NAZI EPA Experimenting on Elderly and Children

Rate this post

The Daily Caller

gina-mccarthy

Report: EPA tested deadly pollutants on humans to push Obama admin’s agenda

by Michael Bastasch

The Environmental Protection Agency has been conducting dangerous experiments on humans over the past few years in order to justify more onerous clean air regulations.

The agency conducted tests on people with health issues and the elderly, exposing them to high levels of potentially lethal pollutants, without disclosing the risks of cancer and death, according to a newly released government report… 

This is a long article, and worth reading at The Daily Caller. I’ve highlighted a few bits to make the point that this rogue agency poses a real and present danger to the people in this country. ~ TD

These experiments exposed people, including those with asthma and heart problems, to dangerously high levels of toxic pollutants, including diesel fumes, reads a EPA inspector general report obtained by The Daily Caller News Foundation. The EPA also exposed people with health issues to levels of pollutants up to 50 times greater than the agency says is safe for humans

“Further, the EPA did not include information on long-term cancer risks in its diesel exhaust studies’ consent forms,” the IG’s report noted. “An EPA manager considered these long-term risks minimal for short-term study exposures” but “human subjects were not informed of this risk in the consent form.”

“Particulate matter causes premature death. It doesn’t make you sick. It’s directly causal to dying sooner than you should,” former EPA administrator Lisa Jackson told Congress on Sept. 22, 2011.

PM is a “mixture of harmful solid and liquid particles” that the EPA regulates. PM that is 2.5 microns or less is known as PM2.5, which is about “1/30th the thickness of a human hair.” These small particles can get into people’s respiratory system and can harm human health and even lead to death after just short-term exposure.

The EPA set PM2.5 primary standards at 15 micrograms per cubic meter of air on an annual average basis, but the agency exposed test subjects to PM levels of 600 micrograms per cubic meter — 40 times what the EPA sets as an acceptable outdoor air standard.

But in five of the studies, people were subject to levels higher than what they signed on for. The EPA IG found that one person was hit with “pollutant concentrations that reached 751 [micrograms per cubic meter], which exceeded the IRB-approved concentration target of 600 [micrograms per cubic meter].”

Regulatory implications

The EPA has been trying to justify setting stricter PM2.5 standards in its upcoming national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). But the agency’s public statements on PM don’t square with its lax attitude about testing the air pollutant on humans.

“Maybe the biggest reason to slow down the new rule is that the EPA is talking out of both sides of their mouth,” Louisiana Republican Sen. David Vitter said last year. “On one side exposure to it is deadly, and on the other they say human exposure studies are not harmful.”

The manager also said “that PM risk is focused on susceptible populations and that the risk is small for those with no overt disease.”

This alarmed Republicans who said that either the EPA was misrepresenting the science around PM2.5 to advance its own regulatory agenda or it was exposing people to deadly pollutants for little scientific gain.

“It’s alarming how the EPA is purposefully and blatantly ignoring an ongoing investigation of the legality and therefore scientific legitimacy of the use of human testing,” Vitter said. “This is another example of the EPA continuing to pick and choose scientific ‘facts’ to support their overreaching agenda.”

Read the whole story at: https://dailycaller.com/2014/04/02/report-epa-tested-deadly-pollutants-on-humans-to-push-obama-admins-agenda/#ixzz2xpQcSwO8

BREITBART

EPA CONDUCTED POLLUTION EXPERIMENTS ON CHILDREN

EPA-1970s-Natl-Archives

by Kerry Picket

truckexhaust

The Environmental Protection Agency is under fire for exposing children to pollution as part of an experiment at the University of Southern California.

This information is coming to light from the website junkscience.com after an investigation from the EPA’s Office of the Inspector General stated in a recent report that the EPA’s pollution experiments on older people, done at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, were more harmful to the subjects than what the EPA presented.

The IG also said that while the experiment’s subjects did consent to exposure, the “risks were not always consistently represented.”

“Further, the EPA did not include information on long-term cancer risks in its diesel exhaust studies’ consent forms. An EPA manager considered these long-term risks minimal for short-term study exposures,” the IG report said.

inhalerIn February of 2013, JunkScience.com reported that the EPA gave USC money in the mid 2000’s to find out whether diesel exhaust could “induce reproducible gene expression” in children. From a USC grant in the EPA extramural research grants database, the original December 14, 2012 document showed diesel exposures to children. What now sits on that database is a strongly edited description of the diesel tests on the children. Part of the the experiment’s goal was to examine how particulate matter affects “Asthma in Susceptible Children.”

