Most Hispanics favor gun control, a Democrat-controlled Congress, and Hillary as president

Rate this post

undocumented Democrats
If you care about our constitutional Second Amendment right to bear arms, here’s another reason to oppose illegal “immigration” and Obama’s de facto open border policy.
According to Tom Kludt of TPM (Talking Points Memo), an NBC News/Wall Street Journal/Telemundo poll in 2013 indicates that more than other groups in America, Latinos clamor for stricter gun control. 70% of Latinos believe that “the laws covering the sale of firearms should be made more strict,” while just 5% believe those laws should be made less strict, and 22% say they should be kept the same.
Meanwhile, a more recent NBC/WSJ/Telemundo poll of Latino registered voters (some of whom are non-U.S. citizens!) in September 2014 found that Hispanics, like other Americans, increasingly believe America is headed in the wrong direction and increasingly disapprove of Obama:

  • 56% think things are off on the wrong track, compared to 42% in April of 2013.
  • 47% approve of Obama’s performance as president, compared to 62% in April of 2013; less than 3 in 10 Latinos are “very positive” about Obama.

However, this doesn’t mean Hispanics have gone conservative. On the contrary, they remain glued to the Democrat Party and Demonrat policies:

  • Hispanics are sour on both parties, but more so about the Republican Party:
    • 11% feel “very positive” about the GOP.
    • 13% feel “very positive” about the Democratic Party.
  • More than 6 in 10 Latinos prefer to see a Democrat-controlled Congress, compared to only 28% who want to see the Republicans in charge. That’s because:
    • 53% of Latinos think the Democratic Party looks out for the interests of women, compared to 11% who say that about Republicans.
    • 41% of Latinos think the Democratic party looks out for their interests on immigration, as opposed to 19% who favor the Republican party.
  • Hispanics also prefer potential Democrat presidential candidates in 2016:
    • 35% are “very positive” about Hillary Clinton.
    • Only 8% and 6% are “very positive” about Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio, respectively.

All of the above is made worse by the fact that non-U.S. citizens are illicitly voting and skewing election results. That means the only way we overcome their voter fraud is by turning out in MASSIVE numbers on November 4.

H/t Vdare

Please follow and like us:

7 responses to “Most Hispanics favor gun control, a Democrat-controlled Congress, and Hillary as president

  1. Well you had to know he democrats weren’t bringing them in because they fill their empty hearts with mucho love. As Foxworthy says, ” here’s your sign.” The liberals plan on using the illegals in the same fashion that they have used the black population. Enslave them then make them dance to the Liberal tune. They are without shame.

    • Unfortunately both negroes and Hispanic (most of the ones who flood the West looking for handouts) lack the analytical and reasoning skills to know they are being played by the demoncraps.
      If I were president (be glad I’m not you who are sheeple) I’d decree a minimum 5 year moratorium on ALL immigration, 10-20 years for 3rd world and would deport all illegals (no deposit no return) and if they return…well there are many ways to get rid of them. Someone illegally camping on a 3rd world hellhole, usually faces prison, being sent back to where they came, or death my a number of unpleasant means.
      Interesting how all these creatures of colour all hate the former USA and white people but they never hesitate to thrust their hands in their white host’s faces looking for free rent, health care, food, education, etc
      Of course if I were prez, I’d be assassinated shortly after my inauguration by the CIA through their Illuminati animal trainers

  2. Reblogged this on Centinel2012 and commented:
    This is very bad news as it could affect this election!

  3. And we have Michael R. Bloomberg to act as the tertius guadens, the third party, to join in on the action.
    The right to keep and bear arms is a God-given right. But what Obama & Co. will keep doing is to wedge one part of the public against the other in order to get what they want.
    And in the words of the late, great George Carlin, “nobody seems to notice… Nobody seems to care….”

  4. That’s a no-brainer. All three things would do nothing but benefit illegals.
    1-Stricter gun control-makes being a criminal in America SO much easier. MUCH less likely to be shot while committing a crime if the Lawful Second Amendment Fans can no longer get guns ammo or accessories FOR guns due to “New Federal Requirements”.
    2-Democrat-controlled Congress-a VERY USEFUL in-road to push harder for voiding the First and Second Amendments,as well as the Fourth,and Twenty-Second (? Restricting Presidents [and Imposters] to TWO terms ?) Amendments.
    3-Killary would make O-boy look like an altar boy. Need I say more?

  5. The commie libs are going to get their permanent dem majority, which is why they are bringing them in here.
    And the less-than-worthless RINO repubes are going to sit there like frogs on a log and watch them do it.

  6. I seriously doubt turning out to vote would make a difference, for one, because the corrupted electoral colleges are utilized to nullify the vote of the citizenry anyway, if it goes against the “plan”, and for two, because the sheer volume of illegals likely already trumps the number of “patriotic” people, this plus the fact the border is basically a sieve at this point, and that ensures that if “more” is needed to support obomber or hillary, more will be able to come overnight and cast votes.
    If voting actually counted for anything, and wasn’t used to profile the citizenry (when you register to vote you get signed up for other things that you may not necessarily ask for, such as jury duty for example.) then it would be good to utilize, but as it stands, it doesn’t have any such effect. Playing the voting game is playing with a deck stacked against the citizenry in a casino where the (satanist) house does everything it can, be it legal or otherwise to win, what we really need here is for a massive local turnout to write up and pass local legislation barring federal government from infringing on constitutional rights on the local level, and perhaps to put obomber under citizen’s arrest later (because we can’t expect the military, or the police, etc. to do so.) Only when the local level is secured would it be wise to move onto the bigger threats, because if one’s own locality is not secured, and one goes charging after a much larger enemy making a distracting noise, then those servants of evil in one’s locality will gleefully open the back door for the rest of their forces.
    It might be especially useful for the locals in towns near the border to secure their specific localities so as to force bottlenecks of the stream of illegals or cut off certain routes entirely, making things especially uncomfortable for illegals via strict deportation-on-discovery policies, perhaps?


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.