Obama Mom's Passport Records Destroyed

Again and again, one judge after another has refused to grant a hearing for lawsuits challenging the Sociopath’s constitutional birth eligibility to be President. Those lawsuits have been brought by a 2008 presidential candidate, Dr. Alan Keyes; active and retired U.S. military officers; attorneys; as well as ordinary U.S. citizens. In every case, the judge denied a hearing with the same procedural (instead of substantive) excuse — the plaintiff “lacks standing.”
U.S. citizen Christopher Strunk sought to get some answers by using a different method — filing a Freedom of Information Act request for the passport records of Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham. In response to Strunk’s dogged persistence, the State Department finally released her records.
But there’s a catch: Dunham’s passport records prior to 1965 have been destroyed! This means there are no passport records of Dunham that could confirm or disconfirm whether she had traveled out of the United States to, say, Kenya, before Obama’s birth.  
Something STINKS. No wonder fewer than 1 of 4 American voters actually believe our government has legitimacy.
H/t beloved Fellowship co-founder Steve and member Tina.
~Eowyn

A phantom president with a phantom mother

Oops! Obama mama passport ‘destroyed’

By Jerome R. Corsi – WorldNetDaily – August 1, 2010
Last week, in response to a Freedom of Information Act request, the State Department released passport records of Stanley Ann Dunham, President Obama’s mother – but those records for the years surrounding Obama’s 1961 birth are missing.
The State Department claims that a 1980s General Services Administration directive had resulted in the destruction of many passport applications and other “non-vital” passport records, including Dunham’s 1965 passport application and any other passports she may have applied for or held prior to 1965.
Destroyed, then, would also be any records shedding light on whether Dunham did or did not travel out of the country around the time of Barack Obama’s birth.
The claim made in the FOIA response letter that many passport records were destroyed during the 1980s comes despite a statement on the State Department website that claims Passport Services maintains U.S. passport records for passports issued from 1925 to the present.
[…] Also revealed by the released records is a heretofore unknown, alternative name for Barack Obama. In the 1968 application to renew her 1965 passport, Dunham listed as her son Barack Hussein Obama, including in parenthesis below the name, “Saebarkah,” in what appears to be a variation of an Indonesian surname not previously associated in the public record with the president.


S. Ann Dunham in Indonesia

[…] Ann Dunham died Nov. 7, 1995, and was known to have been in Indonesia in 1994 when an Indonesian doctor first misdiagnosed as indigestion the first signs of the ovarian cancer that was the cause of her death the following year.
The released documents shed no light on proving or disproving whether Ann Dunham might have held a passport prior to Barack Obama’s birth that she could have used to travel to Kenya for his birth, as has been speculated in the absence of the release of Obama’s long-form birth certificate from Hawaii..
The State Department released the documents on July 29, responding to a FOIA request submitted by Christopher Strunk, a New York resident who has actively pursued obtaining documents regarding Barack Obama’s birth and his eligibility to be president under the “natural born citizen” requirement of Section 1, Article Two of the United States Constitution.
The Ann Dunham passport documents released last week by the State Department in response to the Strunk FOIA request have been archived on the Internet.
A prominent array of commentators, including Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Michael Savage, Mark Levin, Lou Dobbs, Peter Boyles and WND’s Chuck Norris and Pat Boone have all said unequivocally and publicly that the Obama eligibility issue continues to be legitimate and worthy. Longtime New York radio talker Lynn Samuels did the same. “We don’t even know where he was born,” she said. “I absolutely believe he was not born in this country.”
Read the rest of the WND article HERE.

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Doc's Wife
Doc's Wife
10 years ago

These people have scrubbed everything!! My hope is that one day soon someone will find something they missed. Maybe then we can get rid of this imposter!

microserf
microserf
10 years ago

There has to be a way to verify this, they could not have gotten rid of everything. tax records, immigration documents, border crossings, flight manifests, fathers passports, family birth certificates…surely some paper trail exists that hasn’t been thought of…

microserf
microserf
10 years ago

there was a rumor he may have even been born in vancouver as the mother crossed into canada around that time as well, has anyone looked into canadian medical records at major vancouver or british columbia hospitals

microserf
microserf
10 years ago

Eowyn, he went to Canada on his first foreign trip and the first thing he said was “I love this country” and walked around like a beaver in heat. Maybe that’s where his socialist views come in. The rumor of him being born in Canada is well known there. someone should look into it.

Doc's Wife
Doc's Wife
10 years ago

Steve–that mother had the morals of a cat! No telling who she was with or how many times she was married. I know she died of ovarian cancer. Wonder if that could be the result of too many men? I believe promiscuity can lead to cervical CA.

Anonymous
Anonymous
10 years ago
Reply to  Doc's Wife

Then there are her nude pictures from before the “had” to get married…

Dave
Editor
10 years ago

Adolf Hitler had his childhood home razed and all of his mother’s records destroyed.
Just sayin.’
-Dave

tina
10 years ago

the guy in his administration by the name of John Brennan,he was the brave one that got rid of all of this!!!! He should enjoy his time also,cause here shortly he might be very confined.

smrstrauss
smrstrauss
1 year ago

There were no records prior to 1965. None, and so they cannot have been destroyed.
BTW: Every file has the date on which it was created, and for some odd reason——now I wonder what that could be—–Strunk did not mention the date on the file that he got.
Now why do you suppose? IF the date that the file was created was 1961 surely he would have been delighted to mention that fact. But he didn’t. Now why do you suppose? Could the file have been created in 1965?