Not buying her claim…

Rate this post

Government worker hard at work

Why am I not surprised?  Argh…

Washington State pays workers to sit home and do nothing

Via King5: Since 2007 at least 350 state employees have been instructed to sit home and collect a paycheck, vacation, sick days and full benefits. All they have to do is stay at home during their shift and be near the phone in case the state needs their service.
These employees are on “home assignment” because they’ve been accused of wrongdoing on the job. The idea is to keep them away from the workplace so the state can conduct a swift and fair investigation.
The KING 5 Investigators have found there’s nothing swift about some of these investigations. Through public records, KING 5 identified employees who have been on the clock, but off the job for weeks, months, and in some cases years; all at taxpayer expense.
Tammy Jo France of Tacoma worked for seven years as a residential rehabilitation counselor at the Special Commitment Center (SPCC) on McNeil Island, where the state houses the most dangerous sexually violent predators.
But for the majority of those years, France never stepped foot on McNeil Island. Instead, her workday involved activities such as making coffee in her kitchen, taking care of her cat, tending to her garden and playing the popular Facebook game, Farmville.
“That was how I worked; in my residence playing Farmville,” said France. “Am I thankful that I got paid? Yes, I am. But it was still wrong, the way I got paid, because I did nothing to earn my paycheck.
The taxpayers of Washington state paid France to sit at home while collecting a salary of $36,500 a year plus vacation, sick pay and full benefits. The pay while sitting at home also boosted her pension. This routine went on for three years and seven months. It sounds like a version of winning the lottery, but France says the extended time at home was an insult to taxpayers and other state workers. She actually wanted to work.
“You have all kinds of state workers around this state that had to take furlough days off, without pay, because the state didn’t have money. But yet (they) had money enough to pay me to sit home for three and a half years,” said France. “How do you justify that?”
DSHS sent France home in 2007 after a convicted rapist at the SCC accused her of smuggling pornography and food into the facility for him and of secretly borrowing money from him.  The Washington State Patrol and the FBI launched an investigation. France received a letter from DSHS telling her she was officially on paid leave until the investigation concluded. A portion of that letter states:
You are assigned to your home with full pay and benefits until further notice. While at home you are required to remain at your residence and reachable by telephone at all times during your normal scheduled work shift (which)…will be 8:00 a.m. until 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Your days off will continue to be Saturday and Sunday.
I was a prisoner in my own home from 8 to 4 Monday through Friday,” said France. “You can only clean so much. You can only read so much. You can only watch TV so much. It’s like being in a prison.”
Read more about other workers paid to stay home while “investigations” continued here.
I am not surprised that this occurs within state government/union employees. Remember the New York school teachers that were paid to do nothing?  Maybe she wouldn’t have felt like a “prisoner” if she was being paid to do “union activities” or “official time”.
What really ticks me off about this woman is that she plays the “victim”, she’s a “prisoner”, while all the time drawing a salary, benefits, AND a pension.  Was she legally bound to continue working for the state so that she couldn’t be bothered to look for another job?  If your private sector company laid you off for a false claim, you’d be out looking for another job to pay the bills and your attorney to sue the former employer.
If she ACTUALLy wanted to work, why not say, “screw this”, quit, and get out to find another job?  She most likely could have collected unemployment as Washington State’s guidelines for receiving unemployment are very generous.
Hard to take this woman’s claim seriously that she wanted to work while she sat at home – collecting a salary, benefits, and a pension – knowing all the time that it was the wrong thing to do. 

Please follow and like us:

0 responses to “Not buying her claim…

  1. Sign me up for a gig like that!

  2. Sheesh, must be nice… *eye roll*
    In total agreement w/ your last paragraph DCG…

    • Yep, and she only came forward with her story after she was terminated.

      • She’s sorry she was in the situation or that she’s not being paid any more?
        And, don’t know what’s worse: that she smuggled in porn/food for and bummed money off of an inmate she’s supposed to be rehabilitating (not manipulative at all, was he?) or that it took the state 3 years, 7 months to decide to fire her for it.

  3. I want to know who lost their jobs for letting this situation go on for as long as it did? Especially with the economy in the state it is in, the good people of the state of Washington certainly cannot let the people we employ waste our tax dollars on situations like this one. They act like the people in charge are heros for finally doing something about it??


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.