Newsweek calls Obama "first gay president"

“Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness.” -Isaiah 5:20

In Liberal Newspeak, words have no fixed meaning. They mean what you want them to mean, and to hell with what the dictionary says.
During the Clinton administration, the Liberal Establishment Media were so infatuated with Billy, they called him America’s “first black president” even though Billy was and remains pasty white.
Now, the cover of the latest issue of Newsweek to hit the newstand orgasmically proclaims that Obama, his head topped with a rainbow halo, is America’s “first gay president”.

The accompanying cover story was written by openly homosexual sodomite political pundit Andrew Sullivan. The full cover story is not yet online, but in a blog post published earlier this week, Sullivan wrote that Obama’s support of gay marriage brought him to tears.

Obama, Sullivan writes, “had to discover his black identity and then reconcile it with his white family, just as gays discover their homosexual identity and then have to reconcile it with their heterosexual family.”

Although Newsweek’s cover calling Obama “first gay President” is a reference to his recent declaration of support for “same-sex” marriage, the appellation may also be the liberal media’s tacit “wink-wink” acknowledgment that all the rumors about Obama being gay (or bisexual) are true. See, for example,

The New Yorker, too, is orgasmic over Obama’s support of homosexual marriage. Its May 21 issue has this cover:

Bob Staake, the artist who drew the New Yorker cover, said:

“It’s a celebratory moment for our country, and that’s what I tried to capture. […] I wanted to celebrate the bravery of the President’s statement—a statement long overdue—but all the more appreciated in this political year. We are on the right side of history.”

The same Andrew Sullivan who commends Obama for his support of gay marriage candidly admits, in “Virtually Normal” (pp. 202-203), that homosexuals’ push for same-sex marriage does not mean they either want or are prepared to be monogamous:
there is more likely to be greater understanding of the need for extramarital outlets between two men than between a man and a woman; and again, the lack of children gives gay couples greater freedom. Their failures entail fewer consequences for others. But something of the gay’s relationship’s necessary honesty, its flexibility, and its equality could undoubtedly help strengthen and inform many heterosexual bonds.”

Given that homosexuals want marriage but not the monogamy of those boring heterosexuals, the inquiring mind asks why then do they want “same sex” marriage?

Here’s why:
“A middle ground might be to fight for same-sex marriage and its benefits and then, once granted, redefine the institution of marriage completely, to demand the right to marry not as a way of adhering to society’s moral codes but rather to debunk a myth and radically alter an archaic institution.” –Michelangelo Signorile, “Bridal Wave,” OUT magazine, December/January 1994, p. 161.
[Legalizing “same-sex marriage”] is also a chance to wholly transform the definition of family in American culture. It is the final tool with which to dismantle all sodomy statutes, get education about homosexuality and AIDS into public schools, and, in short, usher in a sea change in how society views and treats us.” –Michelangelo Signorile, “I Do, I Do, I Do, I Do, I Do,” OUT magazine, May 1996, p. 30.
And they deride Conservatives as paranoiac when we’ve said there’s a homosexual agenda!
H/t FOTM reader Wade.
~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:
0
 

0 responses to “Newsweek calls Obama "first gay president"

  1. Obama started something dangerous that can never be undone. No one, not even preachers, will be able to speak against homosexuality. These are truly scary times!

     
    • Yep, we are “haters” now.
      Someone tweeted pic last night from their kid’s school. Gym was plastered with “no hate” posters. Ugh.

       
    • sparrow,I really hope they all remember the liberal brainwashing job of political correctness and what it did to our Country. No more. Say it like it is. Don’t beat around the bush or they will take everything said and run with it.

       
  2. SRM is out of control. How one cannot see their blatant agenda is beyond me.
    Makes me ill…

     
  3. I don’t think this will work out to the LGBT advantage. This is all happening too fast and still too soon. Also I do believe there will be a rift in the AA community. some who will be forced to choose between the true Messiah above or the “Black Jesus” below. Some will stick to the gospel while others in support of the ” first Black President” will swallow their faith and Vote for Obama once more.
    I believe what is going to happen is that some will NOT vote for Obama- nor will they vote Republican- but instead stay home claiming they voted for Obama so we (I say we because me saying “they” is ridiculous) can attempt to “square” things up with God without voting against the first Black President.

     
  4. So Obama is Gay ! That’s what Larry Sinclair has been trying to tell everyone for a long time !

     
  5. Talk about a slippery slope. One minute it’s DADT thrown out the window, then the same sex marriage stuff is everywhere, and now the Globe says Hillary is moving in with another woman. I guess that’s why the next big shindig is moving to “camp” David. They’re all going to be “camping” it up over there, it’s just like Faulty Towers or the Goon Show.

     
  6. the first gay president? well at least someone finally admitted it. heehee

     
  7. May you live in interesting times....is definitely a curse.

    Yeah, about Hillary…we’re all waiting breathlessly (well…) for her to to come out with her girlfriend, Huma, Weiner’s ex-wife (now THAT was a marriage of convenience) and close relative of prominent muslim brotherhood members.

     
  8. wow! Newsweek finally got something right. They forgot its illegal alien HOMO muslim communist treasonous fraud. Waiting to see if the author tells about Larry Sinclair,Donald Young and the rest…Regger, are they going to tell all the truth? I’ll send people here to get the truth. He belongs in gitmo with his brothers and holder. Despicable he is.

     
  9. me too Grouchy,he is going to make a break for it one of these days-he won’t get far-he can run but he can’t hide. He should of gave it up long ago,they say if you find yourself in a hole,throw the shovel down. Well,he just keeps on diggin.

     
  10. Good observation, Terry! Hmm…..

     
  11. This will most likely also fire up the radical Muslim’s who already think we are the great Satan. He should have kept his big mouth shut, that also goes for that idiot Biden as well. Obama the Fag and his radical far left crew have destroyed this country.

     
  12. Well, I was a lone voice in the wilderness when I first heard about the Obamamama as the “dark horse” candidate out of Chicago, and started ranting about how such were ALWAYS bought & paid for before they ever get to say a word. I was born & raised there till age 15, when my sensible father had enough and took us to the relative wilds of Bellevue, WA in 1958. By age 8 one understood the realpolitik of the Windy City, OR ELSE. I cannot think of a more corrupt political arena anywhere, even in Asia or the ‘stans. Obama was and still is a pawn of Goldman Sachs and the Pritzgers. UGH! Gross beyond words, slime of slime, lie upon lie, unto the last generation!

     
  13. I think what is happening is that the Twinkie-in-Chief, along with his homosexual “partners” are trying to queer the whole country. Maybe they really meant it when that had a group called Queer Nation.
    But these little punks think that the whole country is going to support their pathetic agenda. Being a conspiracy historian through observation, Time-Warner photo of breast feeding goes comes along from the HBO photos of well…I’m not going to describe it here. The perverts run and operate the media, and one after the other photo covers are coming out
    to brainwash the people.
    But since they are perverts, they have no power, they have no authority, and they have no rights to tell any of us what to think, do, or say. This whole political agenda is run by queers so the government apparently has aspirations and condones queers. Which means that they have no power because they have already lost their discussion to natural law. God didn’t make people to act like the queers. One doesn’t need a bible to know that.
    Just remember, there is no power in evil. The only thing that evil people have to look forward to is doom.

     
  14. This is not news to me, I’ve always thought this Manchurian Candidate was gay. Michele and these children, I do think they’re actually his, are his beard. (Much like Clinton married an upwardly mobile lesbian to provide stable marriage cover while he played around.)
    When you look at his background, what little we truly know, it is enough. The boy was bounced around the third world by a mother with the morals of a rabbit. He never had a father figure to speak of other than Frank Marshall Davis, who likely sexually abused him. His grandparents were commies. What molded him besides the CIA and the Ford Foundation?
    The NWO has hooks into these puppets so as to control them. They have dirt on every last one of them, that keeps them in line. Kennedy “out punted his coverage” as my husband likes to say. He eventually thought his controlling flaws were insignificant and that the presidency would protect him. When he went against his controllers they reeled him back in. Permanently. Think back on every president you’ve known and you likely can think of what flaw was used to control each and every one o them.
    Perhaps “Mormonism” will be the control for Romney should he get elected. The NWO is in the process of attacking religion. What better than to force a sitting president to downplay if not disavow his faith.

     
  15. winstonsmith6079

    On the other hand, let these socialist pinkos go homosexual! Homosexuals don’t naturally breed so maybe they’ll go extinct – socialist dodos (but I repeat myself)!
    BTW, did anyone notice the sub-head right above his nose? “A fiendish new terror plot”? Maybe it’s further commentary on their main headline?

     

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *