Women demorats proudly display their gender-specific “p*ssy hats” and “nasty woman” t-shirts and want you to vote vaginas into office.
So how come when they have a baby girl they want to raise her in a genderless environment? Aren’t they proud of her vagina and want to raise her as a strong woman? Don’t the women proggies want more vaginas in the country to smash the patriarchy?
I will never understand liberal logic…
From People Magazine: Kate Hudson isn’t putting any gender labels on little Rani Rose.
The 39-year-old actress and WW ambassador revealed in a recent interview with AOL that she embraces a “genderless approach” to parenting 3-month-old Rani and her two older brothers from Hudson’s previous relationships: Bingham Hawn, 7½, and Ryder Russell, 15.
“[Having a daughter] doesn’t really change my approach, but there’s definitely a difference,” she told the outlet. “I think you just raise your kids individually regardless — like a genderless [approach]. We still don’t know what she’s going to identify as.”
“I will say that, right now, she is incredibly feminine in her energy, her sounds and her way,” Hudson explained. “It’s very different from the boys, and it’s really fun to actually want to buy kids’ clothes.”
“With the boys it was just onesies … actually, I did pretty good with the boys,” she clarified with a laugh. “But with her it’s a whole other ball game. There’s some stuff that I’m like, ‘I can’t do that to her, because it’s so over-the-top.’”
Hudson’s own upbringing — as the only girl in a group of brothers, including Oliver Hudson and Wyatt Russell — helped her be able to see the fluidity of gender roles.
“I was a tomboy in a spinning dress,” she shared. “My middle brother [Boston Russell], who is closest to me in age, was basically my sister because I put makeup on him all the time, and I’d dress him up and he loved it.”
Read the whole story here.
DCG
Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!
Hey, Kate Hudson. If there are no gender distinctions, why are you such a skank?
If the young tend to rebel against their parents, it’ll be interesting what the children of this generation of leftists like Hudson will be.
” We still don’t know what she is going to identify as.” But..but..but…if there are no gender distinctions how can she identify as one or the other? So how about just plain old female. Your daughter can probably adjust to that with intensive therapy. Seriously, Kate Hudson (and I don’t know or care who she is) needs to be isolated and quarantined to prevent her contagion from spreading. Psychotic processes are apparently transmissable, as evidenced by the proliferation of libtards. It’s an epidemic I tell you
What I get from the quotes is that she spouts her Jewish paymasters’ anti white-family slogans as she knows she must to survive and then throws out a lame excuse because she’s going to dress her baby daughter as a little girl and raise her boys as boys anyway.
Poor child, subjected to her mother’s guidance growing up with an identity not yet defined is not a healthy upbringing for the three children. Will she allowed the two older boys and the girl, shower together and naked playing together in a bathtub? Small children’s innocence and imagination must be guarded by the parents, especially if there is a 15 year old and a 7 1/2 year old. Does she and her partner allow children to watch while they make love? There are many definitions of child abuse!
Wait until the Muslims take over. These girls are in for a rude shock.
I guess Katie’s going to have to be really, really careful that her kids don’t ever drop their pants or look at themselves and then get hold of a book that’s about sexual aspects of being human in a relatively normal fashion. Yeppers, normality is scarey for sure!
How can someone be so brilliant at some things and dumb as a rock at others? She’s FAR from stupid,but she’s Liberal,and THAT knocks her clear off the ladder….
Should she have called it a daughter? I suppose later on she can refer to it as ‘my thing’.
Children are not social experiments, nor are they lab rats. Nothing that is presented to them from birth onward in the shaping and making of their sense of self and self-worth, as well as their concept of themselves in both the family and the societal constellation, can be undone, and, it will affect every aspect of their lives cradle to grave. Worst of all, children are not lab rats to be experimented upon by a trusted and loved parent. Double whammy. Ask a teacher, ask a school counselor, or a private mental health provider. They are not short-lived “throw-aways” that… Read more »
What a dip this woman is. She has a 3-month old baby “and her two older brothers from Hudson’s previous relationships: Bingham Hawn, 7½, and Ryder Russell, 15.” That’s relationships, not relationship. Where are the fathers? Nowhere in this woman’s self aggrandizing publicity stunt (producing a kid when she’s less than a year shy of the Big Four O) a stunt to show her inane fans that she’s STILL GOT IT, is there the slightest hint that these absent fathers are going to have any input on how their children are going to be reared. But then, this is Hollywierd.… Read more »
Does anyone understand the “problem” this is designed to “fix”? I don’t. Beyond some vague, floating notion that everyone who came before did this “wrong”, what are they trying to accomplish and why?
Simple me believes that the real purpose is the total destruction of Western Society. But, I could be wrong (?).