Obama Is Creating a Civilian Military Force

Rate this post

Do you remember these astonishing words uttered by Barack Obama during the 2008 presidential campaign? On July 2, 2008, in Colorado Springs, Colorado, Obama deviated from his pre-released speech script and said the following:

“We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”

Obama never explained what he meant by those unsettling words. But Rahm Emanuel, who is Obama’s White House Chief of Staff, did say in a 2006 interview with the New York Daily News that all Americans aged 18-25 should be inducted into “universal civil defense training” — in effect, a civilian military corps. Emanuel’s idea is also contained in his co-authored book, The Plan. Here’s the audio of the interview:

All of which is evocative of the Hitler Jugend (Hitler Youth Movement) and Soviet Union’s Leninist Young Pioneers. What Obama proposed in his Colorado Springs speech also just happens to be against a federal law, the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878. Here’s what wikipedia says

The Posse Comitatus Act is a United States federal law (18 U.S.C. § 1385) passed on June 18, 1878, after the end of Reconstruction, with the intention… of substantially limiting the powers of the federal government to use the military for law enforcement. The Act prohibits most members of the federal uniformed services (today the Army, Air Force, and State National Guard forces when such are called into federal service) from exercising nominally state law enforcement, police, or peace officer powers that maintain “law and order” on non-federal property (states and their counties and municipal divisions) within the United States.
The statute generally prohibits federal military personnel and units of the National Guard under federal authority from acting in a law enforcement capacity within the United States, except where expressly authorized by the Constitution or Congress. The Coast Guard is exempt from the Act during peacetime.

It is those words of Obama in Colorado Springs that should raise concerns about news that he has issued an Executive Order to create a Council of Governors, comprised of ten hand-picked state governors and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) officials, to “advise” on “homeland security” and “military activities” within the United States. Recall that last April, a leaked DHS internal memo identified as “potential terrorists,” not radical Islamists such as Fort Hood jihadist murderer Nidal Malik Hasan, but veterans, conservatives, Christians, pro-lifers, and pro-2nd Amendment Americans!
More distressing still is the fact that this Council of Governors, like Obama’s many “czars,” is a done deal by virtue of the fact that the Council is a creation of a presidential executive order, which does not require the scrutiny and approval of Congress.


Executive order creates team of governors to address ‘homeland defense’
By Bob Unruh – Jan 12, 2010
President Obama by executive order has established a new “Council of Governors” designated to advise on the “synchronization and integration of state and federal military activities in the United States.” The recent order, posted on the White House website, was accompanied by the explanation that the group is to work “to protect our nation against all types of hazards.” It comes just weeks after the president issue a similarly obscure order vastly expanding INTERPOL’s privileges in the U.S.

The White House said the new council is to include governors and administration officials to review “such matters as involving the National Guard of the various states; homeland defense, civil support; synchronization and integration of state and federal military activities in the United States; and other matters of mutual interest pertaining to National Guard, homeland defense, and civil support activities.”
However, there was no definition of what would be included in the group’s authority. Can the council recommend “military activities” and can the governors, who already are in command of their own state guard units, mandate activities outside of their areas of jurisdiction? The White House did not respond to WND questions on the issue.
The previous order regarding INTERPOL caused concern for some in the U.S. because it exempts the international police force from such oversight as the Freedom of Information Act in the U.S. At the ThreatsWatch.org website, authors Steve Schippert and Clyde Middleton said Obama’s order will lead to further erosions of American sovereignty. “In light of what we know and can observe, it is our logical conclusion that President Obama’s Executive Order amending President Ronald Reagans’ 1983 EO 12425 and placing INTERPOL above the United States Constitution and beyond the legal reach of our own top law enforcement is a precursor to more damaging moves,” they wrote.  “When the paths on the road map converge – Iraq withdrawal, Guantánamo closure, perceived American image improved internationally, and an empowered INTERPOL in the United States – it is probable that President Barack Obama will once again make America a signatory to the International Criminal Court. It will be a move that surrenders American sovereignty to an international body whose INTERPOL enforcement arm has already been elevated above the Constitution and American domestic law enforcement,” they said. “For an added and disturbing wrinkle, INTERPOL’s central operations office in the United States is within our own Justice Department offices. They are American law enforcement officers working under the aegis of INTERPOL within our own Justice Department. That they now operate with full diplomatic immunity and with ‘inviolable archives’ from within our own buildings should send red flags soaring into the clouds,” they said.
The new governors panel, which the White House said was called for in the Fiscal Year 2008 National Defense Authorization Act, will include 10 governors picked by the president as well as the Coast Guard commandant and other officials from the Department of Homeland Security and other agencies.
The White House announcement said the council “will provide an invaluable senior administration forum for exchanging views with state and local officials on strengthening our national resilience and the homeland defense and civil support challenges facing our nation today and in the future.”
Los Angeles Times blogger Andrew Malcolm poked fun at the announcement,  writing Obama “has determined that, a) there is an insufficient number of advisory bodies among the gazillion already in existence for the federal government in general and said president and his White House specifically.” Obama also, Malcolm said, “chooses to ignore the existence of the National Governors Assn., the Republican Governors Assn., the Democratic Governors Assn. and the secure telephones within arms-reach of virtually everywhere said president chooses to sit and/or recline. Ultimately, he said, Obama has decided, “One more meaningless advisory body probably couldn’t hurt anything, and might actually look good.”
At Canada Free Press, commentary writer Judi McLeod said, “Like the 30-plus czars running America with neither the people’s nor the congress’s blessings, the Council of Governors is already a done deal.”
Blogger Nicholas Contompasis suggested it was the “first step towards martial law in America” because it sets up the “use of federal troops and the combination of state and federal agencies under the Defense Department.” Participants on his forum page said the order appears to be in defiance of posse comitatus, which restricts U.S. military action within the United States. One contributor noted the order talks about “hazards” but then addresses only military hazards. “The very notion of the executive branch (good intentions or not) issuing executive orders/presidential directives that apply to anything or anyone not specifically within the executive branch is tyrannical,” the forum participant said.

Please follow and like us:

12 responses to “Obama Is Creating a Civilian Military Force

  1. Well, here it comes and I hope this doesn’t surprise anyone with half a brain. Our Constitutional rights are being further stripped away and now this administration trying to eliminate our national sovereignty. I’ve said it once and I will say it again, I will not recognize any other law other than our Constitution. I am a firm believer that it better to fight and die to perserve freedom than to live as a slave to globalism. I pray it won’t come to that but I know God did not put me here to bow before evil, and I also know he gives me strength to combat the evil forces at work in our world today.
    As a veteran I never had to fire on a fellow human being , never had to take a life and I know it would not be an easy thing to do, but I know deep down that if came to my life, the life of a compatriot and an enemy of this great nation either foreign or domestic, they’d better be prepared for a fight…to the death!

    • Tom,
      I’m fully prepared to die defending, protecting, and preserving the U.S. Constitution and the original vision of the Founding Fathers — right along your side. Although I don’t know how to use a gun, I’m a fast learner!

      • Don’t worry Eowyn there will be plenty of fellow Patriots to show you how, just remember to aim dead center that way it you are off some you will hit something.

  2. Steve,
    I want to know what the governors of the 40 states who will be left out of Obama’s Council of Governors think and say! Only TEN governors will be in the Council, all handpicked by The Imposter in the White House.

  3. I hear you Steve and as far as the constitutionality of these healthcare bills are concerned I don’t think the courts can get involved until the bill is finalized and signed by Obama, I could be wrong but I think that is the process.
    I would rather that these monstrosities never see the light of day and get struck down before they ever make it to Obama’s desk.

  4. This is, without a doubt, a complete nightmare! I will fight as best as I can. I have been a fighter all of my life!
    We must never forget to pray to Our Lord daily for our country, which is more powerful than anything we can do. Americans must come back to Our Lord and have personal conversion. I think that all of the opposition towards Obama is part of that conversion.

  5. Eowyn–if I can shoot a gun, then you can certainly learn! My Papa in MS. starting teaching me when I was about twelve. My grandmother did not approve, but I loved it and developed a great respect for guns. I keep my double-barrel ready at all times since I we live in the middle of nowhere!

  6. I’m pretty sure Obama is just talking about giving more funding to community building programs, not creating some sort of civilian militia. What would this militia even do? What purpose would it serve? Who would even do that? This kinda of stuff is exactly what the framers worried about, and why we have an electoral college instead of direct voting for the president — because we can’t trust the masses (aka gun-crazy ultra-conservatives) to think for themselves. It seems like the only civilian militia in the United States is the one being started by you and your commenters.
    Also, INTERPOL is pretty much a powerless research institution. They can’t even make arrests! I really wouldn’t worry about them, they are a pretty insignificant international organization that focuses on forged goods and illegal drugs. They have about the same budget as a large American high school.

    • Matt,
      I have no idea where you got the idea that “It seems like the only civilian militia in the United States is the one being started by you and your commenters.”
      Who’s “you”? If you’re referring to me, the author of this post, not only have I not joined a militia, I don’t even know how to use a gun. Nor do I know of any regular commenter on this blog being a member of a militia.
      I sure hope you are right in being so sanguine!

    • I’m pretty sure Obama is just talking about giving more funding to community building programs, not creating some sort of civilian militia
      What, did you and The Traitor have a conversation on the golf course on Sunday during the President of Poland’s funeral?

  7. Pingback: URL

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.