NY Times: Pedophilia, A Disorder, Not a Crime

Rate this post

The author, Margo Kaplan,an assistant professor at Rutgers School of Law

The author, Margo Kaplan,an assistant professor at Rutgers School of Law

NY Times: Think back to your first childhood crush. Maybe it was a classmate or a friend next door. Most likely, through school and into adulthood, your affections continued to focus on others in your approximate age group. But imagine if they did not.

By some estimates, 1 percent of the male population continues, long after puberty, to find themselves attracted to prepubescent children. These people are living with pedophilia, a sexual attraction to prepubescents that often constitutes a mental illness. Unfortunately, our laws are failing them and, consequently, ignoring opportunities to prevent child abuse.

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders defines pedophilia as an intense and recurrent sexual interest in prepubescent children, and a disorder if it causes a person “marked distress or interpersonal difficulty” or if the person acts on his interests. Yet our laws ignore pedophilia until after the commission of a sexual offense, emphasizing punishment, not prevention.

Part of this failure stems from the misconception that pedophilia is the same as child molestation. One can live with pedophilia and not act on it. Sites like Virtuous Pedophiles provide support for pedophiles who do not molest children and believe that sex with children is wrong. It is not that these individuals are “inactive” or “nonpracticing” pedophiles, but rather that pedophilia is a status and not an act. In fact, research shows, about half of all child molesters are not sexually attracted to their victims.

A second misconception is that pedophilia is a choice. Recent research, while often limited to sex offenders — because of the stigma of pedophilia — suggests that the disorder may have neurological origins. Pedophilia could result from a failure in the brain to identify which environmental stimuli should provoke a sexual response. M.R.I.s of sex offenders with pedophilia show fewer of the neural pathways known as white matter in their brains. Men with pedophilia are three times more likely to be left-handed or ambidextrous, a finding that strongly suggests a neurological cause. Some findings also suggest that disturbances in neurodevelopment in utero or early childhood increase the risk of pedophilia. Studies have also shown that men with pedophilia have, on average, lower scores on tests of visual-spatial ability and verbal memory.

The Virtuous Pedophiles website is full of testimonials of people who vow never to touch a child and yet live in terror. They must hide their disorder from everyone they know — or risk losing educational and job opportunities, and face the prospect of harassment and even violence. Many feel isolated; some contemplate suicide. The psychologist Jesse Bering, author of “Perv: The Sexual Deviant in All of Us,” writes that people with pedophilia “aren’t living their lives in the closet; they’re eternally hunkered down in a panic room.”

While treatment cannot eliminate a pedophile’s sexual interests, a combination of cognitive-behavioral therapy and medication can help him to manage urges and avoid committing crimes. But the reason we don’t know enough about effective treatment is because research has usually been limited to those who have committed crimes.

Our current law is inconsistent and irrational. For example, federal law and 20 states allow courts to issue a civil order committing a sex offender, particularly one with a diagnosis of pedophilia, to a mental health facility immediately after the completion of his sentence — under standards that are much more lax than for ordinary “civil commitment” for people with mental illness. And yet, when it comes to public policies that might help people with pedophilia to come forward and seek treatment before they offend, the law omits pedophilia from protection.

The Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 prohibit discrimination against otherwise qualified individuals with mental disabilities, in areas such as employment, education and medical care. Congress, however, explicitly excluded pedophilia from protection under these two crucial laws.

It’s time to revisit these categorical exclusions. Without legal protection, a pedophile cannot risk seeking treatment or disclosing his status to anyone for support. He could lose his job, and future job prospects, if he is seen at a group-therapy session, asks for a reasonable accommodation to take medication or see a psychiatrist, or requests a limit in his interaction with children. Isolating individuals from appropriate employment and treatment only increases their risk of committing a crime.

There’s no question that the extension of civil rights protections to people with pedophilia must be weighed against the health and safety needs of others, especially kids. It stands to reason that a pedophile should not be hired as a grade-school teacher. But both the A.D.A. and the Rehabilitation Act contain exemptions for people who are “not otherwise qualified” for a job or who pose “a direct threat to the health and safety of others” that can’t be eliminated by a reasonable accommodation. (This is why employers don’t have to hire blind bus drivers or mentally unstable security guards.)

The direct-threat analysis rejects the idea that employers can rely on generalizations; they must assess the specific case and rely on evidence, not presuppositions. Those who worry that employers would be compelled to hire dangerous pedophiles should look to H.I.V. case law, where for years courts were highly conservative, erring on the side of finding a direct threat, even into the late 1990s, when medical authorities were in agreement that people with H.I.V. could work safely in, for example, food services.

Removing the pedophilia exclusion would not undermine criminal justice or its role in responding to child abuse. It would not make it easier, for example, for someone accused of child molestation to plead not guilty by reason of insanity.

A pedophile should be held responsible for his conduct — but not for the underlying attraction. Arguing for the rights of scorned and misunderstood groups is never popular, particularly when they are associated with real harm. But the fact that pedophilia is so despised is precisely why our responses to it, in criminal justice and mental health, have been so inconsistent and counterproductive. Acknowledging that pedophiles have a mental disorder, and removing the obstacles to their coming forward and seeking help, is not only the right thing to do, but it would also advance efforts to protect children from harm.

See also:


Please follow and like us:

0 responses to “NY Times: Pedophilia, A Disorder, Not a Crime

  1. This female clearly has screws loose in her white matter. It seems the next move for social deviants is a “coming out” party for pedophiles. If pedophilia is made into a legal disorder then pedophiles can basically get paid by the government (in terms of disability) to fantasize, molest, and rape children. These perverts who act out on children belong in jail, whether male or female.
    Her argument can also be made for rapists, maybe they should be in a mental institution or get disability checks because of their desire to rape. They have “marked distress or interpersonal difficulty” because they want to rape and many act on those desires.
    According to this article, the pedophile perverts have a choice, whereas some choose to molest, others fantasize (how far does their sick “fantasy” go? does it include child porn? Child porn creates victims). I don’t buy the ‘pity the pedophiles’ to protect children story. If we want to protect the children, we need tougher laws and punishment and not embrace pedophilia. No one is going after pedophiles for their thoughts…only their actions including possessing of child porn. Because it’s the actions that make the consequences and create victims. My concern is for the victims (the children) because they don’t have a choice and they have to live with what these sick bast*rds do to them. Ms. Kaplan’s bleeding heart is on the wrong side…I say pray for the pedophiles to change and get the devil out or at least keep away from children, but, put the predators behind bars where they belong away from creating new victims.

    • Some people also propose “drawn” or “art” (commonly known as “loli” or “shota” respectively, at least in Japan.) as a victim-lss way of “treating” the problem, except that it doesn’t treat the problem, and anyone with any common sense should know that too… remember that native american proverb about the two wolves? This is a case of feeding the bad one again (it will not “treat” the problem, it will contribute to it, and induce criminal behavior, like with other unhealthy sicknesses cold turkey is the only route of any use, should serial killers be given a video game like “call of duty”, or should they learn that killing at all when not in self-defense is not viable? that’s the basic mentality here), most often porn contributes to pedophilia as well, even if it isn’t involving children, the satanists in charge of the porn industry do certain things and have set certain “standards” to ensure this happens… consider the fact that certain pubescent cues are typically removed as “undesirable” (such as pubic hair, the #1 visual cue to show that the one being looked at is an adult) across porn “shaving” is a must, except for certain niches, other cues are messed with as well, such as scenarios, manner of dress that is stripped off (sometimes childish, diapers etc.), and behavior (also sometimes childish), to produce stimuli that works on the viewer to cause changes in the brain’s pleasure/reward system (as masturbation or intercourse is usually expected to accompany the porn viewing, this helps facilitate the reprogramming) which changes what they find “hot”*… I have heard stories of parents who became attracted to their own children after being involved with porn (not even the irregular stuff), or saw other people’s kids sexually for a brief time, and were so disgusted that they abandoned the porn altogether, after figuring that it was the sole cause.
      This is the sort of insidious sick lengths the puppets of evil will go to to make “change”, and we should remember that evil is evil, it has no decency or morals and will try for the maximum amount of corruption all the while claiming ignorance and benevolence.
      *the stuff spoken of here is a principle called “neuro plasticity”, it is also a way of brainwashing with “pleasure” instead of trauma, which is not often spoken of with regards to brainwashing etc.

  2. all part of the all powerful new genie gig. I wonder how long will this be until taught in public schools?
    Hey Mac, hand me a new shovel will ya?

  3. it’s an easy fix. castrate them and the urge goes away.

  4. Not sure that’ll do it,Ralphy. It could also cause them to get MORE violent,the rage and all.
    I go more with re-opening and re-staffing the Mental Asylums that were closed,(due to cuts in budget and lawsuits to let people decide for themselves if they should be locked up) and re-admitting these lunatics that do harm to kids,as well as the nut-cases that have a tendency to go shoot large numbers of people then killing themselves to avoid prosecution.

  5. The puppets of evil are seeing how fast they can get pedophilia legalized, after all homosexuality only took them how long? This will likely be in half the time, especially with things like omegle ensuring kids run into strangers looking to get off on them, sexting in schools due to those worthless wads of plastic they dare call phones, and the “sex ed” classes ensuring the children’s minds are warped as early as possible. the “disorder angle” is a canard and completely ignores the underlying causes (who suspects they’ll make “support foundations” to get cash reserves to help in legal fights later?) they outright stated they wanted to change certain laws to give “protections” to these people with this problem, which means they want to promote it and want to encourage it in all venues, as they have the mental-spiritual illness of homosexuality… this one apparently is being fast-tracked, and with all the various factors saturating minors with perverse sexuality from a young age, from school to peer pressure to the blasted cameras everywhere (which were disgustingly promoted as a safety measure no less, claims of the camera and GPS system in them being useful for law enforcement, but the problem is the underlying operating system in the phones is easily hackable, and any computer-competent script kiddy looking to find out where they can get children can exploit the GPS feature to find exactly where the children are and at what time… a camera phone is a safety measure like throwing gasoline & alcohol on a fire is a safety measure.) what we’re looking at is going to produce children who will think later in life that all the “sex ed” and exposure to sexuality “didn’t affect them badly” some may even crop up saying the pedophiles who made advances on them were “nice” and “nothing came from it” same as the rank vile and toxic propaganda contained in the kinsey reports.
    Consider what is at these two links and ask yourselves if you need to light a fire under your local politician’s butts to not only criminalize sexual interaction with minors, and also sexual “education” of minors etc. (everyone reading this should know what I mean, I don’t mean parents explaining anatomical differences at an appropriate age, I mean the filth which is pushed on them in masonic public schools), but to punish it with things as far as exorcism, which may be required in some cases, as the disease is not only mental, it is also spiritual in nature, and outlawing porn of any kind with fines much more strict than traffic tickets. As for the links: https://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/06/18/police-infant-died-after-mother-invited-pedophile-boyfriend-to-rape-child/
    https://www.experienceproject.com/stories/Think-Pedophilia-Is-A-Sexual-Orientation/3133702 This second one is a propaganda /pro-pedophile apologetic piece (Warning, potentially nausea-inducing), and if it is any indication, then things are already pretty far south, so to speak.

  6. Progressive left/liberal normalizing of freakiness… for support. (Soviets used to just kill people like that after taking power, however.)

  7. I don’t know truck….I remember neighbors cats getting “fixed” and their whaling stopped when in heat. Also per Wikipedia definition of castration
    “This causes sterilization (i.e., prevents them from reproducing); it also greatly reduces the production of certain hormones, such as testosterone.”

  8. Margo – you are a sick twist.

  9. The original phrase Eisenhower was supposed to have used was the “ACADEMIC-military-industrial complex,” but he was advised to drop the word “academic.” Regardless of the truth content of this article, Satan knows if he can ruin a person’s sexual function, he can move on to attack that person’s entire character and personality.
    The move to normalize or accept the homosexual orientation did not happen overnight, nor did the move to normalize or accept gay “marriage.” The move to normalize pedophilia has been going on for a few years now, and, like an insidious cancer, is not stopping.
    Our entire culture has become debased in every department or institution. Apparently, Antonio Gramsci’s strategy and Gresham’s Law have been getting along “just swell” for decades now, and it has come to this. And it has been institutionalized: Not only do we have “sex education,” but we also have the UN’s Rights of the Child Treaty, not yet ratified, which will give free reign to this and other perversions.
    When the perverts said, over thirty years ago, “We are coming after your children,” they, like the communists two generations before them, meant it.

  10. Actor Stephen Collins, who played the pastor-dad in the TV show 7th Heaven, must be thanking his lucky stars at this move to normalize pedophilia.
    On Tuesday, news came that, in therapy sessions with his estranged wife Faye Grant, Collins had admitted to molesting or exposing himself to under aged girls. His admission is recorded on audio tapes.

    • Yeah, he’s disgusting. It makes sense though, because hollyweird only deals with their own degenerate kind (mostly). It makes sense they would hire their own kind to play the role of a Christian father and pastor because in reality he’s a pedophile. It’s their way of putting out a show that Christians like and at the same time laughing at us because the people who are supposed to represent our values are reprehensible and abominable. Oh, the irony! Just like all the other major roles of wholesome WASPs played on TV who are just a bunch of degenerates.

  11. See that!! It can happen to anyone….it’s coming I’m afraid.


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.