No one died in Sandy Hook: Testimony from Social Security Death Master File

Rate this post

When a person in the United States dies, his/her death is recorded by the federal government.
The Social Security Death Index (SSDI) is a database of death records created from the Social Security Administration’s Death Master File (DMF). Most persons in the U.S. who had died since 1936, had had a Social Security number, and whose death was reported to the Social Security Administration are listed in the SSDI.
Unlike the Death Master File, the SSDI is available free to the public on several genealogy websites, such as Genealogy Bank. The “state of issue” refers to the state that had issued the individual’s Social Security number.
On January 20, 2013, I undertook a search on Genealogy Bank for the SSDI of Adam Lanza — the alleged mass murderer of his mother, Nancy Lanza, and 20 children and 6 adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, on December 14, 2012.
To my astonishment, Genealogy Bank had Lanza’s SSDI as December 13, 2012 — a day BEFORE the alleged mass shooting. (See “SSDI says Adam Lanza died a day before Sandy Hook massacre“)
Here’s a screenshot I took of Adam Lanza’s SSDI record on the website The date (1/20/2013) and time (2:29PM) when I took the screenshot can be seen in the lower right corner of the image below.

Click image to enlarge

Adam Lanza died 12-13-2012
After the discovery of Lanza’s 12/13/2012 SSDI went viral, on or around February 2, 2013, Genealogy Bank changed Lanza’s SSDI to 12/14/2012, the day of the alleged massacre. (See “SSDI changed Adam Lanza’s date-of-death from Dec. 13 to Dec. 14, 2012 !!!”)
Another genealogy website,, was slower on the uptake. Three days after Genealogy Bank had changed its SSDI for Lanza to 12/14/2012, still listed Lanza’s SSDI as 12/13/2012. (See “ still has Adam Lanza’s date-of-death as a day before the Sandy Hook massacre”)
Lanza’s curious SSDI aside, I was able to find on Genealogy Bank the SSDI (of 12/14/2012) of all of Lanza’s victims, except one — that of Ana Marquez-Greene, age 6, whose father is jazz musician Jimmy Greene. In my search for Ana, I had used every variation of her name: Ana Marquez, Ana Marquez-Greene, Ana Greene, to no avail. I hypothesized that the lack of a SSDI for Ana Marquez-Greene may be because her parents had not yet obtained a Social Security card/number for her. (See “Dec. 14 was date of death for every Sandy Hook massacre victim, except Adam Lanza“)

But wait!

Remember what I’d written at the beginning of this post — that the Social Security Death Index (SSDI) is a database of death records created from the federal government Social Security Administration’s Death Master File?
What if I were to tell you that the Death Master File does NOT contain the SSDIs for any of Adam Lanza’s victims?

In other words, according to the United States Social Security Administration’s Death Master File, nobody died at Sandy Hook Elementary School on December 14, 2012.

That’s exactly what blogger LivingonPlanetZ of Chemtrails: The Exotic Weapon reported on Feb. 22, 2014.
LivingonPlanetZ refers us to what he calls an “originating website” — a document published on (date unknown), titled “Sandy Hook – NO DEATHS, NO VICTIMS; According to SSDI Official Master File.” (You can also read the document in PDF here or here.)
The anonymous person who uploaded the 107-page document to had accessed the Social Security Administration’s Death Master File, updated through January 1, 2014, and searched for Adam Lanza’s victims — in vain.
The document says:

You are invited to search all of these records for the putative ‘victims’ of the Sandy Hook massacre. The children should all be 6 to 7 years old (“born” 2005-2006), and should have “died” in 2012. The adult “victims” appear in the appendix. (Each entry is followed by a 6-7 digit serial entry number, which demonstrates the continuity of the alphabetical listing – in other words, that they are presented here unaltered.)

I did just that and can verify the claim that none of Adam Lanza’s victims is in Social Security’s Death Master File. But before I present my findings, here are the Sandy Hook victims (name, birth date, gender, age at death), according to news accounts:

  1. Charlotte Bacon, 2/22/06, female (age 6)
  2. Daniel Barden, 9/25/05, male (age 7)
  3. Olivia Engel, 7/18/06, female (age 6)
  4. Josephine Gay, 12/11/05, female (age 7)
  5. Ana M. Marquez-Greene, 04/04/06, female (age 6)
  6. Dylan Hockley, 03/08/06, male (age 6)
  7. Madeleine F. Hsu, 07/10/06, female (age 6)
  8. Catherine V. Hubbard, 06/08/06, female (age 6)
  9. Chase Kowalski, 10/31/05, male (age 7)
  10. Jesse Lewis, 06/30/06, male (age 6)
  11. James Mattioli, 03/22/06, male (age 6)
  12. Grace McDonnell, 11/04/05, female (age 7)
  13. Emilie Parker, 05/12/06, female (age 6)
  14. Jack Pinto, 05/06/06, male (age 6)
  15. Noah Pozner, 11/20/06, male (age 6)
  16. Caroline Previdi, 09/07/06, female (age 6)
  17. Jessica Rekos, 05/10/06, female (age 6)
  18. Avielle Richman, 10/17/06, female (age 6)
  19. Benjamin Wheeler, 9/12/06, male (age 6)
  20. Allison N. Wyatt, 07/03/06, female (age 6)


  1. Rachel Davino, 7/17/83, female (age 29)
  2. Dawn Hocksprung, 06/28/65, female (age 47)
  3. Anne Marie Murphy, 07/25/60, female (age 52)
  4. Lauren Russeau, 1982, female (age 29)
  5. Mary Sherlach, 02/11/56, female (age 56)
  6. Victoria Soto, 11/04/85, female (age 27)

