Planned Parenthood sues over new Kansas abortion law

Rate this post

unborn baby Planned Parenthood filed a lawsuit Thursday over  a new Kansas law requiring doctors to inform women seeking abortions that they’re ending the life of a “whole, separate, unique, living human being.”

Planned Parenthood’s clinic in the Kansas City suburb of Overland Park and its director, physician Orrin Moore, contend in the lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court that the law violates doctors’ free speech rights guaranteed by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. They say the statement that an abortion terminates the life of a separate human being requires them to make “a misleading statement of philosophical and/or religious belief.”

The new Kansas requirements take effect next month.

It’s called compelled speech, which is a violation of the First Amendment,” Peter Brownlie, the Planned Parenthood chapter’s president and chief executive officer, said during an interview. “The Legislature is attempting to force us to endorse the political views of the governor and his allies.”

Republican Gov. Sam Brownback is a strong abortion opponent who’s called publicly on legislators to create what he calls a culture of life in Kansas. Legislators approved the new requirements with large, bipartisan majorities in both chambers.

Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri is also attacking a provision of the law that requires its website to link to a Kansas Department of Health and Environment site on abortion and fetal development. Planned Parenthood contends it is required to endorse the health department’s message.

The lawsuit also challenges a requirement that abortion patients receive information that a fetus can feel pain by the 20th week following fertilization. Planned Parenthood contends that statement is misleading but noted in its lawsuit that “all or virtually all” of the patients terminating pregnancies at its clinic do so before the 20th week, making the information “irrelevant.”

Mary Kay Culp, executive director of Kansans for Life, the most influential anti-abortion group at the Statehouse, said Planned Parenthood is attacking requirements aimed at strengthening a long-standing state law under which a doctor must obtain “informed consent” from a patient before terminating her pregnancy. Kansans for Life officials said the requirement is satisfied if a patient has access to the health department’s information, whether a doctor criticizes it or contradicts it verbally.

“These laws are just so that there’s an opportunity for women to know the facts outside the confines of these businesses. … It’s nothing more than the state protecting its citizens,” Culp said.

Brownlie said Moore and the clinic will ask a court to block the requirements from taking effect July 1 as planned. “A physician has the right to determine what information is relevant” in treating patients, said Brownlie. He also said the new law “undermines a woman’s ability to trust her doctor.”


But Troy Newman, president of the anti-abortion group Operation Rescue, accused Planned Parenthood of “trying to keep information from women.” “I don’t understand how it is a violation of the First Amendment when you are informing people, you are actually telling people what is going on,” he said.

The new “informed consent” requirements were part of legislation that also will ban sex-selection abortions, block abortion providers from receiving tax breaks that other businesses and organizations receive, and prohibit them from being involved in public school sex-education classes.

The measure also included a declaration that life begins “at fertilization.” Supporters saw that language as a statement of principle and not an outright abortion ban because it later notes that any rights suggested by the wording are limited by decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court protecting access to abortion.

Brownlie noted that the tax changes don’t take effect until January. “We are still evaluating those provisions and will make a decision sometime in the future on challenging some of those,” he added.

Planned Parenthood, doing their best to keep their abortion business alive and well.

Please follow and like us:

0 responses to “Planned Parenthood sues over new Kansas abortion law

  1. So is this PP admitting abortions are really their bread and butter and not the mammograms that they don’t do? Or birth control, that was another one of their stories.

  2. Rust would be evidence of life on Mars but a fetus born alive and having its neck severed is no different than a flu shot to these people? Some amazing stretches there.

  3. Silent Screams (Baby Talk)

    I tried to crawl away screaming I live!
    Stop killing me, I want to live and love!
    My limbs are useless in a prison of flesh!
    I’ am a little baby nobody hears or wants!

    Someone help me! I’m alone, please help!
    Something is ripping me apart as I scream!
    Why do you all deny knowing, I want to live!
    I’m defenseless to your butchery as I scream!

    What kind of person does this to me? I scream!
    Who let this happen to me? I scream even louder!
    Someone paid someone to do this to me? I scream!
    My dream of life torn apart, I scream no not by you!

    Who murders their own baby? Why did you help her?
    A baby no more I scream! I want one mother to hold
    all theirs to love but all remained deaf to my screams.
    I want a mother’s love, you to hear my silent screams.

  4. 3rd paragraph is an eye-opener . The ” Compelled speech thing “………I guess Brownlie doesn’t mind it when it goes in his favor ; but when it pees on his parade , he gets his panties in a wad .
    As to the last part of that paragraph , sounds a lot like what this p.c. shiot is all about ………

  5. That’s really a hollow argument. If this were the case, the warning labels on liquor and cigarettes are unconstitutional.

  6. It must not be infanticide when left/liberals do it or something…

  7. Keep that in mind Racefish, if they win maybe we can hit paydirt by suing the government on behalf of the tobacco companies and for all the trauma that they have caused smokers like me … hmmmmmmmmm, you may be on to something there! What is sad is that it would probably work.

  8. “It’s called compelled speech … The Legislature is attempting to FORCE US TO ENDORSE the political views of the governor and his allies.”

    I can’t believe he said that!  Cry a bucket of tears!  How does it feel when the shoe is on the other foot?  

    That’s exactly what the Feds are requiring of employees, on a similarly heated topic, whether they approve or not, ie, to “vocally ENDORSE  homosexuality”:


  9. planned parent hood is evil to the bone!

  10. They are really gonna freak about the new law Texas is trying to get through…


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.