Obama's secret DOJ memo on killing US citizens

Rate this post

A secret Obama regime memo, detailing the circumstances and legal justification in which a US government may order the killing of an American citizen who is a high-ranking member of al-Qaida, has just been leaked.
Titled “Department of Justice White Paper,” a copy of the 16-page memo was obtained by NBC.
The memo gives a very wide latitude and flexibility to the Executive Branch of the U.S. government to decide whether an individual is “a senior al-Qaida member” and when and how that individual poses “an imminent threat” to U.S. national security. Add to all this the fact that the memo insists the President needs not consult or obtain the court’s approval.
Peter Beaumont reports for the UK’s Guardian, Feb. 5, 2013, that the document, dating from 2011, lays out for the first time the precise rationale for carrying out targeted killings of senior al-Qaida members who are US citizens, and who are believed to pose an “imminent threat of violent attack” against Amercia.

Although the white paper deals specifically with the issue of when and how the president can order the killing of a US citizen who is a member of al-Qaida, it also provides one of the most comprehensive accounts of the wider international legal framework the US believes supports its controversial drones policy.
Although the paper does not specify the “minimum legal requirements” for launching such an operation, it insists that the killing would be constitutionally justified as the United States is engaged in an “armed conflict”, as defined by international law and authorized by Congress, with al-Qaida and its affiliates.
In a key passage in the document – which is unsigned – it argues that for a US citizen who has rights under the due process clause and the fourth amendment, “that individual’s citizenship would not immunize from a lethal operation”.
The paper concludes: “Where certain circumstances are met, a lethal operation against a US citizen who is a senior operational leader of al-Qaida … and who himself poses an imminent threat of violent attack against the United States, would not violate the constitution.”
The leaking of the documents came as eight Democratic and three Republican senators wrote to Barack Obama requesting the disclosure of all the legal opinions drawn up at his request authorizing the killing of Americans.
The question of the constitutionality of such operations emerged after the killing of Anwar al-Awlaki, a US-born radical Muslim cleric, in a drone strike in Yemen in September 2011. Although the leaked paper is not understood to be the legal determination that authorized that killing, it is understood to mirror it.
The paper argues that the operation must be consistent with the laws of war, and that capture of the individual must have be found to be unfeasible. But in a number of areas, it controversially appears to give considerable flexibility to administration officials to define key issues.
Those include defining the imminence of the specific threat and the operational seniority of the target, considerations outside of the overview of the US courts. The paper insists the decision to authorize a lethal operation may be made by an “informed, high-level official of the US government”, rather than by the courts.
On the issue of imminence, the justification is particularly wide-reaching: as attacks are “continually” being planned by al-Qaida, it is argued, “imminence must incorporate considerations of the relevant window of opportunity.”
The paper justifies the exclusion of the courts by arguing that “judicial enforcement of such orders would require the court to supervise inherently predictive judgments by the president and his national security advisers as to when and how to use force against a member of an enemy force against which Congress has authorized the use of force.”
The leaking of the document, with its dense legal argument justifying the targeted killings of US citizens, is certain to escalate the arguments that have been swirling around the issue.
Speaking to the New York Times, Hina Shamsi, director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s national security project, denounced the memorandum as “a profoundly disturbing document”, adding: “It’s hard to believe that it was produced in a democracy built on a system of checks and balances. It summarizes in cold legal terms a stunning overreach of executive authority: the claimed power to declare Americans a threat and kill them, far from a recognized battlefield and without any judicial involvement.”
Here’s the URL of the 16-page memo, “Department of Justice White Paper”:
If that URL doesn’t work, I’ve saved the pdf document to FOTM’s Media Library. Click here: DOJ_White_Paper
Now do you see what 9/11 and the subsequent War on Terror spawned? We have gone from George W. Bush’s troubling Patriot Act to this monstrosity of Obama’s kill memo. 🙁
Please follow and like us:

0 responses to “Obama's secret DOJ memo on killing US citizens

  1. So you’re saying, if I step out from my outdoor shower, with a suspicious black and white checked towel wrapped around my head, I may have just given Mr. O all the pretext he needs to accu-bolt me with a hellfire missile?
    Oh, that is not good.
    Again, both Left and Right view this president’s actions as profoundly troubling.

  2. Welcome to your new world. If you have a hello kitty bubble gun, better hide it now!

  3. Reblogged this on Thepoliticalchef's Blog and commented:
    Wow…just wow

  4. I’m waiting for the outcry of the left, especially given what Bush did. They should be beyond themsleves, yet I won’t hold my breath.

  5. They’re so “on” this one, huh? Got it all mapped out in writing. But when it came to PROTECTING Americans in Benghazi we just didn’t seem to have a clear course of action.

  6. Is there such a thing as schitzophrenics anonymous?
    ONe minute we are training Al Quada to attack Syria and arranging for arms to get to them, work with them so we can get Qadaffi, then use them as a pretext to have France overwhelm Mali on their way to Algeria and Nigeria and anywhere else uranium is to be found, and then issue an order allowing the Commander in Chief or in dire circumstances someone with high rank, to drone attack or bomb an American citizen without any verification that can be watched and adjudicated by anyone except someone like Brennan or Valerie Jarrett?
    What kind of policy is this? Instead of getting worried about ourselves perhaps we should just insist that anyone who has anything to do with arranging this policy is judged first, are they are threat to the US population and our Republic? They should be tried for treason against We the People and if they plead insanity, then Duh!!!

  7. It’s not American talibastards these drones will ultimately be used on.
    Remember what Big Sis said about white male Christian conservatives way back in the early part of the comrade Dear Ruler’s reign?

  8. I just got an idea, another take on this thing. His whole policy if you could call it that, his modus operandi, his declared intention is misleading, or as he puts it “leading from behind”. In other words, GOING BACKWARDS.
    How can we follow something that is going backwards.
    How can we follow someone that who has fallen so far behind the notion of what a human being is and should be developing into, is tantamount to embracing the New Dark Age which he will most certainly usher in as he and Tony Blair hurtle back towards the undoing of the Treaty of Westphalia, they are in a Time Machine that has taken leave of it’s senses, it has started to unwind, or unravel.
    Tipping out, or whatever you call it when something comes undone, when it comes apart. His pants aren’t just sagging, they’re all around his ankles. I think he’s tripping……………………..AND IT’S A BAD TRIP.
    Not even the least reputable pusher would survive dealing this type of drug. Those banksters must be really desperate if this is the best they can come up with. There’s not a dime in it for any of them to launder.
    So there it is.

  9. As to the last 2 sentences of the article . This is what happens when you fall into the trap of the left/ right paradigm . There is NO difference . De-population is their goal. , The sooner you grasp that concept , the better of you will be . T.P.T.B.don’t give a rats ass about the ” common folk ” paying the bills . We are nothing but cannon – fodder in their eyes . USEFUL-IDIOTS ……………………….

  10. Thank you Dr. Eowyn for this informative post. Remember, “Absolute power corrupts absolutely.” The check and balance system set forth within the Constitution is essentially null and void as long as the king is in power.

    • joandare, i have to aggressively beg to differ regarding your comment. Just because the king claims the checks and balance system is null and void does not make it so. However, i do support your claim that we have no checks and balances right now but only because we the people are allowing it to be so. The constitution is a potent instrument given to us by our forefathers to protect us from just this type of thing, yet “we” are seemingly choosing not to use it.


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.