Here are the search results for each of the above names in the Social Security Death Master File (DMF). In the list below, the names of alleged child victims are colored pink; those of adults are colored green:

  1. Charlotte Bacon: DMF has 36 individuals named Charlotte Bacon, none of whom is Sandy Hook’s Charlotte Bacon.
  2. Daniel Barden: DMF has 6 individuals named Daniel or Danny Barden, none of whom is Sandy Hook’s Daniel Barden.
  3. Olivia Engel: DMF has one Olivia Engel, but she was born on May 18, 1905.
  4. Josephine Gay: DMF has 29 Josephine Gay, none of whom is Sandy Hook’s Josephine Gay.
  5. Anna Marquez: DMF has 21 Anna Marquez, none of whom is Sandy Hook’s Anna Marquez.
  6. Dylan Hockley: DMF has no one named Dylan Hockley.
  7. Madeline Hsu: DMF has no one named Madeline Hsu. The closest, an individual named M. Hsu, was born on Oct. 27, 1940.
  8. Catherine Hubbard: DMF has 68 individuals named Catherine Hubbard, none of whom is the Sandy Hook Catherine Hubbard.
  9. Chase Kowalski: DMF has no one named Chase Kowalski. The closest, Chas Kowalski, was born on April 10, 1900.
  10. Jesse Lewis: DMF has 565  individuals named Jess or Jesse Lewis, none of whom is Sandy Hook’s Jesse Lewis.
  11. James Mattioli: DMF has no one named James Mattioli.
  12. Grace McDonnell: DMF has 38 individuals named Grace or Gracie McDonnell, none of whom is Sandy Hook’s Grace McDonnell.
  13. Emilie Parker: DMF has 12 individuals named Emilie, Emilia, or Emiline Parker, none of whom is Sandy Hook’s Emilie Parker.
  14. Jack Pinto: DMF has 12 individuals named Jack or Jacob Pinto, none of whom is Sandy Hook’s Jack Pinto.
  15. Noah Pozner: DMF has no one named Noah Pozner.
  16. Caroline Previdi: DMF has no one named Caroline Previdi.
  17. Jessica Rekos: DMF has no one named Jessica Rekos.
  18. Avielle Richman: DMF has 5 individuals with a first name that begins with the alphabet A and a last name of Richman, none of whom is Avielle Richman.
  19. Benjamin Wheeler: DMF has 206 individuals named Benjamin (or Benjamine, Benjemin, Benj, Benji) Wheeler, none of whom is Sandy Hook’s Benjamin Wheeler.
  20. Allison Wyatt: DMF has 4 individuals named Allison Wyatt, none of whom is Sandy Hook’s Allison Wyatt.
  21. Rachel Davino: DMF has no one named Rachel Davino.
  22. Dawn Hochsprung: DMF has no one named Dawn Hochsprung.
  23. Ann Marie Murphy: DMF has 11 individuals named Ann (or Anna) Murphy, 4 of whom are named Ann Marie Murphy, but none of them is Sandy Hook’s Ann Marie Murphy.
  24. Lauren Russeau: DMF has no one named Lauren Russeau.
  25. Mary Sherlach: DMF has two Marian Sherlach, but none named Mary Sherlach.
  26. Victoria Soto: DMF has 50 individuals named Victoria Soto. The closest is a Victoria G. Soto who was born about 1985, married in Texas on July 2, 2011, but is not dead.

LivingonPlanetZ posted about the document “Sandy Hook – NO DEATHS, NO VICTIMS; According to SSDI Official Master File” on February 22, 2014.
It is noteworthy that a month later, Social Security Administration changed its policy on the public’s access to its Death Master File. On the website of the Social Security Administration, it says beginning March 27, 2014, the public can have only “limited access” to its Death Master File. To gain access to the DMF, we the American people must now jump through several hoops:

  • One must be “certified” (via having one’s application approved) to be granted “limited access”.
  • Only certain people are eligible to be “certified”. One must have a “legitimate” fraud prevention interest, or have a “legitimate” business purpose pursuant to a law, governmental rule, regulation, or fiduciary duty in order to be certified under the program. (The critical word “legitimate” is undefined, which means Social Security Administration’s bureaucrats decide what “legitimate” means.)
  • Those who are “certified” for access to the Death Master File must pay a hefty annual per-person subscription fee of $995.

Then there’s this cover-their-posterior all-purpose qualifier by Social Security Administration:

This [Death Master] file includes the following information on each decedent, if the data are available to the SSA: social security number, name, date of birth, date of death. The SSA does not have a death record for all persons; therefore, SSA does not guarantee the veracity of the file. Thus, the absence of a particular person is not proof this person is alive.

But wait!

We don’t just have to depend on Social Security’s Death Master File data to know that no one died at Sandy Hook Elementary School on December 14, 2012.
How do we know that?
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) tells us so!
Adan Salazar reports for Infowars, Sept. 24, 2014, that recently released FBI crime statistics show that no murders occurred in Newtown, Connecticut, in 2012, despite reports that 20 schoolchildren, 6 faculty members, and Nancy Lanza were killed or, in the case of Adam Lanza, committed suicide on December 14, 2012.

Click image to enlarge

FBI 2012 crime stats1
In contrast to the Connecticut report, the 2012 FBI crime report for the state of Colorado shows that 29 murders occurred in the town of Aurora that year, a figure that takes into account the 12 people who died in the Century Theater during the midnight premiere of The Dark Knight Rises on July 20, 2012.
FBI crime stats2
To conclude, no one was killed on December 14, 2012 at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut. More perverse still, according to the Social Security Administration’s records, none of the alleged Sandy Hook victims ever lived!
As the author of “Sandy Hook – NO DEATHS, NO VICTIMS; According to SSDI Official Master File” puts it:

ALL of the identities of the “children victims” of the supposed Sandy Hook massacre, are purely fictitious identities, with no record of either birth or death. As to the adult “victims”, the only one with an identity possibly verifiable from the intact SSD Master File, is Victoria G. Soto. The other identities may or may not have been assumed by real people at some time; but the identities themselves are nevertheless fictitious. Secondary copies of the Master File, or perhaps earlier versions, appear to have been altered or “corrected”, to include the fake identities. Such altered copies appear to be in use by popular genealogy search websites, though inconsistently.

H/t Nicholas K, Kelleigh N, Victoria M.
For Fellowship of the Minds’ other posts on this great deception, go to our “Sandy Hook Massacre” page.

Please follow and like us:

0 responses to “No one died in Sandy Hook: Testimony from Social Security Death Master File

  1. Great article – I appreciate your work for the truth. Two quick corrections – you mention this twice, I believe you meant “December, 2012”, not “September 2012”:
    “We don’t just have to depend on Social Security’s Death Master File data to know that no one died at Sandy Hook Elementary School on September 14, 2012.” and “To conclude, no one was killed on September 14, 2012 at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut.”
    I’m a technical writer and notice things like this … thank you!

  2. Superb job. You’re in good form today! Loved the several “BUT WAIT! There’s More!”, lol, cute! 🙂 (Who says we can’t still have some Fun & Laughs amidst a Luciferian NWO!)
    Just the other day I was trying to look up an only-slightly-suspicious death — an anti-Smart Grid expert/activist (occurring a few years ago) at the 3rd party SSDI sites & was “rudely reminded” that we can no longer look up SSDI deaths in a timely manner but must now wait 3 Whole Years post-death! Grrrr! That thanks to a “Budget Law” dated 12/26/13, 1-Year & 12-Days after Sandy Hoax.
    Searched 9/21/14 for a death in Sept. 2012 & got this response at:
    In compliance with Section 203 (“Restriction on Access to the Death Master File”) of the Budget Act of 2013, we are no longer able to display SSDI records for individuals who have died within the previous 3 years. You can learn more here:
    I did go read that “law” & found the tiny portion re SSDI sites, & very true, you have to jump through hoops (become “certified”) to now gain access prior to the 3-Year mark. AND no FOIA requests will be honored either! Evil evil evil!

    • “we can no longer look up SSDI deaths in a timely manner but must now wait 3 Whole Years post-death!”
      What are they afraid of? Wait…. We know. It’s called the TRUTH!

      • I believe the great orator himself (snarc) once said, “The only people that don’t want to disclose the truth are people with something to hide.”
        So after all these decades and all the computer improvements, they have to shut the site down? Yeah right.
        Keep exposing Dr. you are doing a great job.

  3. Pingback: No one died in Sandy Hook: Testimony from Social Security Death Master File -

  4. Many thanks for yr usual brilliant Internet sleuthing. This solves the question: “Was it a staged black op event?” w/a resounding “YES!” and puts an end to the naysayers as to whether it was a conspired event. I’ve already sent the email to my people for their further enlightenment.

  5. Pingback: No one died in Sandy Hook: Testimony from Social Security Death Master File | From the Trenches World Report

  6. Thank you Dr. Eowyn for this most thorough post, which was indeed incredibly time-consuming; you post is absolutely excellent and superior. I am aghast, but not surprised, that SS has made certain records now exclusive, costly and difficult to obtain, because they do not want people to know the truth or what really happened or did not happen.

  7. Michelle Peterson

    You are an idiot. Even when you are proven wrong, like a true conservative, you believe if you repeat something enough times you will convince everyone else that it is true. DICK Cheney tried that and now that idiot gets respect from no one. Give it up and get a life. Trying to become famous with lies is sick. It took thousands of scientists of all kinds about 50 years to FINALLY show that Oswald was the loan gunman. Your doctorate is probably in philosophy. lol

    • “You are an idiot.”
      Gosh, thank you for the gratuitous insult! How Alinsky Rules-For-Radicals #5 of you.
      “Even when you are proven wrong.”
      Did you do that? I seem to have missed it. Must be one of your grandiose narcissistic fantasies again. Tsk, tsk.
      “Trying to become famous with lies is sick.”
      Yes, indeed. I’m “trying to become famous” by using an alias! Too funny.
      “Oswald was the loan gunman.”
      Dear Michelle Peterson, do try to spell correctly when you’re making an ad hominem.
      “Your doctorate is probably in philosophy.”
      Whatever the discipline is, sadly, I’m still way way way more educated than you, as is evident in your completely unsubstantive, evidence-less, with only one-insult-after-another comment. Your simple shallow mind explains why you imagine a doctorate in Philosophy to be an insult. The word “philosophy” comes from the ancient Greeks; it means “love of wisdom” — a love that’s clearly lacking in you.
      The truth about Sandy Hook must really be getting to you “useful idiots” Obamabots.

    • This isn’t even shooting a fish in a barrel, it’s more like shooting a minnow in a bucket…. Dr. E has eviscerated much of Michelle’s petulant little screed, but I just have to poke the carcass a bit more.
      “Even when you are proven wrong, like a true conservative, you believe if you repeat something enough times you will convince everyone else that it is true.”
      This squares up exactly with what I posted only a short time ago in another thread — the lefties always accuse US of what they actually DO.
      “DICK Cheney tried that and now that idiot gets respect from no one.”
      And by “no one”, of course you mean the insulated and sheltered little crowd you travel with, and truth be told, you NEVER respected Mr. Cheney, so please don’t try to sell it here that he somehow lost your respect along the way. He is a decent man, and THAT is the real reason you people hate him. But really…. after all these years, you still want to gratuitously bring Dick Cheney into a discussion?!? Wouldn’t you much rather discuss Joe Biden?
      “It took thousands of scientists of all kinds about 50 years to FINALLY show that Oswald was the loan gunman.”
      More gratuitous argumentative shapeshifting…. geez Louise, just ONCE I would like to meet a commie-lib who can stay on topic and respond with factual points instead of trying to throw dust in the air with distracting and unrelated nonsense. Still, I’d like to see references and sources cited for this claim; if nothing else, I’m dying of curiosity to know who these “thousands” of scientists are! But even if this claim were true and held up under counter-analysis, it would only show how good a case the “more than one shooter” folks had in the first place, if it took 50 years to disprove that case.

      • “It took thousands of scientists of all kinds about 50 years to FINALLY show that Oswald was the loan gunman.”
        I’m not a mind-reader,but I’m pretty sure you meant LONE gunman,not LOAN,which would be meaningless.

      • Dick Cheney is a decent man? That was a joke right? Or maybe sarcasm that I’m not picking up on? A ton of evidence points to Cheney being a key conspirator in the 9/11 attacks, on top of being implicated in torture and rape of MK Ultra slaves. I could go on and on. But Cheney is nothing if not evil.

    • LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL-You’re so funny! You should be-oh wait-you probably ARE a writer for a sit-com. And the angrier you get,the more stupid you appear! Seriously,though,if you’re going to write,learn to either spell or use the “Spell Check” button. Better yet,go back to school and finish your Socialist Indoctrination.

    • Dear Michelle: You are a USEFUL Idiot. Look it up.

    • Talk to any combat veteran who has actually killed a man and they’ll tell you the only way the rear of JFK’s skull along with his brains ended up on the trunk of that car was because he was shot from the front.
      You can get together all the academics in the country to back up your “lone gunman” theory, but the whole of them doesn’t add up to a single soldier/marine who has actually lived it.

    • No, you are the idiot. The greatest sniper(Gunnery Sgt. Carlos Hathcock)who ever lived tried to duplicate what they say Oswald did and he couldn’t. Good enough for me.

    • This person must be a family member of one of the fake victims haha
      How much did they pay you?

  8. You know, when this first happened and they released photos of the children, I thought, how weird ….. all those pics look way too professional. I mean when a child meets with tragedy, the news shows a photo of the child looking very natural, in other words authentic. These pics all looked like head shots for child actors.

    • This bring attention back to the “sibling” choir that sang, who looked a lot like the kids in question, but older… One can reasonably suspect they are “child crisis actors”, and one wonders, where are they now?

      • Keep watching-these kids will probably show up as “victims” in the NEXT “red flag event”.

      • honestly i saw the video of them singing at the super bowl and do you realize that the singing happened one year after the sandy hook event? at least the video i found of them singing was uploaded a year after sandy hook happened. but the children did look older so could they really be the “victims” like everyone says? i’m just curious.

    • Those photos didn’t look professional at all. Every single “victim” photograph associated with Sandy Hook has the tell-tale signs of crappy photoshop work. They all look as if they used photos from 4-6 years ago and chopped them into the same childs “current” photograph to make it look like older/younger siblings who never existed. The most photoshopped of them all is Ryan Lanza, whose photos from years prior are what was used to create Adam Lanza. I challenge anyone to find an Adam Lanza photograph that isn’t a clear photoshop. They don’t exist.

      • I agree, when they first started showing pictures of the children, it was exposed that one little dark haired little girl’s picture had been taken off of the internet mother’s site for pictures. She was livid since her daughter was still alive and well and the pictures was a few years old. She had a blue ribbon in her hair.
        As the good Dr. has proven, one big farce. That school even looked abandoned in the first air pictures shown during the ‘event.’

  9. Some time between the birth of my first child (1983) and my second (1990), federal tax laws made it necessary for parents to obtain a SSN for all children born in order to be declared as a dependent on your taxes (for deductions purposes). All these children should have had SSN’s.

  10. Thank you, platinumtruth/Victoria!

  11. Wow! It seems so preposterous, and yet, it seems to be the only answer we have to the puzzle in Sandy Hook, Newtown, Connecticut.

  12. Brilliant post, Dr. Eowyn! Proves what so many of us have said all along!

  13. Wow, thank for this site. I do have one question though. Since you have all the inside info, could you please tell me what did happen to these people? I am sure that my friend, her sister, father and husband would love to find out that her mother wasn’t killed that day and they buried someone else at the funeral. Apparently since she didn’t exist, her daughter is in on the conspiracy as well, and I can’t have friends like that.

  14. What does Israel have to do with Sandy Hook? Do give us evidence — FIRM, UNEQUIVOCAL evidence — because you are slandering a government and, by extension, an entire people, whether you call them with the deflecting word “Zionists” or the more explicit direct word “Jews.”

    • You gotta love how every time something happens, almost on que, the same neo-nazi’s come out of the woodwork trying to start up sh*t against the Jews in a pathetic attempt to push public opinion toward Fascism and finishing the job their savior Hitler wasn’t able to do. One can only find comfort in knowing there is a special place in hell awaiting such people.

  15. Pingback: Sandy Hook: CT crime data confirms FBI report -

  16. Pingback: Sandy Hook Conspirator Theorists Vindicated: Apologies Welcome »

  17. There is at least one fly in this ointment — The spelling is Lauren Rousseau, not Russeau. (So of course there is no listing.) I don’t know if any other names are incorrect, but Lauren is/was a very real person. A close friend of mine helped raise her just after she was born. He shared several photos of her on facebook after 12/14/12, and was devastated with her loss. He roomed with her parents, Giles and Teresa, while he was a college student, (they were in some of the photos, too) and he still lives in the area.
    I don’t know if Lauren was killed, or simply taken into witness protection and “Disappeared,” but I would love to know if her parents ever saw her body. Either way, the official story stinks to high heaven. If I can some day convince my friend to consider the (lack of) facts and the crazy circumstances, he might start wondering about the truth — but at this point I’m not in a position to press the issue.


  19. One thing I always mention to people when I bring up this sandy hook joke; where’s the evidence? There isn’t any. And, they have done (gone out of their way) to prohibit any manner to collect or verify any “evidence” . Which, only adds to the doubt. The same with osama bin laden, he was dead a while ago. Yes SF went in and killed someone, but it wasn’t him. And, there was no evidence, obuma claiming he had to be buried at sea. Let’s see the evidence.

  20. Pingback: Wolf meets with Oath Keepers / CIA Spy confirms Sandy Hook and Boston bombing “false flags” | Starship Earth: The Big Picture

  21. Pingback: » Wolfgang Halbig converts Oath Keeper members regarding Sandy Hook and Boston Bombing Independence Day

  22. Pingback: Why We Must Never Forget Sandy Hook -

  23. I was suspicious from day one of this supposed event. The timing and many obvious flaws in the production have not been pointed out. I was watching the news first reports right after it happened, when they were showing the helicopter footage of the police chasing the men in the woods, and I was glued to the media, listened to the 911 calls and the dispatcher, but was confused, as were many, at the constant changing information and misinformation on everything from the gunman’s description, (mask/no mask/, vest/no vest, rifles/shotguns, assault rifle/hand guns) to the false story that Lanza had come to the school the previous day and his mother was somehow connected to the school. As I watched the helicopter footage, I kept wondering several things.
    First, where were all the OTHER school children??? There should have been hundreds of them! The ONLY children I saw outside the school were the same 14 or 15 kids lined up walking with their eyes closed, being led—somewhere single file through the middle of the parking lot by some woman police officer. NOT running or hurrying out out of the school. It looked like a drill! And there were some children who apparently came down the street going towards the school with some adults. Do they expect people to believe that they took hours releasing the OTHER children one or two at a time, to parents who would have been terrified out of their skulls to get to their own children who were okay? And then the media just somehow failed to capture any of them?
    Next, I have looked at the aerial shots of the school that day, and another thing that has always puzzled me is, where did all the other non-official cars come from so soon, that were parked all over the school parking lot, when the road had been blocked from any private cars getting in. In fact, MOST of the cars look to be private non-official in nature, parked everywhere, and so soon after the shooting supposedly occurred! To whom do they belong and how did THEY get there so soon?
    The things that raises the most questions, though, are the parent’s behavior. NO ONE SEEMS ALL THAT SAD! You never see any real tears, and SO SOON after what would be the most horrific tragedy that any parent could experience, to go on TV and photo ops with Obama, laughing and talking as if their child had been gone for years…I just find that to be incredible! I believe that the suffering you would go through would just NOT allow you to do things like that so soon after losing a little child in such a monstrous way. The one parent who was laughing and then starting acting real sad before he gave the statement to the press, was REALLY unbelievable.
    Also given human nature, at least ONE set of parents would have lashed out to the news media, they would have been blaming the school system for the inadequate security or at least talking about what happened, but of the ones whom I saw talking about it to the press, they were only seeming to point the finger at gun control. I didn’t hear any complaints about the security of the school, being partially at fault, or the need for greater security in schools.
    AND FINALLY>>> you KNOW…..SOMEONE, PROBABLY several OF THE FAMILIES WOULD HAVE BROUGHT WRONGFUL DEATH SUITS against the school system, county, state or whomever they could! Out of twenty kids and the other supposed victims, you KNOW at least ONE family would have SUED! But there is nothing mentioned about any law suits! Are we to believe that all of the families who lost children and/or loved ones are all so altruistic that they would just walk away and do nothing? Or at least they would be bringing law suits against the bloggers and so called conspiracy theorists for casting aspersions on the death of their child! BUT NONE, that I know of have come out and said, “OK, enough! Here is the proof that my child died! Here is his/her DEATH CERTIFICATE or Coroner’s report, and I am going to prove that I am not an actor, when I sue you!”
    If the Phelps and the Sextons are two different couples, why don’t all 4 of them get together for an interview, to prove THAT THEY ARE NOT ACTORS!
    THIS IS WHAT IS NEEDED TO PUT THE QUESTIONS OF A HOAX TO REST! The police need to release pertinent information and release at least one crime scene photo, (Not with the deceased in it of course) but of afterward, before it was cleaned, and give the name of the company who did the official clean up and have the head of that company, which can be verified as legitimate come forward and attest to the evidence. If they would do these things there would be no conspiracy of a hoax!
    Please pass this around, since I am not a blogger and don’t know how to ask these questions, but perhaps someone who reads it will know and be able to get this settled. Proof or no proof…that is the question.

  24. Pingback: Sandy Hook child victim Noah Pozner was killed twice! Also a victim in Pakistan Taliban shooting! -

  25. Nice Facebook page,Victoria-NOTHING on it but 2 pics. REALLY makes you appear credible-NOT.

  26. I just read this article again, Dr. Eowyn. It is breathtaking. We are lost in a hall of mirrors. Obama, his puppeteers and Pravda have succeeded in deceiving a nation.

  27. Thank you for all of your hard work and taking the time to reveal your findings. I’ve always had a feeling that this was a false flag or some kind of fraud. It’s disgusting the lengths these people will go to achieve whatever outcome they want from the general public. I’ve felt bad at times for not believing the official story like I’m somehow disrespecting the nightmare this caused for so many if it really did happen but there are just too many things that weren’t right about it. Sure as it was breaking all the media is trying to be first to report and things get reported that end up being retracted but this isn’t that kind of mistake. Thanks again for your vigilance!

  28. I think the reason they’re not trying to prove any of our thoughts wrong is that,as long as we’re all discussing THIS,they can go about their OTHER business,which they’d prefer NOT to have us watching. (It’s TOO hard to deceive us while we’re looking right AT them.)

  29. I was really shocked to see a picture of one of the Sandy Hook kids posted as a victim of the Pakistan school shooting by the Taliban. How could this have happened??

  30. This is patently false. I have access to the DMF, and I see deaths recorded for each child killed at Sandy Hook.

    • Really? Then show us the evidence, by taking a screenshot of Social Security’s Death Master File’s (DMF) entry for each of Adam Lanza’s 28 victims (incl. his mother’s), as well as DMF’s entry for Lanza himself. Send the screenshots to FOTM, & I promise you I’ll publish them.
      Our email address:

  31. Okay. I sent.

    • To Amanda (with an anonymized IP address,
      FOR THE RECORD, your comment “Okay. I sent” was published on FOTM at 5:58 pm on Feb. 10, 2015.
      It is now 12 hours later. As of 5:52 am this morning, Feb. 11, 2015, there is still no email from you.
      Here’s our email address, again:
      ~Dr. Eowyn
      Owner, FOTM

  32. Well, that’s strange. Here, I’ll make it easy for you:
    You can copy/paste, right?

    • Thank you, Amanda. To answer your question: Yes, I can copy/paste, AND save the image you’d sent to FOTM’s Media Library, AND publish the image in my response to you. Here’s the image you sent which you claim to be from Social Security’s Death Master File (DMF):
      Alleged Sandy Hook Death Master File
      Alas, there are at least 3 problems with the image you sent:
      1. There is no indication of its source. How do we know the names are from the Death Master File (DMF)?
      2. The image contains the names of 19 of the alleged Sandy Hook victims. Where are the other 9, as well as the DMF of Adam Lanza? Didn’t they die on Dec. 14, 2012 as well?
      3. DMF lists deaths alphabetically. For example, individuals with the same last name (surname) of Sheffield would all be grouped together. But the image/list you sent doesn’t do that:
      * the 19 names are not arranged in alphabetical order
      * the 19 names are all of alleged victims of Sandy Hook. DMF does not classify deaths by categories other than last names.
      FOTM readers can verify the image sent by Amanda by going to:

      • Amanda,
        To show that the image you sent us is from Social Security’s Death Master File:
        1. Go the DMF.
        2. Search for the names of alleged Sandy Hook victims.
        3. When you’re taken to that page, take a screenshot of that page including the URL of the page (at the very top) and the date and time when you took the screenshot (in the bottom right of your computer screen).
        Thank you.

      • This information is taken from an SQL database containing the full (not Limited Use) DMF. SQL doesn’t index alphabetically.
        Your claim is that none of the deaths of the children who died that day are recorded in the DMF. I’ve shown that to be false to the best of my ability. Why would I put more time into producing more evidence when you are unwilling to accept what I’ve already sent? That would be silly.

        • No where in the image you sent does it show that the source is an SQL database — whatever that is — but you ask that we take it on faith. That is not the empirical method — a method that I employ in writing my posts, including this one, “No one died in Sandy Hook.”
          The least you can do is to give us the URL of your “SQL database” so that I (and our readers) can go on the site and see the information for ourselves. Doing that takes just ONE minute of your time. I’ve been civil and reasonable with you, but your attitude of “Why would I put more time into producing more evidence when you are unwilling to accept what I’ve already sent? That would be silly” makes you look disingenuous and petty.

          • SQL databases don’t have URLs. That’s just not how it works. When you subscribe to and pay for the full DMF, you will be given access to a host of databases which are then downloaded and accessed through SSMS. The screen shots that I supplied are clearly from SSMS. You’re free to Google images of that interface at your leisure to confirm.

            • “SQL databases don’t have URLs.”
              Which is why in my first comment in response to your first comment “This is patently false. I have access to the DMF, and I see deaths recorded for each child killed at Sandy Hook.”, I had asked you to take SCREEN SHOTS of those DMF entries on alleged Sandy Hook victims and on Adam Lanza.
              To take a screenshot, if you use Windows:
              1. When you’re on the SQL database
              2. Click Windows icon.
              3. Click “Snipping Tool”
              4. When you see the “Snipping Tool” little box opens, use your browser to put a frame around the image you want to cut & paste.
              5. Save the image to your hard-drive.
              6. Then upload the image(s) to me in an email to
              I look forward to your screenshots, but they must indicate their source as the SS Death Master File, or they are useless.

      • Right Wing and Proud

        Dr. Eowyn, I tried to clink on the link Amanda left….access denied. Apparently, I need special permission by google just to read this so called list……very suspicious if you ask me.

  33. Actually, funny thing…as it turns out, you can get this same information off of the good ol’ www. No access to the DMF necessary. Here are a couple of examples. If you’re truly interested, I’m sure you can complete the work.

    • Thank you, Amanda, for the 2 links to Family Search. Alas, neither is the SS Death Master File. I had already found the info contained in both links when I searched Genealogy Bank for the SSDI of Sandy Hook victims back in 2013 — as I’d clearly stated in this post: “Lanza’s curious SSDI aside, I was able to find on Genealogy Bank the SSDI (of 12/14/2012) of all of Lanza’s victims, except one – that of Ana Marquez-Greene, age 6, whose father is jazz musician Jimmy Greene.”
      Data bases like Family Search and Genealogy Bank get their information from Social Security. Translated for you, that means Social Security’s Death Master File is the ORIGINAL SOURCE, whereas Family Search, Genealogy Bank, et al are all SECONDARY sources. Any researcher knows the critical importance of ORIGINAL or primary sources. This post, “No one died in Sandy Hook: Testimony from Social Security Death Master File,” is precisely about the SS Death Master File original source, which blogger LivingonPlanetZ claims does not contain entries on Sandy Hook victims, not even Adam Lanza himself.

      • So, I guess you’re saying that when FamilySearch cites the SSDI, they are lying, and when I cite the DMF, I am lying.

        • No where have I said that. Those are your words.
          I’ve been polite, reasonable and patient with you. But you are asking us to just take your word as the truth, without giving us evidence from the PRIMARY source of SS’s Death Master File. That is most unreasonable.
          If you cannot produce evidence that your information is from SS’s Death Master File, admit it and stop wasting our time. We both have better things to do.

  34. HA HA HA! And just as I suspected all along. Amanda has no proof from the SS Death Master File, because it doesn’t exist!

  35. I’ll assume your comment is not rhetorical. To be clearer, you can state, exactly, what you consider “proof” that the source is the DMF.

    • 1. The image you send must contain words to the effect that the source of the data is Social Security’s Death Master File.
      2. The image you send must have the date and time on your computer when you accessed the data.
      3. That is why I asked you to take screenshots.
      4. As for SS providing you access to its DMF, but there is no URL for the data base, please explain how that is possible. Anything that’s online has an URL, although that doesn’t necessarily mean anyone can access the data by going to that URL. But there is an URL, which is why, once again for the umpteenth time, I ask you to take a screenshot when you’re on the DMF data base — a screenshot that includes the URL.

      • Amanda will never take the screen shot you’re asking for, because the info she claims to have doesn’t exist. Is she a troll? Likely. A time waster? Absolutely.

  36. I’m kind of getting the feeling that you’re not going to accept any evidence that weakens your argument. If that’s the case, it’ll be clear when you reject the image at this link. As requested, a screenshot showing the time and date the information was referenced and the left-hand navigation showing the DMF table structure. (Sigh.)
    To answer your question about how there is no URL…The DMF is available as a web service or as a raw data file. I would think that you would already know that.

    • Throughout our exchanges, I have refrained from insult, snide insinuation, or sarcasm, but have treated you with courtesy and patience. I don’t appreciate your insinuation, “I’m kind of getting the feeling that you’re not going to accept any evidence that weakens your argument.” Nor do I appreciate your sarcastic “I would think that you would already know that.” I have no access to SS’s Death Master File, so how would I know “The DMF is available as a web service or as a raw data file.”
      As I’d promised you, I’m publishing the latest image you sent, which appears to show your data as deriving from DMF, assuming that DMF refers to Death Master File.
      alleged Sandy Hook DMF
      1. Should I assume that you had accessed the data on Feb. 11, 2015?
      2. How did you manage to gain access to Social Security’s Death Master File? Did you pay the hefty fee?

  37. OK so for those of you who havent taken the time to research this so far i looked up the death certificates on the twent child victims and there is death certificates for all 20 children who died on December 12, 2012. one link to a site if you need to look it up for your self is
    look up Newtown Connecticut under death and enter in any of the 20 childrens first and last names they are all listed as deceased on december 12, 2012. so as far as the ppl who wrote this article you should really look up multiple sources before publishing unfounded articles like this one.

    • Matt, before you trash other people, you really should re-read my post. For I clearly wrote that I had found in genealogy websites the SSDIs (Soc. Sec. Death Index) of Adam Lanza and his alleged victims, except the SSDI of Ana Marquez-Greene. I also stated that genealogy websites also had Lanza’s SSDI as Dec. 13, 2012 — a day BEFORE he allegedly shot 27 people dead. It was only when bloggers discovered this that those genealogy websites changed his SSDI to Dec. 14.
      The site to which you so triumphantly refer,, is a genealogy website and like all genealogy websites, obtains its data, including SSDIs, from the Social Security Death Master File (DMF).
      This post is about the Social Security Death Master File (DMF). I can’t help it if you are too stupid to know the difference.

      • I will never let these intrusions down. You know, I can’t help but think the psyop manufacturers would have thought us “conspiracy” folks to have given up by now. Like JFK, people would just accept that we disagree. I am telling all who read this, believers or not, we will N E V E R give up. More people wake up every day. This is not Russia. We cannot be subjected to communal or social rule, because too many Americans know what FREEDOM is. The planning put into taking this country down has been substantial. The money, even more so. But there is one wild card that can never, EVER, be predicted, and that is you, me, and 150,000,000 other Americans. Do your part. Spread the word. Make people listen. My family has started to listen; before I was taken with skepticism. Spread the facts about official reports that have more holes than swiss cheese. Do your part. Save America before it is too late.

    • @Matt
      Idiot lok

    • Looking at Matt Was it 12/12/2012 Matt? You seem to have your dates confused! Most reports seem to say it happened two days later. Maybe you were the one who set up the Website a day early for donations.

  38. Pingback: Country singer Tim McGraw sells out. Headlines Sandy Hook gun control concert -

  39. Could you check the deaths of the people at Waco?

  40. Ana Marquez-Greene is how the name is spelled on

  41. Pingback: Dead again: Sandy Hook child victim Noah Pozner also killed in Pakistan Taliban shooting! | From the Trenches World Report

  42. Brilliant and cogent. In the book, “Nobody Died at Sandy Hook,” where I read this article originally, I didn’t see the distinction between the Death Master Index and the SSDI. The link to the excerpted Death Master Index in this article made all the difference. If this doesn’t raise serious questions about Sandy Hook, I doubt anything would. Thanks for your diligence and persistence, Dr. Eowyn.

  43. Pingback: Sandy Hook math: It doesn’t add up.* | Doretta Wildes

  44. We don’t yet need to access the Social Security Master Death File to learn the truth about Sandy Hook and all the other supposed shootings, as these three websites do not list any of the SH “victims”:
    On left side of the page, click on “Filter by Collection…” and select “Social Security Death Index”. Then enter the name and click on “Refine Search”.
    On left side of the page, under “Narrow your search results”, click on “Birth, Marriage & Death”. Then enter the name.

  45. Pingback: Fake Funerals and False Flags « The Thinking Housewife

  46. Dixie Sedgwick

    HI, excellent article. I got blasted on fb for posting, course I do not care. A friend told me a friend of a friends said his nephew died at Sandy Hook, Wheeler, Benjamin. And I see his name on your list. Not sure how to proceed with out offending her, which seems inevitable.

    • “Not sure how to proceed with out offending her”
      You’ll have to decide whether truth or your friend is more important to you.
      A “friend” who gets offended because you disagree with her is hardly your friend. JMHO.

  47. A thorough and informative read Dr.Eowyn, I notice that those that have come here to disclaim some of the facts on here get touchy when called out . They never seem to come back and offer real evidence to substantiate their claims. Also it’s always second or third hand knowledge (Hearsay) that they knew a “friend of a friend”
    I’d like to know why all the secrecy, Atrocities have been carried out everyday since this event, so why is this event so guarded and shrouded. To me it smells like cover up. Every avenue someone opens up is shut down by new regulation. When are Americans going to wake up to this?
    Keep up your great work.

    • Thank you, Scranton!
      Indeed, commenters who claim SH is real always cite some 2nd or 3rd-hand source.
      Indeed, when challenged, they NEVER respond or return to defend themselves. Please note that I had not banned any one of them from responding.

  48. Must just be another weird coincidence regarding this very true tragedy. /s
    They just don’t want to include the victims because of the sensitivity and feelings of the parents. /s
    The FBI not reporting any homicides is quite funny as well. Guess they didn’t get the memo to keep the farce going.
    They really didn’t even try to make this whole hoax believable since they used the whole “it was children” narrative to try and make people guilty to ever question it as what monster would ever question the deaths of children! So ridiculous that it worked for so many.
    I’m actually thinking they were this sloppy on purpose to see how easy it would be to get away with it so they would know for the future if they would have to put in more work for the next hoax.

    • Yes, but I suspect the reason for the deliberate sloppiness has to do with conditioning people to “believe” regardless of evidence to the contrary. By doing this they set up a dynamic whereby “good citizens” believe what they are told.

  49. If the school was closed down for 3 or so years before this event, surely the neighbors would know that. There must be someone nearby to ask the questions. I see in the posts above that school maintenance records arent available.

  50. You guys are hurting your credibility here by seeming irrational and dumb. And I support the work you do, so do not mistake criticism as personal insult.
    The FBI report, if you click the link “Data Declaration” under methodology it states how they collect their data: that it’s taken from local and city police exclusively.
    Copy&pasted quote: “The data used in creating this table were from all city and town law enforcement agencies submitting 12 months of complete offense data for 2012.”
    The Sandy Hook incident was handled by the Connecticut state police.
    This explains why local police would not have had the data on it.

    • “You guys are hurting your credibility here by seeming irrational and dumb…. The Sandy Hook incident was handled by the Connecticut state police. This explains why local police would not have had the data on it.”
      I marvel at how you throw out these assertions with such nonchalant confidence. Let me explain how the FBI compiles its crime statistics for its annual reports.
      To begin, I checked the FBI website and found that it has not changed its crime statistics for Connecticut 2012. Here’s a screenshot of the table. Note that the FBI still shows the number of homicides for the city of Newtown in 2012 as 0:
      This is the FBI’s methodology (
      “The national UCR Program published the Uniform Crime Reporting Handbook (revised 2004), which details procedures for classifying and scoring offenses and serves as the contributing agencies’ basic resource for preparing reports. The final responsibility for data submissions rests with the individual contributing law enforcement agency.
      In other words, the methodology used by the FBI in compiling its annual report on crimes in the USA relies on law enforcement agencies following the procedures described in the FBI publication, Uniform Crime Reporting Handbook.
      The following is from Uniform Crime Reporting Handbook, 2004 (
      pp. 8-9: “Jurisdiction – The purpose of establishing appropriate jurisdiction is to depict the nature and volume of crime in a particular community, not for an agency to claim or take credit…the national UCR Program developed the following guidelines:
      1. City law enforcement agencies should report offenses that occur within their city jurisdictions.
      2. County or state law enforcement agencies should report offenses that take place in the county outside the limits of the city….
      6. Agencies must report only those arrests made for offenses committed within their own jurisdictions….
      In other words, cities having their own police departments, as a rule, report their own crime data to the UCR Program…. In some localities, the sheriff, state police, or a federal law enforcement agency will assist a local police department in the investigation of crimes committed within the limits of the city. Even though this is the case, the city police department will report the offenses, unless, again, there is a written or oral agreement specifying otherwise. The jurisdictional guidelines provide for most local reporting. Whenever possible, the local law enforcement agency of the geographical area in which the crime occurred should report the data.
      From the above, it is clear that according to the FBI’s methodology, specifically the Uniform Crime Reporting Handbook, 2004, it is the responsibility of city police departments, including Newtown’s police department, to report their crime data — including the number of homicides — to the FBI, which in 2012 numbered zero (0).
      Lastly, your IP address says you’re in Toronto, Canada. Why don’t you mind your own business? Don’t you have enough problems of your own in Canada?

  51. Pingback: National Data Bases Don't 6 Show Adults Killed at Sandy Hook | Light On Conspiracies - Revealing the Agenda

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *