Missouri Rejects Obamacare

Rate this post

America’s first popular referendum on Obamacare took place yesterday, August 3, 2010, in the state of Missouri. And the result is a resounding “NO”!

Tony Messenger of St. Louis Today (Stltoday.com) reports:
Missouri voters on Tuesday overwhelmingly rejected a federal mandate to purchase health insurance, rebuking President Barack Obama’s administration and giving Republicans their first political victory in a national campaign to overturn the controversial health care law passed by Congress in March.
“The citizens of the Show-Me State don’t want Washington involved in their health care decisions,” said Sen. Jane Cunningham, R-Chesterfield, one of the sponsors of the legislation that put Proposition C on the August ballot. She credited a grass-roots campaign involving Tea Party and patriot groups with building support for the anti-Washington proposition.
With most of the vote counted, Proposition C was winning by a ratio of nearly 3 to 1. The measure, which seeks to exempt Missouri from the insurance mandate in the new health care law, includes a provision that would change how insurance companies that go out of business in Missouri liquidate their assets. “I’ve never seen anything like it,” Cunningham said at a campaign gathering at a private home in Town and Country. “Citizens wanted their voices to be heard.”
About 30 Proposition C supporters whooped it up loudly at 9 p.m. when the returns flashed on the television showing the measure passing with more than 70% of the vote. “It’s the vote heard ’round the world,” said Dwight Janson, 53, from Glendale, clad in an American flag-patterned shirt. Janson said he went to one of the first Tea Party gatherings last year and hopped on the Proposition C bandwagon because he wanted to make a difference. “I was tired of sitting on the sidelines bouncing my gums,” he said.
Missouri was the first of four states to seek to opt out of the insurance purchase mandate portion of the health care law that had been pushed by Obama. And while many legal scholars question whether the vote will be binding, the overwhelming approval gives the national GOP momentum as Arizona, Florida and Oklahoma hold similar votes during midterm elections in November. “It’s a big number,” state Sen. Jim Lembke, R-Lemay, said of the vote. “I expected a victory, but not of this magnitude. This is going to propel the issue and several other issues about the proper role of the federal government.”
From almost the moment the Democratic-controlled Congress passed the health care law — which aims to increase the number of Americans with health insurance — Republicans have vowed to try to repeal it. Their primary argument is that they believe the federal government should not be involved in mandating health care decisions at the local level.
While repeal might seem an unlikely strategy, the effort to send a message state by state that voters don’t approve of being told they have to buy insurance could gain momentum. That’s what Republicans are counting on at least, hoping that the Missouri vote will give the national movement momentum. “It’s like a domino, and Missouri is the first one to fall,” Cunningham said. “Missouri’s vote will greatly influence the debate in the other states.”
[…] Democrats also generally opposed Proposition C, though they didn’t spend much time or money talking about it.
In the closing days of the campaign, many politicians ‘sidled up” to Proposition C, Cunningham said, seeing the momentum the issue had gained. Among them was U.S. Rep. Roy Blunt, who won the Republican primary for U.S. Senate on Tuesday night. Late last week, Blunt announced his support of Proposition C. On Monday, Blunt said he hoped Missouri voters would send a “ballot box message” to the Obama’s administration by overwhelmingly passing the measure.
The question now is whether the administration will respond by suing the state to block passage of the law, much as it did in Arizona recently over illegal immigration.
The issue in both is the same: When state laws conflict with federal laws, the courts have generally ruled in favor of the federal government, because of the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Richard Reuben, a law professor at the University of Missouri School of Law, said that if the federal government sues on the issue, it would likely win. Several other Missouri legal and political scholars agreed.
But Cunningham is undaunted. She’s got her own experts, and they’re ready to do battle in court. “Constitutional experts disagree,” she said. “There is substantial legal status to this thing.”

Please follow and like us:

0 responses to “Missouri Rejects Obamacare

  1. In order for Missouri or any other state to win a battle against Obama about the Health Care they would first have to have his health care bill declared unconstitutional.
    They can challenge the law all they want but if it is not declared unconstitutional they cannot win the fight.
    It would be better to repeal the bill or declare it unconstitutional and take it to court on that basis. At least it might get to the Supreme Court on the grounds of unconstitutionality.
    Repealing the bill would only have Obama veto the repeal and then after that it would require two thirds majority in both the house and the Senate to kick it out. Even if we win in November the odds of repealing it with that kind of a majority is slim to none. Obama knows all this–That’s why they rammed it through illegally. They knew we couldn’t stop it.
    We cannot even refuse to pay the fines –they will have the IRS remove them from our paychecks. What a deal….

  2. Although I applaud this I doubt it will lead to anything…except a court case where the judge rules against the will of the people, just like they did in CA today.

    • How’s that judicial “empathy” (empathy for left/liberal bullcrap, that is) workin’ for y’all?


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.