Indiana School Superintendent Has $1M Retirement

Rate this post

The state of Indiana has a total debt of $27,563,948,872 when calculated by adding the total of outstanding debt, pension and OPEB UAAL’s, unemployment trust funds and the 2010 budget gap as of July 2010. This is one reason why:

In just one school district alone — Indianapolis’ Wayne County — its retired school superintendent Terry Thompson not only gets paid $1,353 a day to serve in an “advisory” capacity as Superintendent Emeritus, his entire retirement package is worth a whopping ONE MILLION DOLLARS.

Thompson was superintendent for 15 years — for a school district with a total of only 15,700 students.


Terry Thompson

Ex-schools chief to quit $1,352-a-day job
Move follows criticism of retirement package worth more than $1M
By Bill McCleery – – Jan 28, 2011

Former Wayne Township Schools Superintendent Terry Thompson is negotiating an early resignation from his $1,352-a-day job as “superintendent emeritus,” an attorney for the Westside school district said Friday.
The five-month position, considered unusual if not unprecedented among Indiana school administrators, was part of a $1 million retirement package that has drawn protest from township School Board members — even though most of them voted to approve it four years ago.
Thompson, who retired in December after 15 years as superintendent, did not respond to calls made to his home Friday. In a written statement provided to The Indianapolis Star, he did not directly mention the board’s call for his resignation as superintendent emeritus, saying only that “it is time for me to take on a different role” in Wayne Township Schools. School district attorney Jon M. Bailey said he expects Thompson’s resignation Monday, adding, “We’ve exchanged proposals with his counsel, and I anticipate agreement.”
None of the seven School Board members — five of whom were in office and voted for the renegotiated contract in 2007 — responded to telephone messages.
Like other districts in this time of reduced revenues, Wayne — which has more than 15,700 students — has had to eliminate some programs, freeze administrators’ pay and reduce teaching positions through attrition. So why did board members approve Thompson’s lucrative retirement package in the first place?
They probably neglected to calculate the actual amount they would be promising Thompson, Bailey said, adding that he now regrets not doing more to inform them. “Did they fully understand how much money was in that package? No, I don’t think they did,” said Bailey, who represented the school district at the time of the renegotiation. “I was asked to approve it as to form and legality, and that’s what I did.”
The contract showed Thompson received more than $817,000 in lump sum severance payouts, including annual base pay of $225,000 as well as accrued vacation and sick pay and other considerations, all paid when he retired last month. The superintendent emeritus position, which included advising his successor, would have paid Thompson an additional $202,000 over the 150 days specified in the contract — and pushed the total retirement package to more than $1 million.
“It was a very lucrative contract,” Bailey said. “With benefit of hindsight, rather than just doing the narrow task I was assigned to do, the board would have been better served had I grabbed them by the lapels and said, ‘Let’s slow this down.’ ” But, Bailey added, he doubts it would have made much difference. Thompson, the 2010 Indiana Superintendent of the Year, was considered among the area’s strongest school administrators, and other districts were trying to lure him away.
“It came at a time when he was deciding whether to finish his career at Wayne or go somewhere else to finish his career,” said Bailey, an attorney at Bose McKinney & Evans in Indianapolis. “He possesses a package of skills that were very unique, and I think the board was quite frankly afraid to lose him.”
In his written statement, Thompson said the contract was “mutually negotiated” and was “based in part on my record of service.” He touted the district’s accomplishments during his tenure, such as launching all-day kindergarten and a college-credit program for high school students.
Most of the money promised Thompson has been paid, and board members as well as Bailey were drawing criticism Friday.
“I am so upset with the School Board members’ lack of integrity and lack of knowledge of what their job is. . . . The School Board attorney was not looking out for the best interests of the taxpayers and families in Wayne Township,” said Julie Volbers-Klarich, a parent and former teacher in the district. “My plan is that I hope to speak at the next School Board meeting and ask the five board members who were there in 2007 to resign. . . . We entrusted them to do a job that they failed to do.”
Please follow and like us:

0 responses to “Indiana School Superintendent Has $1M Retirement

  1. I hope Julie gets on the schoolboard. So much goes on,such as this,because people don’t have time to delve into what they are doing.{and they know this} looks like they will be in the boat with Calif. soon. Sent this to Rush,Kuhner and Mattera. Hopefully,some awareness will come of that. This is just disgraceful.

  2. When will these deal/decision makers own the responsibility for their mistakes?

  3. What about the children? These “public servants” are nothing more than leeches…

  4. A lady I met years ago whose husband had been a school board member for over 20 years told me that it was often the case that school administrators formed consortiums to buy vacant land in their districts or nearby and when construction of a new school or facility was needed, they sold their land to the school district, making huge profits. Crony capitalism among public employees? Yup!

  5. Nice work if you can get it. Must be nice for anti-trust, fraud, theft-in-office, etc. laws not to apply to school districts.

  6. Does anyone know if the $1,000,000 is going to come from future unfunded taxes, or is it coming from a legitimate managed pension “fund”?

  7. what a fuckhead

    • Surely you have a richer English vocabulary than 4-letter words.
      You violated this blog’s stated policy on vulgar/obscene/profane language. Do this again and you’ll be banned.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.