Orwell's 1984 Comes to California

Rate this post

The Global Warming cabal claims to be based on Science, but their behavior says otherwise.
A fundamental and essential principle of Science is its openness to experimentation, debate, dissent, and contrary evidence. Now that people are becoming increasingly skeptical about the entire Global Warming contentions, evidence, and agenda,  the Warmists are turning to censorship to gag dissent. This is not science. The Global Warming movement is a Cult, made all the more dangerous because they have and wield political power.
~Eowyn
Forbidden Speech

By Jon Coupal – Howard Jarvis Tax Foundation – November 29, 2010
Philosophers have pondered and debated the question of “what is true?” for eons. Now, thanks to the bureaucrats at the California Air Resources Board (CARB), we have our answer: The truth is whatever CARB says it is, and those who utter forbidden opinions to the contrary will be punished.
Sounding like something from George Orwell, CARB is poised to adopt a regulation that literally “forbids” and “penalizes” opposing views. The resolution, which CARB dubs, “prohibition on false statements,” is frightening in that it would actually sanction communications to the agency during hearings or in the presentation of studies that CARB disagrees with. Apparently, CARB’s legal staff missed that whole bit on the First Amendment. In America, we don’t jail people for making “counter-revolutionary statements.”
Not surprisingly, it is usually the crackpot dictator forbidding dissent who plays fast and loose with the truth. CARB’s regulations which have so devastated the trucking industry were based on a discredited report by a “Dr.” Hien Tran, a CARB researcher who mail ordered his PhD from a phony university. However, even when it was discovered that Hien Tran had falsified his qualifications, CARB refused to fire him and stood by his study – a study that now even CARB itself admits overestimated pollution by more than 300%. If you are waiting for CARB to apply its new proposed rule to itself, don’t hold your breath.
That CARB seeks to squelch dissent before it even begins is not surprising. In the wake of Prop 23’s defeat, CARB is chafing at the bit to fully implement California’s one-of-a-kind “global warming solution” law known as AB 32. The last thing the agency wants is to have to contend with contrary views about complex issues – notwithstanding the fact that the so-called “consensus” on climate change has become much less of a consensus since the days of Al Gore.
Moreover, it is not just the science of climate change to which CARB has an allergic reaction to competing views. In attempting to measure the true cost of AB 32 on California’s economy, any suggestion that “green jobs” won’t be the miracle cure claimed by CARB and the investors behind Green Tech will be met with a reaction similar to that of a vampire to a crucifix.
Despite its lack of economic expertise, CARB and its allies are committed to a vision of California unhinged from reality. They believe that imposing price hikes during a recession will lead to this new “green jobs” economy. But that myth has already started to unravel with the closure of model green business, Solyndra’s first factory. Solyndra, a solar panel manufacturer, had once been hailed by the CARB cheering section as an example of many more green manufacturers to come. Yet despite hundreds of millions in subsidies and the support of the Governor and President Obama, the Solyndra closure illustrates how even green manufacturers have difficulty competing under our state’s crushing burden of high taxes and endless red tape….
CARB’s Chairwoman, Mary Nichols, is now proceeding “full speed ahead” with AB 32 implementation, effectively flooring the accelerator as she and her agency drive our economy over the cliff. “Forbidding” people from saying this may not be a good idea right now is the equivalent of Mary Nichols putting her hands on her ears and saying “la la la I can’t hear you la la la,” as taxpayers and business owners scream that she stop.
H/t my friend Bob W.
~Eowyn
Please follow and like us:
0
 

0 responses to “Orwell's 1984 Comes to California

  1. Honestly, Eowyn, California is more of a country than a state. Your point about the expectation for science to look at reasonable avenues of possibilities, which is the benchmark of science, is most appropriate given the Warmists’ non-scientific, narrow and fanciful dictatorial position. They have ulterior motives not based upon openness and disclosure.

     
  2. Good grief…lunatics down there I tell ya!

     
  3. In the immortal (though purposely-mangled-for-humor-and-a-PG-rating) words of Roman Moronie for these CARB left/libtards…

     
  4. Moronie was my favorite character in Johnny Dangerously.
    I love that movie.
    -Dave

     
  5. Well so the answer is fossil fuels til either we totally destroy the earth or start wwIII when the fossil fuels run out? I admit that some government regulation and policy is wack but without government the free market would completely poison and kill the lower class. It’s cheaper to not be safe.

     
    • “Well so the answer is fossil fuels til either we totally destroy the earth or start wwIII when the fossil fuels run out?”
      How on earth did you manage to derive that conclusion from my post?
      You are doing what the Global Warming ideologues do, which is to frighten and intimidate the whole world with your DOOMSDAY fear-mongering into surrendering our power and autonomy to the Global Warming Nazis.
      No, the ANSWER is to stop being hypocrites. The Warmists insist they’re doing “science” and that “the science is settled.” No, the science is not settled. I’m trained in and taught university courses in epistemology and the scientific method. If Warmists have even the slightest understanding of and respect for science, you and they will actually follow and honor the scientific process and principles of:
      1. Intersubjectivity and replicability: 2 or more similarly trained scientists must come to the same conclusion when they conduct the same experiment or examine the same empirical data. Instead, Warmists such as Phil Jones and Michael Mann form a conspiracy to censor dissenting views and data by blocking skeptical scientists from being published in peer-reviewed journals. The latter turn out to be cabal-reviewed journals. Shame on them!
      2. Empiricism: sticking to actual facts and sensory measurable data, instead of making Global Warming into a cult, which is what the UN’s IPCC did when it invented bogus data about the Himalayan ice melting and the disappearance of the Amazon rain forests.
      3. Openness to new or contrary evidence; and above all
      4. HONESTY.
      All in short supply among Warmists.

       
    • Ah yes, thank goodness the government will save us! The same government that has drowned us in debt and created job killing policies, thereby elevating the lower class!! Brilliant idea!!

       

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *