Most and least narcissistic U.S. presidents

arrogance
No, it’s not Barack Obama, although we all know he would win that dubious distinction, hands down.
That’s because the psychologists who did the study oh-so-conveniently excluded the POS from its rating.
Rich Morin reports for Pew Research Center, Nov. 14, 2013, that Lyndon Johnson leads the list of 42 presidents on measures of “grandiose narcissism,” according to a new study by a team of psychologists published online by the journal Psychological Science.
Obama was not rated.
The top ten most narcissistic presidents and their political party IDs are:

  1. Lyndon Johnson (D)
  2. Teddy Roosevelt (R)
  3. Andrew Jackson (D)
  4. Franklin D. Roosevelt (D)
  5. John F. Kennedy (D)
  6. Richard Nixon (R)
  7. Bill Clinton (D)
  8. Chester A. Arthur (R)
  9. Andrew Johnson (D)
  10. Woodrow Wilson (D)

The ten least narcissistic presidents are:

33. James Garfield (R)
34. William McKinley (R)
35. Rutherford B. Hayes (R)
36. James Madison (Democratic Republican)
37. William Howard Taft (R)
38. Calvin Coolidge (R)
39. Ulysses S. Grant (R)
40. Grover Cleveland (D)
41. James Monroe (Democratic Republican)
42. Millard Fillmore (Whig)

The researchers also found that, unsurprisingly, presidents on average are more narcissistic than the average American. Moreover, presidents are getting more and more grandiosely narcissistic in recent decades.
Grandiose narcissism is a distinctive type of narcissism characterized by exhibitionism, attention-seeking, inflated demands of entitlement and denial of weaknesses.
To compile their rankings of most and least grandiosely narcissistic presidents, these researchers assembled data from three major sources:
1. The heart of their analysis is data collected as part of an earlier study of the personality characteristics of all U.S. presidents through Bill Clinton, which they supplemented with data on George W. Bush. For this earlier study, 120 “expert raters” evaluated presidents by filling out standardized personality tests, using their knowledge of the presidents to inform their answers. The raters included historians, presidential biographers and other scholars. For each president that fell within their area of expertise, these raters answered nearly 600 questions on the personality and behavior of their president or presidents. The questionnaire included measures that are used to diagnose various psychological conditions, including grandiose narcissism. Separate questions assessed other aspects of presidential character including unethical behavior.
(A caveat:  Comparing one president’s ranking with another should be done cautiously because raters only evaluated presidents they were knowledgeable about and not all first executives. Beyond that, these ratings are based, in part, on personal opinions, albeit the judgments of well-informed experts—another reason for caution.)
2. The research team supplemented these data with historical surveys of presidential performance. They included a 2009 C-SPAN survey of 64 historians who rated the presidents on 10 dimensions, including overall job performance, persuasiveness and crisis management. They also analyzed a 2010 Siena College survey of 238 historians who ranked the presidents on 20 dimensions of performance and an academic study summarizing a dozen rankings of the presidents.
3. Finally they added object measures of presidential performance to this statistical stew.  These included overall share of the vote, number of terms and total years served, scandals in office and whether the president was subject of one or more congressional impeachment resolutions.
The research team found that a generous helping of inflated self-worth is like a double-edged sword in that grandiosity has both positive and negative effects on a presidency:

  • On the one hand, Ashley L. Watts and her colleagues found grandiose narcissism was associated with “superior overall greatness” as measured by historians’ rankings of presidential stature and “positively associated with public persuasiveness, crisis management, agenda setting and allied behaviors.” And when they looked at objective measures of presidential performance, researchers found that grandly narcissistic presidents won a larger share of the vote and initiated more legislation than less self-infatuated first executives.
  • But there’s also a dark side to grandiose narcissism. Leaders ranking higher on this narcissism measure also were more likely to be the targets of impeachment resolutions (Richard Nixon stood sixth on the list, just behind Kennedy) and engage in unethical behavior (Bill Clinton ranked seventh).

The researchers also ran their data by using the index to clinically diagnose narcissistic personality disorder (NPD). No matter. Lyndon Johnson still leads the presidential pack, again finishing first on the NPD index.
Here’s the list:
narcissisticPresidents

Lyndon JohnsonNarcissists lack empathy. So it’s not surprising that Lyndon Johnson cruelly yanked a beagle up by its ears, while bystanders fawned.

Boston University history professor Robert Dallek undertook 14 years of research for his two-volume biography of Lyndon B. Johnson, Flawed Giant. In an article for The Atlantic, “Three New Revelations About LBJ,” Dallek described Johnson as “urinating in a sink, inviting people into his bathroom, showing off his abdominal scar, exposing his private parts.”
Since pathological narcissists have constructed a grandiose false self, they are alienated from their true self. Beneath their arrogant strutting veneer, narcissists actually feel empty inside.
Johnson was no different. His press secretary Bill Moyers said Lyndon Johnson had “an unfillable hole in his ego.” Feelings of emptiness spurred him to eat, drink, and smoke to excess. Sexual conquests also helped to fill the void. He was a competitive womanizer. When people mentioned John F. Kennedy’s many affairs, Johnson would bang the table and declare that he had more women by accident than Kennedy ever had on purpose.
~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:
error130
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0 0
 

Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

All the way with LBJ…

americanforchange
Guest

Reblogged this on My opinions on America's issues and commented:
This is a great read about out Presidents. I was surprised that Reagan wasn’t higher on the list of narcissistic Presidents.

Mike howrightismike
Member
Mike howrightismike

Fascinating. I thought Reagan would be high on the list of Least Narcissistic. He once had a tough day at the White House and complained about how hot it was. An aide suggested he remove his suit jacket. Reagan replied, “Oh, no. I can’t take my jacket off in here.”

John Molloy
Guest
John Molloy

And two of the least narcissistic were assassinated. One would think that
It should have been the otherwise.

CalGirl
Guest
CalGirl

THREE of the least-narissistic (ranked in a row) were assassinated …McKinley, Garfiled, Lincoln…. Does this mean, perhaps, that decent, altruistic, people, appear as “push-overs” to the more “unblanaced” or the more aggressive “power-mongers or manipuators” among us????? Does “decency” appear as vulnerability to us? I’m leaning that way…even in moderrn times….Are we increasingly bowing to “might makes right?” Can we even apply this thought to the JFK assassination years later than these 3? Methinks so.

joandarc
Guest
joandarc

Thank you Dr. Eowyn for this interesting post. The very fact they did not include the king in their study nullifies any substance of the study for me. Sickening!

Pat
Guest
Pat

Unsure that men ensconced in the culture are capable of distinguishing, much less ranking, narcissism, even in public. Particularly true in comparing the living and the dead. But as Trump takes the public stage, it is an excellent opportunity for men to understand what narcissism is in our culture, what drives it, to whom it applies, and why, and what entitlements it fosters that influences society. The dog who caught the bus is a description much used to describe the rise of Trump by other men…..but can that really describe the humiliation on stage of 16-18 other qualified candidates, all… Read more »