Junk Science made a Freedom of Information Act request to the EPA to explain the deletion and alteration of its database of the documentation regarding diesel experiments on children. The EPA’s response to JunkScience was that the deletion was due to a technical mishap.

gina-mccarthy-epa

nazi-experimentsmengeleMs. McCarthy, Josef Mengele would be proud of your studies.
~ TD

Please follow and like us:
0
 

0 responses to “NAZI EPA Experimenting on Elderly and Children

  1. Why are people agreeing to these experiments and putting their children at risk? I can only assume the adults who may be getting paid to participate, have to be be ignorant of history and/or very desperate for money. Sick.

     
    • traildustfotm

      That’s my question, too. There may also be a bit too much confidence in the moral integrity of the EPA.

       
  2. This is sick and evil. The EPA under Pres. Lucifer has become Dr. Mengele’s Nazi laboratory.

    See also:
    1. “Gun control via ammunition control: EPA shuts down last U.S. lead smelter plant” https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2013/12/14/gun-control-via-ammunition-control-epa-shuts-down-last-u-s-lead-smelter-plant/
    2. “It’s time to fire the EPA” https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2014/03/17/its-time-to-fire-the-epa/

     
  3. If you study the covert history, you would have to conclude that although Germany lost WW II, Nazism did not die: It merely went underground. I have been studying Eugenics and the British connection to the Third Reich. The Empire funded the Reich in the beginning, and the Reich’s eugenic policies were derived from British-originated ideas. These facts are on record.
    After the War, we brought many of the Nazi scientists over here and put them to work in the CIA. The Nazi Reich not only gave us the miserable methadone; They also introduced estrogen and estrogen mimickers into the food supply. Contraception, abortion and Agenda 21 are also eugenic ideas. And if we consider the further bifurcation of the Genocide, we have what Alex Jones calls the “soft kill” portion of the Program: Fluoride in water (started by the Nazis), GMO foods, massive prescription drugging of the population, black people injected with syphilis, polio vaccines poisoned with monkey viruses and other vaccines poisoned with mercury. And now chemtrails!
    Nazism didn’t die; It merely went underground.
    “The more we do to you, the less you seem to believe we are doing it,” said Goebbels.

     
    • It would be hard to argue against your thoughts, Steven. The details may be accurate in one thing, and off base on another, or entirely correct, but even so, the general direction of things has been toward a Nazi styled dystopia. CS Lewis was warning us about the “progressive” schools of the 1940s in England, and progressivism was the same thing then as now. And the founder of Planned Parenthood in America was an inspiration to Hitler’s people. It even comes out recently that Hitler himself has been living in an alpine lake district in Argentina, and dying in 1984 at the age of 95. What else have we not been told?

       
  4. If we’ve already established that the EPA’s boss has no interest in protecting the environment, or people, then it is reasonable to conclude the EPA is not about protecting those things, what, then, is it protecting? It would appear that would be the plans of their boss’s father, as FEMA isn’t about aiding people involved in natural disasters (else it would be called the Natural Disaster Mitigation Agency.) it is about “managing federal emergencies” (think about that for a minute), so the EPA is about protecting the plans of what is usually called agenda 21, but could generally be called the “green” movement in large, with a lot of well-meaning, but very gullible people funding it. Not that pollution is a good thing, just that the EPA is being used as a tool of destruction, the same way pollution is. Consider that the EPA’s special status and their ability to issue regulations willy nilly, has permitted it to make war on people’s ability to stay warm in winter (They’ve caused wood stoves to become illegal. https://news.slashdot.org/story/13/11/10/0131230/epa-makes-most-wood-stoves-illegal ) This is not a matter of clean air (especially not in winter when most people would prefer to be indoors anyway) this is a matter of removal of self-sufficiency, after all, self-sufficiency means lack of reliance on the govstapo shogunate and it’s agencies, and poses a threat to their father’s plans. They expect people to replace these with “pellet stoves” or other, *electricity-reliant* worthless devices that cannot even generate enough heat to cook on, and of course, need electrity to even run because of the way they’re built. If smog were such a concern, why not ban diesel and gasoline vehicles in favor of steam or alcohol-driven ones (and give them away to the population to replace the old vehicles)? The lack of rational thought here, plus the fact they’re not so incompetent that they could make such a blunder, points to overt malevolence.

    Needless to say, like other alphabet agencies, secret societies, and movements, the EPA should not be trusted to act in anyone’s best interests, except for their boss’s father, the devil.

     
  5. Pingback: Watchdog: EPA human test subjects not always told about lethal risks of studiesBig Online News | Big Online News

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *