Is "Moderate Muslims" A Meaningful Concept?

Rate this post

Why the Peaceful Majority is Irrelevant
By Paul Marek – February 20, 2006

She misses the point: Her job is to prevent the fanatics from hijacking her faith.

I used to know a man whose family were German aristocracy prior to World War II. They owned a number of large industries and estates. I asked him how many German people were true Nazis, and the answer he gave has stuck with me and guided my attitude toward fanaticism ever since.
Very few people were true Nazis,” he said, “but many enjoyed the return of German pride, and many more were too busy to care. I was one of those who just thought the Nazis were a bunch of fools. So, the majority just sat back and let it all happen. Then, before we knew it, they owned us, and we had lost control, and the end of the world had come. My family lost everything. I ended up in a concentration camp and the Allies destroyed my factories.”
We are told again and again by experts and talking heads that Islam is the religion of peace, and that the vast majority of Muslims just want to live in peace. Although this unquantified assertion may be true, it is entirely irrelevant. It is meaningless fluff, meant to make us feel better, and meant to somehow diminish the specter of fanatics rampaging across the globe in the name of Islam.
The fact is that the fanatics rule Islam at this moment in history. It is the fanatics who march. It is the fanatics who wage any one of 50 shooting wars world wide. It is the fanatics who systematically slaughter Christian or tribal groups throughout Africa and are gradually taking over the entire continent in an Islamic wave. It is the fanatics who bomb, behead, murder, or execute honor killings. It is the fanatics who take over mosque after mosque. It is the fanatics who zealously spread the stoning and hanging of rape victims and homosexuals. The hard, quantifiable fact is that the “peaceful majority” is the “silent majority,” and it is cowed and extraneous.
Communist Russia was comprised of Russians who just wanted to live in peace, yet the Russian Communists were responsible for the murder of about 20 million people. The peaceful majority were irrelevant. China’s huge population was peaceful as well, but Chinese Communists managed to kill a staggering 70 million people. The average Japanese individual prior to World War II was not a war-mongering sadist. Yet, Japan murdered and slaughtered its way across Southeast Asia in an orgy of killing that included the systematic murder of 12 million Chinese civilians – most killed by sword, shovel and bayonet. And who can forget Rwanda, which collapsed into butchery? Could it not be said that the majority of Rwandans were “peace loving”?
History lessons are often incredibly simple and blunt; yet, for all our powers of reason, we often miss the most basic and uncomplicated of points. Peace-loving Muslims have been made irrelevant by the fanatics. Peace-loving Muslims have been made irrelevant by their silence. Peace-loving Muslims will become our enemy if they don’t speak up, because, like my friend from Germany, they will awaken one day and find that the fanatics own them, and the end of their world will have begun.
Peace-loving Germans, Japanese, Chinese, Russians, Rwandans, Bosnians, Afghanis, Iraqis, Palestinians, Somalis, Nigerians, Algerians and many others, have died because the peaceful majority did not speak up until it was too late. As for us, watching it all unfold, we must pay attention to the only group that counts: the fanatics who threaten our way of life.
The author of this essay is Paul Marek, a Canadian Jew. The essay was first published on February 20, 2006, in his blog Celestial Junk, re-published in 2007 by the IsraelNationalNews website, after which something weird happened. The essay was altered, posted on various blogs, and disseminated via e-mail under a new title “A German’s View on Islam,” with its authorship deliberately misattributed to an alleged German psychiatrist named Dr. Emanuel Tanay. That is not true (See TruthOrFiction).
The real Dr. Emanuel Tanay, while a forensic psychiatrist, is  not German but an American who is a Holocaust survivor born in Poland. Nor did the real Tanay write the essay.
Whoever altered the essay’s title and deliberately misattributed its authorship to “a German named Dr. Emanuel Tanay” probably did so under the mistaken and lamentable belief that a German author would give the essay more credibility and that identifying Marek as the author would detract from the essay’s merits.
H/t beloved fellow FS.

Please follow and like us:

0 responses to “Is "Moderate Muslims" A Meaningful Concept?

  1. It would be if there actually was such a thing.

  2. Yes, they may not be out beheading infidels but they sure enjoy being on the side of Allah as those who do. (Real moderate muslims drink and smoke without making an excuse about being on a jihad or stopping if somebody critizes them– Mohammed said Allah said no eating pork, he just personally didn’t like booze and smoking otherwise. Anyone else… well, if they blame Jews and Americans for everything, celebrate when stuff gets blown up and think Sharia is da bomb, they’re not moderates.)

    • P.S. If they think suicide bombing is a valid response against Islamophobia then they have no frickin’ sense beside definitely not being moderates.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *