon 7-11 video From a 7-11 surveillance camera: Instead of the doe-eyed pic of 13-year-old Trayvon Martin which the State Controlled Media like to use, this is what 17-year-old Martin (on right) actually looked like on the night he was shot by Zimmerman. 

Erin Donaghue reports for CBS News that the state’s case spanned nearly nine days of testimony from numerous witnesses, including Martin’s mother and brother, a medical examiner who conducted Martin’s autopsy, a DNA analyst, and numerous neighbors, first responders and police officers who witnessed the fatal altercation or its aftermath.

In opening statements June 24, prosecutors recounted the profanity-laced statements Zimmerman used in a Feb. 26, 2012 non-emergency call placed to dispatchers to report Martin as a suspicious person in his neighborhood. Prosecutors claim Zimmerman had profiled Martin as a criminal that evening and shot him because “he wanted to.”

In a starkly different picture of events, defense attorneys said Zimmerman shot in self-defense after he was “viciously attacked” by Martin.

Zimmerman & defense attorney Mark O'MaraZimmerman (l) and defense attorney Mark O’Mara (AP photo)

As the state’s case wrapped up Friday afternoon, defense attorney Mark O’Mara argued for a judgment of acquittal before Circuit Judge Debra Nelson on the grounds that Zimmerman had acted in self-defense, outside of the presence of the jury. Once the state concludes a case, the court may enter a judgment of acquittal if the judge finds the evidence the state has presented is insufficient to warrant a conviction.

O’Mara said testimony and evidence support Zimmerman’s self-defense claim, including photos of Zimmerman after the altercation that he said show “undeniable injuries that evidence nothing other than a violent attack by Trayvon Martin.” O’Mara also said the state has not presented evidence that Zimmerman followed Trayvon Martin through the community after he was told by a dispatcher not to.

But the judge denied the judgement for acquittal motion.

Rachel JeantelMartin’s girl friend, Rachel Jeantel

Key witnesses for the prosecution included Rachel Jeantel, a friend of Martin’s who was on the phone with him minutes before he was fatally shot as he was walking to his father’s fiancee’s home in the gated Sanford, Fla. community.

Jeantel said she heard Trayvon Martin saying, “Get off, get off” before the fatal shot was fired, a potential blow for the defense team, which claims Zimmerman shot in self-defense. But in a lengthy and at times heated cross-examination, defense attorney Don West highlighted changes in her story in an apparent attempt to bring her credibility into question.

(See FOTM’s Steve’s posts on Jeantel, here and here.)

Also providing crucial testimony was a neighbor, John Good, who said he believes he saw Trayvon Martin on top of George Zimmerman moments before the gunshot.

Trayvon Martin's parents, Tracy Martin & Sybrina FultonTrayvon’s parents: Tracy Martin (l), Sybrina Fulton. (AP photo)

Friday, Trayvon Martin’s mother and brother took the stand to say they believe Martin was the one screaming in the background of a 911 call placed the evening of the altercation. Who is screaming on the tape has been a key point of contention. Before the trial launched last week, defense attorneys successfully blocked a prosecution expert who said he identified the screams as Trayvon Martin’s. Zimmerman’s father has also said the screaming was his son’s.

A voice expert testified before the jury that it’s impossible to scientifically analyze who was screaming on the call, but that someone familiar with the voice – such as a family member – might have a “better chance” of identifying it.

Also on Friday, a medical examiner who conducted the autopsy on Trayvon Martin testified that Martin could have been alive and suffering between one and ten minutes after he was shot through the heart. On cross-examination, Dr. Shiping Bao said he recently changed his opinion – he had originally said one to three minutes – based on a case his office reviewed of another man who was shot through the heart and whose survival for 10 minutes was documented on a 911 call.

See also:

Have you been watching the trial? (I haven’t, because I’ve been wrestling with Internet connectivity problems for the past three days. Aargh!!!!)

What do you think?

~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:
0
 

0 responses to “Prosecution rests in Zimmerman trial

  1. The reverse of the Chewbacca Defense: He’s a “white Hispanic,” he must’ve done it– get him, Justice 4 Trayvon!! (Makes about as much sense, left/liberals stink.)

     
  2. Question – Why have people forgotten, it’s N-O-T guilty until proven innocent, guilty because I think you are or guilty because of your race! Remember it’s “I-N-N-O-C-E-N-T until P-R-O-V-E-N guilty?”

    Question – Why did people march wearing black hoodies, carrying skittles and posters demanding justice for Martin because of skin color? (march happened before anyone had evidence, except a black 17 yr old was killed by a non-back).

    Question – Isn’t the racisim from the many crying for racism to stop?

    Question – Why was Zimmerman proclaimed guilty before the evidence, because of his skin color?

    Hard to believe racism from the many crying for racism to STOP!

    It’s unfortunate and sad that Martin’s family has and continues to endure such pain, but their pain doesn’t make one guilty. On the flip side, it’s unfortunate that Zimmerman’s family has and is enduring much pain because prosecutor was pressured to charge an innocent man!

    Martins parents are being UNJUST, as well as judge and prosecution for the State of Florida. Any of us could be in the same postion as Zimmerman!

    I’ve watched the trial in its entirety and thus far all the evidence indicates Zimmerman isn’t guilty of murder or manslaughter! I’m not saying that because of skin!

    Zimmerman didn’t commit murder or manslaughter!
    He was not engaged in an unlawful activity and not attacked in a place where he didn’t have a right to be. He met force and he resonably feared great bodily harm and even death. Think logically, “if Zimmerman profiled and followed Martin he would have had his gun out and used it before confrontation,” and “person being beat, (which has been proven) would have been screaming!” He called 911, he screamed for help and no help was rendered. He shot AFTER, NOT before, he was feared he was or would be beaten to death! WHAT ELSE could he do? ANYONE in Zimmerman’s position would have done the same thing!

     
    • But dispassionate rule of law, evidence, etc. is “racist” and not emotionally “authentic”– that would offend the Democratic base

       
  3. Thank you a zillion times, Cheryl B! I’d bet my last peso that this would never have made it to the front page, much less the courts, if Trayvon had been white and Zimmerman black. You can take that to the nearest bank!
    Thanks to you, Dr. Eo, for these posts, too!

     
  4. You are 100% correct.

     

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *