Obama Releases Birth Certificate, after 2+ Years. UPDATE!

Rate this post

UPDATE:
Here are some anomalies that I am sure  people will ask questions about.
• If the original document was in a bound volume (as reflected by the curvature of the left hand side of the certificate), how can the green patterned background of the document’s safety paper be so seamless?
• Why, if Obama was born on August 4, 1961, was the “Date Accepted by Local Reg.” four days later on August 8, 1961?
• What is the significance of the smudges in the box containing the name of the reported attendant?
• David A. Sinclair, the M.D. who purportedly signed the document, died nearly eight years ago at age 81. So he is conveniently unavailable to answer questions about Obama’s reported birth.
• In the “This Birth” box there are two mysterious Xs above “Twin” and “Triplet.” Is there a sibling or two unaccounted for?
• What is the significance of the mysterious numbers, seen vertically, on the document’s right side?
• Finally, the “Signature of Local Registrar” in box 21 may be a desperate attempt at establishing the document’s Hawaiian authenticity. Note to forgers: it is spelled “Ukulele.”


Please examine both these birth certificates, notice the date of birth on the bottom one , Aug 5, 1961 and then notice the birth certicate number at the top under Department of Health, 61 10637. Now look at Obama’s, DOB Aug 4, 1961 and then the birth certificate number 61 10641. Now I am not an expert but why would a birth that took place a day before the other one have a higher birth certificate number, just asking.
Tom in NC

Please follow and like us:
0
 

0 responses to “Obama Releases Birth Certificate, after 2+ Years. UPDATE!

  1. No official raised seal. Possible forgery. Who cares. No time to get him out before next election anyway. Mom was from KS??!

     
  2. Mr Bott took most of the words out of my mouth. I would say it is a forgery too for the same reason. If an embossed seal shows up on some others I have seen, it should on this one also and there is none!
    But we can’t stop trying because it would make all that he has done null and void no matter when it has been proved. They have to go back and overturn everything!

     
  3. Someone on another site made the point about the father’s race being listed as “African” and that, back in 1961 – before the onslaught of Political Correctness – it would have said “Negro.” Is “African” a RACE? Why isn’t the mother’s race listed as “American?”
    Is this a slip-up?
    Regardless, the questions still loom: why so long in the coming and why now? Who knew him at Harvard? Where are the school-chums from the past who can testify to knowing him? Why did he travel to Pakistan in the 80’s?
    Why did we know everything about Joe the Plumber – within hours of his curbside interview – his financial status, tax history, marriage situation, work license status, voting history – but so mch still lingers about our President?

     
    • It’s congenitally impossible for anyone of the left/liberal presuasion to utter or write the word “Negro” under any circumstances… better to let white stodgy/elderly conservatives look racist.
      But, seriously, they found a 39-year-old MD so progressive as to use “African” in 1961 when it was cutting-edge avante guard liberal, if not radical, to use “Black” and 95% of folk there who could be called that were mainlanders from the States? Possible, just seems quite odd.

       
  4. lowtechgrannie

    Hawaii has always been a racial melting pot so I wouldn’t argue with the word “African” being used to identify “race”. In fact, the certificate makes clear that his father was NOT A CITIZEN. To me, that makes the constitutional case for ineligibility.
    As to validity, I’d need an expert’s opinion. I do think Trump’s making it an issue is the reason the Obama Team finally caved in after two years.

     
  5. It was a matter of time before CLB made it’s historical appearance. The procrastanation was to insur all the “I”s were dotted and “T”s crossed. What powers prevail, that American Governments never made the initial request of proof? The ride for Americans has only begun. Preparedness will be the only course of survivability.

     
  6. The birth certificate is a fake like its presenter.
    Looks like the check register for a commercial bank account!

     
    • Well, most gov’t documents look about like that. Anything too clean and sharp is probably a forgery… remember forgers take time, effort and care, gov’t bureaucrats just slap something together and go on to the next one (or lunch).

       
  7. Something stinks but what really shocked me was the attitude over at Newsbusters calling the so called birther’s “silly”. My patience has officially worn out at these so called conservative sites, at Glenn Beck, hell even my favorite guy Mark Levin. Let’s just burn the effing constitution and be done with it since eligibility questions are now “silly” question.
    I think it’s about time I cut ties with all of them. Every. Last. One. We so called silly people make up a good chunk of their listeners, readers and supporters. We were there when they tried to shut your asses down using the fairness doctrine, the MSM and even the White House. We did not ask for you to support our position but to respect it as a valid issue.
    All we received was friendly fire for our efforts to up hold the constitution and to make sure everyone played by the rules.
    Thanks guys your support was most helpful. \sarc

     
  8. Investigative reporter Wayne Madsen, who broke the story of Obama being a member of a Chicago gay man’s club, has this reaction to Obama’s purported birth certificate:

    Wayne Madsen (Washington)
    “On the long form birth certificate, Obama Sr’s race is listed as “African”. That race designation will come as a surprise to white Kenyans, South Africans, and Rhodesians. Also will surprise Arabs of north Africa and euro- French from Algeria. The designation for race in 1961 in the USA was “Negro”. One of obama’s staffers screwed up big time.”

    http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/articles/20110426_2 (for subscribers only)

     
    • Good info Ewoyn but when the people who should be watching your back is trying to stab you instead will just ignore it as another “silly” distraction that we dumb as a box of rocks “birthers” are trying to cling onto and we should just let it go because we make them look bad.
      Don’t these morons get it!? No matter what we do liberals will NEVER like us, they will NEVER see us in a good light, they will NEVER accept us. We will always look bad to them. All of them. In every media outlet known to mankind. The only way we would ever look good to a liberal if we written a suicide note saying they were right and blew our own brains out.
      We are eating our own.

       
  9. Compare this to the Nordyke’s birth certificate – WHAT’s missing??? Look at the bottom of Obama’s nothing there but a stamp signature….now look at Nordyke’s, which states:
    ” THIS CERTIFIES THAT THE ABOVE IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL RECORD ON FILE ……”
    Then this is followed by two signatures, one by the Director of Health, the other by the Registrar General, also includes a date 5/5/1966 when it was issued?
    VERY STRANGE

     
    • Yes, the copies were made 45 years apart. In 1966, they didn’t have green crosshatch security paper and photocopy machines.

       
  10. We are not screwed yet Steve not, until “We The People” say so.

     
  11. lol, all circumstantial. Move on, buy a life!

     
  12. Another lie.

     
  13. is it possible to believe anything that obama says or does? and the problem is way to many americans really think that obama is doing a good. and will believe anything that he says and think that fox news is some kind of evil right wing conspiracy and that republicans and tea partiers are extremeists. he could hold up a napkin and say its his birth certificate and a large part of our country would yell see he has a birth certificate. and jon stewart and comedy central news would spend hours poking fun at any one who thought that the napkin was a fake.

     
    • Concur igor…this may be real (not buying it) yet why release it now? What about all his other records?
      Just can’t trust this man on anything he says…

       
      • DCG,
        Given the Obamanista’s track record of lies, distortions, miss-truths, half-truths, falsehoods, constantly pulling the wool over our eyes, and the daily general BS these people spew, I’m not buying it yet, either.
        -Dave

         
  14. Stamp reads:
    “I Certify this is a true copy OR ABSTRACT OF TXE (sic) Record on File…..
    1. THE is spelled TXE??
    2. This is a copy of the ABSTRACT of the Record on File. Why??
    3. Obama was adopted at age 3,,4,5,6?? His name was changed OFICIALLY to Barry Soetero (sp?) or something. He was a citizen of Indonesia.
    4. School Records indicate this.
    5. When he returned to the States as a child, he was still known as BARRY S.
    6. He traveled on an Indonesian passport to Pakistan.
    7. He never OFFICIALLY changed his name back to his birth name. He just started to refer to himself by his birth name as a young adult.
    8. My theory..He received foreign aid for school. Thats why no school records. Wrote both books as OBAMA when he was still OFFICIALLY Barry S from Indonesia. Ran into problems with IL when his law license app indicated his name was Barak Obama AND he answered “NO” to the question…Have you ever been known by any other name? That is the reason he voluntarily gave up license.
    ALL HIS RECORDS indicate Barry Soetero, NOT Barak Obama.
    IT’S THE COVER-UP. He doesn’t want to explain that he has never changed his name from Soetero officially and has been lying all this time.
    Original birth certificates are pulled when an adoption occurs and a new certificate issued with the adopted fathers name listed and childs name changed.
    There IS AN ORIGINAL CERTIFICATE IN HI, but under the name BARRY SOETERO. He is also a citizen of Indonesia and has an Indonesia passport.

     
  15. By the way, I still think all birthers should be shot or otherwise killed in some brutal fashion.
    you are traitors to this country, lying about the president like you do.

     
    • Hey, you looneytunes from Port Angeles, Washington. I see you’re back, with yet another IP address. Admit it, you whose first alias was “killthebirthers,” you just can’t stay away from this blog ’cause you just love us. Admit it!
      ~Eowyn
      IP addresses used by Mr. Looneytunes:
      24.236.152.71
      24.113.150.252
      24.113.22.31
      24.113.151.251
      24.113.152.38
      24.113.18.55
      24.113.18.162
      24.113.145.190

       
    • I think America-hating commie scum like you should be rousted out of bed in the middle of the night, frogmarched at gunpoint to the nearest airport, handed a one-way ticket to North Korea, and if you resist even in the slightest, hogtied and thrown into the cargo hold.
      BTW, you mindless Soros-servicing Obamabot, questioning the eligibility of a sitting POTUS is not treason.
      And shouldn’t you be busy putting the finishing touches on that big red parade float?
      After all, May Day is fast approaching, and if you don’t get all that red decoration stuff on that float, your local commissar is not going to be happy with you, and might just pack your red ass off to a North Korean gulag himself.
      LOL – Wouldn’t that be a crying shame.
      PS: How do you like your dog prepared, comrade?
      -Dave

       
  16. Interesting vid on youtube about O’s birth certificate:

     
  17. I know I’m one of the few here that doesn’t champion this issue but I’ll tell you why and you can decide for yourself if it’s valid or not.
    1. For those of us who spend as much time as we do staying on top of the day-to-day politics of DC, there are many, many more who do not. It’s almost hard to understand sometimes just how many voters out there really have no idea for whom, or what they’re voting.
    2. As much damage as Obama’s done during his first term, a lame duck Obama would have no impetus in compromise at all. At least since Nov ’10 he’s had to swallow the hard pill of opposition.
    3. The “birther” issue divides the right and galvanizes the left.
    4. “Birthers” are branded -wrongly, in my opinion- but no amount of evidence will change that.
    5. The media is still far too powerful and given that they’ve chosen sides, you’ll not get anyone of any standing to investigate the “birther” claims with the intent to prove them true; rather, they will always set out to prove them wrong. Just like a push poll, they’ll always get the results they desire.
    I’ve stated it here before, the consequences of an invalid presidency, especially during a time of war, would be catastrophic for our country. We can undo ObamaCare, spending, the EPA, and Obama himself, but we can’t bring back the lives of people we’ve killed under an illegitimate Commander in Chief.
    Additionally, what we’re seeing is exactly why this issue was prolonged by the White House: Conservative in-fighting. Turning on each other is what the left wants; it’s their only hope for retaining power.
    So what I propose is this: If you are adamant in your resolve to overthrow the Obama presidency in 2012 on the basis of the birther issue, then keep that fire and vote. Continue to make your case if that helps keep you motivated, but don’t denigrate those who chose not to make this their most important issue yet likewise want to remove and replace arguably the worst occupant 1600 Penn Ave has ever housed. Some might want him gone over his position on abortion; some for his positions regarding energy or labor. All are good reasons to put him in the unemployment line where he left so many others. We’ll need every Conservative, Republican, and RINO vote we can muster to relegate Obama to the history books, along with the policies that are driving this country back to the 1930’s. Circular firing squads won’t make that happen.
    I’m not a big tent guy, but we can’t change what needs to be changed all at once. It’ll take a while to get the right people in place, starting at the local and state level. A divided Conservative vote could set us back a long time.
    By the way, the UKL Lee, thing? Really? What are the chances?

     
  18. Candance Moore

    I suspect that Nordyne has a smaller number because even though she was born later her paper got filed first. Four days is indeed a long turnaround for something like that.

     
  19. BK I don’t think anyone has to worry about losing votes. I think I can safely say that no matter what happens, we all are going to turn out to vote, even if it may be for (God forbids) the “Donald”. I don’t think anyone is going to hold their breath till they turn blue and withhold their votes to get back at anyone ( I can say for certain I won’t). Yes there will be skirmishes some infighting but in the end we will pull together on this.
    With that said I despise when people tell me to look and “question with boldness” (Glenn Beck little catch phrase) but then tell me to STFU when I question the wrong thing at the wrong time. Look I know we have bigger fish to fry but instead of showing folks like us some decorum we have other conservatives jumping on the same bandwagon with liberals yelling heretic.
    Like I said we will pull together. I will be there right beside you (in spirit) pulling the lever for anyone who can get this freak of nature out of office but by the grace of God if we take back the presidency and the Senate, I will remember all that took their shot at us. Politicians are not the only ones who need donations.
    Does it sound selfish…maybe, hell, I would not fault you if you did, but I don’t give money to people who openly ridicule me then come by asking for my support to keep their website up.
    I give this a week (two tops) and everyone will be pulling together again, and cooler heads will once again prevail. We still have a year and some change it won’t last forever.
    As always we appreciate your 2 cents.

     
  20. I just hope I don’t get blown all the way to Chattanooga tonight, ’cause it’s getting a little stormy around here.
    -Dave

     
  21. What makes you think the birth certificates of the Nordyke twins are authentic, given the discrepancies in the dates listed on line 18b of the certificates of the Nordyke twins?

     

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *